Energy expenditure during nutritional rehabilitation: a scoping review to investigate hypermetabolism in individuals with anorexia nervosa.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain and nutritional rehabilitation are essential first steps to achieve medical stabilization in anorexia nervosa, and frequent resistance to weight gain requires patients to consume high kilocalorie loads. Adaptive hypometabolism is common when patients begin treatment, and rebound hypermetabolism is suspected to be a significant barrier to weight gain. The aim of this review was to summarize existing data describing metabolic changes in anorexia nervosa during weight restoration. The reported findings challenge current hypotheses of weight gain resistance and highlight key areas for future research. METHODS: Using scoping review guidelines, three databases were searched for studies investigating metabolic changes in anorexia nervosa before and after renourishment. Two reviewers systematically screened the titles and abstracts of 447 articles, and full-text versions of 106 studies were assessed for eligibility. A total of 36 studies were included for review. Data regarding the study description, sample population (including age, weight, BMI, duration of treatment, and caloric intake), and metabolic variable descriptions were extracted. RESULTS: Female patients with anorexia nervosa from studies across 13 countries were included. Across the studies, average BMI increased from 13.7 kg/m2 at admission to 17.57 kg/m2. Patients presented to treatment with clinically reduced energy expenditure levels. After varying levels of nutritional rehabilitation and weight restoration, measured energy expenditure increased significantly in 76% of the studies. Energy expenditure values at the second timepoint increased to the standard range for normal weight female teenagers and adults. Despite these increases, the studies do not indicate the presence of a hypermetabolic state during renourishment. Additionally, all studies including both measured and predicted energy expenditure reported that predicted energy expenditure overestimated measured values. CONCLUSION: This study provides a detailed evaluation of the literature investigating energy expenditure and metabolic rate in patients with anorexia nervosa before and following a period of renourishment. The findings from this review identify important gaps in the current beliefs of energy expenditure in anorexia nervosa and highlight a need for further exploration of metabolic alterations during weight restoration.

Nutritional rehabilitation and weight restoration are two primary goals of anorexia nervosa treatment that pose significant physiological and psychological challenges for patients. Patients often require high caloric loads to continue an adequate weight gain trajectory, but the underlying cause of weight gain resistance remains unknown. We completed a scoping review of research into energy expenditure and metabolic rate during treatment. Our search identified 447 relevant articles from academic databases, and 106 were deemed eligible after screening. We extracted data, including sample characteristics, kilocalorie intake, energy expenditure, and treatment information, from 36 studies. When individuals arrived for treatment, their energy expenditure was lower than that of individuals without an eating disorder due to the prolonged state of nutrient deprivation. After varying amounts of time and kilocalorie intake, most studies reported significant increases in energy expenditure. However, energy expenditure after a period of renourishment did not indicate an overactive metabolism (i.e., "hypermetabolism"). Funders should consider supporting exploration of additional factors that may be functioning as barriers to weight gain during treatment, in pursuit of making treatment more efficient and long-lasting. Additionally, future research describing metabolism in anorexia nervosa should provide more consistent methodologies, robust statical testing, and comprehensive reporting of dietary intake.

Intestinal energy harvest is associated with post-bariatric surgery weight loss.

Background/Objectives: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment for severe obesity; however, a significant subset of patients does not achieve expected weight loss or have substantial weight recurrence over time. The intestinal energy harvest is a potential determinant of varying weight loss outcomes, but with limited exploration. We assess the relationships between diet, intestinal energy harvest, and weight outcomes over 24 months in individuals who have undergone MBS. Subjects/Methods: Calorie absorption was assessed with bomb calorimetry and dietary questionnaires before and after MBS. Within a total of 67 patients, fecal energy density was measured in 67, 56, 60, 67, 44, 47 samples at 0, 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Multivariate regression was developed to identify potential weight loss predictors, and random forest algorithms were employed to forecast weight results based on intestinal energy harvest. Results: Intestinal energy harvest enhanced the predictability of patient weight loss outcomes with random forest models. A notable difference in relative fecal energy content was observed between patients experiencing optimal and sub-optimal weight loss (p<0.01). Prior to MBS, an increased energy content in feces (indicating less energy absorption) is associated with greater weight loss after the operation. Associations between diet and energy harvest were insignificant. Conclusion: MBS changes energy harvest capacity post-surgery. A higher relative fecal energy content (lower energy absorption) at one month correlates with better weight loss outcomes at 6M, 12M, 18M and 24M post-MBS. Findings may guide the development of diagnostic tools and treatment guidelines for patients at risk of suboptimal weight loss outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03065426).

