Experiences in Improving the Quality of Community-Based Fever Management from Three Malaria-Endemic African Countries.

The WHO affirms that trained, supervised, and supported community health workers (CHWs) can deliver high-quality health services effectively and has called for documentation of enabling factors, needs, and implementation strategies of successful CHW programs. In response, the U.S. President's Malaria Initiative Impact Malaria Project conducted a study to document implementation approaches, best practices, and lessons learned for quality improvement (QI) of community-based fever management in Madagascar, Malawi, and Mali. The team conducted 10 key informant interviews (KIIs) with individuals at national, regional, and district levels using an open-ended interview guide tailored to each level, and a desk review of documents and materials related to community-based QI. Each country's community health landscape and QI approaches were summarized into four categories identified during the KIIs (training, supervision, coaching/mentoring, and review meetings) and compared. Results found that Madagascar, Malawi, and Mali all had well-defined community health strategies that include QI, but countries could not extend their full package of community-based QI approaches to all CHWs as a result of limited human and financial resources. Vertical funding for health programs limits the scope and coverage of QI approaches, especially at the community level. Recommendations from key informants for strengthening community-based QI included integrating QI approaches to improve cost efficiency, to define roles and responsibilities more clearly, to engage communities and all health system levels in implementation, and to digitize QI tools. Increased financial and skilled human resources are needed for community-based QI activities to achieve their intended effect.

Applying a zero-corrected, gravity model estimator reduces bias due to heterogeneity in healthcare utilization in community-scale, passive surveillance datasets of endemic diseases.

Data on population health are vital to evidence-based decision making but are rarely adequately localized or updated in continuous time. They also suffer from low ascertainment rates, particularly in rural areas where barriers to healthcare can cause infrequent touch points with the health system. Here, we demonstrate a novel statistical method to estimate the incidence of endemic diseases at the community level from passive surveillance data collected at primary health centers. The zero-corrected, gravity-model (ZERO-G) estimator explicitly models sampling intensity as a function of health facility characteristics and statistically accounts for extremely low rates of ascertainment. The result is a standardized, real-time estimate of disease incidence at a spatial resolution nearly ten times finer than typically reported by facility-based passive surveillance systems. We assessed the robustness of this method by applying it to a case study of field-collected malaria incidence rates from a rural health district in southeastern Madagascar. The ZERO-G estimator decreased geographic and financial bias in the dataset by over 90% and doubled the agreement rate between spatial patterns in malaria incidence and incidence estimates derived from prevalence surveys. The ZERO-G estimator is a promising method for adjusting passive surveillance data of common, endemic diseases, increasing the availability of continuously updated, high quality surveillance datasets at the community scale.

Efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine in the treatment of falciparum uncomplicated malaria in Madagascar.

BACKGROUND: Since 2006, the artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) are recommended to treat uncomplicated malaria including non Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Madagascar. Artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine are the first- and second-line treatment in uncomplicated falciparum malaria, respectively. No clinical drug efficacy study has been published since 2009 to assess the efficacy of these two artemisinin-based combinations in Madagascar, although the incidence of malaria cases has increased from 2010 to 2016. In this context, new data about the efficacy of the drug combinations currently used to treat malaria are needed. METHODS: Therapeutic efficacy studies evaluating the efficacy of ASAQ were conducted in 2012, 2013 and 2016 among falciparum malaria-infected patients aged between 6 months and 56 years, in health centres in 6 sites representing different epidemiological patterns. The 2009 World Health Organization protocol for monitoring anti-malarial drug efficacy was followed. RESULTS: A total of 348 enrolled patients met the inclusion criteria including 108 patients in 2012 (n = 64 for Matanga, n = 44 for Ampasipotsy), 123 patients in 2013 (n = 63 for Ankazomborona, n = 60 for Anjoma Ramartina) and 117 patients in 2016 (n = 67 for Tsaratanana, n = 50 for Antanimbary). The overall cumulative PCR-corrected day 28 cure rate was 99.70% (95% IC 98.30-99.95). No significant difference in cure rates was observed overtime: 99.02% (95% IC 94.65-99.83) in 2012; 100% (95% IC 96.8-100) in 2013 and 100% (95% IC 96.65-100) in 2016. CONCLUSION: The ASAQ combination remains highly effective for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Madagascar.