Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 68
Filtrar
2.
Chest ; 165(2): 417-430, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37619663

RESUMEN

TOPIC IMPORTANCE: Thoracic imaging with CT scan has become an essential component in the evaluation of respiratory and thoracic diseases. Providers have historically used conventional single-energy CT; however, prevalence of dual-energy CT (DECT) is increasing, and as such, it is important for thoracic physicians to recognize the utility and limitations of this technology. REVIEW FINDINGS: The technical aspects of DECT are presented, and practical approaches to using DECT are provided. Imaging at multiple energy spectra allows for postprocessing of the data and the possibility of creating multiple distinct image reconstructions based on the clinical question being asked. The data regarding utility of DECT in pulmonary vascular disorders, ventilatory defects, and thoracic oncology are presented. A pictorial essay is provided to give examples of the strengths associated with DECT. SUMMARY: DECT has been most heavily studied in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; however, it is increasingly being used across a wide spectrum of thoracic diseases. DECT combines morphologic and functional assessments in a single imaging acquisition, providing clinicians with a powerful diagnostic tool. Its role in the evaluation and treatment of thoracic diseases will likely continue to expand in the coming years as clinicians become more experienced with the technology.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Enfermedades Torácicas , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón , Enfermedades Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
Chest ; 164(3): e86, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37689480
4.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 7(2)2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37027213

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) decreases lung cancer mortality. However, its benefit may be limited by nonadherence to screening. Although factors associated with LCS nonadherence have been identified, to the best of our knowledge, no predictive models have been developed to predict LCS nonadherence. The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model leveraging a machine learning model to predict LCS nonadherence risk. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients who enrolled in our LCS program between 2015 and 2018 was used to develop a model to predict the risk of nonadherence to annual LCS after the baseline examination. Clinical and demographic data were used to fit logistic regression, random forest, and gradient-boosting models that were internally validated on the basis of accuracy and area under the receiver operating curve. RESULTS: A total of 1875 individuals with baseline LCS were included in the analysis, with 1264 (67.4%) as nonadherent. Nonadherence was defined on the basis of baseline chest computed tomography (CT) findings. Clinical and demographic predictors were used on the basis of availability and statistical significance. The gradient-boosting model had the highest area under the receiver operating curve (0.89, 95% confidence interval = 0.87 to 0.90), with a mean accuracy of 0.82. Referral specialty, insurance type, and baseline Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (LungRADS) score were the best predictors of nonadherence to LCS. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a machine learning model using readily available clinical and demographic data to predict LCS nonadherence with high accuracy and discrimination. After further prospective validation, this model can be used to identify patients for interventions to improve LCS adherence and decrease lung cancer burden.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer
5.
Chest ; 164(1): 69-84, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36907372

RESUMEN

COPD is a condition characterized by chronic airflow obstruction resulting from chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or both. The clinical picture is usually progressive with respiratory symptoms such as exertional dyspnea and chronic cough. For many years, spirometry was used to establish a diagnosis of COPD. Recent advancements in imaging techniques allow quantitative and qualitative analysis of the lung parenchyma as well as related airways and vascular and extrapulmonary manifestations of COPD. These imaging methods may allow prognostication of disease and shed light on the efficacy of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. This is the first of a two-part series of articles on the usefulness of imaging methods in COPD, and it highlights useful information that clinicians can obtain from these imaging studies to make more accurate diagnosis and therapeutic decisions.


Asunto(s)
Bronquitis Crónica , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Enfisema Pulmonar , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfisema Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Espirometría
6.
Chest ; 164(2): 339-354, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36907375

RESUMEN

The diagnosis, prognostication, and differentiation of phenotypes of COPD can be facilitated by CT scan imaging of the chest. CT scan imaging of the chest is a prerequisite for lung volume reduction surgery and lung transplantation. Quantitative analysis can be used to evaluate extent of disease progression. Evolving imaging techniques include micro-CT scan, ultra-high-resolution and photon-counting CT scan imaging, and MRI. Potential advantages of these newer techniques include improved resolution, prediction of reversibility, and obviation of radiation exposure. This article discusses important emerging techniques in imaging patients with COPD. The clinical usefulness of these emerging techniques as they stand today are tabulated for the benefit of the practicing pulmonologist.


