Malunions following lower extremity fractures in veterans with a spinal cord injury/disorder.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 50% of all persons with a spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) will sustain an osteoporotic fracture sometime in their life, with lower extremity fractures being the most common. There are a number of complications that can occur post fracture, including fracture malunion. To date, there have been no dedicated investigations of malunions among persons with SCI/D. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with fracture malunion among fracture-related (type of fracture, fracture location, initial fracture treatment) and SCI/D-related factors. Secondary objectives were to describe treatment of fracture malunions and complications following these malunions. METHODS: Veterans with SCI/D with an incident lower extremity fracture and subsequent malunion from Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-2015 were selected from the Veteran Health Administration (VHA) databases using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) codes for lower extremity fractures and malunion. These fracture malunion cases underwent electronic health record (EHR) review to abstract information on potential risk factors, treatments and complications for malunion. Twenty-nine cases were identified with a fracture malunion with 28 of them successfully matched with Veterans with a lower extremity fracture during FY2005-FY2014 without a malunion (matched 1:4) based on having an outpatient utilization date of care within 30 days of the fracture case. There was trend towards more nonsurgical treatment in the malunion group (n = 27, 96.43%) compared to the control group (n = 101, 90.18%) (P = 0.05), though fracture treatment proved not to be not associated with developing a malunion in univariate logistic regression analyses (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.08-1.09). In multivariate analyses, Veterans with tetraplegia were significantly less likely (approximately 3-fold) to have a fracture malunion (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.14-0.93) compared to those with paraplegia. Fracture malunion was significantly less likely to occur for fractures of the ankle (OR = 0.02; 95% CI: 0-0.13) or the hip (OR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.56) compared to femur fractures. Fracture malunions were rarely treated. The most common complications following malunions were pressure injuries (56.3%) followed by osteomyelitis (25.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Persons with tetraplegia as well as fractures of the ankle and hip (compared to the femur) were less likely to develop a fracture malunion. Attention to prevention of avoidable pressure injuries following a fracture malunion is important.

Age and beliefs about vaccines associated with COVID-19 vaccination among US Veterans.

This project surveyed Veterans' COVID-19 vaccination beliefs and status. 1,080 (30.8%) Veterans responded. Factors associated with being unvaccinated, identified using binomial logistic regression, included negative feelings about vaccines (OR = 3.88, 95%CI = 1.52, 9.90) and logistical difficulties such as finding transportation (OR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.01, 3.45). This highlights the need for education about and access to vaccination.

Antimicrobial stewardship strategy implementation and impact in acute care spinal cord injury and disorder units.

CONTEXT: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) are crucial to optimizing antibiotic use. ASPs are implemented in the Veterans Health Administration (VAs), but they do not target the needs of populations at high risk for resistant infections, such as spinal cord injury and disorder (SCI/D). OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess key ASP leader and SCI/D clinicians' perceived level of implementation and impact of 33 Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS) strategies. METHOD: SCI/D clinicians and ASP leaders across 24 VA facilities with SCI/D units were surveyed. Participants rated their perceived level of impact ("high", "mild", "low") and perceived level of implementation ("not", "partially", "fully") for 33 AS strategies in SCI/D units in VAs. Strategies were grouped into core elements which they support. We conducted a Fisher's exact test to assess differences between respondent perceptions based on role (SCI/D clinicians versus ASP leaders). RESULTS: AS strategy implementation varied across VA facilities. Of the AS strategies, pre-authorization was perceived to be highly impactful (78%) and fully implemented (82%). SCI/D clinicians and ASP leaders rated AS strategies differently such that SCI/D clinicians were less aware of implementation of AS strategies related to reporting requirements; further, SCI/D clinicians rated strategies which guide treatment duration and which limit C. difficile antibiotic exposure as more impactful than ASP leaders. Ratings for facility-wide and SCI/D unit ratings did not significantly differ for impact or implementation. CONCLUSION: Implementation practices varied across VA facilities. Future work should implement highly impactful AS strategies according to facility and unit needs.

Differences in perceptions and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination between vaccine hesitant and non-hesitant persons.

Acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccination becomes more critical as new variants continue to evolve and the United States (US) attempts to move from pandemic response to management and control. COVID-19 stands out in the unique way it has polarized patients and generated sustained vaccine hesitancy over time. We sought to understand differences in perceptions and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination between vaccine hesitant and non-hesitant patients, with the goal of informing communication and implementation strategies to increase uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in Veteran and non-Veteran communities. This qualitative study used interview data from focus groups conducted by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the University of Utah; all focus groups were conducted using the same script March-July 2021. Groups included forty-six United States Veterans receiving care at 28 VA facilities across the country and 166 non-Veterans across Utah for a total of 36 one-hour focus groups. We identified perceptions and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination through qualitative analysis of focus group participant remarks, grouping connections with identified themes within domains developed based on the questions asked in the focus group guide. Responses suggest participant attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine were shaped primarily by vaccine attitude changes over time, impacted by perceived vaccine benefits, risks, differing sources of vaccine information and political ideology. Veterans appeared more polarized, being either largely non-hesitant, or hesitant, whereas non-Veterans had a wider range of hesitancy, with more participants identifying minor doubts and concerns about receiving the vaccine, or simply being altogether unsure about receiving it. Development of COVID-19 vaccine communication strategies in Veteran and non-Veteran communities should anticipate incongruous sources of information and explicitly target community differences in perceptions of risks and benefits associated with the vaccine to generate candid discussions and repair individuals' trust. We believe this could accelerate vaccine acceptance over time.

Predictors of lower extremity fracture-related amputation in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: a case-control study.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of lower extremity (LE) long bone fracture-related amputation in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). SETTING: US Veterans Health Administration facilities (2005-2015). METHODS: Fracture-amputation sets in Veterans with tSCI were considered for inclusion if medical coding indicated a LE amputation within 365 days following an incident LE fracture. The authors adjudicated each fracture-amputation set by electronic health record review. Controls with incident LE fracture and no subsequent amputation were matched 1:1 with fracture-amputation sets on site and date of fracture (±30 days). Multivariable conditional logistic regression determined odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for potential predictors (motor-complete injury; diabetes mellitus (DM); peripheral vascular disease (PVD); smoking; primary (within 30 days) nonsurgical fracture management; pressure injury and/or infection), controlling for age and race. RESULTS: Forty fracture-amputation sets from 37 Veterans with LE amputations and 40 unique controls were identified. DM (OR = 26; 95% CI, 1.7-382), PVD (OR = 30; 95% CI, 2.5-371), and primary nonsurgical management (OR = 40; 95% CI, 1.5-1,116) were independent predictors of LE fracture-related amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Early and aggressive strategies to prevent DM and PVD in tSCI are needed, as these comorbidities are associated with increased odds of LE fracture-related amputation. Nonsurgical fracture management increased the odds of LE amputation by at least 50%. Further large, prospective studies of fracture management in tSCI are needed to confirm our findings. Physicians and patients should consider the potential increased risk of amputation associated with non-operative management of LE fractures in shared decision making.

"Pathological" fractures in spinal cord injuries and disorders: Insight into International classification of diseases, ninth revision coding.

OBJECTIVE: Analyses of osteoporosis-related fractures in persons with Spinal Cord Injury or Disorder (SCID) using administrative data often exclude pathological fractures (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 733.1x). We examined how often lower extremity "pathological" fractures were secondary to osteoporosis. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study, fiscal years 2005-2015. SETTING: Veterans Health Administration. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans with SCID and an ICD-9 code for lower extremity fracture. OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and SCID-related characteristics were compared in pathological and non-pathological fractures. A subset of Veterans with lower extremity fracture had data on fracture etiology from prior electronic health record (eHR) review. Of these, all with eHR-confirmed pathological fractures were considered cases. For each case, four unmatched controls with non-pathological fractures from this subset were randomly selected. Fracture etiology was compared between subsample cases and controls. We sought expert opinion from specialists who care for these fractures to understand their perspectives on what constitutes a pathological fracture and narrate our findings. RESULTS: 6,397 Veterans sustained 16,279 lower extremity fractures, including 314 (1.93%) pathological fractures in 264 Veterans. Ten of 13 (76.9%) cases of pathological fracture (76.9%) and 82.4% of non-pathological fractures were secondary to osteoporosis. Of the 19 experts surveyed, only two coded osteoporotic fractures as pathological. CONCLUSION: Most pathological lower extremity fractures by ICD-9 codes in SCID are secondary to osteoporosis. Pathological fractures can be considered for inclusion in epidemiologic studies of osteoporosis in SCID when the risk-benefit profile for the study favors capturing all osteoporotic fractures at the expense of some misclassification.

