Epidemiology of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand.

Objectives: To investigate the epidemiology of MDR Gram-negative bacilli ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (MDR GNB-VAT) and MDR GNB ventilator-associated pneumonia (MDR GNB-VAP) among mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study among hospitalized patients who underwent continuous mechanical ventilation for ≥48 h at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Results: During the 18 month study period, 1824 unique patients underwent continuous mechanical ventilation (12 216 ventilator-days). The cumulative incidences of MDR GNB-VAT and -VAP were 8.4% and 8.3%, respectively. The incidence rates of MDR GNB-VAT and -VAP were 12.52 and 12.44 episodes/1000 ventilator-days, respectively. Among those with VAT, the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of subsequent VAP development within 7 days were 11.76% and 2.81 episodes/1000 ventilator-days, respectively. The median durations of mechanical ventilation before having VAP and VAT were 9 and 12 days, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified three independently associated factors for patients having VAP compared with having VAT: underlying cerebrovascular disease [adjusted OR (aOR): 0.46; 95% CI: 0.27-0.78; P = 0.04], previous surgery (aOR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.57-0.8; P < 0.001) and acute renal failure (aOR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.27-2.40; P = 0.001). Conclusions: The study revealed high incidences of MDR GNB-VAT and -VAP among mechanically ventilated patients. The independent risk factors for having VAP can help identify patients at risk for developing VAP and who need early weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Rat bite fever caused by Streptobacillus notomytis mimicking pyogenic polyarthritis: A case report.

We report the world's sixth case of rat bite fever caused by Streptobacillus notomytis that mimicked pyogenic polyarthritis and required surgical debridement in combination with prolonged antibiotic therapy. This case report highlights the higher severity of rat bite fever caused by S. notomytis compared to S. moniliformis.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among Thai older adult.

Introduction: This study aims to assess the economic impact of introducing the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) to Thai older adult aged ≥ 65 years who are healthy or with chronic health conditions and immunocompromised conditions from a societal perspective in order to introduce the vaccine to Thailand's National Immunization Program for the older adult. Methods: A Markov model was adopted to simulate the natural history and economic outcomes of invasive pneumococcal diseases using updated published sources and Thai databases. We reported analyses as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) in USD per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. In addition, sensitivity analyses and budget impact analyses were conducted. Results: The base-case analysis of all interventions (no vaccinations [current standard of care in Thailand], PPSV23, and PCV13) showed that PPSV23 was extendedly dominated by PCV13. Among healthy individuals or those with chronic health conditions, ICER for PCV13 was 233.63 USD/QALY; meanwhile, among individuals with immunocompromised conditions, ICER for PCV13 was 627.24 USD/QALY. PCV13 are economical vaccine for all older adult Thai individuals when compared to all interventions. Conclusions: In the context of Thailand, PCV13 is recommended as the best buy and should be primarily prioritized when both costs and benefits are considered. Also, this model will be beneficial to the two-next generation pneumococcal vaccines implementation in Thailand.

Pneumococcal carriage among high-risk adults in a country with nonmandatory pneumococcal vaccination during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage is a prerequisite for clinical infections and is used to make public health decisions on vaccine licensure. Pneumococcal carriage data among high-risk Thai adults are needed before national vaccine program introduction. The association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumococcal carriage were also investigated. METHODS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted among high-risk Thai adults from September 2021 to November 2022. Pneumococcal carriage and serotypes were investigated using both conventional and molecular methods. Demographics and co-morbidities were determined for carriage while accounting for case clustering from various study sites. RESULTS: A total of 370 individuals were enrolled. The prevalence of pneumococcal carriage, as determined by the molecular method, was 30.8 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 26.1-35.8), while after excluding non-typeable pneumococci from the oropharyngeal sample, the carriage prevalence was 20.8 % (95 % CI: 16.79-25.31). The serotype coverage rates by pneumococcal vaccine were 12.3 %, 13.1 %, and 16.4 % for PCV13, PCV15 or PCV20, and PPSV23, respectively, while the non-vaccine type was the majority (45.1 %). The most common serotype was 19B/C (35.5 %), followed by 6 A/B/C/D (10.7 %). The age group under 65 years was associated with a higher pneumococcal carriage rate than the age group 85 and older (odds ratio (OR): 5.01, 95 % CI: 1.75-14.36). There was no significant difference between SARS-CoV-2 and carriage status. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pneumococcal carriage in Thais was high. The majority of serotypes were not covered by the vaccine. Further studies on the link between carriage serotypes and disease are required. The magnitude and serotype distribution of carriage were comparable in the SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative groups.

Development and Implementation of a Mobile Application for Choosing Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy for Bacteremia, Pneumonia, Urinary Tract Infection, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infection among Hospitalized Patients.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and computerized clinical decision support programs are effective antimicrobial stewardship strategies. The DigitalAMS™, a mobile-based application for choosing empirical antimicrobial therapy under the hospital's CPGs, was implemented at Siriraj Hospital and evaluated. From January to June 2018, a cross-sectional study was conducted among 401 hospitalized adults who received ≥1 dose of antimicrobials and had ≥1 documented site-specific infection. The antimicrobial regimen prescribed by the ward physician (WARD regimen), recommended by the DigitalAMS™ (APP regimen), and recommended by two independent infectious disease (ID) physicians before (Emp-ID regimen) and after (Def-ID regimen) the final microbiological results became available were compared in a pairwise fashion. The percent agreement of antimicrobial prescribing between the APP and Emp-ID regimens was 85.7% in the bacteremia group, 59.1% in the pneumonia group, 78.6% in the UTI group, and 85.2% in the SSTI group. The percent agreement between the APP and Emp-ID regimens was significantly higher than that between the WARD and Emp-ID regimens in three site-specific infection groups: the bacteremia group (85.7% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001), the UTI group (78.6% vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001), and the SSTI group (85.2% vs. 40.2%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the percent agreement between the APP and Def-ID regimens was similar to that between the Emp-ID and Def-ID regimens in all sites of infection. In conclusions, the implementation of DigitalAMS™ seems useful but needs some revisions. The dissemination of this ready-to-use application with customized clinical practice guidelines to other hospital settings may be beneficial.

Comparison of the mathematical equation and trapezoidal approach for 24 h area under the plasma concentration-time curve calculation in patients who received intravenous vancomycin in an acute care setting.

The current recommendation for therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin has recently suggested AUC-guided dosing in patients with serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. The study objective was to evaluate mathematical equations and trapezoidal methods for calculating the 24 h area under the plasma vancomycin concentration-time curve (AUC24). The analysis of plasma vancomycin concentrations was performed in 20 adult patients treated with intravenous vancomycin. For each patient, AUC24 was estimated using two methods including, equation and trapezoidal calculation. The AUC24 from two methods was analyzed for correlation. The correlation between the equation and trapezoidal methods was strong. The coefficient of determination (R2 ) values was greater than .99. The two plasma vancomycin concentrations to achieve the highest correlation were concentration at 2.5 to 3 h after starting the infusion and concentration at 1 h before the next dose. Moreover, the AUC24 calculation from trapezoidal and equation methods showed that 19 out of 20 patients (95%) had AUC24 of more than 400 mg·h/L, and more than 50% in this group had AUC24/MIC greater than 600. Of those patients with AUC-trapezoidal >600, 15.38% of patients had trough under 15 mg/L, 15.38% of patients had trough in the range 15 to 20 mg/L and 69.23% of patients had trough more than 20 mg/L. The results of AUC-equation were similar to those of the AUC-trapezoidal method. Our study confirmed that the AUC monitoring is more appropriate than the trough vancomycin concentration. Given these considerations, the AUC-equation method is better and more practical to use in part of a point-of-care treatment, especially in the part of the Bayesian program is not available. The best sampling time point of the peak concentration was 0.5-1 h after 2-h infusion.

A Risk Prediction Model and Risk Score of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Following Healthcare-Related Exposure.

Hospital workers are at high risk of contact with COVID-19 patients. Currently, there is no evidence-based, comprehensive risk assessment tool for healthcare-related exposure; so, we aimed to identify independent factors related to COVID-19 infection in hospital workers following workplace exposure(s) and construct a risk prediction model. We analyzed the COVID-19 contact tracing dataset from 15 July to 31 December 2021 using multiple logistic regression analysis, considering exposure details, demographics, and vaccination history. Of 7146 included exposures to confirmed COVID-19 patients, 229 (4.2%) had subsequently tested positive via RT-PCR. Independent risk factors for a positive test were having symptoms (adjusted odds ratio 4.94, 95%CI 3.83−6.39), participating in an unprotected aerosol-generating procedure (aOR 2.87, 1.66−4.96), duration of exposure >15 min (aOR 2.52, 1.82−3.49), personnel who did not wear a mask (aOR 2.49, 1.75−3.54), exposure to aerodigestive secretion (aOR 1.5, 1.03−2.17), index patient not wearing a mask (aOR 1.44, 1.01−2.07), and exposure distance <1 m without eye protection (aOR 1.39, 1.02−1.89). High-potency vaccines and high levels of education protected against infection. A risk model and scoring system with good discrimination power were built. Having symptoms, unprotected exposure, lower education level, and receiving low potency vaccines increased the risk of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 following healthcare-related exposure events.

JMM Profile: Fosfomycin: a potential antibiotic for multi- and extensively resistant bacteria.

Fosfomycin (FOF) is the first antimicrobial of the epoxide class. It is commercially available in oral and parenteral formulations. Oral FOF is widely used to treat uncomplicated cystitis in women, while parenteral FOF is extensively utilized for upper urinary tract infections. FOF has a broad-spectrum bactericidal activity with a low risk of cross-resistance to other antimicrobial classes. Therefore, parenteral FOF is increasingly prescribed adjunctive therapy to treat extra-urinary tract infections caused by multidrug-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Tropical Infectious Diseases: Focusing on Dengue and Malaria.

Acute undifferentiated febrile illness (AUFI) is the presenting symptom of various tropical and infectious diseases. Viral infection is generally the most common cause of AUFI, accounting for 8-11.8% of cases; thus, antibiotics might be unnecessary. Dengue and malaria are common tropical infectious diseases requiring effective supportive treatment and antimalarial agents, respectively. The uncertainty of early diagnosis results in widespread empirical antimicrobial treatment in high -income as well as in low-and middle-income countries. Although rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been shown to limit antibiotic prescriptions in dengue and malaria, we observed a wide range of antibiotic prescriptions for 13-92.7% of cases in previous literature, particularly in RDT-negative malaria cases. Given several RDT limitations, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) appears to be an effective strategy for controlling unnecessary antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevention. This program should be endorsed by a multidisciplinary team in tropical diseases to control collateral damage of inappropriate antimicrobial use. Empirical antibiotic treatment should be administered based on clinical judgement, microbiological evidence, and local epidemiological data. Rapid termination of antibiotic therapy, including disease control or elimination, is the mainstay of AMS in tropical diseases. Local and international sectors should implement an AMS programme to reduce AMR in the Tropics.

Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Empirical Antibiotic Therapy of Bacteremia, Urinary Tract Infection, and Pneumonia: A Multi-Center Quasi-Experimental Study.

A quasi-experimental study was conducted on the implementation of locally developed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for empirical antibiotic (ATB) therapy of common infections (bacteremia, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia) in the hospitals from January 2019 to December 2020. The CPGs were developed using data from patients with these infections at individual hospitals. Relevant CPG data pre- and post-implementation were collected and compared. Of the 1644 patients enrolled in the study, 808 and 836 were in the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively, and patient outcomes were compared. Significant reductions in the mean durations of intensive care unit stay (3.44 ± 9.08 vs. 2.55 ± 7.89 days; p = 0.035), ventilator use (5.73 ± 12.14 vs. 4.22 ± 10.23 days; p = 0.007), piperacillin/tazobactam administration (0.954 ± 3.159 vs. 0.660 ± 2.217 days, p = 0.029), and cefoperazone/sulbactam administration (0.058 ± 0.737 vs. 0.331 ± 1.803 days, p = 0.0001) occurred. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CPG-implementation was associated with favorable clinical outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 1.286, 95% confidence interval: 1.004-1.647, p = 0.046). Among patients who provided follow-up cultures (n = 284), favorable microbiological responses were significantly less frequent during the pre-implementation period than the post-implementation period (80.35% vs. 91.89%; p = 0.01). In conclusion, the locally developed CPG implementation is feasible and effective in improving patient outcomes and reducing ATB consumption. Hospital antimicrobial stewardship teams should be able to facilitate CPG development and implementation for antimicrobial therapy for common infections.

Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin for the Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19: A Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.

The safety and efficacy of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 are still controversial topics. From August to November 2021, we conducted a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Eligible participants were adults ≥ 18 years with suspected COVID-19 who underwent a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. After enrollment, the participants were randomized to receive either ivermectin (400−600 µg/kg/d) or placebo once daily for 3 days. Among 983 participants, 536 (54.5%) with a negative RT-PCR result were enrolled in the prevention study, and 447 (45.5%) with a positive RT-PCR result were enrolled in the treatment study. In the prevention study, the incidence of COVID-19 on Day 14 was similar between the ivermectin and the placebo group (4.7% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.844; Δ = −0.4%; 95% CI; −4.3−3.5%). In the treatment study, there was no significant difference between the ivermectin and placebo group for any Day 14 treatment outcome: proportion with oxygen desaturation (2.7% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.75), change in WHO score from baseline (1 [−5, 1] vs. 1 [−5, 1]; p = 0.50), and symptom resolution (76% vs. 82.2%; p = 0.13). The ivermectin group had a significantly higher proportion of transient blurred vision (5.6% vs. 0.6%; p < 0.001). Our study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of a 3-day once daily of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. The given regimen of ivermectin should not be used for either prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in populations with a high rate of COVID-19 vaccination.

