Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol ; 75(1): 41-50, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548384

RESUMEN

Healthcare workers handling antineoplastic drugs (ADs) in preparation units run the risk of occupational exposure to contaminated surfaces and associated mutagenic, teratogenic, and oncogenic effects of those drugs. To minimise this risk, automated compounding systems, mainly robots, have been replacing manual preparation of intravenous drugs for the last 20 years now, and their number is on the rise. To evaluate contamination risk and the quality of the working environment for healthcare workers preparing ADs, we applied the Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) method to compare the acceptable risk level (ARL), based on the risk priority number (RPN) calculated from five identified failure modes, with the measured risk level (MRL). The model has shown higher risk of exposure with powdered ADs and containers not protected by external plastic shrink film, but we found no clear difference in contamination risk between manual and automated preparation. This approach could be useful to assess and prevent the risk of occupational exposure for healthcare workers coming from residual cytotoxic contamination both for current handling procedures and the newly designed ones. At the same time, contamination monitoring data can be used to keep track of the quality of working conditions by comparing the observed risk profiles with the proposed ARL. Our study has shown that automated preparation may have an upper hand in terms of safety but still leaves room for improvement, at least in our four hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Sector de Atención de Salud , Antineoplásicos/análisis , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Hospitales , Personal de Salud , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos
2.
Molecules ; 29(3)2024 Jan 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38338382

RESUMEN

Despite the considerable steps taken in the last decade in the context of antineoplastic drug (AD) handling procedures, their mutagenic effect still poses a threat to healthcare personnel actively involved in compounding and administration units. Biological monitoring procedures usually require large volumes of sample and extraction solvents, or do not provide adequate sensitivity. It is here proposed a fast and automated method to evaluate the urinary levels of cyclophosphamide and iphosphamide, composed of a miniaturized solid phase extraction (µSPE) followed by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) analysis. The extraction procedure, developed through design of experiments (DoE) on the ePrep One Workstation, required a total time of 9.5 min per sample, with recoveries of 77-79% and a solvent consumption lower than 1.5 mL per 1 mL of urine sample. Thanks to the UHPLC-MS/MS method, the limits of quantification (LOQ) obtained were lower than 10 pg/mL. The analytical procedure was successfully applied to 23 urine samples from compounding wards of four Italian hospitals, which resulted in contaminations between 27 and 182 pg/mL.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Exposición Profesional , Ifosfamida , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Cromatografía Líquida con Espectrometría de Masas , Monitoreo Biológico , Ciclofosfamida , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Extracción en Fase Sólida , Solventes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA