Impact of Centralizing Gastric Cancer Surgery on Treatment, Morbidity, and Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Centralization of gastric cancer surgery is thought to improve outcome and has been imposed in the Netherlands since 2012. This study analyzes the effect of centralization in terms of treatment outcome and survival in the Eastern part of the Netherlands. METHODS: All gastric cancer patients without distant metastases who underwent a gastrectomy in six hospitals in the Eastern part of the Netherlands between 2008 and 2011 (pre-centralization) and 2013-2016 (post-centralization) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient and tumor characteristics and treatment outcomes (duration of surgery, blood loss, resection margin, lymphadenectomy, chemotherapy, postoperative complications and hospital stay, and overall and disease-free survival) were analyzed and compared between pre- and post-centralization. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients were included pre-centralization and 106 patients post-centralization. Patient and tumor characteristics were almost similar in the two periods. After centralization, more patients were treated with perioperative chemotherapy (25 vs. 42% p < 0.01). The proportion of patients treated with an adequate lymphadenectomy (21 vs. 93% p < 0.01) and laparoscopic surgery (6 vs. 40% p < 0.01) increased significantly (p < 0.01). The amount of cardiac complications (16 vs. 7.5% p < 0.05) decreased; however, complications needing a re-intervention were comparable (42 vs. 40% p = 0.79). Median hospital stay decreased from 10 to 8 days (p < 0.01). A 30-day mortality did not differ significantly (4.2 vs. 1.9%). A 1-year overall (78 vs. 80% p = 0.17) and disease-free survival (73 vs. 74% p = 0.66) remained stable. DISCUSSION: Centralizing gastric cancer treatment in the Eastern part of the Netherlands resulted in improved lymph node harvesting and a successful introduction of laparoscopic gastrectomies. Centralization has not translated into improved mortality, and other variables may also have led to these improved outcomes. Further research using a nationwide population-based study will be needed to confirm these data.

Image guided surgery: new technology for surgery of soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

AIM: Providing the surgical oncologist with a new means of performing safe and radical sarcoma surgery with the help of image guidance technology. METHOD: Two patients with pelvic sarcomas were operated upon with the help of an intra-operative navigation system. The technology of image guided surgery is described in one patient with a retroperitoneal sarcoma invading the bony pelvis and another patient with a chondrosarcoma of the iliac crest. RESULTS: We show that this new procedure enables optimal radical surgical resection with minimal treatment related morbidity or loss of function. CONCLUSION: Image guided surgery is a new technical tool in sarcoma surgery.

Quality of life after severe bacterial peritonitis and infected necrotizing pancreatitis treated with open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine quality of life after severe bacterial peritonitis and infected necrotizing pancreatitis treated with open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: University hospital intensive care unit, general wards, and outpatient department. PATIENTS: Forty-one patients who survived severe bacterial peritonitis and infected necrotizing pancreatitis treated with open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Over a period of 7 yrs, 95 patients underwent open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations for severe bacterial peritonitis and infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Thirty-nine patients died during the initial intensive care unit stay and 12 as a result of nonperitonitis-related systemic diseases after discharge. Four patients were lost or excluded from final analysis. Long-term morbidity and quality of life using Karnofsky and Rankin scores at discharge and at follow-up at least 1 yr after discharge (mean: 4 yrs) and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) were determined. The remaining 41 patients reviewed showed significant long-term morbidity, including dysfunction of the abdominal wall resulting from herniation, persistent polyneuropathy, and mental disorders needing psychiatric support. Patients having persistent polyneuropathy and, to a lesser extent, mental disorders, showed significantly lower Karnofsky, higher Rankin, and higher SIP scores. After discharge, performance status of patients improved significantly, as shown by higher Karnofsky and lower Rankin scores, and, because Karnofsky and Rankin scores are closely related to SIP scores, higher SIP scores. Especially in measuring quality of life in terms of social and role management, assessment of the SIP proved to have additional value. CONCLUSIONS: About three-quarters of patients who survive open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations for severe bacterial peritonitis and infected necrotizing pancreatitis regain a good quality of life. Some patients, especially those who suffer from persistent polyneuropathy and mental disorders, show restrictions in daily life.

[Unusual form of ileus, except in elderly patients?]. / Een ongebruikelijke vorm van dunnedarmileus, tenzij bij oudere patiënten?

Two women aged 88 and 92, recently admitted to hospital, were diagnosed with gallstone ileus. Over a longer period of time they had suffered intermittently from abdominal pain related to a migrating and impacting stone. This disease is mostly diagnosed correctly during exploratory laparotomy for persistent intestinal obstruction. CT scanning, however, is a new and helpful way to early diagnosis. Both women had successful surgery. Gallstone ileus is a disease of the elderly; its early diagnosis is important. CT can be very helpful in this respect.

Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra-abdominal sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Early classification of patients presenting with peritonitis and intra-abdominal sepsis by means of objective scoring systems is desirable to select patients for 'aggressive' surgery and to compare results of different treatment regimens. However, none of the existing scoring systems has fulfilled all expectations. METHODS: Evaluation of the value of various scoring systems (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, Sepsis Severity Score, Multiple Organ Failure, Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), Ranson and Imrie) was performed in 50 patients. Additionally, scoring systems were combined to obtain a 'combined score' for the prediction of peritonitis-related in-hospital death. Hazard ratios were calculated in a univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis all scoring systems, except Ranson and Imrie, predicted the primary outcome. In the multivariate analysis, only the APACHE II score (hazard ratio 6.7) and the MPI (hazard ratio 9.8) contributed independently to the prediction of outcome. All patients with an APACHE II score of 20 or more and a MPI of 27 or more died in hospital. CONCLUSION: Combination of the APACHE II and the MPI provides the best scoring system fitting clinical goals.