Neuromeningeal cryptococcosis in a patient not infected with human immunodeficiency virus and without known risk factors: A case report.

We report a 24-year-old female patient not infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and without other risk factors of immunosuppression, presenting with neuromeningeal cryptococcosis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed the presence of Cryptococcus neoformans. The evolution was unfavorable and the patient died even after appropriate antifungal treatment.

[Prevalence and etiological profiles of atypical localization venous thrombosis : A descriptive multicenter study]. / Prévalence et profils étiologiques des thromboses veineuses de localisation atypique : une étude multicentrique descriptive.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thrombosis of unusual sites is much rarer than in the lower limbs and requires a rigorous etiological approach. The objective was to describe the clinical and progressive peculiarities of unusual localization venous thrombosis as well as their etiologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicenter descriptive retrospective study of hospitalized patient records in the two large Hospital Centers, Antananarivo, Madagascar between 2017 and 2020 in which the diagnosis of unusual venous thrombosis was confirmed by imaging. RESULTS: Seventy-seven thrombosis of atypical localization were present in fifty-nine patients identified. These were 24 men and 35 women with an M/F sex ratio of 0.68. The mean age of our patients was 49.4 years (± 16.76). Thrombosis seated in the majority of cases in the portal veins (n ​​= 27), cerebral veins (n ​​= 20), vena cava (n = 10), splenic veins (n ​​= 5), upper limbs and splenomearic trunk (each n = 4), Renal vein (n = 3). Venous thrombosis had occurred following tobacco intoxication (n = 15 cases); bed rest (n = 10); surgical intervention (n = 4). The aetiological assessment revealed a neoplastic origin in 27 cases (45.77%) dominated by hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 13). the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome dominates the case of autoimmune causes (n = 4). In terms of mortality, there were no deaths during the initial hospitalization. Eight patients had died, 4 of them due to hepatocellular carcinoma, 2 after surgery, and 1 each due to kidney cancer and liver cirrhosis. The mean follow-up period was 34.03 ± 51.5 days. CONCLUSION: Unusual thrombosis, although rare, constitute a real challenge in the etiological approach. In clinical practice, the description of these thrombosis would allow us to understand their pathophysiological mechanism in order to plan the best management.

Use of Perindopril Arginine/Indapamide/Amlodipine in the Management of Hypertension in Two Sub-Saharan African Island Countries of Madagascar and Mauritius.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa require two or more drugs to control their blood pressure. Triple fixed-dose combination therapy of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine is more effective in lowering blood pressure, offers better target organ protection and has increased adherence compared to monotherapy and free combination therapy, and is safe to use. This observational study evaluates the effectiveness of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine in controlling blood pressure at least 1 month after treatment initiation and assesses patient- and physician- reported drug tolerance over a 3-month period in Madagascar and Mauritius. METHODS: A total of 198 patients with hypertension in ambulatory care who had been on fixed-dose combination of perindopril arginine, indapamide, and amlodipine for at least 4 weeks were included. The main outcome measures were changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, attainment of blood pressure control under 140/90 mmHg and 130/80 mmHg, self-reported drug tolerance by the patient, and perceived drug tolerance by the treating physician. Data was collected at 1 month and 3 months. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure was significantly lower at the 1-month (- 3.4 mmHg, p = 0.002) and 3-month (- 8.5 mmHg, p < 0.0001) visits. Diastolic blood pressure also decreased significantly (- 2.4 mmHg at 1-month, p = 0.017 and - 5.4 mmHg at the 3-month visits, p < 0.0001). At 3 months, 80.4% of the patients attained blood pressure targets less than 140/90 mmHg and 42.7% attained targets less than 130/80 mmHg on the basis of their baseline blood pressure. Excellent drug tolerance was reported by more than 90% of patients and physicians at the 1-month visit and by more than 95% at the 3-month visit. CONCLUSION: Triple fixed-dose therapy of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine continues to show additional blood pressure-lowering capacity even months after initiating the treatment in patients with hypertension in Madagascar and Mauritius. It is also well tolerated by patients with hypertension and assessed as safe to use by physicians.

Giant compressive emphysema: a rare complication of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new ribonucleic acid (RNA) beta-coronavirus, responsible for a worldwide pandemic. Very few cases of SARS-COV-2-related emphysema have been described, except among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The thoracic CT scan is the key examination for the diagnosis and allows to evaluate the severity of the pulmonary involvement. The prognosis of the patient with giant emphysema (GE) on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critical or severe form remains poor. We report an original case of COVID-19 pneumonia, critical form, complicated by a giant compressive left emphysema of 22.4 cm in a young subject without respiratory comorbidities. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old man was hospitalized for left laterothoracic pain. He had no prior medical history. The physical examination revealed tympany on percussion of the left lung. The CT scan confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia with 95% lung involvement. Also, the presence of a voluminous left sub pleural emphysema of 22.4 cm with compression of the ipsilateral pulmonary parenchyma as well as the mediastinal structures towards the right side. The diagnosis COVID-19 pneumonia, critical form, complicated by a compressive left giant emphysema was made. He was put on oxygen, a dual antibiotic therapy, a corticotherapy, and curative doses of enoxaparin. A thoracic drainage surgery was performed at 24th day of hospitalization, which confirmed the giant emphysema. The patient remains on long-term oxygen therapy. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 has polymorphic manifestations, pneumonia is the most important one. There are relatively few reports associating COVID-19 and emphysema; furthermore, reports associating COVID-19 and giant emphysema are extremely scarce. CT scans can confirm the diagnosis and differentiate it from a pneumothorax. The pulmonary prognosis of the association of COVID-19 in its severe or critical form with giant emphysema remains poor.