Needle Decompression Complicated by Cardiac Injury in a Prehospital Environment.

Needle decompression is a mainstay intervention for tension pneumothorax in trauma medicine. It is used in combat and prehospital medicine when definitive measures are often not available or ideal. It can temporarily relieve increased intrathoracic pressure and treat a collapsed lung or great vessel obstruction. However, when done incorrectly, it can result in underlying visceral organ and vessel trauma. This is a case of an adult male who presented to the emergency department after sustaining multiple stab wounds during an altercation. On arrival, the patient had a 14-gauge angiocatheter inserted at the 4th intercostal space (ICS), left of the parasternal line traversing the right ventricle and interventricular septum and terminating in the left ventricle. The case emphasizes the importance of understanding the landmarks of performing needle decompression in increasing the procedure's efficacy and reducing iatrogenic complications.

Defining digital surgery: a SAGES white paper.

BACKGROUND: Digital surgery is a new paradigm within the surgical innovation space that is rapidly advancing and encompasses multiple areas. METHODS: This white paper from the SAGES Digital Surgery Working Group outlines the scope of digital surgery, defines key terms, and analyzes the challenges and opportunities surrounding this disruptive technology. RESULTS: In its simplest form, digital surgery inserts a computer interface between surgeon and patient. We divide the digital surgery space into the following elements: advanced visualization, enhanced instrumentation, data capture, data analytics with artificial intelligence/machine learning, connectivity via telepresence, and robotic surgical platforms. We will define each area, describe specific terminology, review current advances as well as discuss limitations and opportunities for future growth. CONCLUSION: Digital Surgery will continue to evolve and has great potential to bring value to all levels of the healthcare system. The surgical community has an essential role in understanding, developing, and guiding this emerging field.

Initial report on special operations clinical training at a civilian academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Military-civilian partnerships for combat casualty care skills training have mostly focused on traditional, combat surgical team training. We sought to better understand US Special Forces (SF) Medics' training at West Virginia University in Morgantown, West Virginia, a Level 1 trauma center, via assessments of medical knowledge, clinical skills confidence, and technical performance. METHODS: Special Forces Medics were evaluated using posttraining medical knowledge tests, procedural skills confidence surveys (using a 5-point Likert scale), and technical skills assessments using fresh perfused cadavers in a simulated combat casualty care environment. Data from these tests, surveys, and assessments were analyzed for 18 consecutive SF medic rotations from the calendar years 2019 through 2021. RESULTS: A total of 108 SF Medics' tests, surveys, and assessments were reviewed. These SF Medics had an average of 5.3 years of active military service; however, deployed experience was minimal (73% never deployed). Review of knowledge testing demonstrated a slight increase in mean test score between the precourse (80% ± 14%; range, 50-100%) when compared with the postcourse (82% ± 14%; range, 50-100%). Skills confidence scores increased between courses, specifically within the point of injury care ( p = 0.09) and prolonged field care ( p < 0.001). Technical skills assessments included cricothyroidotomy, chest tube insertion, and tourniquet placement. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting military-civilian partnerships at an academic Level 1 trauma center to provide specialty training to SF Medics as demonstrated by increase in medical knowledge and confidence in procedural skills. Additional opportunities exist for the development technical skills assessments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Preoperative Weight Loss as a Predictor of Short and Midterm Postoperative Weight Loss in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Objective: To examine if preoperative weight loss correlates to postoperative weight loss 2 and 3 years after surgery. Methods: A review was conducted of bariatric surgery patients who underwent either gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy during 2015-2018 and had 3-year follow-up data. Demographic and outcome data were collected. A best-fit regression model for weight loss was constructed. Results: Eight hundred fifty-nine patients underwent surgery during the selected period, of which 199 patients (23%) were analyzed. Eighty-two percent of patients had gastric bypass and 82% were female. Preoperative percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was not significantly associated with 2- and 3-year postoperative %EWL (p = 0.18). Patients demonstrated significant weight regain at 3 years postoperatively versus 1 year (p < 0.01). Higher preoperative weight loss was associated with lower %EWL 3 years postoperatively versus 1 year (p = 0.04). Postoperative %EWL had a significant negative association with higher preoperative weight, diabetes, baseline use of a mobility device, and sleeve gastrectomy. Conclusions: In a cohort of bariatric surgery patients, there was no statistically significant association between preoperative and midterm postoperative %EWL. Postoperative %EWL was negatively associated with several patient-specific factors and increasing time since operation.

Emergency Laparoscopic Repair of an Iatrogenic Gastric Perforation in a Hiatal Hernia following a Failed Endoscopic Closure.

Iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation is a rare, life-threatening complication of endoscopic procedures, which requires either endoscopic or surgical repair. We report the account of an 82-year-old woman with an iatrogenic gastric perforation of a hiatal hernia secondary to an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure. Despite immediate recognition of the complication and endoscopic closure with through-the-scope (TTS) clips, the patient developed mediastinitis, peritonitis, and sepsis. She subsequently underwent an emergency laparoscopic hiatal hernia dissection and repair of the perforation with mediastinal and peritoneal washout. Given the patient's age and the degree of insult, subdiaphragmatic anchoring with abdominal drain placement was performed, and the hiatus was left open for additional drainage. The use of a side-viewing duodenoscope with the presence of a large hiatal hernia contributed to the risk of gastric perforation. We conclude that performing endoscopic procedures in patients with a known hiatal hernia should be carefully undertaken. If a perforation in such patients occurs, laparoscopic repair of such complications is feasible as demonstrated in this case video.

Selective nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds with isolated solid organ injury.

OBJECTIVE: To review selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of gunshot wound (GSW) patients with isolated abdominal solid organ injury. METHODS: Patients who sustained isolated solid organ injury secondary to GSW from 2003 to 2014 were studied. The use of SNOM over time was analyzed, and comparisons of initial SNOM and operative management (OM) groups were performed. RESULTS: Of 127 patients, 63 (50%) underwent SNOM. There were no significant differences between the early/late or SNOM/OM groups in demographics, physiologic presentation, or Injury Severity Score. SNOM increased from the early to late cohorts (31%-67%, p < 0.001), without any change in outcomes. SNOM patients had shorter hospital stays (5.8 vs. 10.0 days, p < 0.001), received fewer PRBCs (0.8 vs. 4 units, p < 0.001), and suffered fewer complications (13% vs. 28%, p < 0.05) than the OM group. CONCLUSION: An increase in SNOM vs. OM was associated with equivalent outcomes. Patients undergoing SNOM received fewer PRBCs and had shorter LOS.