Four-Point Impedance: A Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing After Cochlear Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation allows for electroacoustic stimulation, which leads to better music appreciation, noise localization, and speech comprehension in noisy environments. Real-time intraoperative electrocochleography (rt-ECochG) monitoring has shown promise in improving residual hearing rates. Four-point impedance (4PI) is being explored as a potential biomarker in cochlear implantation that has been associated with fibrotic tissue response, hearing loss, and dizziness. In this study, we explore whether monitoring both rt-ECochG intraoperatively and postoperative 4PI improves predictions of the preservation of residual hearing. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Adults with residual acoustic hearing underwent cochlear implantation with intraoperative intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) monitoring. The surgeon responded to a drop in ECochG signal amplitude of greater than 30% by a standardized manipulation of the electrode with the aim of restoring the ECochG. At the end of the procedure, the ECochG signal was categorized as being maintained or having dropped more than 30%. 4PI was measured on 1 day, 1 week, and 1 and 3 months after cochlear implantation. Residual hearing was measured by routine pure-tone audiogram at 3 months postoperatively. The ECochG category and 4PI impedance values were entered as factors in a multiple linear regression predicting the protection of residual hearing. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were recruited. Rt-ECochG significantly predicted residual hearing at 3 months (t test; mean difference, 37.7%; p = 0.002). Inclusion of both 1-day or 3-month 4PI in a multiple linear regression with rt-ECochG markedly improved upon correlations with residual hearing compared with the rt-ECochG-only model (rt-ECochG and 1-d 4PI model, R2 = 0.67; rt-ECochG and 3-mo 4PI model, R2 = 0.72; rt-ECochG-only model, R2 = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Both rt-ECochG and 4PI predict preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. These findings suggest that the biological response of the cochlea to implantation, as reflected in 4PI, is an important determinant of residual hearing, independent of the acute effects on hearing during implant surgery seen with rt-ECochG. We speculate that 4PI relates to inflammation 1 day after implantation and fibrosis at 3 months.

Intra-cochlear Flushing Reduces Tissue Response to Cochlear Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative trauma leading to bleeding during cochlear implantation negatively impacts residual hearing of cochlear implant recipients. There are no clinical protocols for the removal of blood during implantation, to reduce the consequential effects such as inflammation and fibrosis which adversely affect cochlear health and residual hearing. This preclinical study investigated the implementation of an intra-cochlear flushing protocol for the removal of blood. METHODS: Three groups of guinea pigs were studied for 28 days after cochlear implantation; cochlear implant-only (control group); cochlear implant with blood injected into the cochlea (blood group); and cochlear implant, blood injection, and flushing of the blood from the cochlea intraoperatively (flush group). Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in addition to tissue response volumes were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS: After implantation, the blood group exhibited the highest ABR thresholds when compared to the control and flush group, particularly in the high frequencies. On the final day, the control and blood group had similar ABR thresholds across all frequencies tested, whereas the flush group had the lowest thresholds, significantly lower at 24 kHz than the blood and control group. Analysis of the tissue response showed the flush group had significantly lower tissue responses in the basal half of the array when compared with the blood and control group. CONCLUSIONS: Flushing intra-cochlear blood during surgery resulted in better auditory function and reduced subsequent fibrosis in the basal region of the cochlea. This finding prompts the implementation of a flushing protocol in clinical cochlear implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:1410-1416, 2024.

Using Four-Point Impedance to Detect and Locate Blood during Cochlear Implantation.

