An under-recognized phenomenon: Myocardial volume change during the cardiac cycle.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial volume is assumed to be constant over the cardiac cycle in the echocardiographic models used by professional guidelines, despite evidence that suggests otherwise. The aim of this paper is to use literature-derived myocardial strain values from healthy patients to determine if myocardial volume changes during the cardiac cycle. METHODS: A systematic review for studies with longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strain from echocardiography in healthy volunteers ultimately yielded 16 studies, corresponding to 2917 patients. Myocardial volume in systole (MVs) and diastole (MVd) was used to calculate MVs/MVd for each study by applying this published strain data to three models: the standard ellipsoid geometric model, a thin-apex geometric model, and a strain-volume ratio. RESULTS: MVs/MVd<1 in 14 of the 16 studies, when computed using these three models. A sensitivity analysis of the two geometric models was performed by varying the dimensions of the ellipsoid and calculating MVs/MVd. This demonstrated little variability in MVs/MVd, suggesting that strain values were the primary determinant of MVs/MVd rather than the geometric model used. Another sensitivity analysis using the 97.5th percentile of each orthogonal strain demonstrated that even with extreme values, in the largest two studies of healthy populations, the calculated MVs/MVd was <1. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy human myocardium appears to decrease in volume during systole. This is seen in MRI studies and is clinically relevant, but this study demonstrates that this characteristic was also present but unrecognized in the existing echocardiography literature.

Cardiac MRI demonstrates compressibility in healthy myocardium but not in myocardium with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: The professional guidelines assume that the myocardial volume in systole (MVs) is equal to that in diastole (MVd), despite some limited evidence that points to the contrary. The aim of this manuscript is to determine whether this is true in healthy myocardium using gold standard cardiac MRI, as well as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The secondary aim is to determine whether there are similar MV changes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHOD: A prospectively derived cohort at Mayo Clinic of 115 adult subjects (mean age 42.8 years, 58% female) with no cardiac risk factors was identified. Cardiac MRI was obtained on all 115 patients, 51 of whom also consented to a TTE. MRI from a retrospectively derived cohort of 50 HFrEF patients was also collected. MVs and MVd was calculated using standard approaches with inclusion of the papillary muscles. RESULTS: In the healthy population, MRI demonstrated MVs/MVd = 0.87 (SD 0.04) and TTE demonstrated MVs/MVd = 0.79 (SD 0.07), suggesting compressibility (p < 0.0001). In the 51 healthy patients who received both imaging modalities, MVs/MVd was 8.0% higher in MRI than TTE (p < 0.0001), but both modalities had MVs/MVd < 1 (p < 0.0001). A Bland-Altman plot demonstrated that as the mean MVs/MVd increases, the difference in MVs/MVd MRI-TTE declines (r = -0.53, p < 0.0001). However, in HFrEF populations, MVs/MVd = 1.01 (0.03), suggesting myocardial incompressibility. CONCLUSION: Contrary to currently accepted standards, healthy myocardium is compressible but HFrEF myocardium is incompressible. The ratio MVs/MVd merits further study in an expanded normal cohort and in disease states.

Systolic-to-diastolic myocardial volume ratio as a novel imaging marker of cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: In patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction, it may be difficult to distinguish between the normal and diseased heart. Novel assessments of ventricular function, such as extracellular volume imaging, myocardial perfusion imaging and myocardial contraction fraction are emerging to better assess disease burden in these cases. This study endeavored to determine whether the ratio of myocardial volume in systole to myocardial volume in diastole (MVs/MVd), differs between normal hearts and those with disease states characterized by normal ejection fraction. METHOD: Consecutive patients from 2008 to 2018 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), cardiac amyloidosis, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were selected for inclusion, along with a sex- and age-matched cohort of normal volunteers who also underwent cardiac MRI. Manual tracings were performed on each MRI to calculate MVs/MVd, which was then compared across subgroups. RESULTS: Included were 50 patients with HCM, 50 patients with cardiac amyloidosis, 26 patients with HFpEF, and 30 normal subjects. Age was 54.1 years (SD 16.7); mean MVs/MVd was 0.88 (SD 0.04) in the normal subgroup, 1.03 (SD 0.06) in HCM patients, 1.03 (SD 0.06) in cardiac amyloidosis patients, and 0.97 (SD 0.02) in HFpEF patients, with all pathology subgroups different from the normal subgroup (p < .0001 for each). The ratio of MVs/MVd discriminated diseased from normal with c statistic 0.989 (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a novel and easily-captured metric of ventricular function, MVs/MVd, can differentiate normal ventricular function from multiple cardiomyopathies with normal ejection fractions.