Intensity-Modulated Reirradiation Therapy With Nivolumab in Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reirradiation of nonmetastatic recurrent or second primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Objective: To investigate the tolerability, PFS, OS, and patient-reported outcomes with nivolumab (approved standard of care for patients with HNSCC) during and after IMRT reirradiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter nonrandomized phase 2 single-arm trial, the treatment outcomes of patients with recurrent or second primary HNSCC who satisfied recursive partitioning analysis class 1 and 2 definitions were evaluated. Between July 11, 2018, and August 12, 2021, 62 patients were consented and screened. Data were evaluated between June and December 2023. Intervention: Sixty- to 66-Gy IMRT in 30 to 33 daily fractions over 6 to 6.5 weeks with nivolumab, 240 mg, intravenously 2 weeks prior and every 2 weeks for 5 cycles during IMRT, then nivolumab, 480 mg, intravenously every 4 weeks for a total nivolumab duration of 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was PFS. Secondary end points included OS, incidence, and types of toxic effects, including long-term treatment-related toxic effects, patient-reported outcomes, and correlatives of tissue and blood biomarkers. Results: A total of 62 patients were screened, and 51 were evaluable (median [range] age was 62 [56-67] years; 42 [82%] were male; 6 [12%] had p16+ disease; 38 [75%] had salvage surgery; and 36 [71%.] had neck dissection). With a median follow-up of 24.5 months (95% CI, 19.0-25.0), the estimated 1-year PFS was 61.7% (95% CI, 49.2%-77.4%), rejecting the null hypothesis of 1-year PFS rate of less than 43.8% with 1-arm log-rank test P = .002 within a 1-year timeframe. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse event (6 [12%]) was lymphopenia with 2 patients (4%) and 1 patient each (2%) exhibiting colitis, diarrhea, myositis, nausea, mucositis, and myasthenia gravis. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Questionnaire quality of life scores remained stable and consistent across all time points. A hypothesis-generating trend favoring worsening PFS and OS in patients with an increase in blood PD1+, KI67+, and CD4+ T cells was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: This multicenter nonrandomized phase 2 trial of IMRT reirradiation therapy and nivolumab suggested a promising improvement in PFS over historical controls. The treatment was well tolerated and deserves further evaluation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03521570.

Assessing survival outcomes of patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: Focus on age, sex, and stage.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to provide further insights into whether age and/or sex are associated with prognosis in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing hospital registry data from 2006 to 2016 obtained from the National Cancer Database. Identified patients were divided into various cohorts based on age, sex, and staging. A descriptive analysis was performed using chi-square tests and overall survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 17 642 patients were included in the study. The 5-year overall survival rates were 82.0% (95% CI: 79.8%-84.0%) in younger patients versus 67.5% (95% CI: 66.7%-68.3%, p-value <0.0001) older patients. The median overall survival for females was 143.4 months (95% CI: 133.2-NA) versus 129.8 (95% CI: 125.4-138.7, p-value <0.0001) in males. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that younger age and female sex are both predictors of improved survival in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Using Nerve Blocks for Addressing Radiation-Induced Pain During Pelvic Cancer Treatment.

This Viewpoint discusses the use of nerve blocks for pain during pelvic cancer treatment.

Patterns of Undertreatment and Overtreatment in Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Based on Molecular Classification.

The quality improvement study examines the use of risk-adaptive adjuvant radiotherapy in women with non­mismatch repair deficiency endometrial cancer.

Insurance Authorization and Access to Proton Therapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancers.