Laxative Abuse Is Associated With a Depleted Gut Microbial Community Structure Among Women and Men With Binge-Eating Disorder or Bulimia Nervosa: The Binge Eating Genetics Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the associations of binge eating, compensatory behaviors, and dietary restraint with the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota among participants with binge-eating disorder or bulimia nervosa. METHODS: We analyzed data from 265 participants aged 18 to 45 years with current binge-eating disorder or bulimia nervosa enrolled in the Binge Eating Genetics Initiative study. We evaluated the associations of binge-eating frequency; presence/absence and frequency of vomiting, laxative use, and compulsive exercise; and dietary restraint with abundances of gut microbial genera, species, and diversity (Shannon diversity, Faith phylogenetic diversity, and Peilou's evenness) from 16S rRNA gene sequencing. General linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders, including age and current body mass index, were used to test associations; p values were corrected for the false discovery rate. RESULTS: The normalized abundance of four genus- and species-level gut microbes and three diversity indices were lower among Binge Eating Genetics Initiative participants who reported any laxative use compared with those who reported no laxative use. Vomiting frequency was positively associated with the normalized abundance of the genus Escherichia-Shigella , a potential pathobiont, although the association was attenuated to nonsignificance after adjustment for age, body mass index, and binge-eating episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Laxative use was highly and uniformly predictive of a reduced gut microbial diversity including potential commensals and pathobionts, and should be assessed and accounted for in all future studies of eating disorders and the gut microbiota. Future studies should collect data on specific medications-particularly laxatives-and dietary intake to obtain unbiased estimates of the effect of eating disorders on the gut microbiota and identify potential downstream clinical implications.Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04162574 .

Reproducible changes in the anorexia nervosa gut microbiota following inpatient therapy remain distinct from non-eating disorder controls.

The composition of the gut microbiota in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), and the ability of this microbial community to influence the host, remains uncertain. To achieve a broader understanding of the role of the intestinal microbiota in patients with AN, we collected fecal samples before and following clinical treatment at two geographically distinct eating disorder units (Center of Excellence for Eating Disorders [UNC-CH] and ACUTE Center for Eating Disorders [Denver Health]). Gut microbiotas were characterized in patients with AN, before and after inpatient treatment, and in non-eating disorder (non-ED) controls using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. The impact of inpatient treatment on the AN gut microbiota was remarkably consistent between eating disorder units. Although weight in patients with AN showed improvements, AN microbiotas post-treatment remained distinct from non-ED controls. Additionally, AN gut microbiotas prior to treatment exhibited more fermentation pathways and a lower ability to degrade carbohydrates than non-ED controls. As the intestinal microbiota can influence nutrient metabolism, our data highlight the complex microbial communities in patients with AN as an element needing further attention post inpatient treatment. Additionally, this study defines the effects of renourishment on the AN gut microbiota and serves as a platform to develop precision nutrition approaches to potentially mitigate impediments to recovery.

Comparison of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in the Assessment of Body Composition in Women with Anorexia Nervosa upon Admission and Discharge from an Inpatient Specialist Unit.