Asunto(s)
Pulmón , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Neumonectomía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen
7.
Chest ; 162(1): 156-178, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35038455

RESUMEN

Organizing pneumonia (OP), characterized histopathologically by patchy filling of alveoli and bronchioles by loose plugs of connective tissue, may be seen in a variety of conditions. These include but are not limited to after an infection, drug reactions, radiation therapy, and collagen vascular diseases. When a specific cause is responsible for this entity, it is referred to as "secondary OP." When an extensive search fails to reveal a cause, it is referred to as "cryptogenic OP" (previously called "bronchiolitis obliterans with OP"), which is a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic entity classified as an interstitial lung disease. The clinical presentation of OP often mimics that of other disorders, such as infection and cancer, which can result in a delay in diagnosis and inappropriate management of the underlying disease. The radiographic presentation of OP is polymorphous but often has subpleural consolidations with air bronchograms or solitary or multiple nodules, which can wax and wane. Diagnosis of OP sometimes requires histopathologic confirmation and exclusion of other possible causes. Treatment usually requires a prolonged steroid course, and disease relapse is common. The aim of this article is to summarize the clinical, radiographic, and histologic presentations of this disease and to provide a practical diagnostic algorithmic approach incorporating clinical history and characteristic imaging patterns.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis Obliterante , Neumonía en Organización Criptogénica , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Neumonía , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/complicaciones , Neumonía en Organización Criptogénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía en Organización Criptogénica/etiología , Humanos , Pulmón/patología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/complicaciones , Neumonía/complicaciones
8.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 19(2 Pt A): 232-239, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34861204

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Lung cancer screening (LCS) decreases lung cancer mortality; however, that reduction depends upon screening adherence. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with adherence rate for LCS among patients with negative baseline CT results in a multi-integrated health care network. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted among patients with negative baseline CT results in a multi-integrated health care network LCS program between January 2015 and January 2020. The two outcomes were adherence for the first and second subsequent LCS studies. Negative baseline result was defined as a Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System score 0, 1, or 2. Adherence was defined as undergoing a follow-up study within 11 to 15 months of a prior scan. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of adherence, adjusting for patient demographics, median household income (on the basis of geocoding ZIP codes from the US Census Bureau), smoking history, screening sites, and provider specialty. RESULTS: A total of 30.7% (512 of 1,668) and 16.3% (270 of 1,660) of patients were adherent for the first two annual subsequent screens, respectively. First-year adherence was higher among former smokers and varied by site and provider specialty. Second-year adherence was higher among former smokers and varied by site, provider specialty, and pack-years smoked. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to LCS in a multihospital integrated health care network was poor and even lower at year 2. The identified factors associated with adherence may serve as targets to increase LCS adherence and decrease lung cancer mortality.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tamizaje Masivo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
9.
Respir Care ; 66(12): 1805-1814, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34548407

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) continues to be a global challenge due to the lack of definitive treatment strategies. We sought to determine the efficacy of early administration of anti-interleukin 6 therapy in reducing hospital mortality and progression to mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 11,512 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 who were admitted to a New York health system from March to May 2020. Tocilizumab was administered to subjects at the nasal cannula level of oxygen support to maintain an oxygen saturation of >88%. The Charlson comorbidity index was used as an objective assessment of the burden of comorbidities to predict 10-year mortality. The primary outcome of interest was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were progression to mechanical ventilation; the prevalence of venous thromboembolism and renal failure; and the change in C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and ferritin levels after tocilizumab administration. Propensity score matching by using a 1:2 protocol was used to match the tocilizumab and non-tocilizumab groups to minimize selection bias. The groups were matched on baseline demographic characteristics, including age, sex, and body mass index; Charlson comorbidity index score; laboratory markers, including ferritin, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein values; and the maximum oxygen requirement at the time of tocilizumab administration. Mortality outcomes were evaluated based on the level of oxygen requirement and the day of hospitalization at the time of tocilizumab administration. RESULTS: The overall hospital mortality was significantly reduced in the tocilizumab group when tocilizumab was administered at the nasal cannula level (10.4% vs 22.0%; P = .002). In subjects who received tocilizumab at the nasal cannula level, the progression to mechanical ventilation was reduced versus subjects who were initially on higher levels of oxygen support (6.3% vs 18.7%; P < .001). There was no improvement in mortality when tocilizumab was given at the time of requiring non-rebreather, high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilator, or invasive ventilator. CONCLUSIONS: Early use of anti-interleukin 6 therapy may be associated with improved hospital mortality and reduction in progression to more severe coronavirus disease 2019.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Humanos , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Chest ; 159(6): 2505-2506, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34099133
11.
Chest ; 160(2): 652-670, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33861993

