What are the likely causes of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)?

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a CD30-positive, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative T-cell lymphoma. Where implant history is known, all confirmed cases to date have occurred in patients with exposure to textured implants. The etiopathogenesis of BIA-ALCL is likely to be multifactorial, with current evidence-based theories recognising the combination of chronic infection in setting of textured implants, gram-negative biofilm formation, chronic inflammation, host genetics (e.g. JAK/STAT, p53) and time in tumorigenesis. Proposed triggers for the development of malignancy are mechanical friction, silicone implant shell particulates, silicone leachables and bacteria. Of these, the bacterial hypothesis has received significant attention, supported by a plausible biological model. In this model, bacteria form an adherent biofilm in the favourable environment of the textured implant surface, producing a bacterial load that elicits a chronic inflammatory response. Bacterial antigens, primarily of gram-negative origin, may trigger innate immunity and induce T-cell proliferation with subsequent malignant transformation in genetically susceptible individuals. Future research, investigating BIA-ALCL genetic mutations and immunological modulation with Gram-negative biofilm in BIA-ALCL models is warranted to establish a unifying theory for the aetiology of BIA-ALCL.

Theories of Etiopathogenesis of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a malignancy of T lymphocytes that is associated with the use of textured breast implants in both esthetic and reconstructive surgeries. Patients typically present with a delayed seroma 8-10 years following implantation or-less commonly-with a capsular mass or systemic disease. Current theories on disease pathogenesis focus on the interplay among textured implants, Gram-negative bacteria, host genetics, and time. The possible roles of silicone leachables and particles have been less well substantiated. This review aims to synthesize the existing scientific evidence regarding breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma etiopathogenesis.

Cadaveric Dissection of the Axillary Nerve: An Investigation of Extra-Muscular and Intra-Muscular Branching Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Variations in the axillary nerve branching patterns have been reported. The aim of the study is to investigate the extra- and intra-muscular course of the axillary nerve and quantify the regional innervation of the deltoid. METHODS: In fresh frozen specimens, the origin of the axillary nerve from the posterior cord of the brachial plexus and its extra- and intra-muscular course were identified. Muscle dimensions, branching patterns and the distance from the axillary nerve origin to major branches were measured. The weights of muscle segments supplied by major branches of the axillary nerve were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-three cadaveric dissections were completed. The axillary nerve bifurcated within the quadrangular space in all cases. The mean distance from the origin to bifurcation of the axillary nerve was 39 ± 13 mm; from axillary nerve bifurcation to the teres minor branch was 13 ± 6 mm; and from axillary nerve bifurcation to the middle branch of anterior division was 26 ± 11 mm. The nerve to teres minor and superior lateral brachial cutaneous nerve originated from the posterior division or common trunk in all cases. No fibrous raphe were identified separating anterior, middle and posterior deltoid segments. The anterior division of axillary nerve supplied 85 ± 4% of the deltoid muscle (by weight). The posterior division supplied 15 ± 4% of the deltoid muscle (by weight). The posterior deltoid was supplied by both anterior and posterior divisions in 91.3% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a consistent branching pattern of the axillary nerve. The anterior division of the axillary nerve innervates all three deltoid segments in most instances (85% of the deltoid by weight). This study supports the concept of re-innervation of the anterior division alone in isolated axillary nerve injuries.

Elective hepatic resection is feasible and safe in a regional centre.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resectional surgery remains a highly specialized area of general surgery usually reserved for completion at tertiary metropolitan referral centres. Port Macquarie, on the Mid North Coast of New South Wales, is the only regionally based hospital offering surgery of this nature in mainland Australia. The purpose of this study is to review the data for patients undergoing hepatic resectional surgery in this non-metropolitan centre in order to illustrate that these operations can be carried out safely in a regional setting with comparable results to tertiary-level centres. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing elective hepatic resections at Port Macquarie from February 2008 to 31 October 2015 was completed. Pre-morbid patient clinical and demographic factors, histopathological details, post-operative complications, survival and mortality data were all noted. RESULTS: A total of 66 consecutive elective liver resections were performed during the study period. Metastatic colorectal cancer was the most commonly observed pathology (n = 33, 50.0%). The 90-day mortality was 4.5% (n = 3) whilst 17 patients (n = 17, 25.8%) experienced major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or 4). The median overall survival following hepatectomy for colorectal metastases was 48 months (95% confidence interval 37-59 months). CONCLUSION: Our study shows excellent morbidity, mortality and survival for hepatic resectional surgery performed in a regional centre and is comparable data to major metropolitan centres. Our study confirms that major hepatic resectional surgery in this setting is safe and effective.

Utility of simultaneous interventional radiology and operative surgery in a dedicated suite for seriously injured patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, combined interventional radiology and operative suites have been proposed and are now becoming operational in select trauma centres. Given the infancy of this technology, this review aims to review the rationale, benefits and challenges of hybrid suites in the management of seriously injured patients. RECENT FINDINGS: No specific studies exist that investigate outcomes within hybrid trauma suites. Endovascular and interventional radiology techniques have been successfully employed in thoracic, abdominal, pelvic and extremity trauma. Although the association between delayed haemorrhage control and poorer patient outcomes is intuitive, most supporting scientific data are outdated. The hybrid suite model offers the potential to expedite haemorrhage control through synergistic operative, interventional radiology and resuscitative platforms. Maximizing the utility of these suites requires trained multidisciplinary teams, ergonomic and workplace considerations, as well as a fundamental paradigm shift of trauma care. This often translates into a more damage-control orientated philosophy. SUMMARY: Hybrid suites offer tremendous potential to expedite haemorrhage control in trauma patients. Outcome evaluations from trauma units that currently have operational hybrid suites are required to establish clearer guidelines and criteria for patient management.