Clinical spine care partnerships between high-income countries and low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Clinical collaboration between spine professionals in high-income countries (HICs) and low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) may provide improvements in the accessibility, efficacy, and safety of global spine care. Currently, the scope and effectiveness of these collaborations remain unclear. In this review, we describe the literature on the current state of these partnerships to provide a framework for exploring future best practices. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried for articles on spine-based clinical partnerships between HICs and LMICs published between 2000 and March 10, 2023. This search yielded 1528 total publications. After systematic screening, nineteen articles were included in the final review. RESULTS: All published partnerships involved direct clinical care and 13/19 included clinical training of local providers. Most of the published collaborations reviewed involved one of four major global outreach organizations with the majority of sites in Africa. Participants were primarily physicians and physicians-in-training. Only 5/19 studies reported needs assessments prior to starting their partnerships. Articles were split on evaluative focus, with some only evaluating clinical outcomes and some evaluating the nature of the partnership itself. CONCLUSIONS: Published studies on spine-focused clinical partnerships between HICs and LMICs remain scarce. Those that are published often do not report needs assessments and formal metrics to evaluate the efficacy of such partnerships. Toward improving the quality of spine care globally, we recommend an increase in the quality and quantity of published studies involving clinical collaborations between HICs and LICs, with careful attention to reporting early needs assessments and evaluation strategies.

Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography Quantitatively Assesses Tension Changes of Supraspinous/Interspinous Ligament Complex Under Varied Loads.

BACKGROUND: Although interspinous and supraspinous ligaments of the lumbar spine are thought to contribute to spinal stability, little is known about their dynamic biomechanics. We demonstrate that shear wave elastography (SWE) offers a novel technique to noninvasively and quantitatively evaluate posterior spinous ligament complex functional loading and stiffness in different physiologic positions. METHODS: We performed SWE and measured the length of the interspinous/supraspinous ligament complex in cadaveric torsos (N = 5), isolated ligaments (N = 10), and healthy volunteers (N = 9) to obtain length and shear wave velocity measurements. For cadavers and volunteers, SWE was utilized in 2 lumbar positions: lumbar spine flexion and extension. In addition, SWE was performed on isolated ligaments undergoing uniaxial tension to correlate shear wave velocities with experienced load. RESULTS: Average shear wave velocity in cadaveric supraspinous/interspinous ligament complexes increased for lumbar levels (23%-43%) and most thoracic levels (0%-50%). This corresponded to an average increase in interspinous distance from extension to flexion for the lumbar spine (19%-63%) and thoracic spine (3%-8%). Volunteer spines also demonstrated an average increase in shear wave velocity from extension to flexion for both the lumbar spine (195% at L2-L3 to 200% at L4-L5) and thoracic spine (31% at T10-T11). There was an average increase in interspinous distance from extension to flexion for the lumbar spine (93% at L2-L3 to 127% at L4-L5) and thoracic spine (11% at T10-T11). In isolated ligaments, there was a positive correlation between applied tensile load and average shear wave velocity. CONCLUSION: This study creates a foundation to apply SWE as a noninvasive tool for assessing the mechanical stiffness of posterior ligamentous structures and has potential applications in augmenting or evaluating these ligaments in patients with spine pathology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The interspinous and supraspinous ligaments are critical soft tissue supports of the posterior lumbar spine. Disruption of these structures is thought to have a negative impact on spinal stability in trauma and spine deformities.

Increase in surgeons performing outpatient anterior cervical spine surgery leads to a shift in case volumes over time.

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated an increase in the performance of outpatient anterior cervical surgery. The degree to which this increase is due to volume increase per individual surgeon versus increase in individual surgeons performing outpatient cervical surgery is unknown. Methods: Patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) between 2010 and 2018 in NY state were identified. As a comparison we also evaluated trends for inpatient ACDF and CDA. Annual outpatient case volumes were calculated and defined as being high (> 20/year), intermediate (>5 and ≤ 20/year) or low (>1 and ≤ 5/year). Descriptive statistics were used to report temporal trends and Poisson regression was used to test for statistical significance. We also analyzed trends in various operative metrics by surgeon volume. Results: In 2010, there were 96 surgeons who performed outpatient ACDF or CDA on a total of 1,855 patients. In 2018, this increased to 253 surgeons performing outpatient ACDF or CDA on a total of 3,372 patients. In comparison, there were 350 surgeons performing 6,783 inpatient cases in 2010 and 376 surgeons performing 6,796 inpatient cases in 2018. The average annual outpatient case volume decreased from 18.8 (95% CI, 13.5 - 24.1) to 12.2 (95% CI, 10.0 - 14.3) surgeries per surgeon. The percentage of surgeons with a high case volume also decreased from 30.2% in 2010 to 10.7% in 2018, whereas the percentage with a low case volume increased (32.3% to 49.8%). Differences between high and low volume surgeons in operative time, length of stay and total charges widened over time. Conclusion: The increase in outpatient anterior cervical surgery appears to be primarily driven by a greater number of surgeons performing ACDF and CDA on an outpatient basis, as opposed to increased case volumes for each surgeon. In contrast, trends for inpatient anterior cervical surgery were stable.