Assessment of body composition is fundamental in diagnosis and treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN). The gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is expensive and not universally available. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a non-invasive, inexpensive method relative to DXA. We compared DXA and BIA in the assessment of fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), and body fat percentage (BF%) in women with AN upon admission (ANT1) and discharge (ANT2) from an inpatient specialist unit with a referent healthy control (HC) group. The study population consisted of 31 ANT1, 25 ANT2, and 52 HC women with median age of 21 years. Body composition was measured by DXA and Tanita foot-to-foot BIA. Comparison between the two methods was done using Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, and linear regression. The mean difference (bias) in FM and BF% values obtained by DXA and BIA in ANT1 (FM: +1.01 kg, BF%: +2.26%) and ANT2 (FM: +1.49 kg, BF%: +1.66%) were comparable to HC (FM: -1.32 kg, BF%: -2.29%) although in opposite directions. Less bias was observed in FFM values in ANT1 (-0.46 kg) and ANT2 (-0.86 kg) than in HC (+2.03 kg); however, the limits of agreement between the two methods were wider in ANT1 and ANT2 than in HC for all measurements. No association was observed between age, percentage of total body water, and the time spent on the inpatient specialist unit with the difference in estimates of body composition between DXA and BIA. Comparison of DXA and BIA suggests that DXA should remain the gold standard for measuring body composition; the development of more specific BIA equations is required to improve validity and precision of BIA in patients with AN. Despite ease and cost in both BIA access and operation, the suitability of BIA in a low bodyweight eating disorders population remains questionable.

The intestinal microbiota and anorexia nervosa: cause or consequence of nutrient deprivation.

The intestinal microbiota is a diverse microbial community that colonizes the gastrointestinal tract of animals. Abnormal changes in intestinal microbiota has been associated with multiple diseases including inflammatory bowel diseases and obesity; however, emerging evidence suggests a role for the gut microbiota in anxiety and depression via the gut-brain axis. As this microbial community is associated with weight dysregulation and host behavior it is not surprising that the intestinal microbiota may have a role to play in anorexia nervosa (AN). In this review we examine recent studies linking the gut microbiota with nutrition, psychopathology, and ultimately AN. We also review potential gut microbiota-based therapies for AN.

Risedronate to Prevent Bone Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Study Design and Feasibility Report of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mounting evidence implicates bariatric surgery as a cause of increased skeletal fragility and fracture risk. Bisphosphonate therapy reduces osteoporotic fracture risk and may be effective in minimizing bone loss associated with bariatric surgery. The main objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT; Clinical Trial No. NCT03411902) was to determine the feasibility of recruiting, treating, and following 24 older patients who had undergone sleeve gastrectomy in a 6 month RCT examining the efficacy of 150-mg once-monthly risedronate (versus placebo) in the prevention of surgical weight-loss-associated bone loss. Feasibility was defined as: (i) >30% recruitment yield, (ii) >80% retention, (iii) >80% pills taken, (iv) <20% adverse events (AEs), and (v) >80% participant satisfaction. Study recruitment occurred over 17 months. Seventy participants were referred, with 24 randomized (34% yield) to risedronate (n = 11) or placebo (n = 13). Average age was 56 ± 7 years, 83% were female (63% postmenopausal), and 21% were black. The risedronate group had a higher baseline BMI than the placebo group (48.1 ± 7.2 versus 41.9 ± 3.8 kg/m2). The 10-year fracture risk was low (6.0% major osteoporotic fracture, 0.4% hip fracture); however, three individuals (12.5%, all risedronate group) were osteopenic at baseline. Twenty-one participants returned for 6-month follow-up testing (88% retention) with all (n = 3) loss to follow-up occurring in the risedronate group. Average number of pills taken among completers was 5.9 ± 0.4 and 6.0 ± 0.0 in the risedronate and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.21), with active participants taking >80% of allotted pills. Five AEs (3.7% AE rate) were reported; one definitely related, four not related, and none serious. All participants reported high satisfaction with participation in the study. Use of bisphosphonates as a novel therapeutic to preserve bone density in patients who had undergone a sleeve gastrectomy appears feasible and well-tolerated. Knowledge gained from this pilot RCT will be used to inform the design of an appropriately powered trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03411902. Weight Loss With Risedronate for Bone Health. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Norbuprenorphine and respiratory depression: Exploratory analyses with new lyophilized buprenorphine and sublingual buprenorphine
.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate plasma levels of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine and their relationship to respiratory depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Opioid-dependent subjects were randomized 2 : 1 to novel lyophilized rapid-disintegrating tablet ("bup-lyo") or standard sublingual buprenorphine tablet ("bup-SL"). Measurements included oximetry scores and linked plasma buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine levels. RESULTS: Respiratory depression (cumulative duration of SpO2 < 90% over 30-minute periods) increased with corresponding exposure levels (AUC30 min) of buprenorphine and particularly with norbuprenorphine. A lower buprenorphine/norbuprenorphine ratio was predictive of respiratory depression. The mean (SD) observed ratio was significantly higher for "bup-lyo" (3.4 (2.8)) compared to "bup-SL" (1.7 (0.77)), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Exploratory investigation found respiratory depression more strongly associated with norbuprenorphine than with buprenorphine. This accords with animal studies.
.

Randomised Comparison of a Novel Buprenorphine Oral Lyophilisate versus Existing Buprenorphine Sublingual Tablets in Opioid-Dependent Patients: A First-in-Patient Phase II Randomised Open Label Safety Study.

AIMS: To test the safety of new buprenorphine oral lyophilisate wafer ("bup-lyo") versus standard sub-lingual buprenorphine ("bup-SL"). DESIGN: Randomised (2:1) open-label study; opioid-dependent subjects; subsequent partial cross-over. SETTINGS: Specialised clinical trials facility and addictions treatment facility. PARTICIPANTS: Opioid-dependent subjects (n = 36) commencing buprenorphine maintenance (personalised dose-titration) including patients co-using alcohol, cocaine and benzodiazepines (below thresholds). MEASUREMENTS: Respiratory function (respiratory rate, pulse-oximetry); medication hold and dose adequacy; opiate withdrawal signs and symptoms; tablet disintegration times; treatment retention. Pharmacokinetics (PK) for plasma buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine (n = 11). FINDINGS: Oral lyophilised buprenorphine ("bup-lyo") completely dissolved within 2 min for 58 vs. 5% for "bup-SL." Dose titration resulted in similar maintenance dosing (10.8 vs. 9.6 mg). There were no significant between-group differences in opiate-withdrawal phenomena, craving, adequacy of "hold," respiratory function. No serious adverse events (AEs), nor "severe" AEs, although more AEs and Treatment-Emergent AEs with "bup-lyo" (mostly "mild"). PK found greater bioavailability of buprenorphine with "bup-lyo" (but not norbuprenorphine). CONCLUSIONS: Orally disintegrating buprenorphine oral lyophilisate wafer disintegrated rapidly. No increased respiratory depression was found and clinically no difference between medications was observed. PK found substantially increased bioavailability of buprenorphine (but not of nor-buprenorphine) with "bup-lyo" relative to "bup-SL." In supervised dosing contexts, rapidly disintegrating formulations may enable wider buprenorphine prescribing.