Nephrology-Palliative Care Collaboration to Promote Outpatient Hemodialysis Goals of Care Conversations.

Background: Goals of care conversations and corresponding life-sustaining treatment (LST) progress notes were completed for only one-fourth of patients on outpatient dialysis despite hospital-wide training with nephrologists at the Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to increase completion of LST progress notes and corresponding orders among patients on dialysis through an interdisciplinary nephrology-palliative care collaboration. Observations: The nephrology and palliative care departments began an interdisciplinary collaboration for nephrology to consult palliative care to initiate goals of care conversations and complete LST progress notes with patients on dialysis. A coordinated workflow process was created that included multidisciplinary efforts for patient selection, patient education, and introduction and completion of goals of care conversations for patients on dialysis. Completion rates for LST notes increased from 27% to 81% following the 13-month intervention, with 69 of 85 patients having a documented LST progress note. Conclusions: A collaboration between nephrology and palliative care increased high-quality LST progress note completion. The next steps include expanding these collaborations at other dialysis units and evaluating the impact on patient outcomes.

Risk Factors and Consequences of Lower Extremity Fracture Nonunions in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury.

We used Veterans Health Administration (VHA) national administrative data files to identify a cohort (fiscal years 2005-2014) of veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCID) to determine risk factors for and consequences of lower extremity fracture nonunions. Odds ratios (OR) for fracture nonunion were computed using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. We identified three risk factors for nonunion: (i) older age (OR = 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-4.33), (ii) longer duration of SCID (OR = 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04), and (iii) fracture site (distal femur), with OR (comparison distal femur) including distal tibia/fibula (OR = 0.14; 95% CI 0.09-0.24), proximal tibia/fibula (OR = 0.19; 95% CI 0.09-0.38), proximal femur (OR = 0.10; 95% CI 0.04-0.21), and hip (OR = 0.13; 95% CI 0.07-0.26). Nonunions resulted in multiple complications, with upwards of 1/3 developing a pressure injury, 13% osteomyelitis, and almost 25% requiring a subsequent amputation. Our data have identified a high-risk population for fracture nonunion of older veterans with a long duration of SCID who sustain a distal femur fracture. In view of the serious complications of these nonunions, targeted interventions in these high-risk individuals who have any signs of delayed union should be considered. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Physical and occupational therapist rehabilitation of lower extremity fractures in veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: The risk of lower extremity (LE) fractures in persons with spinal cord injury or disorders (SCI/D) is double that of the able-bodied population. LE fractures are the most common fracture location in SCI/D. Physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) play an important role in rehabilitating LE fractures in Veterans with SCI/D. This paper describes their role in assisting persons with SCI/D and LE fractures to return to previous function and levels of participation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone. Setting: VA SCI centers. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of therapists (PTs and OTs) experienced in LE fracture rehabilitation in SCI/D Interventions: NA. OUTCOME MEASURES: Coding of responses used a data-driven thematic and deductive approach, dictated by a semi-structured interview guide addressing the entire treatment process. RESULTS: Participants strongly advocated for early PT/OT involvement in post-fracture rehabilitation in order to recommend braces and devices to minimize skin breakdown, and needs for patient equipment, skills training and/or caregiver assistance resulting from post-fracture mobility changes. Seating specialists should be involved in post-fracture seating assessments in wheelchair users to address changes in alignment, deformities, limb length discrepancies and/or seating posture during and following fracture management. CONCLUSION: PTs and OTs are critical in rehabilitating LE fractures in persons with SCI/D and LE fractures, bringing expertise in patient function, ambulatory status, transfer strategies, mobility equipment, spasticity, lifestyle, and home and caregiver support. Involving them early in the rehabilitation process, along with orthopedic surgeons, physiatrists and other SCI clinicians can address the multiple and often unique issues that occur in managing fractures in this population.