PURPOSE: We evaluated our institutional experience to assess potential racial inequities in insurance coverage for proton therapy in patients with head and neck (HN) cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We examined the demographics of 1519 patients with HN cancer seen in consultation at our HN multidisciplinary clinic (HN MDC) and 805 patients for whom a proton insurance authorization was sought (PAS) from January 2020 to June 2022. The prospects for proton therapy insurance authorization were prospectively noted based on each patient's ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) diagnosis code and their specific insurance plan. Proton-unfavorable (PU) insurance were those plans whose policy describes proton beam therapy as "experimental" or "not medically necessary" for the given diagnosis. RESULTS: For patients seen in our HN MDC, Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) were significantly more likely to have PU insurance than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (24.9% vs 18.4%, P = .005). In multivariable analysis including race, average income of residence ZIP code, and Medicare eligibility age, BIPOC patients had an odds ratio of 1.25 for PU insurance (P = .041). In the PAS cohort, while there was no difference in the percentage of patients receiving insurance approval for proton therapy between NHW and BIPOC populations (88% vs 88.2%, P = .80), for patients with PU insurance, the median time to determination was significantly longer (median, 15.5 days), and the median time to start any radiation of any modality was longer (46 vs 35 days, P = .08). Compared with NHW patients, the median time from consultation to start of radiation therapy was longer for BIPOC patients (37 vs 43 days, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: BIPOC patients were significantly more likely to have insurance plans unfavorable to proton therapy coverage. These PU insurance plans were associated with a longer median time to determination, a lower approval rate for proton therapy, and a longer time to start radiation of any modality.

Effect of COVID-19 on Gynecologic Oncology Care: A Survey of Practicing Gynecologic Radiation Oncologists in the United States.

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed demands and limitations on the delivery of health care. We sought to assess the effect of COVID-19 on the delivery of gynecologic oncologic care from the perspective of practicing radiation oncologists in the United States. Methods and Materials: An anonymous online survey was created and distributed to preidentified radiation oncologists in the United States with clinical expertise in the management of gynecologic patients. The survey consisted of demographic questions followed by directed questions to assess specific patterns of care related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: A total of 47 of 96 invited radiation oncologists responded to the survey for a response rate of 49%. Fifty-six percent of respondents reported an increase in locally advanced cervical cancer with no similar increase for endometrial, vulvar, or vaginal patients. Most respondents (66%) reported a pause in surgical management, with a duration of 1 to 3 months being most common (61%). There was a reported increased use of shorter brachytherapy regimens during the pandemic. Most providers (61%) reported caring for at least 1 patient with a positive COVID-19 test. A pause or delay in treatment due to COVID-19 positivity was reported by 45% of respondents, with 55% reporting that patients chose to delay their own care because of COVID-19-related concerns. Total treatment times >8 weeks for patients with cervical cancer were observed by 33% of respondents, but occurred in >25% of patients. Conclusions: Data from this prospectively collected anonymous survey of practice patterns among radiation oncologists reveal that the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in delays initiating care, truncated brachytherapy treatment courses, and a reported increase in locally advanced cervical cancer cases at presentation. These data can be used as a means of self-assessment to ensure appropriate decision making for gynecologic patients during the endemic phase of COVID-19.

Ninety-day mortality following transoral robotic surgery or radiation at Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative mortality for oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) varies from 0.2% to 6.5% on trials; the real-world rate is unknown. METHODS: NCDB study from 2010 to 2017 for patients with cT1-2N0-2M0 OPSCC with Charleson-Deyo score 0-1. Ninety-day mortality assessed from start and end of treatment at Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities. RESULTS: 3639 patients were treated with TORS and 1937 with radiotherapy. TORS cohort had more women and higher income, was younger, more often treated at academic centers, and more likely to have private insurance (all p < 0.05). Ninety-day mortality was 1.3% with TORS and 0.7% or 1.4% from start or end of radiotherapy, respectively. From end of therapy, there was no significant difference on MVA between treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: There is minimal difference between 90-day mortality in patients treated with TORS or radiotherapy for early-stage OPSCC. While overall rates are low, for patients with expectation of cure, work is needed to identify optimal treatment.

Incidence and predictors of toxicity in the management of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy.