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has had devastating medical and economic consequences globally. The severity of COVID-19 is related, in a large measure, to the extent of pulmonary involvement. The role of chest CT imaging in the management of patients with COVID-19 has evolved since the onset of the pandemic. Specifically, the description of CT scan findings, use of chest CT imaging in various acute and subacute settings, and its usefulness in predicting chronic disease have been defined better. We performed a review of published data on CT scans in patients with COVID-19. A summary of the range of imaging findings, from typical to less common abnormalities, is provided. Familiarity with these findings may facilitate the diagnosis and management of this disease. A comparison of sensitivity and specificity of chest CT imaging with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing highlights the potential role of CT imaging in difficult-to-diagnose cases of COVID-19. The usefulness of CT imaging to assess prognosis, to guide management, and to identify acute pulmonary complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection is highlighted. Beyond the acute stage, it is important for clinicians to recognize pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities, progressive fibrotic lung disease, and vascular changes that may be responsible for persistent respiratory symptoms. A large collection of multi-institutional images were included to elucidate the CT scan findings described.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
12.
Chest ; 159(3): 1107-1125, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33450293

RESUMEN

Use of molecular targeting agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has increased the frequency and broadened the spectrum of lung toxicity, particularly in patients with cancer. The diagnosis of drug-related pneumonitis (DRP) is usually achieved by excluding other potential known causes. Awareness of the incidence and risk factors for DRP is becoming increasingly important. The severity of symptoms associated with DRP may range from mild or none to life-threatening with rapid progression to death. Imaging features of DRP should be assessed in consideration of the distribution of lung parenchymal abnormalities (radiologic pattern approach). The CT patterns reflect acute (diffuse alveolar damage) interstitial pneumonia and transient (simple pulmonary eosinophilia) lung abnormality, subacute interstitial disease (organizing pneumonia and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), and chronic interstitial disease (nonspecific interstitial pneumonia). A single drug can be associated with multiple radiologic patterns. Treatment of a patient suspected of having DRP generally consists of drug discontinuation, immunosuppressive therapy, or both, along with supportive measures eventually including supplemental oxygen and intensive care. In this position paper, the authors provide diagnostic criteria and management recommendations for DRP that should be of interest to radiologists, clinicians, clinical trialists, and trial sponsors, among others.


Asunto(s)
Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/inducido químicamente , Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/diagnóstico , Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/terapia , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/terapia , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/efectos adversos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos
13.
Radiology ; 298(3): 550-566, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33434111

RESUMEN

Use of molecular targeting agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has increased the frequency and broadened the spectrum of lung toxicity, particularly in patients with cancer. The diagnosis of drug-related pneumonitis (DRP) is usually achieved by excluding other potential known causes. Awareness of the incidence and risk factors for DRP is becoming increasingly important. The severity of symptoms associated with DRP may range from mild or none to life-threatening with rapid progression to death. Imaging features of DRP should be assessed in consideration of the distribution of lung parenchymal abnormalities (radiologic pattern approach). The CT patterns reflect acute (diffuse alveolar damage) interstitial pneumonia and transient (simple pulmonary eosinophilia) lung abnormality, subacute interstitial disease (organizing pneumonia and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), and chronic interstitial disease (nonspecific interstitial pneumonia). A single drug can be associated with multiple radiologic patterns. Treatment of a patient suspected of having DRP generally consists of drug discontinuation, immunosuppressive therapy, or both, along with supportive measures eventually including supplemental oxygen and intensive care. In this position paper, the authors provide diagnostic criteria and management recommendations for DRP that should be of interest to radiologists, clinicians, clinical trialists, and trial sponsors, among others. This article is a simultaneous joint publication in Radiology and CHEST. The articles are identical except for stylistic changes in keeping with each journal's style. Either version may be used in citing this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