Lower extremity fracture prevention and management in persons with spinal cord injuries and disorders: The patient perspective.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To describe patient experiences with fracture prevention and management among persons with spinal cord injuries/disorders (SCI/D). DESIGN: Qualitative data collected via semi-structured telephone interviews. SETTING: Veterans Health Administration (VA) SCI/D System of Care. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans with SCI/D (n = 32) who had experienced at least one lower-extremity fracture in the prior 18 months. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. OUTCOME MEASURES: Interview questions addressed patients': pre-fracture knowledge of osteoporosis and bone health, diagnosis and management of osteoporosis, history and experiences with fracture treatment, and post-fracture care and experiences. RESULTS: Participants expressed concerns about bone health and fractures in particular, which for some, limited activities and participation. Participants recalled receiving little information from providers about bone health or osteoporosis and described little knowledge about osteoporosis prevention prior to their fracture. Few participants reported medication management for osteoporosis, however many reported receiving radiographs/scans to confirm a fracture and most reported being managed non-operatively. Some reported preference for surgical treatment and believed their outcomes would have been better had their fracture been managed differently. Many reported not feeling fully included in treatment decision-making. Some described decreased function, independence and/or participation post-fracture. CONCLUSION(S): Our results indicate that persons with SCI/D report lacking substantive knowledge about bone health and/or fracture prevention, and following fracture, feel unable and/or hesitant to resume pre-fracture participation. In addition, our findings indicate that individuals with SCI/D may not feel as engaged as they would like to be in establishing fracture treatment plans. As such, persons with SCI/D may benefit from ongoing discussions with providers about risks and benefits of fracture treatment options and consideration of subsequent function and participation, to ensure patients preferences are considered.

Reasons for Initiation and Discontinuation of Pharmacological Therapies for Osteoporosis in Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Medications for osteoporosis have not been reported to reduce fracture rates in patients with spinal cord injury and disorders (SCI/D), yet these medications are still prescribed. Clinical decision-making underscoring the initiation and discontinuation of osteoporosis medications in SCI/D remains poorly understood. METHODOLOGY: Veterans with a SCI/D with at least one prescription for an osteoporosis medication (bisphosphonate, calcitonin, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide) who received healthcare within Veterans Affairs (VA) from 2005 to 2015 were identified using VA administrative databases. A 10% subsample of Veterans was selected for electronic health record review. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-seven Veterans with 330 prescriptions underwent electronic health record review. Bisphosphonates were the most frequently prescribed medication for osteoporosis (n = 223, 67.6%). Of the 187 Veterans with prescriptions for prevention or treatment of osteoporosis, the primary reason for initiation was Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan with osteopenia or osteoporosis (n = 119, 63.6% of Veterans), primarily at the hip (81.0% of DXAs). The majority (79.0%) of DXAs were "screening tests," with SCI/D being the sole reason for the scan. Fractures (n = 51, 27.3%) and fall risk concerns (n = 29, 15.5%) were other major reasons for initiation. On average, oral bisphosphonates were filled for <3 yr, with medication-related side effects (n = 23, 15.8% of bisphosphonates discontinued), predominately gastrointestinal (n = 17, 73.9% of reported side effects), the most common reason for discontinuation. Drug holidays occurred in 14.3% of 35 oral bisphosphonates used for ≥5 yr. No cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were found. There was one case of an atypical femoral fracture which could not be confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to initiate pharmacological therapies in SCI/D is primarily based on osteopenia or osteoporosis at the hip by screening DXAs. Gastrointestinal side effects are the major reason for discontinuation of oral bisphosphonates. New therapies for osteoporosis in SCI/D are needed.

Factors influencing providers' decisions on management of bone health in people with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Survey. OBJECTIVES: Managing osteoporosis in persons with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) is difficult as little evidence exists regarding effective strategies. We examined the effect of key factors on providers' bone health management decisions in persons with SCI. SETTING: USA. METHODS: Providers reviewed blocks of 9 hypothetical cases that varied on four factors: osteoporosis, osteopenia, or normal bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); DXA region of interest (lumbar spine, hip, knee), prior lower extremity fracture; and no or limited ambulation. They indicated how likely they would recommend pharmacological management, what treatment(s) they would recommend, and whether they would request another DXA before treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-two healthcare providers completed the survey. Treatment recommendations for bisphosphonates and Vitamin D/calcium supplements, respectively, were more likely if there was a prior fracture (OR: 2.65, 95%CI: 1.76-3.99, p < 0.0001; OR: 2.96, 95%CI: 1.40-6.26, p = 0.004) and if a DXA scan found osteopenia (OR: 2.23, 95%CI: 1.41-3.54, p = 0.001; OR: 6.56, 95%CI: 2.71-15.85, p < 0.0001) or osteoporosis (OR: 12.08, 95%CI: 7.09-20.57, p < 0.0001; OR: 4.54, 95%CI: 2.08-9.90, p < 0.0001). Another DXA scan was more likely to be requested if there was a prior fracture (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.10-2.78, p = 0.02) but less likely if the person was nonambulatory (OR: 0.41, 95%: 0.19-0.90, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Prior fracture and DXA findings influenced treatment recommendations for bone health management in SCI. Reliance on lumbar spine scans to determine bone loss and treatment identifies a knowledge gap for which future education is required.