Biosensing technologies are emerging as an important consideration when designing implantable medical devices. For cochlear implants, biosensors may help preserve the natural hearing a patient has prior to implantation by detecting blood in the cochlea during insertion. If blood enters the cochlea, it creates a hostile environment leading to further hearing loss and reduced device function. Here we present four-point impedance, measured directly from a commercial cochlear implant, as a biosensor for real-time detection of blood in the cochlea. The four-point impedance of different concentrations of whole blood in saline were measured using the impedance-measuring capabilities of a cochlear implant with a square-wave stimulation. Impedance derived from a cochlear implant succeeded in differentiating concentrations of blood in saline with results from a sensitivity analysis showing the lowest concentration the system could detect was between 12 % to 21 % of whole blood. In a subsequent in-vitro study, continuous four-point impedance was measured from a cochlear implant while it was inserted into a 3D printed cochlear model, followed by an injection of blood to emulate surgical events. These results demonstrated four-point impedance from a cochlear implant can instantaneously detect the addition of blood within the cochlea and localize it along the electrode array. The adaptation of a biosensing tool using a cochlear implant provides more information that can be relayed to the surgeon intraoperatively to potentially enhance hearing outcomes with the implant.Clinical Relevance - Using the cochlear implant itself to detect intra-cochlear bleeding may open therapeutic avenues to prevent further hearing loss.

Four-Point Impedance and Utricular Dysfunction Is Associated with Postoperative Dizziness after Cochlear Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Postimplantation dizziness is common, affecting approximately 50% of patients. Theories for dizziness include utricular inflammation, endolymphatic hydrops, and loss of perilymph. Four-point impedance (4PI) is a novel impedance measurement in cochlear implantation that shows potential to predict hearing loss, inflammation, and fibrotic tissue response. Here, we associate 4PI with dizziness after implantation and explore the link with utricular function. METHODS: Subjective visual vertical (SVV) as a measure of utricular function was recorded preoperatively as a baseline. 4PI was measured immediately postinsertion. Ongoing follow-up was performed at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month, postoperatively. At each follow-up, 4PI, SVV, and the patients' subjective experience of dizziness were assessed. DISCUSSION: Thirty-eight adults were recruited. One-day 4PI was significantly higher in patients dizzy within the next week (254 Ω vs 171 Ω, p = 0.015). The optimum threshold on receiver operating characteristic curve was 190 Ω, above which patients had 10 times greater odds of developing dizziness (Fisher exact test, OR = 9.95, p = 0.0092). This suggests that 4PI varies with changes in the intracochlear environment resulting in dizziness, such as inflammation or hydrops. SVV significantly deviated away from the operated ear at 1 day (fixed effect estimate = 2.6°, p ≤ 0.0001) and 1 week (fixed effect estimate 2.7°, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: One-day 4PI is a potentially useful marker for detecting postoperative dizziness after cochlear implantation. Of the current theories for postoperative dizziness, inflammation might explain the findings seen here, as would changes in hydrostatic pressure. Future research should focus on detecting and exploring these labyrinthine changes in further detail.

Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: Different patterns of electrocochleographic responses along the electrode array after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array have been described. However, the implications of these patterns remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of the study was to correlate different peri- and postoperative electrocochleographic patterns with four-point impedance measurements and preservation of residual hearing. DESIGN: Thirty-nine subjects with residual low-frequency hearing which were implanted with a slim-straight electrode array could prospectively be included. Intracochlear electrocochleographic recordings and four-point impedance measurements along the 22 electrodes of the array (EL, most apical EL22) were conducted immediately after complete insertion and 3 months after surgery. Hearing preservation was assessed after 3 months. RESULTS: In perioperative electrocochleographic recordings, 22 subjects (56%) showed the largest amplitude around the tip of the electrode array (apical-peak, AP, EL20 or EL22), whereas 17 subjects (44%) exhibited a maximum amplitude in more basal regions (mid-peak, MP, EL18 or lower). At 3 months, in six subjects with an AP pattern perioperatively, the location of the largest electrocochleographic response had shifted basally (apical-to-mid-peak, AP-MP). Latency was analyzed along the electrode array when this could be discerned. This was the case in 68 peri- and postoperative recordings (87% of all recordings, n = 78). The latency increased with increasing insertion depth in AP recordings (n = 38, median of EL with maximum latency shift = EL21). In MP recordings (n = 30), the maximum latency shift was detectable more basally (median EL12, p < 0.001). Four-point impedance measurements were available at both time points in 90% (n = 35) of all subjects. At the 3-month time point, recordings revealed lower impedances in the AP group (n = 15, mean = 222 Ω, SD = 63) than in the MP (n = 14, mean = 295 Ω, SD= 7 6) and AP-MP groups (n = 6, mean = 234 Ω, SD = 129; AP versus MP p = 0.026, AP versus AP-MP p = 0.023, MP versus AP-MP p > 0.999). The amplitudes of perioperative AP recordings showed a correlation with preoperative hearing thresholds ( r2 =0.351, p = 0.004). No such correlation was detectable in MP recordings ( r2 = 0.033, p = 0.484). Audiograms were available at both time points in 97% (n = 38) of all subjects. The mean postoperative hearing loss in the AP group was 13 dB (n = 16, SD = 9). A significantly larger hearing loss was detectable in the MP and AP-MP groups with 28 (n = 17, SD = 10) and 35 dB (n = 6, SD = 13), respectively (AP versus MP p = 0.002, AP versus AP-MP p = 0.002, MP versus AP-MP p = 0.926). CONCLUSION: MP and AP-MP response patterns of the electrocochleographic responses along the electrode array after cochlear implantation are correlated with higher four-point impedances and poorer postoperative hearing compared to AP response patterns. The higher impedances suggest that MP and AP-MP patterns are associated with increased intracochlear fibrosis.

Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.

OBJECTIVE: Monitor four-point impedance in cochlear implant recipients over time and determine if implant type, surgical approach, and electrode positioning affected impedance measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational. SETTING: Hospital. PATIENTS: Adult cochlear implant recipients implanted with a perimodiolar or lateral wall cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean values for four-point impedances were calculated for all electrode contacts at perioperative and 3 months after surgery. Linear mixed models were applied to the impedance data to compare between implant types and time points. The angular insertion depth and electrode position relative to the medial and lateral wall, commonly termed the Intracochlear Position Index (ICPI), were collected and compared with impedance measurements. RESULTS: Perioperatively, the four-point impedance was similar between implant types, with perimodiolar implants having marginally higher impedance values in the basal region. At 3 months after surgery, impedances significantly increased in the basal half of the electrode array for both implants, with higher impedance values for CI532 implants. There were no significant differences in insertion angle depth between implant types. The ICPI values for the seven most basal electrodes were similar for both implants; however, CI532 arrays were significantly more medially placed along the remaining apical portion of the array, which is expected. ICPI values did not correlate with impedance measurements for either implant. CONCLUSIONS: Four-point impedance increases at 3 months after surgery may reflect fibrous tissue formation after cochlear implantation. The higher impedance values in perimodiolar implants may reflect a more extensive fibrosis formation as a result of surgical approaches used, requiring drilling of the cochlea bone.

Four-point Impedance Changes in the Early Post-Operative Period After Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring four-point impedance changes after cochlear implantation with comparison to conventional impedance measurements. Four-point impedance provides information regarding the bulk biological environment surrounding the electrode array, which is not discernible with conventional impedances. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational. SETTING: Hospital. PATIENTS: Adult cochlear implant recipients with no measurable hearing before implantation and implanted with a perimodiolar cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean values for four-point and common ground impedances were calculated for all electrode contacts at intra-operative, 1 day, 1 week, 4 to 6 weeks, and 3 months post implantation. Linear mixed models were applied to the impedance data to compare between impedances and time points. Furthermore, patients were divided into groups dependent on the normalized change in four-point impedance from intra-operative to 1 day post-operative. The normalized change was then calculated for all other time points and compared across the two groups. RESULTS: Significant increases in four-point impedance occurred 1 day and 3 months after surgery, particularly in the basal half of the array. Four-point impedance at 1 day was highly predictive of four-point impedance at 3 months. Four-point impedance at the other time points showed marginal or no increases from intra-operative. Patients with an average increase higher than 10% in four-point impedance from intra-operative to 1 day, had significantly higher values at 3 months ( p = 0.012). These patterns were not observed in common ground impedance. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report increases in four-point impedance within 24 hours of cochlear implantation. The increases at 1 day and 3 months align with the natural timeline of an acute and chronic inflammatory responses.

