[3D printing in the field of shoulder surgery]. / 3D-Druck im Bereich der Schulterchirurgie.

The 3D printing technology is a relatively new procedure with a high potential, especially in the field of shoulder surgery. The 3D printing procedures are increasingly being developed and also gaining new users. Principally, 3D printing procedures can be applied preoperatively in planning the surgical procedure, patient clarification and in teaching; however, the technology is increasing being used intraoperatively. In addition to intraoperative visualization of the models, 3D printing permits the use of individual and specific instruments and implants. This allows the precise transfer of the preoperative planning to the surgical procedure. Inaccuracies are mainly caused by soft tissues. The 3D printing can be beneficial in the fields of arthroplasty, shoulder instability as well as orthopedic trauma. The literature shows promising results in relation to duration of surgery, blood loss and clinical results of the procedure. On the other hand, it is still unclear which indications warrant the use of 3D printing. Other aspects that raise questions are the time of planning, the production time and the additional cost that the use of 3D printing entails. Nonetheless, 3D printing represents a meaningful enhancement of the portfolio of surgeons, which becomes highly beneficial and useful in complex situations. Furthermore, this procedure enables a certain amount of flexibility when reacting to certain circumstances.

[Injuries of the biceps-labrum complex : Principles, pathologies and treatment concepts]. / Verletzungen des Bizeps-Labrum-Komplexes : Grundlagen, Pathologien und Behandlungskonzepte.

BACKGROUND: The biceps-labrum complex is prone to acute lesions and degenerative changes due to its anatomical structure and the high load it has to endure. Pathological changes of these structures are common pain generators and can significantly impair shoulder function. Anatomically, the biceps-labrum complex can be divided into three zones: inside, junction and bicipital tunnel. DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE: Despite the focused physical examination and advancements in imaging techniques, the exact localization of pathologies remains challenging. Arthroscopy can be used to accurately diagnose inside and junctional pathologies but extra-articular changes in the region of the bicipital tunnel can only be partially visualized. TREATMENT: In cases of unsuccessful conservative treatment and correct indications, a high level of patient satisfaction can be surgically achieved. In young patients an anatomical reconstruction of inside lesions or tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon is performed; however, even tenotomy is a valuable option and can achieve equally satisfactory results. Unaddressed pathological changes of the bicipital tunnel can lead to persistence of pain. In clinical procedures performing tenodesis, both the different techniques and the implants used have been found to show similar results. This article describes the anatomical principles, pathological changes, the focused clinical instrumental diagnostics and discusses the different treatment philosophies as well as the outcome according to the recent literature.

[Proximal humeral fractures-Where do we stand today? : Comments on the "Proximal fracture of the humerus evaluation by randomization (PROFHER)" study]. / Die proximale Humerusfraktur ­ Wo stehen wir heute? : Ein Kommentar zur "Proximal fracture of the humerus evaluation by randomization (PROFHER)"-Studie.

The PROFHER study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 250 out of 1250 patients assessed for eligibility with dislocated proximal humeral fractures with involvement of the surgical neck. These patients were randomized either for surgery or conservative treatment. Patients with comorbidities that precluded surgery, lack of mental capacity, luxation fractures or clear indications for surgery from the authors' perspective were excluded. To evaluate the outcome, standardized self-assessment methods were used (patient reported outcome [PRO]), including the Oxford shoulder score (OSS). The results showed no differences in the primary and secondary self-assessment outcome scores after both 2 and 5 years. Although no significant differences could be detected between both groups, no clear statement could be deduced from the PROFHER study with respect to which patients would benefit from an operative treatment. Nevertheless, the PROFHER study provides a valuable and important addition to the literature on this heavily debated topic. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the PROFHER study within the existing literature regarding inclusion of patients, fracture treatment and evaluation of the results.

[Torsional malalignment of the humerus]. / Torsionsfehlstellungen am Humerus.

The torsion of the humerus describes the physiological rotation of the humerus around its longitudinal axis. Various clinical and radiological methods for measurement have been described. The computed tomography method is currently the gold standard. The angle between the humeral head axis and the transepicondylar axis is measured. This angle is called retroversion. Values of retroversion vary between 10° and 40°. For the treatment of many humeral pathologies, a precise reconstruction of the anatomical retroversion is required. The retroversion of the humerus has to be considered in shoulder arthroplasty, in fracture situations and also in planning correction of posttraumatic deformities. If an orientation to the original anatomical landmarks of the humerus is no longer possible, an orientation to the contralateral side is recommended.