Association of Bisphosphonate Therapy With Incident of Lower Extremity Fractures in Persons With Spinal Cord Injuries or Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between prescriptions for bisphosphonates; calcium and vitamin D supplements; and receipt of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening, and incident fracture risk in men and women with a spinal cord injury (SCI) or disorder (SCID). DESIGN: Propensity-matched case-control analyses. SETTING: United States Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7989 men and 849 women with an SCID included in VA administrative databases between October 1, 2005 and October 1, 2015 were identified (N=8838). Cases included 267 men and 59 women with a bisphosphonate prescription propensity matched with up to 4 controls. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident lower extremity fractures. RESULTS: There was no significant association between prescriptions for bisphosphonates and incident lower extremity fractures in men (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.77) or women (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.28-3.75). In men, similar null associations were seen among those who were adherent to bisphosphonate therapy (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.73-2.16), were concomitant users of vitamin D and calcium and a bisphosphonate (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.57-1.96), had more than 1 fracture on different dates during the study period (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-1.16) and in those who had undergone DXA testing prior to the date of the bisphosphonate prescription and incident fracture (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.69-2.32). CONCLUSIONS: In men with a traumatic SCI and women with a traumatic SCID, bisphosphonate therapies for osteoporosis do not appear to significantly affect fracture risk. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively demonstrate efficacy of bisphosphonates for fracture prevention in this population. There is a compelling need to identify new medications to prevent fractures in this high-risk population.

Spinal cord injury providers' perspectives on managing sublesional osteoporosis.

Objective: Persons with spinal cord injuries (SCI) experience rapid sublesional bone loss following injury (1, 3). Evidence on preventing/managing osteoporosis in SCI is lacking. This project examined how providers manage bone loss in SCI. Design: Telephone interviews with SCI providers. Setting: VA SCI centers and clinics. Participants: Veterans Administration SCI centers and clinics were categorized on their average number of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans (FY2014-2016). Twelve SCI providers from high and low DXA-ordering sites were interviewed. Questions included osteoporosis screening/diagnosis, prevention/treatment strategies, secondary causes of osteoporosis, and osteoporotic fracture complications. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Results: Providers described a lack of standardized guidelines for managing osteoporosis in SCI. They most often screened for osteoporosis using DXA when: (1) considering use of a new device or activity, (2) for patients with a history of fracture. Some providers assumed that non-ambulatory SCI patients already have osteoporosis so infrequently ordered DXAs. Assessment of secondary causes of osteoporosis was uncommon. Fracture prevention strategies identified included weight-bearing and engaging in activities like adaptive sports. Vitamin D and calcium were frequently prescribed as a result of deficiencies identified during lab testing. Providers seldom prescribed FDA-approved medications for osteoporosis. Post-fracture complications encountered included nonunion/malunion and compartment syndrome. Providers indicated that patients often experienced psychological stress, anxiety and depression following fractures. Conclusion: Providers described a lack of evidence for screening and management of patients with SCI and osteoporosis. Future efforts should include developing evidence-informed guidelines to aid providers in osteoporosis management.

