Gamma Knife radiosurgery for low-grade tectal gliomas.

BACKGROUND: Tectal gliomas are present in a critical location that makes their surgical treatment difficult. Stereotactic radiosurgery presents an attractive noninvasive treatment option. However, tectal gliomas are also commonly associated with aqueductal obstruction and consequently hydrocephalus. This necessitates some form of CSF diversion procedure before radiosurgery. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for tectal gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2002 and May 2011, 11 patients with tectal gliomas were treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Five patients had pilocytic astrocytomas and six nonpilocytic astrocytomas. Ten patients presented with hydrocephalus and underwent a CSF diversion procedure [7 V-P shunt and 3 endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV)]. The tumor volume ranged between 1.2-14.7 cc (median 4.5 cc). The prescription dose was 11-14 Gy (median 12 Gy). RESULTS: Patients were followed for a median of 40 months (13-114 months). Tumor control after radiosurgery was seen in all cases. In 6/11 cases, the tumors eventually disappeared after treatment. Peritumoral edema developed in 5/11 cases at an onset of 3-6 months after treatment. Transient tumor swelling was observed in four cases. Four patients developed cysts after treatment. One of these cases required aspiration and eventually disappeared, one became smaller spontaneously, and two remained stable. CONCLUSION: Gamma Knife radiosurgery is an effective and safe technique for treatment of tectal gliomas. Tumor shrinkage or disappearance after Gamma Knife radiosurgery may preclude the need for a shunt later on.

A planned combined stereotactic approach for cystic intracranial tumors. Report of two cases.

Cyst-associated tumors are classified as cysts with neoplastic mural nodules and intratumoral cysts. The solid component of many of these tumors may be appropriate for gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS). At present there is no systematic protocol for GKS treatment of patients harboring tumors with a cystic component. The purpose of this paper is to suggest such a program. Two cases are presented. One patient had a hemangioblastoma with a cyst and a mural nodule. The second patient had a craniopharyngioma with one large and two small intratumoral cysts. The course in both cases has been satisfactory in the short term. Although the 1-year follow-up period, however, does not provide a basis for determining the correct overall management of such tumors, the treatment strategy does illustrate a program for the management of tumors with associated cysts. Cysts with tumor nodules in their walls should first be treated with GKS followed by aspiration of the cyst contents, unless special circumstances make this unsuitable. This strategy enables treatment planning to take advantage of the natural barrier a cyst may place between a tumor and important surrounding structures. Intratumoral cysts may be aspirated and then treated with GKS, with every attempt made to cover the entire target volume including any residual cyst with the prescription dose. This form of treatment requires very careful follow up. It is probable that in some cases reaccumulation of cyst fluid may require the insertion of an Ommaya reservoir for repeated aspiration or the installation of cytotoxic agents such as bleomycin. This form of treatment is much less traumatic than surgery and does not hinder the performance of subsequent surgery, should this become necessary.