14.
Chest ; 159(1): 443-444, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33422215
15.
Clin Imaging ; 72: 22-30, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197713

RESUMEN

The global pandemic of COVID-19 pneumonia caused by the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has strained healthcare resources across the world with emerging challenges of mass testing, resource allocation and management. While reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is the most commonly utilized test and considered the current gold standard for diagnosis, the role of chest imaging has been highlighted by several studies demonstrating high sensitivity of computed tomography (CT). Many have suggested using CT chest as a first-line screening tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, with advancement of laboratory testing and challenges in obtaining a CT scan without significant risk to healthcare providers, the role of imaging in diagnosis has been questioned. Several imaging societies have released consensus statements and guidelines on utilizing imaging resources and optimal reporting. In this review, we highlight the current evidence on various modalities in thoracic imaging for the diagnosis of COVID-19 and describe an algorithm on how to use these resources in an optimal fashion in accordance with the guidelines and statements released by major imaging societies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Algoritmos , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Chest ; 158(6): 2696-2697, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280750
18.
Chest ; 158(5): 1992-2002, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32681847

RESUMEN

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic will be remembered for the rapidity with which it spread, the morbidity and mortality associated with it, and the paucity of evidence-based management guidelines. One of the major concerns of hospitals was to limit spread of infection to health-care workers. Because the virus is spread mainly by respiratory droplets and aerosolized particles, procedures that may potentially disperse viral particles, the so-called "aerosol-generating procedures" were avoided whenever possible. Included in this category were noninvasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), and awake (nonintubated) proning. Accordingly, at many health-care facilities, patients who had increasing oxygen requirements were emergently intubated and mechanically ventilated to avoid exposure to aerosol-generating procedures. With experience, physicians realized that mortality of invasively ventilated patients was high and it was not easy to extubate many of these patients. This raised the concern that HFNC and NIV were being underutilized to avoid intubation and to facilitate extubation. In this article, we attempt to separate fact from fiction and perception from reality pertaining to the aerosol dispersion with NIV, HFNC, and awake proning. We describe precautions that hospitals and health-care providers must take to mitigate risks with these devices. Finally, we take a practical approach in describing how we use the three techniques, including the common indications, contraindications, and practical aspects of application.


Asunto(s)
Cánula , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Posición Prona , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Vigilia
19.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(7): 845-854, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32485147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risks from potential exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and resource reallocation that has occurred to combat the pandemic, have altered the balance of benefits and harms that informed current (pre-COVID-19) guideline recommendations for lung cancer screening and lung nodule evaluation. Consensus statements were developed to guide clinicians managing lung cancer screening programs and patients with lung nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An expert panel of 24 members, including pulmonologists (n = 17), thoracic radiologists (n = 5), and thoracic surgeons (n = 2), was formed. The panel was provided with an overview of current evidence, summarized by recent guidelines related to lung cancer screening and lung nodule evaluation. The panel was convened by video teleconference to discuss and then vote on statements related to 12 common clinical scenarios. A predefined threshold of 70% of panel members voting agree or strongly agree was used to determine if there was a consensus for each statement. Items that may influence decisions were listed as notes to be considered for each scenario. RESULTS: Twelve statements related to baseline and annual lung cancer screening (n = 2), surveillance of a previously detected lung nodule (n = 5), evaluation of intermediate and high-risk lung nodules (n = 4), and management of clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 1) were developed and modified. All 12 statements were confirmed as consensus statements according to the voting results. The consensus statements provide guidance about situations in which it was believed to be appropriate to delay screening, defer surveillance imaging of lung nodules, and minimize nonurgent interventions during the evaluation of lung nodules and stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: There was consensus that during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is appropriate to defer enrollment in lung cancer screening and modify the evaluation of lung nodules due to the added risks from potential exposure and the need for resource reallocation. There are multiple local, regional, and patient-related factors that should be considered when applying these statements to individual patient care.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico por imagen , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Chest ; 157(5): 1394-1395, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386642
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...