Predicting osteoporosis medication receipt in Veterans with a spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To describe frequency and predictors of use of pharmacological therapies for osteoporosis in persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI).Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: United States Veterans Health Administration (VA) national databases.Participants: 11,048 persons with a traumatic SCI who received VA health care between Fiscal Years (FY) 2005-2015. Pharmacy data from VA's Corporate Data Warehouse were used to identify prescriptions for Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis including bisphosphonates, calcitonin, denosumab, raloxifene and teriparatide.Outcome Measures: Demographics, clinical and SCI-related characteristics, receipt of a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and prevalent lower extremity fractures were examined to determine factors related to receiving a pharmacological agent for osteoporosis.Results: 1,041 persons (9.4%) had a prescription for a pharmacological agent for osteoporosis; the majority (n = 964, 93.0%) were bisphosphonates. There was a significant decline in the number of these prescriptions from FY 2005 (13.0%) to FY 2015 (2.2%). In multivariable analysis, age (>50 years) (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.31-1.94); female sex (OR = 4.09, 95% CI 2.74-6.09); opioid (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.51) or corticosteroid (OR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.01-1.51) prescriptions; complete injury (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.53); receipt of a DXA scan (OR = 84.03, 95% CI 59.80-118.07) and prevalent fracture (OR = 5.43, 95% CI 4.13-7.15) were positive predictors. Black race (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.57) and obese BMI (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.76) were negative predictors.Conclusions: Prescriptions for osteoporosis medications for persons with a SCI declined in recent years. The strongest predictors for having filled these prescriptions were having had a DXA or a prevalent fracture.

Prevention and management of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in persons with a spinal cord injury or disorder: A systematic scoping review.

Objectives: The primary objective was to review the literature regarding methodologies to assess fracture risk, to prevent and treat osteoporosis and to manage osteoporotic fractures in SCI/D.Study Design: Scoping review.Settings/Participants: Human adult subjects with a SCI/D.Outcome measures: Strategies to identify persons with SCI/D at risk for osteoporotic fractures, nonpharmacological and pharmacological therapies for osteoporosis and management of appendicular fractures.Results: 226 articles were included in the scoping review. Risk of osteoporotic fractures in SCI is predicted by a combination of DXA-defined low BMD plus clinical and demographic characteristics. Screening for secondary causes of osteoporosis, in particular hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, vitamin D insufficiency and hypogonadism, should be considered. Current antiresorptive therapies for treatment of osteoporosis have limited efficacy. Use of surgery to treat fractures has increased and outcomes are good and comparable to conservative treatment in most cases. A common adverse event following fracture was delayed healing.Conclusions: Most of the research in this area is limited by small sample sizes, weak study designs, and significant variation in populations studied. Future research needs to address cohort definition and study design issues.

Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy.

Clusters of unvaccinated children are particularly susceptible to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable disease 1,2 . Existing messaging interventions demonstrate short-term success, but some may backfire and worsen vaccine hesitancy 3 . Values-based messages appeal to core morality, which influences the attitudes individuals then have on topics like vaccination 4-7 . We must understand how underlying morals, not just attitudes, differ by hesitancy type to develop interventions that work with individual values. Here, we show in two correlational studies that harm and fairness foundations are not significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy, but purity and liberty foundations are. We found that medium-hesitancy parents were twice as likely as low-hesitancy parents to highly emphasize purity (adjusted odds ratio: 2.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-3.40). High-hesitancy respondents were twice as likely to strongly emphasize purity (adjusted odds ratio: 2.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.39-3.31) and liberty (adjusted odds ratio: 2.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-3.21). Our results demonstrate that endorsement of harm and fairness-ideas often emphasized in traditional vaccine-focused messages-are not predictive of vaccine hesitancy. This, combined with significant associations of purity and liberty with hesitancy, indicates a need for inclusion of broader themes in vaccine discussions. These findings have the potential for application to other health decisions and communications as well.

A flexible influence of affective feelings on creative and analytic performance.

Considerable research shows that positive affect improves performance on creative tasks and negative affect improves performance on analytic tasks. The present research entertained the idea that affective feelings have flexible, rather than fixed, effects on cognitive performance. Consistent with the idea that positive and negative affect signal the value of accessible processing inclinations, the influence of affective feelings on performance on analytic or creative tasks was found to be flexibly responsive to the relative accessibility of different styles of processing (i.e., heuristic vs. systematic, global vs. local). When a global processing orientation was accessible happy participants generated more creative uses for a brick (Experiment 1), successfully solved more remote associates and insight problems (Experiment 2) and displayed broader categorization (Experiment 3) than those in sad moods. When a local processing orientation was accessible this pattern reversed. When a heuristic processing style was accessible happy participants were more likely to commit the conjunction fallacy (Experiment 3) and showed less pronounced anchoring effects (Experiment 4) than sad participants. When a systematic processing style was accessible this pattern reversed. Implications of these results for relevant affect-cognition models are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record