Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in people living with HIV.

PURPOSE: To describe the humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in people living with HIV and identify factors associated with the magnitude of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of electronic patient files in a big single HIV center in Munich, Germany. Non-parametric methods were used for descriptive and comparative statistics. Generalized linear models were used to analyze associations of general and HIV-specific variables with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations after standard vaccination. RESULT: Overall, 665 people living with HIV were included into the analysis (median age: 53 [IQR: 43; 59]), 560 [84.2%] males). Median concentration of anti-SARS-CoV-2-antibodies was 1400 (IQR 664; 2130) BAU/mL. In 18 (2.7%) subjects, antibody concentrations below the threshold of 34 BAU/mL were found. Among PLWH with CD4 cell count < 200 cells/µL, median anti-SARS-CoV-2-Abs were 197 (IQR 44.6; 537.2) as compared to 1420 (IQR 687; 2216) for the group ≥ 200 cells/µL (p < 0.001). In a cumulative logit model, a vaccination scheme including an mRNA vaccine [OR: 4.64 (3.58; 6.02)], being female [OR: 2.14 (1.76; 2.61)], and having higher CD4 cells [OR per 100 cells/µL: 1.06 (1.04; 1.08)] were significantly associated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations in higher quartiles, when adjusted for the time after vaccination. CONCLUSION: We found a robust antibody response in people living with HIV undergoing standard vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. mRNA-containing vaccination schemes, being female, and having a higher CD4 cell count was associated with a higher concentration of antibodies in people living with HIV in our study sample. Particularly in the subgroup with CD4 cell counts < 200 cells/µL, antibody response was poor.

VIM-15 and VIM-16, two new VIM-2-like metallo-beta-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Bulgaria and Germany.

Two Pseudomonas aeruginosa urine isolates from Bulgaria and Germany produced two new VIM-2 variants. VIM-15 had one amino acid substitution (Tyr218Phe) which caused a significant increase in hydrolytic efficiency. The substitution Ser54Leu, characterizing VIM-16, showed no influence on enzyme activity. Both genes were part of class I integrons located in the chromosome.