Purpose/Objective: Given the rarity of vulvar cancer, data on the incidence of acute and late severe toxicity and patients' symptom burden from radiotherapy (RT) are lacking. Materials/Methods: This multi-center, single-institution study included patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma treated with curative intent RT between 2009 and 2020. Treatment-related acute and late grade ≥ 3 toxicities and late patient subjective symptoms (PSS) were recorded. Results: Forty-two patients with predominantly stage III/IV disease (n = 25, 59.5 %) were treated with either definitive (n = 25, 59.5 %) or adjuvant (n = 17, 40.5 %) external beam RT to a median dose of 64 Gy and 59.4 Gy, respectively. Five patients received a brachytherapy boost with a median total dose of 84.3 Gy in 2 Gy-equivalent dose (EQD2). Intensity-modulated RT was used in 37 (88.1 %) of patients, and 25 patients (59.5 %) received concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 27 months. Acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 17 patients (40.5 %), including 13 (31.0 %) acute grade 3 skin events. No factors, including total RT dose (p = 0.951), were associated with acute skin toxicity. Eleven (27.5 %) patients developed late grade ≥ 3 toxicity events, including 10 (23.8 %) late grade ≥ 3 skin toxicity events. Patients with late grade ≥ 3 skin toxicity had a higher mean body-mass index (33.0 vs 28.2 kg/m2; p = 0.009). Common late PSS included vaginal pain (n = 15, 35.7 %), skin fibrosis (n = 10, 23.8 %), and requirement of long-term opiates (n = 12, 28.6 %). Conclusion: RT for vulvar cancer is associated with considerable rates of severe acute and late toxicity and PSS burden. Larger studies are needed to identify risk factors, explore toxicity mitigation strategies, and assess patient-reported outcomes.

Simulation of an HDR "Boost" with Stereotactic Proton versus Photon Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Dosimetric Feasibility Study.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose escalation potential of stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) versus stereotactic body photon therapy (SBXT) using high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (HDR-B) dose-prescription metrics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients previously treated with radiation for prostate cancer were identified and stratified by prostate size (≤ 50cc; n = 13, > 50cc; n = 12). Initial CT simulation scans were re-planned using SBXT and SBPT modalities using a prescription dose of 19Gy in 2 fractions. Target coverage goals were designed to mimic the dose distributions of HDR-B and maximized to the upper limit constraint for the rectum and urethra. Dosimetric parameters between SBPT and SBXT were compared using the signed-rank test and again after stratification for prostate size (≤ 50cm3 and >50cm3) using the Wilcoxon rank test. RESULTS: Prostate volume receiving 100% of the dose (V100) was significantly greater for SBXT (99%) versus SBPT (96%) (P ≤ 0.01), whereas the median V125 (82% vs. 73%, P < 0.01) and V200 (12% vs. 2%, P < 0.01) was significantly greater for SBPT compared to SBXT. Median V150 was 49% for both cohorts (P = 0.92). V125 and V200 were significantly correlated with prostate size. For prostates > 50cm3, V200 was significantly greater with SBPT compared to SBXT (14.5% vs. 1%, P = 0.005), but not for prostates 50cm3 (9% vs 4%, P = 0.11). Median dose to 2cm3 of the bladder neck was significantly lower with SBPT versus SBXT (9.6 Gy vs. 14 Gy, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: SBPT and SBXT can be used to simulate an HDR-B boost for locally advanced prostate cancer. SBPT demonstrated greater dose escalation potential than SBXT. These results are relevant for future trial design, particularly in patients with high risk prostate cancer who are not amenable to brachytherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibition in patients treated with stereotactic radiation for brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may act synergistically to improve treatment outcomes but may also increase the risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN). The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients undergoing SRT with and without concurrent ICI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated for BMs with single or multi-fraction SRT were retrospectively reviewed. Concurrent ICI with SRT (SRT-ICI) was defined as administration within 3 months of SRT. Local control (LC), radiation necrosis (RN) risk and distant brain failure (DBF) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Wilcoxon rank sum and Chi-square tests were used to compare covariates. Multivariate cox regression analysis (MVA) was performed. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine patients treated with SRT for 385 brain lesions were included; 36 patients with 99 lesions received SRT-ICI. Median follow up was 10.3 months (SRT alone) and 7.7 months (SRT- ICI) (p = 0.08). Lesions treated with SRT-ICI were more commonly squamous histology (17% vs 8%) melanoma (20% vs 2%) or renal cell carcinoma (8% vs 6%), (p < 0.001). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compromised 60% of patients receiving ICI (n = 59). Lesions treated with SRT-ICI had significantly improved 1-year local control compared to SRT alone (98 and 89.5%, respectively (p = 0.0078). On subset analysis of NSCLC patients alone, ICI was also associated with improved 1 year local control (100% vs. 90.1%) (p = 0.018). On MVA, only tumor size ≤2 cm was significantly associated with LC (HR 0.38, p = 0.02), whereas the HR for concurrent ICI with SRS was 0.26 (p = 0.08). One year DBF (41% vs. 53%; p = 0.21), OS (58% vs. 56%; p = 0.79) and RN incidence (7% vs. 4%; p = 0.25) were similar for SRT alone versus SRT-ICI, for the population as a whole and those patients with NSCLC. CONCLUSION: These results suggest SRT-ICI may improve local control of brain metastases and is not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis in a cohort of predominantly NSCLC patients. Larger, prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings and better elucidate the impact of SRT-ICI on other disease outcomes.

Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (GRID) Prior to Standard Neoadjuvant Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy for Bulky, High-Risk Soft Tissue and Osteosarcomas: Feasibility, Safety, and Promising Pathologic Response Rates.

Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (GRID) has been utilized primarily in the palliative and definitive treatment of bulky tumors. Delivered in the modern era primarily with megavoltage photon therapy, this technique offers the promise of safe dose escalation with potential immunogenic, bystander and microvasculature effects that can augment a conventionally fractionated course of radiotherapy. At the University of Maryland, an institutional standard has arisen to incorporate a single fraction of GRID radiation in large (>8 cm), high-risk soft tissue and osteosarcomas prior to a standard fractionated course. Herein, we report on the excellent pathologic responses and apparent safety of this regimen in 26 consecutive patients.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials.

OPINION STATEMENT: The importance of assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is now well recognized as an essential measure when evaluating the effectiveness of new cancer therapies. Quality of life measures provide for a multi-dimensional understanding of the impact of cancer treatment on measures ranging from functional, psychological, and social aspects of a patient's health. Patient-reported outcomes provide for an assessment of physical and functional symptoms that are directly elicited from patients. Collection of PROs and HRQoL data has been shown to not only be feasible but also provide for reliable measures that correlate with established outcomes measures better than clinician-scored toxicities. The importance of HRQoL measures has been emphasized by both patients and clinicians, as well as policy makers and regulatory bodies. Given the benefits associated with measuring HRQoL and PROs in oncology clinical trials, it is increasingly important to establish methods to effectively incorporate PROs and HRQoL measures into routine clinical practice.

A multi-center analysis of single-fraction versus hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated-SRS (HF-SRS) may allow for improved local control and a reduced risk of radiation necrosis compared to single-fraction-SRS (SF-SRS). However, data comparing these two treatment approaches are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between SF-SRS versus HF-SRS across our multi-center academic network. METHODS: Patients treated with SF-SRS or HF-SRS for brain metastasis from 2013 to 2018 across 5 radiation oncology centers were retrospectively reviewed. SF-SRS dosing was standardized, whereas HF-SRS dosing regimens were variable. The co-primary endpoints of local control and radiation necrosis were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to evaluate the impact of select independent variables on the outcomes of interest. Propensity score adjustments were used to reduce the effects confounding variables. To assess dose response for HF-SRS, Biologic Effective Dose (BED) assuming an α/ß of 10 (BED10) was used as a surrogate for total dose. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty six patients with 335 brain metastasis treated with SF-SRS (n = 222 lesions) or HF-SRS (n = 113 lesions) were included. Prior whole brain radiation was given in 33% (n = 74) and 34% (n = 38) of lesions treated with SF-SRS and HF-SRS, respectively (p = 0.30). After a median follow up time of 12 months in each cohort, the adjusted 1-year rate of local control and incidence of radiation necrosis was 91% (95% CI 86-96%) and 85% (95% CI 75-95%) (p = 0.26) and 10% (95% CI 5-15%) and 7% (95% CI 0.1-14%) (p = 0.73) for SF-SRS and HF-SRS, respectively. For lesions > 2 cm, the adjusted 1 year local control was 97% (95% CI 84-100%) for SF-SRS and 64% (95% CI 43-85%) for HF-SRS (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, SRS fractionation was not associated with local control and only size ≤2 cm was associated with a decreased risk of developing radiation necrosis (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.58, p < 0.01). For HF-SRS, 1 year local control was 100% for lesions treated with a BED10 ≥ 50 compared to 77% (95% CI 65-88%) for lesions that received a BED10 < 50 (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison study of dose fractionation for the treatment of brain metastases, there was no difference in local control or radiation necrosis between HF-SRS and SF-SRS. For HF-SRS, a BED10 ≥ 50 may improve local control.

