Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 122(11): 1902-1908, 2018 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30442225

RESUMEN

Vasoplegia following cardiac transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have not accounted for primary graft dysfunction (PGD). The definition of vasoplegia is based on pressor requirement at 48 hours, many PGD parameters may have normalized after the initial 24 hours on inotropes. We surmised that the purported negative effects of vasoplegia following transplantation may in part be driven by PGD. We reviewed 240 consecutive adult cardiac transplants at our center between 2012 and 2016. The severity of vasoplegia was evaluated as a risk factor for 1-year survival, and the analysis was repeated for the subgroup of 177 patients who did not develop PGD. Overall, 63 (26%) of patients developed mild, moderate, or severe PGD. In those without PGD, vasoplegia was associated with length of stay but not with short- or long-term mortality. Moderate and/or severe vasoplegia occurred in 35 (15%) patients and was associated with higher short-term mortality, length of stay, and PGD. Multivariate logistic regression identified body mass index ≥35 kg/m2, left ventricular assist device before transplantation, and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as joint risk factors for vasoplegia. In patients without PGD, only left ventricular assist device before transplantation was associated with vasoplegia. In conclusion, our results show that, in the sizeable subgroup of patients with no signs of PGD, vasoplegia had a much more modest impact on post-transplant morbidity and no significant effect on 1- and 3-year survival. This suggests that PGD may be a confounder when assessing vasoplegia as a risk factor for adverse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Vasoplejía/etiología , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Texas/epidemiología , Vasoplejía/mortalidad
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 7(11)2018 05 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29773577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vasoplegia is associated with adverse outcomes following cardiac surgery; however, its impact following left ventricular assist device implantation is largely unexplored. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 252 consecutive patients receiving a left ventricular assist device, vasoplegia was defined as the occurrence of normal cardiac function and index but with the need for intravenous vasopressors within 48 hours following surgery for >24 hours to maintain a mean arterial pressure >70 mm Hg. We further categorized vasoplegia as none; mild, requiring 1 vasopressor (vasopressin, norepinephrine, or high-dose epinephrine [>5 µg/min]); or moderate to severe, requiring ≥2 vasopressors. Predictors of vasoplegia severity were determined using a cumulative logit (ordinal logistic regression) model, and 1-year mortality was evaluated using competing-risks survival analysis. In total, 67 (26.6%) patients developed mild vasoplegia and 57 (22.6%) developed moderate to severe vasoplegia. The multivariable model for vasoplegia severity utilized preoperative Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile, central venous pressure, systolic blood pressure, and intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass time, which yielded an area under the curve of 0.76. Although no significant differences were noted in stroke or pump thrombosis rates (P=0.87 and P=0.66, respectively), respiratory failure and major bleeding increased with vasoplegia severity (P<0.01). Those with moderate to severe vasoplegia had a significantly higher risk of mortality than those without vasoplegia (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-4.18; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Vasoplegia is predictive of unfavorable outcomes, including mortality. Risk factors for future research include preoperative INTERMACS profile, central venous pressure, systolic blood pressure, and intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass time.


Asunto(s)
Presión Arterial , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Vasoplejía/etiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Presión Arterial/efectos de los fármacos , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Presión Venosa Central , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Vasoplejía/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoplejía/mortalidad , Vasoplejía/fisiopatología
3.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 31(1): 61-63, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29686556

RESUMEN

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a multifactorial structural abnormality of the myocardial wall characterized by prominent trabeculae and deep trabecular recesses. LVNC may present as a congenital or acquired defect characterized by 2 distinct tissue layers: a spongy, noncompacted inner myocardium and a thin, compacted outer myocardium. Patients with LVNC are prone to thromboembolic events, either due to deep trabeculations in the noncompacted myocardium or due to arrhythmias accompanying the defect. There are sparse data concerning treatment options for patients with LVNC who fail medical management. We present 2 such patients with LVNC who, following failed medical management, received a left ventricular assist device (LVAD): one for long-term management and one as a bridge to transplant. Both were managed successfully without thromboembolic events to date. The success of these cases suggests that LVAD placement is a viable therapy in patients with LVNC as a bridge to transplant or as long-term management.

4.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 30(2): 226-227, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28405092

RESUMEN

Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients after cardiac transplant has not been well studied. Traditionally, patients have undergone corrective surgery. We report a 64-year-old man who presented with new heart failure symptoms 6 months after cardiac transplantation. He was found to have severe MR and underwent successful implantation of a MitraClip® with reduction of his MR to mild as well as improvement in his symptoms. Six months later he was still doing well, and a repeat echocardiogram showed good results. We found two previously reported cases using the MitraClip to treat severe MR in adult cardiac transplant patients. The MitraClip is a viable treatment option for MR in cardiac transplant patients despite their distorted anatomy.

5.
J Am Soc Hypertens ; 9(6): 420-426.e2, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26051923

RESUMEN

The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) is a questionnaire developed for screening of non-adherence in patients with several chronic conditions, including uncomplicated hypertension. However, its accuracy in predicting non-adherence in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (a-TRH) is not known. Accordingly, we performed a retrospective study in 47 patients with a-TRH who had completed the eight-item MMAS during the initial clinic visit. Non-adherence was defined as presence of undetected serum levels of at least one prescribed antihypertensive drug by therapeutic drug monitoring. We found that 26% of patients were considered to have low adherence score (<6), while the actual prevalence of non-adherence was 51% by therapeutic drug monitoring. Sensitivity of the MMAS-8 was 26% (95% confidence interval, 10.3%-48.4%) with specificity of 75% (95% confidence interval, 53.3%-90.2%). By multivariate analysis, the MMAS-8 score was not an independent predictor of non-adherence, while certain clinical parameters such as heart rate were found to be independent predictors of non-adherence. Our study suggested limited accuracy of the MMAS-8 in detecting medication non-adherence in a-TRH.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Área Bajo la Curva , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 17(9): 713-9, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25917401

RESUMEN

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is present in up to 20% of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). Investigation for PA in patients with TRH is recommended by current guidelines after medication nonadherence is excluded. Studies using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have shown that >50% of patients with TRH are nonadherent to their prescribed antihypertensive medications. However, the relationship between the prevalence of PA and medication adherence as confirmed by TDM has not been previously assessed. A retrospective analysis from a hypertension referral clinic showed that prevalence of PA in adherent patients with TRH by TDM was significantly higher than in nonadherent patients (28% vs 8%, P<.05). Furthermore, cost analysis showed that TDM-guided PA screening was $590.69 less expensive per patient, with minimal impact on the diagnostic accuracy. These data support a TDM-guided PA screening approach as a cost-saving strategy compared with routine PA screening for TRH.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas/economía , Hiperaldosteronismo/diagnóstico , Hiperaldosteronismo/economía , Hipertensión/sangre , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Aldosterona/sangre , Antihipertensivos/economía , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Hiperaldosteronismo/sangre , Hipertensión/economía , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Renina/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Case Rep Infect Dis ; 2013: 685346, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23984128

RESUMEN

We describe a rare case of Klebsiella pneumoniae renal abscess with metastatic spread leading to endopthalmitis, pulmonary cavitary lesions, and cerebral emboli in a 41-year-old Hispanic female with diabetes mellitus who presented with a four-to-five-day history of fevers, headache, eye pain, and vomiting. She was treated with IV antibiotics and made a gradual but full recovery.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA