International Liver Transplantation Society Global Census: First Look at Pediatric Liver Transplantation Activity Around the World.

BACKGROUND: Over 16 000 children under the age of 15 died worldwide in 2017 because of liver disease. Pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) is currently the standard of care for these patients. The aim of this study is to describe global PLT activity and identify variations between regions. METHODS: A survey was conducted from May 2018 to August 2019 to determine the current state of PLT. Transplant centers were categorized into quintile categories according to the year they performed their first PLT. Countries were classified according to gross national income per capita. RESULTS: One hundred eight programs from 38 countries were included (68% response rate). 10 619 PLTs were performed within the last 5 y. High-income countries performed 4992 (46.4%) PLT, followed by upper-middle- (4704 [44·3%]) and lower-middle (993 [9·4%])-income countries. The most frequently used type of grafts worldwide are living donor grafts. A higher proportion of lower-middle-income countries (68·7%) performed ≥25 living donor liver transplants over the last 5 y compared to high-income countries (36%; P = 0.019). A greater proportion of programs from high-income countries have performed ≥25 whole liver transplants (52.4% versus 6.2%; P = 0.001) and ≥25 split/reduced liver transplants (53.2% versus 6.2%; P < 0.001) compared to lower-middle-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents, to our knowledge, the most geographically comprehensive report on PLT activity and a first step toward global collaboration and data sharing for the greater good of children with liver disease; it is imperative that these centers share the lead in PLT.

National Liver Allocation Policy-Consensus Document by the Liver Transplantation Society of India for a Nationally Uniform System of Allocation of Deceased Donor Liver Grafts.

Background: Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is increasing in India and now constitutes nearly one-third of all liver transplantation procedures performed in the country. There is currently no uniform national system of allocation of deceased donor livers. Methods: A national task force consisting of 19 clinicians involved in liver transplantation from across the country was constituted under the aegis of the Liver Transplantation Society of India to develop a consensus document addressing the above issues using a modified Delphi process of consensus development. Results: The National Liver Allocation Policy consensus document includes 46 statements covering all aspects of DDLT, including minimum listing criteria, listing for acute liver failure, DDLT wait-list management, system of prioritisation based on clinical urgency for adults and children, guidelines for allocation of paediatric organs and allocation priorities for liver grafts recovered from public sector hospitals. Conclusion: This document is the first step in the setting up of a nationally consistent policy of deceased donor liver allocation.

First Report of a Paediatric Collision Tumour in the Liver Recognised After Liver Transplantation: Blissful Ignorance Has Benefits!

Liver tumours are uncommon in the paediatric population, constituting 1-2 % of all paediatric tumours and 4% of all paediatric liver tumours. Hepatoblastoma followed by hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common tumours in this age group. Simultaneous development of two discrete liver tumours of distinct histologies (collision tumour) has been occasionally reported in adults but never in children. We hereby present the first reported case of hepatic collision tumours (hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma) in the explant liver of a child who underwent living donor liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease and severe hepatopulmonary syndrome. The manuscript describes the clinical, radiological and histopathological findings of this case and also highlights the dilemma associated with management of this case had the diagnosis been made in the preoperative setting and also about the proposed management plan for this case in the postoperative period.

Liver Transplant Society of India Guidelines for Liver Transplant During COVID-19 times.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected liver transplantation in many ways. There is risk of infection to the transplant recipients; and COVID-19 is associated with significant risk of mortality in patients on wait list. The Liver Transplant Society of India (LTSI) has prepared guidelines regarding selection of adult and pediatric patients for liver transplantation, transplant for acute liver failure, use of deceased donor organs, transplant techniques and minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, pre- and postsurgery testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related coronavirus disease 2019 in donors and recipients, role of COVID-19 antibody testing, shifting of recipients from COVID-19 to non-COVID-19 areas after recovery, isolation policy of team members exposed to COVID-19 patients, drug therapy of proven or suspected COVID-19 infection early posttransplant, care of SARS-CoV-2 positive donors and recipients and a separate COVID-19 consent for surgery.

Late-Onset Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Not Otherwise Specified in a Liver Transplant Recipient: A Rare Subtype of Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare complication seen in the period after liver transplant. The commonest subtype is B-cell PTLD which is usually associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. T-cell PTLD is rare and the association with EBV is again rarer. CASE: Our patient, a 21-year-old young adult, presented to us with generalized lymphadenopathy, 5 years after liver transplantation. The biopsy of the lymph node was suggestive of peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, which was associated with EBV infection. The Positron emission tomography and computerised tomography (PET-CT) scan showed stage 3 disease. He was treated with standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, and prednisolone chemotherapy and is currently in remission. CONCLUSION: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified is a rare subtype of PTLD and its association with EBV is even more rare. A few patients can achieve complete remission with standard chemotherapy.

Liver Transplantation Society of India Guidelines for the Management of Acute Liver Injury Secondary to Yellow Phosphorus-Containing Rodenticide Poisoning Using the Modified Delphi Technique of Consensus Development.

BACKGROUND: Acute liver failure caused by the ingestion of yellow phosphorus-containing rodenticide has been increasing in incidence over the last decade and is a common indication for emergency liver transplantation in Southern and Western India and other countries. Clear guidelines for its management are necessary, given its unpredictable course, potential for rapid deterioration and variation in clinical practice. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used for developing consensus guidelines under the aegis of the Liver Transplantation Society of India. A detailed review of the published literature was performed. Recommendations for three areas of clinical practice, assessment and initial management, intensive care unit (ICU) management and liver transplantation, were developed. RESULTS: The expert panel consisted of 16 clinicians, 3 nonclinical specialists and 5 senior advisory members from 11 centres. Thirty-one recommendations with regard to criteria for hospital admission and discharge, role of medical therapies, ICU management, evidence for extracorporeal therapies such as renal replacement therapy and therapeutic plasma exchange, early predictors of need for liver transplantation and perioperative care were developed based on published evidence and combined clinical experience. CONCLUSION: Development of these guidelines should help standardise care for patients with yellow phosphorus poisoning and identify areas for collaborative research.

Liver Transplantation for Rapidly Progressive Giant Hepatic Hemangioma With Diffuse Hemangiomatosis.

Cavernous hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors of the liver and are usually asymptomatic. On the other hand, giant hemangioma and diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis may become symptomatic by causing compression on adjacent structures, rupture, or consumptive coagulopathy. The coexistence of these 2 entities in an adult is extremely rare, and the literature, especially on their management, is sparse. We report the case of a young woman who developed a rapidly growing recurrent giant hemangioma and diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis with significant pressure effects, raising the suspicion of a malignant tumor. She had previously undergone a liver resection and an aborted attempt at liver transplant elsewhere. As a preoperative measure, with an aim to shrink the tumor, she underwent arterial embolization and chemotherapy. After this procedure, she underwent deceased donor liver transplant. Her postoperative period was uneventful, and she was well at her 6-month follow-up. We highlight the challenges involved and the need for a multidisciplinary approach in managing these lesions. Liver transplant is an excellent option for patients who develop life-threatening complications or poor quality of life due to these benign liver tumors.

Awareness and Concerns Among Adult Liver Transplant Recipients in the Current Pandemic Caused by Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19): Strategies to Safeguard a High-risk Population.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus is spreading rapidly, and there are obvious concerns for the immunocompromised patient population including transplant recipients. Creating awareness and understanding patient concerns will play an important role in protecting this vulnerable group in developing timely and appropriate healthcare interventions. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 23rd March 2020 and 1st April 2020 among 154 liver transplant recipients, transplanted between October 2018 and February 2020. An 18-point questionnaire explored their knowledge of COVID-19, awareness of recipient's high-risk status, interventions to minimize cross-infections, and concerns of this patient group regarding the pandemic. RESULTS: There were 112 (73%) respondents, with median age of 53 years (81% males). There was no difference in demographics between those who responded (n = 112) and those who did not respond to the survey (n = 42). Most of the recipients were aware of the main symptoms of COVID-19, such as fever (92%), breathlessness (86%), and dry cough (87%), but less than half were aware of diarrhea (39%) as a symptom. Awareness about spread from asymptomatic individuals was limited (26%). Majority (95%) understood their high-risk status, but worryingly, 23% of the respondents felt that there was no risk in visiting the hospital for routine clinic visit and blood tests. Concerns were raised by the recipients mostly regarding the uncertainties of COVID-19 infection and its treatment options, the quality of information on social messaging platforms, and lack of access to routine tests/immunosuppression levels because of lockdown/social distancing. CONCLUSIONS: Our liver transplant recipients have a reasonable awareness regarding COVID-19. Problems in accessing the healthcare system during prolonged periods of lockdown was a major concern. It is important for each transplant unit to educate, support, and remain accessible to this vulnerable patient cohort as the pandemic continues to progress worldwide.