Real-World Effectiveness and Optimal Dosage of Favipiravir for Treatment of COVID-19: Results from a Multicenter Observational Study in Thailand.

Favipiravir is a broad-spectrum oral antiviral agent that shows in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2. Presently, data on the real-world effectiveness and optimal dosage of favipiravir for treating COVID-19 are limited. We conducted a retrospective observational study of hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 at five tertiary care hospitals in Thailand. We reviewed patient charts to obtain all necessary data. Among 247 COVID-19 patients, 63 (23.0%) received ≥1 dose of favipiravir. Of these 63 patients, 61.9% were male with a median age of 48 years (range 22-85 years), 27.0% required an O2 nasal cannula, 9.5% required non-invasive ventilation and/or high-flow O2 therapy, and 6.4% required invasive mechanical ventilation and/or ECMO. The median baseline NEWS2 score was 5 (0-16). The Day-7 clinical improvement rate [95%CI] was 66.7% [53.7-78.0%] in all patients, 92.5% [75.7-99.1%] in patients who did not require O2 supplementation, and 47.2% [0.4-64.5%] in patients who required O2 supplementation. No life-threatening adverse events were identified. The 28-day mortality rate was 4.8%. A multivariate analysis revealed three poor prognostic factors for Day-7 clinical improvement (odds ratio (95%CI); p-value): older age (0.94 (0.89-0.99); p = 0.04), a higher baseline NEWS2 score (0.64 (0.47-0.88); p = 0.006), and a lower favipiravir loading dose (≤45 mg/kg/day) (0.04 (0.005-0.4); p = 0.006). In conclusion, our study reports the promising effectiveness of favipiravir for treating COVID-19 patients. In addition to older age and a high baseline NEWS2 score, a low loading dose of favipiravir (≤45 mg/kg/day) was also identified as a poor prognostic factor for early clinical improvement. Further studies to explore the optimal dose and the optimal timing of drug initiation for favipiravir should be performed.

Cumulative incidence of and risk factors for herpes zoster among patients with diabetes mellitus: Results from a 10-year nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-known risk factor for herpes zoster (HZ). Data specific to the incidence of and risk factors for HZ among Thai DM patients are scarce. METHODS: This nested case-control study evaluated a 10-year cohort of DM patients (N = 1428) treated at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). We included 40 cases with ≥1 episode of HZ, and we randomly sampled 175 non-HZ controls. Data were obtained from chart review and the ICD-10 diagnosis code, pharmacy database, and laboratory database. RESULTS: During 2005-2014, the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of HZ among all study patients was 2.80% [95%CI: 2.00-3.79%] and 3.96 [95%CI: 2.90-5.28] per 1000 person-years, respectively. The most common site was trunk (27.5%) followed by zoster ophthalmic (22.5%). Only 1 case required hospitalization. Independent risk factors for HZ included underlying hypertension [aOR: 3.48, 95%CI: 1.28-9.43; p = 0.01], number of hypoglycemic drugs used [aOR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.03-2.08; p = 0.04], and previous herbal remedy use [aOR: 3.83, 95%CI: 1.06-13.84; p = 0.04]. Higher body mass index was a protective factor against HZ [aOR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.81-0.98; p = 0.02]. CONCLUSION: The incidence of HZ among DM patients at our center is comparable to other Asian countries. The identified independent risk factors can be used to discern patients who would benefit most from preventive interventions.

Economic Impact of Home-Use versus Office-Use Diphenylcyclopropenone in Extensive Alopecia Areata.

Introduction: Diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) is the medication of choice for the treatment of severe alopecia areata (AA) according to AA treatment guidelines. Precise initiation and application are important factors for successful treatment. However, it is difficult for patients who live far away to visit their doctor weekly. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the cost, effectiveness, and side effects of DPCP treatment between office-use DPCP (O-DPCP) and home-use DPCP (H-DPCP) in severe AA patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the perspective of healthcare providers and patients using real-world data and the national cost statistics for hospital services comparing O-DPCP and H-DPCP in patients with severe AA at 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Results: Two groups of 41 patients treated with O-DPCP and H-DPCP were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who showed a favorable outcome (≥50% improvement) with minimal side effects between both groups at 24 (O-DPCP 43.9% vs. H-DPCP 26.8%, p = 0.11), 36 (O-DPCP 58.5% vs. H-DPCP 43.9%, p = 0.19), or 48 weeks (O-DPCP 63.4% vs. H-DPCP 56.1%, p = 0.49). The cost of H-DPCP was half of the cost of O-DPCP. Discussion/Conclusion: H-DPCP is a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative treatment option for severe AA patients.

