A 16-Year Analysis of Aesthetic Surgery Volume and Its Association With US Economic Performance.

Historically, demand for plastic surgery has been associated with the performance of the US economy. This study evaluates the relationship between economic performance indicators and the popularity and profitability of aesthetic surgery from 2006 to 2022, considering several recessions and the rise of social media. The data were collected from the Aesthetic Society's (AS) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' (ASPS) Plastic Surgery Statistics Report from 2006 to 2022. Procedures analyzed included the most performed cosmetic surgeries, as well as neuromodulator injections and dermal fillers. Pearson correlation tests were used to analyze the strength of association between 8 financial indicators and case volumes and expenditures for each procedure. From 2006 to 2020, ASPS data demonstrated gross domestic product (GDP) per capita year-over-year (YOY) change that was positively correlated with case volume and expenditures across 13 out of the 24 different procedure metrics (54.2%). From 2006 to 2016, AS data were positively correlated with the YOY change of theNational Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ), Standard and Poor's 500, and Dow Jones in 12 of the 24 variables (50%). This was followed by GDP YOY change, with positive correlations to 11 variables (45.8%). YOY changes of consumer-level finances and inflation indicators were less frequently associated among both datasets.In conclusion, our study shows that aesthetic plastic surgery procedures and expenditures correlate with GDP. Although aesthetic surgery demand may be difficult to anticipate, this study elucidates several factors plastic surgeons may use as a bellwether for their practices.

Picture Perfect: Standardizing and Safekeeping Clinical Photography in Plastic Surgery.

Plastic surgery relies heavily on clinical photography to document preoperative and postoperative changes, visualize surgical approaches, and evaluate outcomes. However, the contemporary landscape of plastic surgery photography faces challenges, including a lapse in standards due to the prevalence of smartphones, social media platforms, and security concerns related to data storage and cyberattacks. In this comprehensive review, the authors aim to provide plastic surgeons with practical guidelines for achieving standardized, high-quality clinical photography while navigating the evolving landscape of technology, security, and ethical considerations. We explore the security challenges associated with storing clinical photographs, emphasizing the legal obligations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). We also discuss various storage options, including HIPAA-compliant cloud services, electronic medical records, and emerging technologies like blockchain and artificial intelligence.

Current Weight Loss Medications: What Plastic Surgeons Should Know.

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over 650 million adults are obese worldwide. Recently, antidiabetic medications have rapidly become popular as weight loss medications. With the rising prevalence of obesity and the increasing demand for aesthetic procedures, it is anticipated that a growing number of patients presenting for consultation will be prescribed these medications. Therefore, it is critical for practicing plastic surgeons to understand their potential synergistic effects and safety considerations. This manuscript explores the potential benefits and considerations of antidiabetic medications in plastic surgery patients for weight loss therapy. The authors discuss the mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, potential side effects, and relevant considerations for incorporating these medications into plastic surgery practices and medical spas.

The Looming Future of Private Equity in Plastic Surgery.

Private equity acquisition of independent private practices has grown dramatically in the last decade, with private equity firms increasingly investing in surgical specialties that practice in outpatient ambulatory centers. This trend has slowly started to creep into plastic surgery; therefore, understanding the concepts of private equity ownership in healthcare and its benefits and risks is critical. This article provides a fundamental economic background on private equity, describes its current state in healthcare, including trends in plastic surgery, and provides recommendations for plastic surgeons considering private equity acquisition.

Forty-Year Follow-Up After Great Toe-to-Thumb Transfer: A Literature Review.

The thumb is a crucial part of the hand, and traumatic thumb amputation is a devastating injury that significantly diminishes hand function. In situations in which replantation is not possible, great toe-to-thumb transfer is a well-established option for reconstruction. Although most studies describe excellent functional outcomes and patient satisfaction, there is a paucity of literature presenting long-term follow-up to determine whether these outcomes are maintained. In this case report, we present a case of great toe-to-thumb transfer performed 40 years ago and evaluate outcomes using validated questionnaires and standardized examination maneuvers. Our results highlight sustained patient satisfaction and excellent functional outcomes decades after the initial reconstruction.

Objective Residency Applicant Assessment Using a Linear Rank Model.