Trinational Study Exploring the Early Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Organ Donation and Liver Transplantation at National and Unit Levels.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is stressing healthcare services to an unprecedented extent. There is anecdotal evidence of reduction in organ donation and transplantation activity across the world. METHODS: The weekly organ donation and liver transplant numbers over a 3-month period (Feb 17, 2020, till May 17, 2020) for the United States, United Kingdom, and India were compared with their previous year's activity. Liver transplant activity in 6 centers from these countries with varying local COVID-19 caseload was also compared. RESULTS: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant contraction in organ donation and liver transplantation in all 3 countries. Peak reduction ranged from 25% in the United States to over 80% in the United Kingdom and India. The reduction was different for deceased donor and living donor liver transplantation and varied between centers within a country. There was early evidence of recovery of deceased donation in the United States and United Kingdom and resumption of living donor liver transplantation activity in India toward the end of the study period. A number of policy changes were undertaken at national and transplant center levels to ensure safe transplantation despite significant redirection of resources to combat the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: There was a substantial reduction in organ donation and liver transplantation activity across the 3 countries with signs of recovery toward the end of the study period. Multiple factors including COVID-19 severity, stress on resources and influence of regulatory agencies and local factors are responsible for the reduction and recovery.

Live Liver Donors: Is Right Still Right?

BACKGROUND: Conventional wisdom dictates that a larger hepatectomy is more prone to complications. Consequently, with the donor safety as paramount, the transplant community has intuitively been proponents of left lobe donation in live donor liver transplantation (LDLT), thereby satisfying the tenet of double equipoise. More recently some data suggest that this may not always be the case, especially in established centres. Our aim was to compare right and left lobe donor outcomes in LDLT from a centre with cumulative experience. METHODS: Review of a prospectively collected database of right and left lobe liver donors operated between August 2009 and July 2017 was performed. Their preoperative demographics, operative and post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 904 liver transplantations, 458 were right lobe donors [379 without middle hepatic vein (MHV), 79 with MHV] and 58 left lobe donors. There was a significant difference in GRWR and functional liver remnant between the right and left lobe donors (1.27 ± 0.45 vs. 1.03 ± 0.28 p = 0.004, and 63.2 ± 7.9 vs. 37.7 ± 16.3, respectively, p value). The end portal pressure (7 vs. 8 mmHg p = <0.001), peak bilirubin (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 2.9 ± 1.5 p = <0.001) and day 5 bilirubin (0.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9 p = <0.001) were significantly higher in right lobe donors. There was no difference in blood loss, duration of surgery or peak lactate between the groups. Complications (20.7% vs. 25.9% p = 0.48), including serious complications (Clavien-Dindo > III) (6.9% vs. 8.1% p = 0.95), duration of ICU and hospital stay, were comparable between the groups. Subgroup analysis between left lobe and right lobe with and without MHV donor was also comparable. CONCLUSION: Though biochemical differences exist between the groups, no difference in outcomes was noted. Despite larger liver mass loss in right lobe donors, a strict protocol-based approach to donor selection leads to comparable outcomes between left lobe and right lobe donations.

Explant liver evaluation decodes the mystery of cryptogenic cirrhosis!

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To determine the concordance of liver explants with the pretransplant diagnosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 251 liver explants. Patient information included demography, comorbidity, and etiological diagnosis. Final diagnosis was based on morphological and histological findings. For non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cryptogenic cirrhosis, we investigated comorbid states such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Chi square test and Cohen's Kappa value were used. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients (76.5%) were males. A significant concordance of explant diagnosis with pretransplant diagnosis was present in 225 (89.6%) patients. It was 100% for alcohol-related disease, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, autoimmune (AI) liver disease, biliary cirrhosis, and Budd-Chiari syndrome. Of 37 patients with a pretransplant diagnosis of cryptogenic cirrhosis, major discordance was observed in 23 (62.1%). On explant, seven patients each had hemochromatosis 5 (13.5%), AI hepatitis, and NASH (18.9%); two had noncirrhotic fibrosis (5.4%); and one each had Wilson's disease and congenital hepatic fibrosis (2.7%). Of the 20 explants, 3 with pretransplant diagnosis of NASH had a diagnosis of cryptogenic cirrhosis on explant specimens. Cohen's Kappa for the concordance of pretransplant diagnosis and explant diagnosis in NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis patients was 0.75 and 0.47, respectively. An incidental hepatocellular carcinoma was picked up in 16 explants, and 18 had granulomas. CONCLUSION: Concordance between pretransplant and explant diagnosis is lower for NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis. The true prevalence of cryptogenic cirrhosis in our study was 5.6%.

Auxiliary Partial Orthotopic Liver Transplantation for Selected Noncirrhotic Metabolic Liver Disease.

Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) in selected noncirrhotic metabolic liver diseases (NCMLDs) is a viable alternative to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as it supplements the function of the native liver with the missing functional protein. APOLT for NCMLD is not universally accepted due to concerns of increased technical complications and longterm graft atrophy. Review of a prospectively collected database of all pediatric patients (age ≤16 years) who underwent liver transplantation for NCMLD from August 2009 up to June 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 underwent APOLT and group 2 underwent OLT. In total, 18 OLTs and 12 APOLTs were performed for NCMLDs during the study period. There was no significant difference in the age and weight of the recipients in both groups. All APOLT patients needed intraoperative portal flow modulation. Intraoperative peak and end of surgery lactate were significantly higher in the OLT group, and cold ischemia time was longer in the APOLT group. There were no differences in postoperative liver function tests apart from higher peak international normalized ratio in the OLT group. The incidence of postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and 1- and 5-year survivals were similar in both groups. In conclusion, we present the largest series of APOLT for NCMLD. APOLT is a safe and effective alternative to OLT and may even be better than OLT due to lesser physiological stress and the smoother postoperative period for selected patients with NCMLD.

Determinants of Medication Adherence in Liver Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to study the determinants of nonadherence to immunosuppressant drugs in liver transplant (LT) recipients using personalised interview and questionnaire methods. METHODS: The study was conducted on adult LT recipients (deceased donor liver transplant [DDLT] and living donor liver transplant [LDLT]) from the Indian subcontinent, at post-LT clinic visit between July and December 2016. Recipient details included baseline demography, comorbidity, psychological status, details of addiction, indication and type of transplant. Details on financial support for transplantation, admissions for rejection, infection and posttransplant complications were obtained from the hospital records. An adherence questionnaire was completed by direct interview and using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-seven LT recipients (56 males, median age 48.17 years) constituted the study group. Overall, 11 patients (16.47%) were nonadherent to treatment. LDLT recipients were more adherent than DDLT recipients. Nonadherent recipients were believers in alternative systems of medicine. Medication-related factors such as improper dosing, meagre drug knowledge difficulty in remembering drug dose and timings and economic constraints in continuing medical treatment were statistically significant in nonadherent recipients. Although variation in the tacrolimus levels were significantly more common in the nonadherent group, acute cellular rejection and infection were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of nonadherence was 16.5%. Determinants of nonadherence were DDLT, belief in alternative medications, high regimen complexity, poor knowledge about medications and cost issues with long-term medications.