Feasibility, Challenges, and Benefits of Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System Implementation: Results from a Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study.

The Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) is one of the pillars of the global action plan on antimicrobial resistance launched by the World Health Organization in 2015. This study was conducted to determine the feasibility and benefits of GLASS as a component of antimicrobial stewardship strategies in three provincial hospitals in Thailand. Data on the types of bacteria isolated and their antibiotic susceptibility during January-December 2019 and January-April 2020 were retrieved from the microbiology laboratory of each participating hospital. Laboratory-based antibiograms from 2019 and GLASS-based antibiograms from 2020 were created and compared. A total of 14,877 and 3580 bacterial isolates were obtained during January-December 2019 and January-April 2020, respectively. The common bacteria isolated in both periods were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. Hospital-acquired infection (HAI)-related bacteria were observed in 59.0%, whereas community-acquired infection (CAI)-related bacteria were observed in 41.0% of isolates. Antibiotic resistance in CAIs was high and may have been related to the misclassification of colonized bacteria as true pathogens and HAIs as CAIs. The results of this study on AMR surveillance using GLASS methodology may not be valid owing to several inadequate data collections and the problem of specimen contamination. Given these considerations, related personnel should receive additional training on the best practices in specimen collection and the management of AMR surveillance data using the GLASS approach.

Impact of Antibiotic Authorisation at Three Provincial Hospitals in Thailand: Results from a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Implementing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) at non-university hospitals is challenging. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to determine the impact of customised antibiotic authorisation implementation on antimicrobial consumption and clinical outcomes at three provincial hospitals in Thailand. Customised pre-authorisation of selected restricted antibiotics and post-authorisation of selected controlled antibiotics were undertaken and implemented at each hospital by the local AMS team with guidance from the AMS team at the university hospital. From January 2019−December 2020, there were 1802 selected patients (901 patients during the pre-implementation period and 901 patients during the post-implementation period). The most commonly used targeted antimicrobial was meropenem (49.61%), followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (36.46%). Comparison of the outcomes of the patients during the pre- and post-implementation periods revealed that the mean day of therapy of the targeted antimicrobials was significantly shorter during the post-implementation period (6.24 vs. 7.64 days; p < 0.001), the favourable clinical response (the improvement in all clinical and laboratory parameters at the end of antibiotic therapy) was significantly higher during the post-implementation period (72.70% vs. 68.04%; p = 0.03) and the mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter during the post-implementation period (15.78 vs. 18.90 days; p < 0.001). In conclusion, implementation of antibiotic authorisation at provincial hospitals under experienced AMS team's guidance was feasible and useful. The study results could be a good model for the implementation of customised AMS strategies at other hospitals with limited resources.

New Donor Excision Design for Better Hair Alignment in Hair Restoration Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The linear scar and misalignment of hair follicles are disadvantages of the follicular unit transplantation (FUT) or strip technique. The most common misalignment is at the end of the strip. Although most surgeons try to match hair direction to achieve optimal hair alignment, their attempts are often unsuccessful. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess strip designs to improve hair alignment during hair transplantation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 157 patients who underwent hair transplantation with either the commonly used elliptical incision or our novel triangular flag-shaped designed incision on the donor strip tip. Two blind evaluators assessed the outcome of hair alignment using a 5-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: In total, 303 wounds on 157 patients were assessed. Overall, our triangular flag-shaped design (TFD) achieved better hair alignment than the common elliptical design (CED) (p=0.01). Patients with hair direction straight on the upper wound edge and hair direction inward on the lower wound edge showed improved outcomes with TFD, whereas patients with hair direction inward on both upper and lower wound edges showed better outcomes with CED. CONCLUSIONS: The TFD tip of donor strips achieved proper hair alignment for most hair transplant patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Feasibility of implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in acute-care hospitals: A nationwide survey in Thailand.

A nationwide survey was conducted in 399 acute-care hospitals in Thailand. Most had a designated antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), but <20% had an infectious disease physician on the team. The most frequently cited challenges in ASP implementation were the increased workload, followed by a lack of antimicrobial stewardship knowledge and a lack of hospital administrator concern.