OBJECTIVES: Residency applicant assessment is imperfect, with little objectivity built into the process, which, unfortunately, impacts recruitment diversity. Linear rank modeling (LRM) is an algorithm that standardizes applicant assessment to model expert judgment. Over the last 5 years, we have used LRM to assist with screening and ranking integrated plastic surgery (PRS) residency applicants. This study's primary objective was to determine if LRM scores are predictive of match success and, secondarily, to compare LRM scores between gender and self-identified race categories. DESIGN: Data was collected on applicant demographics, traditional application metrics, global intuition rank, and match success. LRM scores were calculated for screened and interviewed applicants, and scores were compared by demographic groups. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of LRM scores and traditional application metrics with match success. SETTING: University of Wisconsin, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred seventeen candidates who applied to a single institution over 4 application cycles (2019-2022). RESULTS: Using area under the curve modeling, LRM score was the most predictive indicator for match success. With every one-point increase in LRM score, there was an 11% and 8.3% increase in the likelihood of screened and interviewed applicant match success (p < 0.001). An algorithm was developed to estimate the probability of match success based on LRM score. No significant differences in LRM scores were appreciated for interviewed applicant gender or self-identified race groups. CONCLUSIONS: LRM score is the most predictive indicator of match success for PRS applicants and can be used to estimate an applicant's probability of successfully matching into an integrated PRS residency. Furthermore, it provides a holistic evaluation of the applicant that can streamline the application process and improve recruitment diversity. In the future, this model could be applied to assist in the match process for other specialties.

Offering No-Cost Cosmetic Revisions: The Experience of an Academic Cosmetic Surgery Program.

Background: The financial principles of a no-cost revision policy and their implications for revision rates are not well understood. Objectives: Therefore, the primary objective of this retrospective study is to report our no-cost revision rates and, secondarily, to survey the cosmetic revision policies of other cosmetic surgery practices and detail the financial principles underpinning no-cost revisions. Methods: All aesthetic surgeries and no-cost revisions performed by the plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons, and facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons at our academic outpatient cosmetic surgery center from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2022 were identified using procedural codes. Data on the number of surgeries, number of revisions, operative minutes, and time intervals between initial and revision surgeries were collected. A survey was administered to assess the revision policies of similar cosmetic surgery practices. Results: A total of 1491 aesthetic surgeries and minimally invasive procedures were included, and 125 revision procedures were performed (8.4%). Thigh lifts (3, 13.6%), rhinoplasties or septoplasties (25, 15.8%), and otoplasties (3, 27.3%) had the highest revision rates. Three practices (15%) offered cosmetic revisions at no cost, 9 (45%) did not apply a surgeon's fee, 5 (25%) evaluated fees on a case-by-case basis, 1 (5%) offered revisions with an insurance policy, and 2 (10%) cosmetic surgery practices did not offer revisions at a reduced rate. Conclusions: Despite offering revisions at no cost, our revision rates are reasonable for an academic cosmetic surgery practice. The revision policies offered to patients on the private market are varied, but most surveyed practices offer revisions at either a reduced rate or no cost.

Out-of-scope Cosmetic Surgery: A Review of Malpractice Lawsuits against Nonplastic Surgeons.

The increasing patient demand for cosmetic surgeries and minimally invasive procedures has encouraged physicians without aesthetic surgery training accredited by the American Board of Medical Specialties to provide these services. This systematic review aims to determine the rate of out-of-scope practice in medical malpractice lawsuits involving cosmetic surgery or minimally invasive procedures performed by nonplastic surgeons. Methods: Our systematic review of the Westlaw legal database from 1979 to 2022 included 64 malpractice cases. Inclusion criteria were cosmetic surgeries or minimally invasive procedures in medical malpractice lawsuits not involving board-certified plastic surgeons. Out-of-scope was defined using the procedural competencies established by the American Council for Graduate Medical Education, the Commission on Dental Accreditation, and the Council of Podiatric Medical Education. Data on legal proceedings, provider credentials and board certification, surgical interventions, and legal outcomes were collected. Results: The majority of malpractice cases involving cosmetic surgeries or minimally invasive procedures occurred when providers were practicing out of scope (N = 34; 55.7%). The verdict was ruled in favor of the plaintiff (patient) in 34.4% of cases. Out-of-scope practice occurred most in family/internal medicine, no board certification, and obstetrics/gynecology (N = 4, N = 4, and N = 3, respectively). The most common allegation was permanent injury or disfigurement (N = 21; 21.4%). Plastic surgeons provided expert testimony 44.0% of the time. Conclusion: Our review of the Westlaw legal database suggests that the majority of nonplastic surgeon cosmetic malpractice cases may occur in the setting of out-of-scope practice.

The Price Is Right? An Economic Analysis of Factors Influencing Cosmetic Surgery Prices.