Electrocochleography triggered intervention successfully preserves residual hearing during cochlear implantation: Results of a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Preservation of natural hearing during cochlear implantation is associated with improved speech outcomes, however more than half of implant recipients lose this hearing. Real-time electrophysiological monitoring of cochlear output during implantation, made possible by recording electrocochleography using the electrodes on the cochlear implant, has shown promise in predicting hearing preservation. Sudden drops in the amplitude of the cochlear microphonic (CM) have been shown to predict more severe hearing losses. Here, we report on a randomized clinical trial investigating whether immediate surgical intervention triggered by these drops can save residual hearing. METHODS: A single-blinded placebo-controlled trial of surgical intervention triggered when CM amplitude dropped by at least 30% of a prior maximum amplitude during cochlear implantation. Intraoperative electrocochleography was recorded in 60 adults implanted with Cochlear Ltd's Thin Straight Electrode, half randomly assigned to a control group and half to an interventional group. The surgical intervention was to withdraw the electrode in ½-mm steps to recover CM amplitude. The primary outcome was hearing preservation 3 months following implantation, with secondary outcomes of speech-in-noise reception thresholds by group or CM outcome, and depth of implantation. RESULTS: Sixty patients were recruited; neither pre-operative audiometry nor speech reception thresholds were significantly different between groups. Post-operatively, hearing preservation was significantly better in the interventional group. This was the case in absolute difference (median of 30 dB for control, 20 dB for interventional, χ² = 6.2, p = .013), as well as for relative difference (medians of 66% for the control, 31% for the interventional, χ² = 5.9, p = .015). Speech-in-noise reception thresholds were significantly better in patients with no CM drop at any point during insertion compared with patients with a CM drop; however, those with successfully recovered CMs after an initial drop were not significantly different (median gain required for speech reception score of 50% above noise of 6.9 dB for no drop, 8.6 for recovered CM, and 9.8 for CM drop, χ² = 6.8, p = .032). Angular insertion depth was not significantly different between control and interventional groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that surgical intervention in response to intraoperative hearing monitoring can save residual hearing during cochlear implantation.

A Vision-Based Machine Learning Method for Barrier Access Control Using Vehicle License Plate Authentication.

Automatic vehicle license plate recognition is an essential part of intelligent vehicle access control and monitoring systems. With the increasing number of vehicles, it is important that an effective real-time system for automated license plate recognition is developed. Computer vision techniques are typically used for this task. However, it remains a challenging problem, as both high accuracy and low processing time are required in such a system. Here, we propose a method for license plate recognition that seeks to find a balance between these two requirements. The proposed method consists of two stages: detection and recognition. In the detection stage, the image is processed so that a region of interest is identified. In the recognition stage, features are extracted from the region of interest using the histogram of oriented gradients method. These features are then used to train an artificial neural network to identify characters in the license plate. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves a high level of accuracy as well as low processing time when compared to existing methods, indicating that it is suitable for real-time applications.

Four-point impedance as a biomarker for bleeding during cochlear implantation.

Cochlear implantation has successfully restored the perception of hearing for nearly 200 thousand profoundly deaf adults and children. More recently, implant candidature has expanded to include those with considerable natural hearing which, when preserved, provides an improved hearing experience in noisy environments. But more than half of these patients lose this natural hearing soon after implantation. To reduce this burden, biosensing technologies are emerging that provide feedback on the quality of surgery. Here we report clinical findings on a new intra-operative measurement of electrical impedance (4-point impedance) which, when elevated, is associated with high rates of post-operative hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction. In vivo and in vitro data presented suggest that elevated 4-point impedance is likely due to the presence of blood within the cochlea rather than its geometry. Four-point impedance is a new marker for the detection of cochlear injury causing bleeding, that may be incorporated into intraoperative monitoring protocols during CI surgery.