RESUMEN
The catheterization of supra-aortic vessels during neuroendovascular interventions may be challenging in the setting of complex aortic arch anatomy. Evaluation of a new mechatronic controllable directional device in conjunction with different sheath and guide catheters to ease the cannulation of the supra-aortic vessels was conducted in the setting of a first-in-human clinical study. The evaluation assessment included access to the aortic arch, the technical success of the device in terms of time to target vessel, target vessel catheterization, adverse events, and clinical outcome. Ten subjects were enrolled at 1 site for treatment. Successful access, target vessel catheterization, and correct positioning of the catheter into the target vessel with the G60 device were achieved for all 10 procedures (7 from femoral access, 3 from radial access). One procedural complication, unrelated to the G60 device, was recorded during the investigation. The G60 is a polyvalent active device that facilitates guide catheter navigation in neuroendovascular interventions.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is the primary approach used to treat indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs). In this study, the authors evaluated the immediate and long-term efficacy and safety of different endovascular techniques for indirect CCFs. METHODS: The databases of two endovascular centers were retrospectively reviewed to collect the patients with indirect CCFs treated using endovascular techniques between 2013 and 2023. Demographics, clinical presentation, CCF features, EVT characteristics, and clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated and analyzed. The analysis was performed to compare the clinical and radiological data between different endovascular approaches and different embolic materials. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included in the study. EVT was successful in 95 patients (96.9%). Immediate complete obliteration of the CCF was achieved in 93.9% of patients, with 98% undergoing embolization with liquid embolic agents (LEAs) and 95.6% undergoing coiling alone. Complete CCF obliteration was higher in the transvenous than in the transarterial approach (94.3% vs 75%, p = 0.010). At ≥ 6 months follow-up, complete CCF obliteration was achieved in all patients (100%). The rate of procedure-related complications was higher following LEAs than with coiling alone (32.0% vs 15.6%). New cranial nerve (CN) palsy was diagnosed in 26.0% and 2.2% after embolization with LEAs and coiling alone, respectively (p = 0.001), with complete CN palsy recovery in 78.6%. Procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3 patients (3.1%). Two patients experienced an ischemic stroke following Onyx migration into the internal carotid artery. Ocular symptoms improved in 93% (83/89) of the patients who were followed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, complete obliteration of an indirect CCF was achieved in more than 90% of patients. Despite the occurrence of some new postprocedural ocular CN palsy, ocular symptoms improved in most patients in long-term follow-up. The transvenous approach was the most effective method for treating the indirect CCF. Coiling was safer than LEAs for the embolization of the indirect CCF.
Asunto(s)
Fístula del Seno Cavernoso de la Carótida , Embolización Terapéutica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Fístula del Seno Cavernoso de la Carótida/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula del Seno Cavernoso de la Carótida/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Parálisis/complicaciones , Parálisis/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The increase in life expectancy raises the question of the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in extremely old patients (>80 years). We present results in terms of occlusion and complications in both symptomatic and asymptomatic aneurysm. METHODS: All patients aged >80 years admitted to the Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild between January 1, 2005 and March, 2023 were included. Aneurysms were grouped as compressive and non-compressive. Procedural complications were grouped as symptomatic (i.e., leading to any temporary or permanent neurological deficit) and severe (defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3 at follow-up). RESULTS: Forty-two aneurysms were treated in the study period. Coiling (with or without remodeling) was the treatment of choice in 30 patients. Eighteen patients had compressive aneurysm. Six complications occurred (14.2%), all ischemic. The majority of complications occurred in symptomatic aneurysms, in 4 patients (66.6%). One of the patients treated by flow-diverter had severe complications (mRs ≥3) with hemiplegia. CONCLUSION: In extremely specific cases, treatment of unruptured aneurysm in people older than 80 years may be considered. Compressive aneurysm is associated with a high risk of complications. Treatments can be endovascular. Further prospective studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.