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic surgery is a large portion of practice revenue for many plastic surgeons, and therefore understanding the economic principles of pricing is critical. Although national averages provide a starting point for price determination, they may not reflect specific economic factors. Over the last decade, publicly reported pricing for cosmetic surgery has increased in prevalence, improving price transparency for patients and surgeons alike. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare publicly reported prices to national cosmetic surgery averages and identify variables that have the greatest impact on price determination. METHODS: An Internet search was performed with the term "cosmetic surgery, price" for practices that publicly reported cosmetic surgery prices. Publicly reported prices were compared to national averages generated from The Aesthetic Society's Aesthetic Society Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics. The impact of regional prices, practice type, and surgeon accreditation were analyzed for the most popular cosmetic surgery procedures. RESULTS: Sixty-six practices were identified that reported cosmetic surgery pricing information. Publicly reported prices were significantly higher for all surgical procedures except nipple procedures, excision of (excess) skin, fat grafting, fat harvest, and lip enhancement. Facility/operating room fees (n = 38) and anesthesia fees (n = 34) were the most common components included in a price, after surgeons' fees (n = 66). A significant price difference was appreciated when separating practices by region for all procedures except breast augmentation (P = .074) and liposuction (P = .088). CONCLUSIONS: Publicly reported prices provide greater insight than national averages into specific pricing factors and strategies that can be employed when setting surgical prices.

The Anatomy of a Malpractice Lawsuit.

Medical malpractice lawsuits can be a source of emotional, physical, and financial distress for both providers and patients. A thorough understanding of the medical malpractice process's history and current landscape will help providers navigate malpractice challenges. Given the impact and prevalence of medical malpractice, in this paper, the authors sought to dissect the intricate anatomy of a medical malpractice lawsuit. This includes a comprehensive and detailed report of tort reform, the criteria of a medical malpractice suit, and a description of the court proceedings. In addition, the authors also performed an extensive review of the medicolegal literature and have provided recommendations for healthcare providers to avoid these lawsuits in their practice.

The Implications of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act and the No Surprises Act for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons.

SUMMARY: The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) was enacted by Congress in 1986 to protect uninsured patients against economic discrimination. Although this law has been established for several decades, recent passage of the No Surprises Act may invoke new implications for the health care system under EMTALA. Therefore, it is worthwhile to review EMTALA's applications to the practice of plastic surgery and review EMTALA in the context of the recently passed No Surprises Act. First, providers are mandated by EMTALA to administer a medical screening examination to any patient presenting for emergent care. Second, providers must administer medical stabilization if the medical screening examination reveals an emergent condition. If the hospital lacks specialized capabilities to provide stabilizing care, they are required to transfer the patient to a facility that can provide care. Although EMTALA's provisions protect patients and provide them with leverage to obtain emergency care, the act has been associated with out-of-network, or "surprise," medical bills for the insured population and, ultimately, may be detrimental to plastic surgeons in emergency settings. The concerns related to EMTALA within plastic surgery involve the overburdening of surgeons at tertiary care centers because of uncompensated care and high rates of interfacility transfers. In addition, the recent passage of the No Surprises Act to end out-of-network emergency bills may further impact care provided by plastic surgeons in emergency settings under EMTALA's mandate. Potential methods to address these concerns include increasing on-call reimbursement rates and implementation of emergency department telemedicine services.

The No Surprises Act: What Do Plastic Surgeons Need to Know?

Background: Out-of-network, or "surprise" bills, have grown common in recent years and have raised substantial concern for patients. Congress recently enacted the No Surprises Act, effective on January 1, 2022, ending the majority of out-of-network bills for privately insured patients. The aim of this review is to briefly summarize the history of surprise billing, describe the regulations of the No Surprises Act, and examine the impact this legislation will have on the field of plastic surgery. Methods: A PubMed and Google Scholar literature search was conducted on out-of-network billing, or surprise bills, and the No Surprises Act. Media outlets, governmental agencies, and local and national medical organizations were additionally queried for surprise billing and the No Surprises Act. Results: Under the No Surprises Act, privately insured patients are protected from surprise medical bills in emergency and nonemergency settings, and uninsured or self-pay patients must be provided a good faith estimate of service fees before receiving nonemergent care. Plastic surgeons may consent patients to receive out-of-network bills if consent is obtained at least 72 hours before rendering a nonemergency service. Despite these patient protections, this act may influence plastic surgeons' reimbursement rates and incentivize surgeons to alter their network status. Conclusions: The No Surprises Act provides significant protections for patients. However, it may have adverse effects for plastic surgeons. Plastic surgeons will only get paid in-network fees while providing care to patients unless consent is properly obtained in a nonemergent setting.

The Management of Postsurgical Pyoderma Gangrenosum following Breast Surgery.

Background: Postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare condition characterized by ulcerative lesion development at surgical sites. It is frequently misdiagnosed as infection and mismanaged with surgical debridement, which only worsens the condition. Achieving the correct diagnosis is crucial to delivering the appropriate medical therapy. This article presents four clinical cases of postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum in breast surgery patients, and proposes a work-up schematic to aid in its diagnosis based on literature review and author experience. Methods: Four patients who developed postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum following breast surgery were identified by chart review at our institution. Results: The cases include two breast reduction patients, an abdominally based breast reconstruction patient, and a breast augmentation patient. The time to diagnosis and treatment varied greatly between the patients, with diagnosis achieved as early as 13 days postoperatively to as late as one year postoperatively. Two of the four patients were initially mismanaged with surgical debridement, and all patients were treated with at least one course of antibiotics for a misdiagnosis of surgical site infection before they were correctly diagnosed. Conclusions: Postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare, ulcerative condition that is difficult to diagnose and often mismanaged with surgical debridement. Diagnosis requires a high clinical suspicion and should be considered in patients with ulcerative lesions resistant to antibiotic therapy, in patients who have bilateral lesions with NAC sparring, and in those with systemic inflammatory conditions. Diagnosis is usually delayed, so it is imperative that surgeons keep this diagnosis in mind when treating breast patients with postsurgical wounds.

Dermatologic Complications Following Cosmetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: Plastic surgery procedures, including minimally invasive cosmetic procedures, continue to grow in popularity. Although dermatologic complications following plastic surgery procedures are rare, the authors have encountered several of these complications in their practice, including herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) and varicella zoster virus (VZV) infections, pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), contact dermatitis, and suture hypersensitivity. These cases prompted a systematic literature review of dermatologic complications following plastic surgery procedures. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant articles published from 1975 to 2021. Articles were independently reviewed by the authors to determine whether studies met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The majority of articles that met inclusion criteria represented level V evidence. The most robust evidence in the literature was for PG, for which there were 63 total studies. Pyoderma gangrenosum was most frequently reported following breast surgery (85.1%), while HSV-1 infections were frequently seen following minimally invasive procedures (84.6%). VZV reactivation was reported after a range of interventions, including pedicled flap surgeries and laser treatments. Other complications, such as suture hypersensitivity, were less frequently reported in the literature, usually as isolated case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologic complications represent a rare but serious concern following plastic surgery procedures. While most dermatologic complications resolve with appropriate treatment, sequelae of these conditions can be devastating to the patient's overall outcome. Plastic surgeons performing procedures at a high risk of these complications should recognize the diagnostic criteria to facilitate appropriate treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Linear Modeling to Reduce Bias in Plastic Surgery Residency Selection.

BACKGROUND: Consistently selecting successful, productive applicants from an annual candidate pool is the goal of all resident selection practices. Efforts to routinely identify high-quality applicants involve scrutiny of multiple factors and formulation of an ordinal rank list. Linear modeling offers a quantified approach to applicant selection that is strongly supported by decades of psychological research. METHODS: For the 2019 residency application process, the University of Wisconsin Plastic Surgery Residency Program used linear modeling in their evaluation and ranking process. A linear model was developed using United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 scores, letters of recommendation, publications, and extracurricular activities as inputs. RESULTS: The applicant's total score was calculated from a maximum total score of 100. The mean and median scores were 49 and 48, respectively, and applicants were ranked according to total score. A separate rank list was maintained using our program's standard methodology for applicant ranking, which involves global intuitive scoring during the interview process. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the two lists was 0.532, and differences between the rank lists were used as a fulcrum for discussion before making the final rank list. CONCLUSIONS: This article presents the first known instance of the use of linear modeling to improve consistency, increase fairness, and decrease bias in the plastic surgery residency selection process. Transparent sharing of methodology may be useful to other programs seeking to optimize their own ranking methodology. Furthermore, it indicates to applicants that they are being evaluated based on fair, quantifiable criteria.

University of Wisconsin Guidelines for Treatment of Facial Trauma While Minimizing the Risk of COVID-19 Transmission.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many practices to completely change the interface between health care providers and patients. Patients presenting with facial trauma present a special risk for COVID-19 transmission, as contact with respiratory and ocular secretions is common, and so special precautions must be taken in managing them. METHODS: We created guidelines and a triage/management algorithm for patients presenting with facial trauma to decrease the risk of COVID-19 transmission. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, we present a set of guidelines and a triage algorithm we have successfully implemented to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 while managing facial trauma. We believe that these guidelines can help other providers restructure their practices during this pandemic.

Medicaid for the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon.

Medicaid is a complex federally and state funded health insurance program in the United States that insures an estimated 76 million individuals, approximately 20 percent of the U.S. population. Many physicians may not receive formal training or education to help understand the complexities of Medicaid. Plastic surgeons, residents, and advanced practice practitioners benefit from a basic understanding of Medicaid, eligibility requirements, reimbursement methods, and upcoming healthcare trends. Medicaid is implemented by states with certain federal guidelines. Eligibility varies from state to state (in many states it's linked to the federal poverty level), and is based on financial and nonfinancial criteria. The passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 permitted states to increase the federal poverty level eligibility cutoff to expand coverage for low-income adults. The aim of this review is to provide a brief history of Medicaid, explain the basics of eligibility and changes invoked by the Affordable Care Act, and describe how federal insurance programs relate to plastic surgery, both at academic institutions and in community practice environments.