Comparison of practical application steps of the previously used adrenaline auto injector in Turkey (EpiPen) and the currently available adrenaline auto injector (Penepin): a multi-center study.

AIM: It has been shown by a great number of studies that the correct use of adrenaline auto injectors prescribed to patients with anaphylaxis is associated with the design of the auto injector, in addition to training. The aim of this study was to compare the skills of adults in using two different auto injectors prescribed to patients with anaphylaxis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Parents of patients aged between 1 and 18 years who referred to allergy outpatients were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 630 volunteers from nine centers were included in the study. Four hundred fifty-seven (72.5%) of the participants were females and 235 (37.3%) were undergraduates. The rate of showing all the steps of auto injector trainers correctly by the participants was found as (60.2%) (n=379) for EpiPen and 42.9% (n=270) for Penepin (p<0.001). The most frequent mistake with both auto injector trainers was the step of "place appropriate injection tip into outer thigh/press the trigger so it clicks." When the preferences of the volunteers were asked after training and application, 527 (83.7%) chose EpiPen, stating that it was easier and simpler to use. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the correct usage rates of both adrenaline auto injectors were much lower than expected and there could be mistakes in the application of both. It could be appropriate to make improvements in the design of Penepin, which is still the only available adrenaline auto injector in Turkey, such that its application steps will be simpler and quicker.

LATCH scores and milk intake in preterm and term infants: a prospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to detect the breastmilk intake in preterm and term infants and to determine if the LATCH scoring system (latch; audible swallowing; type of nipple; comfort [breast/nipple]; hold [positioning]) could be helpful to denote that infants have taken enough breastmilk according to their postnatal age and weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six breastfeeding sessions were monitored and scored simultaneously by using the LATCH scoring system. The weight of the 66 infants (33 preterm, 33 term) was measured before and after a breastfeeding session, and thereby milk intake by breastfeeding was determined. The expected amount of milk volume that infants should receive for each feeding session was calculated according to the postnatal age and weight. The breastmilk intake by breastfeeding was compared with LATCH scores and the expected milk volume for each feeding. RESULTS: We observed that 25 term infants (75.8%) took 100% of the expected milk volume for each feeding session, compared with two preterm infants (2.1%) (p=0.009). The median LATCH scores were 7.0 (minimum-maximum=5-9) in preterm babies and 9 (minimum-maximum=7-10) in term babies (p<0.0001). Term babies could consume 95.4% of the expected milk volume for each feeding session, whereas this ratio was only 45% in preterm babies. In each group, babies receiving a score of ≥7 took at least 50% of the expected milk volume for each feeding session. In each group, higher LATCH scores were associated with higher median intake, but the minimum and maximum intake for each LATCH score revealed marked variability. CONCLUSIONS: High LATCH scores (7-10) may be helpful to determine that infants take at least 50% of the expected breastmilk volume for each feeding in both preterm and term infants. However, LATCH scores cannot substitute for test weights in premature infants because of variability in minimum and maximum milk intake per LATCH score.

Midstream clean-catch urine collection in newborns: a randomized controlled study.

UNLABELLED: We aimed to evaluate a recently defined technique based on bladder stimulation and paravertebral lumbar massage maneuvers in collecting a midstream clean-catch urine sample in newborns. A total of 127 term newborns were randomly assigned either to the experimental group or the control group. Twenty-five minutes after feeding, the genital and perineal areas of the babies were cleaned. The babies were held under the armpits with legs dangling. Bladder stimulation and lumbar paravertebral massage maneuvers were only applied to the babies in the experimental group. Success was defined as collection of a urine sample within 5 min of starting the stimulation maneuvers in the experimental group and of holding under the armpits in the control group. The success rate of urine collection was significantly higher in the experimental group (78%) than in the control group (33%; p < 0.001). The median time (interquartile range) for sample collection was 60 s (64.5 s) in the experimental group and 300 s (95 s) in the control group (p < 0.0001). Contamination rates were similar in both groups (p = 0.770). CONCLUSION: We suggest that bladder stimulation and lumbar paravertebral massage is a safe, quick, and effective way of collecting midstream clean-catch urine in newborns.