Breast Cancer Litigation in the 21st Century.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of general surgeons practicing in the United States face a medical malpractice lawsuit each year. This study aimed to determine the reasons for litigation for breast cancer care during the past 17 years by reviewing a public legal database. METHODS: The LexisNexis legal database was queried using a comprehensive list of terms related to breast cancer, identifying all cases from 2000 to 2017. Data were abstracted, and descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: The study identified 264 cases of litigation pertaining to breast cancer care. Delay in breast cancer diagnosis was the most common reason for litigation (n = 156, 59.1%), followed by improperly performed procedures (n = 26, 9.8%). The medical specialties most frequently named in lawsuits as primary defendants were radiology (n = 76, 28.8%), general surgery (n = 74, 28%), and primary care (n = 52, 19.7%). The verdict favored the defendant in 145 cases (54.9%) and the plantiff in 60 cases (22.7%). In 59 cases (22.3%), a settlement was reached out of court. The median plaintiff verdict payouts ($1,485,000) were greater than the settlement payouts ($862,500) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Failure to diagnose breast cancer in a timely manner was the most common reason for litigation related to breast cancer care in the United States. General surgery was the second most common specialty named in the malpractice cases studied. Most cases were decided in favor of the defendant, but when the plaintiff received a payout, the amount often was substantial. Identifying the most common reasons for litigation may help decrease this rate and improve the patient experience.

Multicenter study of crystalloid boluses and transfusion in pediatric trauma-When to go to blood?

BACKGROUND: The 9th edition of Advanced Trauma Life Support recommends up to three crystalloid boluses in pediatric trauma patients with consideration of transfusion after the second bolus; however, this approach is debated. We aimed to determine if requirement of more than one fluid bolus predicts the need for transfusion. METHODS: The 2010 to 2016 highest tier activation patients younger than 15 years from two ACS Level I pediatric trauma centers were identified from prospectively maintained trauma databases. Those with a shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) greater than 0.9 were included. Crystalloid boluses (20 ± 10 mL/kg) and transfusions administered prehospital and within 12 hours of hospital arrival were determined. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine association between crystalloid volume and transfusion. RESULTS: Among 208 patients, the mean age was 5 ± 4 years (60% male), 91% sustained blunt injuries, and median (interquartile range) Injury Severity Score was 11 (6,25). Twenty-nine percent received one bolus, 17% received two, and 10% received at least three. Transfusion of any blood product occurred in 50 (24%) patients; mean (range) red blood cells was 23 (0-89) mL/kg, plasma 8 (0-69), and platelets 1 (0-18). The likelihood of transfusion increased logarithmically from 11% to 43% for those requiring 2 or more boluses (Fig. 1). This relationship persisted on multivariable analysis that adjusted for institution, age, and shock index with good discrimination (Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic, 0.84). Shock index was also strongly associated with transfusion. CONCLUSION: Almost half of pediatric trauma patients with elevated shock index require transfusion following two crystalloid boluses and the odds of requiring a transfusion plateau at this point in resuscitation. This supports consideration of blood with the second bolus in conjunction with shock index though prospective studies are needed to confirm this and its impact on outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.