Downstream Effect of a Proton Treatment Center on an Academic Medical Center.

PURPOSE: To quantify the effects of opening a proton center (PC) on an academic medical center (AMC)/radiation oncology department. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiation treatment volume and relative value units from fiscal year 2015 (FY15) to FY17 were retrospectively analyzed at the AMC and 2 community-based centers. To quantify new patient referrals to the AMC, we reviewed the electronic medical record for all patients seen at the PC since consults were initiated in November 2015 (n = 1173). Patients were excluded if the date of entry into the AMC electronic medical record predated their PC consultation. Hospital resource use and professional and technical charges were obtained for these patients. Academic growth, philanthropy, and resident education were evaluated based on grant submissions, clinical trial enrollment, philanthropy, and pediatric case exposure, respectively, from PC opening through FY17. RESULTS: From FY15 to FY17, radiation fractions at the AMC and the 2 community sites decreased by 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-16%, P < .001) and increased by 19% (95% CI, 16%-23%, P < .001) and 2% (95% CI, -1.1 to 4.3%, P = NS), respectively; the number of new starts decreased by 3% (95% CI, -13% to 7%, P = NS) and 2% (95% CI, -20% to 16%, P = NS) and increased by 13% (95% CI -2% to 27%, P = NS), respectively. At the AMC, technical and professional relative value units decreased by 5% and 14%, respectively. The PC made 561 external referrals to the AMC, which resulted in $2.38 million technical and $2.13 million professional charges at the AMC. Fifteen grant submissions ($12.83 million) resulted in 6 awards ($3.26 million). Twenty-two clinical trials involving proton therapy were opened, on which a total of 5% (n = 54) of patients enrolled during calendar years 2017 and 2018. The PC was involved in gift donations of $1.6 million. There was a nonsignificant 37% increase in number of pediatric cases. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a slight decline in AMC photon patient volumes and relative value units, a positive downstream effect was associated with the addition of a PC, which benefited the AMC.

First Clinical Report of Proton Beam Therapy for Postoperative Radiotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The characteristic Bragg peak of proton beam therapy (PBT) allows for sparing normal tissues beyond the tumor volume that may allow for decreased toxicities associated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). Here we report the first institutional experience with proton therapy for PORT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assess early toxicities and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 61 consecutive patients treated from 2011 to 2014 who underwent PORT for locally advanced NSCLC for positive microscopic margins and/or positive N2 lymph nodes (stage III), with 27 patients receiving PBT and 34 receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 23.1 months for PBT (2.3-42.0 months) and 27.9 months for IMRT (0.5-87.4 months). The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy for PBT (50.4-66.6 Gy) and 54 Gy for IMRT (50.0-72.0 Gy). Grade 3 radiation esophagitis was observed in 1 and 4 patients in the PBT and IMRT groups, respectively. Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was observed in 1 patient in each cohort. Dosimetric analysis revealed a significant decrease in the V5 and mean lung dose (P = .001 and P = .045, respectively). One-year median overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were 85.2% and 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.8%-99.7% and 70.5%-96.2%, P = .648) and 92.3% and 93.3% (82.5%-100%, 84.8%-100%, P = .816) for PBT and IMRT cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative PBT in NSCLC is well-tolerated and has similar excellent short-term outcomes when compared with IMRT. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine if PBT has a meaningful improvement over IMRT for PORT.