Double-blind, 12 month follow-up, placebo-controlled trial of mifepristone on cognition in alcoholics: the MIFCOG trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Increased levels of cortisol during acute alcohol withdrawal have been linked to cognitive deficits and depression. Preclinical research found that the glucocorticoid Type II receptor antagonist, mifepristone, prevented some of the neurotoxic effects of withdrawal and memory loss. Clinical trials have shown mifepristone effective in the treatment of depression. This study aims to examine the extent to which the glucocorticoid Type II receptor antagonist, mifepristone, when given to alcohol dependent males during the acute phase of alcohol withdrawal, will protect against the subsequent memory loss and depressive symptoms during abstinence from alcohol. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a Phase 4 therapeutic use, "Proof of Concept" trial. The trial is a double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial of mifepristone versus inactive placebo. The trial aims to recruit 120 participants referred for an inpatient alcohol detoxification from community alcohol teams, who meet the inclusion criteria; 1) Male, 2) Aged 18-60 inclusive, 3) alcohol dependent for 5 or more years. A screening appointment will take place prior to admission to inpatient alcohol treatment units to ensure that the individual is suitable for inclusion in the trial in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. On admission participants are randomised to receive 600 mg a day of mifepristone (200 mg morning, afternoon and evening) for 7 days and 400 mg for the subsequent 7 days (200 mg morning and evening) or the equivalent number of placebo tablets for 14 days. Participants will remain in the trial for 4 weeks (at least 2 weeks as an inpatient) and will be followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. Primary outcome measures are cognitive function at week 3 and 4 after cessation of drinking and symptoms of depression over the 4 weeks after cession of drinking, measured using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated battery and Beck Depression Inventory, respectively. Secondary outcome measures are severity of the acute phase of alcohol withdrawal, alcohol craving, symptoms of protracted withdrawal and maintenance of abstinence and levels of relapse drinking at follow-up. DISCUSSION: The current trial will provide evidence concerning the role of glucocorticoid Type II receptor activation in cognitive function and depression during acute alcohol withdrawal and the efficacy of treatment with mifepristone. ISRCTN: ISRCTN54001953, Registered 29th September 2011.

Pharmacological treatments for drug misuse and dependence.

INTRODUCTION: Substance misuse disorder (DSM-5) remains a major health challenge. Harm reduction is the initial treatment goal, by reducing or eliminating non-prescribed drug use. Eventual abstinence is the ultimate harm reduction goal. However the scope for evidence-based pharmacological interventions remains limited. AREAS COVERED: The paper takes a pragmatic clinical approach to existing and developing pharmacotherapies for substance misuse. Dependence may be characterised as a cycle with three stages: binge/intoxication, withdrawal/negative affect and preoccupation/anticipation (craving). Each of these stages may be the focus of pharmacotherapeutic intervention, and current literature is discussed which is of relevance to the practising clinician. Dependence on opiates, stimulants, cannabis and prescribed medications including benzodiazepines and the current treatments are addressed. EXPERT OPINION: Possible pharmacotherapies of the future include anti-craving medications, which are still incompletely understood. Other developments include ultra-long-acting formulations, some of which have already been produced and are being studied or are in early clinical practice. A completely new line of investigation has been drug 'vaccines', whereby the body is stimulated to produce antibodies to, for example, cocaine and nicotine. Despite a number of evidence-based strategies for the treatment of substance misuse disorder, the range of licensed pharmacological treatment choices nevertheless remains narrow.

After the randomised injectable opiate treatment trial: post-trial investigation of slow-release oral morphine as an alternative opiate maintenance medication.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: To establish if slow-release oral morphine (SROM) is an acceptable maintenance medication in heroin users currently being prescribed injectable diamorphine, who are intolerant to supplementary methadone. DESIGN AND METHODS: Case note review of interviews and medication details before and after change in medication in 12 treatment-resistant chronic heroin users attending a supervised injecting clinic twice a day for prescribed injectable diamorphine plus supplementary oral methadone to ensure 24 h stability. SROM was substituted for oral methadone by cross-titration. The patients' experiences of methadone treatment and expectations of SROM were recorded before the switch. Their responses to SROM and changes in injectable diamorphine requirements were recorded after a mean of 10 weeks' SROM treatment. RESULTS: The patients described a dislike and intolerance of methadone but had positive expectations of SROM which they believed would allow them to reduce their diamorphine dose. The mean stable methadone : SROM maintenance dose ratio was 1:7.5. After 10 weeks' SROM treatment, the average daily diamorphine dose reduced from 382 mg to 315 mg and patients reported fewer cravings and improved sleep and well-being. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Alternative forms of maintenance medication are required for patients who are intolerant to methadone. SROM is a valuable alternative which enabled some patients to reduce both their dose and number of injections of diamorphine. SROM treatment may therefore represent a route to stop injecting.