Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BJS Open ; 5(1)2021 01 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33609379

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Phlegmonous and gangrenous appendicitis represent independent pathophysiological entities with different clinical courses ranging from spontaneous resolution to septic disease. However, reliable predictive methods for these clinical phenotypes have not yet been established. In an attempt to provide pathophysiological insights into the matter, a genomewide gene expression analysis was undertaken in patients with acute appendicitis. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and, after histological confirmation of PA or GA, analysed for genomewide gene expression profiling using RNA microarray technology and subsequent pathway analysis. RESULTS: Samples from 29 patients aged 7-17 years were included. Genomewide gene expression analysis was performed on 13 samples of phlegmonous and 16 of gangrenous appendicitis. From a total of 56 666 genes, 3594 were significantly differently expressed. Distinct interaction between T and B cells in the phlegmonous appendicitis group was suggested by overexpression of T cell receptor α and ß subunits, CD2, CD3, MHC II, CD40L, and the B cell markers CD72 and CD79, indicating an antiviral mechanism. In the gangrenous appendicitis group, expression of genes delineating antibacterial mechanisms was found. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence for different and independent gene expression in phlegmonous and gangrenous appendicitis in general, but also suggest distinct immunological patterns for the respective entities. In particular, the findings are compatible with previous evidence of spontaneous resolution in phlegmonous and progressive disease in gangrenous appendicitis.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/clasificación , Apendicitis/genética , Leucocitos Mononucleares/patología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Gangrena , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis por Micromatrices , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 126(19): 547-50, 2001 May 11.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11402910

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lack of efficacy in the treatment of hypertension with only one drug presents a problem in general practice and often requires switching to another type of drug, because higher dosage of currently used antihypertensives increases the frequency of side effects. Angiotensin II antagonists are well tolerated and there is no evidence of dose-related increase in side effects. This study in 574 hypertensives under therapy with ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers was undertaken to determine whether direct switching to the Angiotensin II-antagonist candesartan cilexetil at its maximal dose of 16 mg is as effective and tolerable as starting therapy with candesartan cilexetil 8 mg followed by up-titration to 16 mg after 4 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 258 men (mean age 57 +/- 11 years) and 316 women (58 +/- 12) with essential hypertension (blood pressure < 180/95 mm Hg) under ambulatory therapy with ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers with inadequate efficacy or tolerability were switched to monotherapy with candesartan cilexetil. Half of the patients were treated with 8 mg for 4 weeks (n = 284), the other half received 16 mg (n = 290). Both groups then were treated with candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg, for further 4 weeks. Choice of treatment was doubly blinded and randomised. RESULTS: After 4 weeks significant blood pressure reduction was observed in both treatment groups (p < 0.0001 for each pretreatment group). A tendency for more adequate blood pressure reduction under initial therapy with candesartan cilexetil 16 mg was observed. There was a small further blood pressure reduction in both treatment groups after 8 weeks. In comparison with the previous medications the proportion of patients with blood pressure reduction < 90 mm Hg diastolic was doubled in both treatment arms after 4 weeks: after initial dose of candesartan cilexetil 8 mg from 36.7% to 78.8%, after initial dose of candesartan cilexetil 16 mg from 43.9% to 81.1%. Clinically relevant side effects were not observed. CONCLUSION: Switching of antihypertensive monotherapy with ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers to candesartan cilexetil 8 mg or 16 mg under ambulatory conditions is safe and equally well tolerated and effectively reduces blood pressure.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetrazoles , Adolescente , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Bifenilo/efectos adversos , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 12(2): 127-32, 1978 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-278603

RESUMEN

The association of Guillain-Barré Syndrome as a possible complication of swine flu inoculation created the potential for conversion reactions simulating this syndrome. Upon termination of the swine flu vaccination program, a study was initiated in a prepaid health plan to identify and categorize such patients. An estimated 8000 adults were vaccinated and it was hypothesized that a large number of these patients would present to the health plan with conversion symptoms. However, only seven patients met the criteria and they were compared to two control groups (inoculated and uninoculated). The patients with conversion symptoms did show similatities to those previously described in the literature: all were female, of lower educational level, and had great concern with health problems. Other speculations as to why these patients had conversion reactions were made.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Conversión/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Polirradiculopatía/diagnóstico , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adulto , Trastornos de Conversión/epidemiología , Trastornos de Conversión/psicología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Virus de la Influenza A , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA