Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potential.

STUDY QUESTION: Is a commercially available embryo assessment algorithm for early embryo evaluation based on the automatic annotation of morphokinetic timings a useful tool for embryo selection in IVF cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: The classification provided by the algorithm was shown to be significantly predictive, especially when combined with conventional morphological evaluation, for development to blastocyst, implantation, and live birth, but not for euploidy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The gold standard for embryo selection is still morphological evaluation conducted by embryologists. Since the introduction of time-lapse technology to embryo culture, many algorithms for embryo selection have been developed based on embryo morphokinetics, providing complementary information to morphological evaluation. However, manual annotations of developmental events and application of algorithms can be time-consuming and subjective processes. The introduction of automation to morphokinetic annotations is a promising approach that can potentially reduce subjectivity in the embryo selection process and improve the workflow in IVF laboratories. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This observational, retrospective cohort study was performed in a single IVF clinic between 2018 and 2021 and included 3736 embryos from oocyte donation cycles (423 cycles) and 1291 embryos from autologous cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A, 185 cycles). Embryos were classified on Day 3 with a score from 1 (best) to 5 (worst) by the automatic embryo assessment algorithm. The performance of the embryo classification model for blastocyst development, implantation, live birth, and euploidy prediction was assessed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All embryos were monitored by a time-lapse system with an automatic cell-tracking and embryo assessment software during culture. The embryo assessment algorithm was applied on Day 3, resulting in embryo classification from 1 to 5 (from highest to lowest developmental potential) depending on four parameters: P2 (t3-t2), P3 (t4-t3), oocyte age, and number of cells. There were 959 embryos selected for transfer on Day 5 or 6 based on conventional morphological evaluation. The blastocyst development, implantation, live birth, and euploidy rates (for embryos subjected to PGT-A) were compared between the different scores. The correlation of the algorithm scoring with the occurrence of those outcomes was quantified by generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Finally, the performance of the GEE model using the embryo assessment algorithm as the predictor was compared to that using conventional morphological evaluation, as well as to a model using a combination of both classification systems. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The blastocyst rate was higher with lower the scores generated by the embryo assessment algorithm. A GEE model confirmed the positive association between lower embryo score and higher odds of blastulation (odds ratio (OR) (1 vs 5 score) = 15.849; P < 0.001). This association was consistent in both oocyte donation and autologous embryos subjected to PGT-A. The automatic embryo classification results were also statistically associated with implantation and live birth. The OR of Score 1 vs 5 was 2.920 (95% CI 1.440-5.925; P = 0.003; E = 2.81) for implantation and 3.317 (95% CI 1.615-6.814; P = 0.001; E = 3.04) for live birth. However, this association was not found in embryos subjected to PGT-A. The highest performance was achieved when combining the automatic embryo scoring and traditional morphological classification (AUC for implantation potential = 0.629; AUC for live-birth potential = 0.636). Again, no association was found between the embryo classification and euploidy status in embryos subjected to PGT-A (OR (1 vs 5) = 0.755 (95% CI 0.255-0.981); P = 0.489; E = 1.57). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective nature of this study may be a reason for caution, although the large sample size reinforced the ability of the model for embryo selection. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Time-lapse technology with automated embryo assessment can be used together with conventional morphological evaluation to increase the accuracy of embryo selection process and improve the success rates of assisted reproduction cycles. To our knowledge, this is the largest embryo dataset analysed with this embryo assessment algorithm. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by Agencia Valenciana de Innovació and European Social Fund (ACIF/2019/264 and CIBEFP/2021/13). In the last 5 years, M.M. received speaker fees from Vitrolife, Merck, Ferring, Gideon Richter, Angelini, and Theramex, and B.A.-R. received speaker fees from Merck. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

A new system of sperm cryopreservation: evaluation of survival, motility, DNA oxidation, and mitochondrial activity.

BACKGROUND: Sperm vitrification (V) is a method for cryopreservation, without the use of conventional cryoprotectants, by plunging the sperm suspension directly into liquid nitrogen (LN25). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the new system of V with conventional freezing (CF) protocol using fresh spermatozoa as reference (C). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study. A total of 47 sperm samples from men attending the infertility clinic at Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad Valencia. The sperm V solution was 0.3 M trehalose-sucrose and plunged directly in liquid nitrogen in microdroplets of 5-10 lL, using a new system collector of V. Sperm viability indicators such as sperm motility, vitality rates, mitochondrial function, and sperm DNA oxidation were assessed before and after cryopreservation. Sperm motility and vitality analysis were performed according to published guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO, 2010). Mitochondrial function was evaluated using JC-1 (fluorescent cationic dye, 5,50,6,60-tetrachloro-1-10,3,30-tetraethyl-benzamidazolocarbocyanin iodide). Sperm DNA oxidation was determined using a fluorescent assay (Oxy-DNA test) for the detection of 8-oxoguanine. The evaluation was carried out before and after cryopreservation using flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and chi-square test, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULT(S): Sperm parameters, including progressive motility, total motility, and viability, observed after cryopreservation were as follows: C = 74.9% [1] 12.3, CF = 27.2% [1] 8.4, V = 42.3% [1] 9.3, p < 0.001; C = 90.1 [1] 6.8, CF = 42.0 [1] 12.9, V = 61.4 [1] 11.8, p < 0.001; C = 90.0% [1] 7.4, CF = 42.5% [1] 14.6, V = 70.9% [1] 6.5, p < 0.001, respectively. Regarding Oxy-DNA and mitochondrial activity, they were significantly affected in both groups (V and CF) when compared to the control group. DISCUSSION: The sperm V and CF have negative impact on sperm parameters as well as DNA integrity and mitochondrial activity. However, sperm V presented improved sperm motility recovery, similar levels of DNA oxidation, and, moreover, a slightly increase in mitochondrial activity when compared to the conventional method. CONCLUSION(S): V as an optimal protocol for sperm cryopreservation.

Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: Is the indication for fertility preservation (FP) related to success in IVF cycles after elective-FP (EFP) for age-related fertility decline and FP before cancer treatment (Onco-FP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although success rates were lower in cancer patients, there was no statistically significant association between malignant disease and reproductive outcome after correction for age and controlled-ovarian stimulation (COS) regime. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: FP is increasingly applied in assisted reproduction, but little is known about the outcome of IVF cycles with vitrified oocytes in FP patients. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective, observational multicenter study of vitrification cycles for FP and of the warming cycles of women who returned to attempt pregnancy from January 2007 to May 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In all, 6362 women (EFP = 5289 patients; 7044 cycles + Onco-FP = 1073 patients; 1172 cycles) had their oocytes vitrified for FP. A logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the impact of indication for FP corrected for age at vitrification. The protocol used for COS was also included as a possible confounder. The main outcome measures were oocyte survival and live birth. A detailed description of the baseline and clinical data is provided, with comparisons between EFP and Onco-FP. The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per utilized oocyte according to age at vitrification was analyzed in those patients returning to use their oocytes. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: Age at vitrification was significantly older in EFP patients (37.2 ± 4.9 vs. 32.3 ± 3.5 year; P < 0.0001). Fewer oocytes were retrieved and vitrified per cycle in EFP (9.6 ± 8.4 vs. 11.4 ± 3.5 and 7.3 ± 11.3 vs. 8.7 ± 2.1, respectively; P < 0.05), but numbers became comparable when analyzed per patient (12.8 ± 7.4 vs. 12.5 ± 3.2 and 9.8 ± 6.4 vs. 9.5 ± 2.6). Storage time was shorter in EFP (2.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9 years; P < 0.0001). In all, 641 (12.1%) EFP and 80 (7.4%) Onco-FP patients returned to attempt pregnancy (P < 0.05). Overall oocyte survival was comparable (83.9% vs. 81.8%; NS), but lower for onco-FP patients among younger (≤35 year) subjects (81.2% vs. 91.4%; P > 0.05). Fewer EFP cycles finished in embryo transfer (50.2% vs. 72.5%) (P < 0.05). The implantation rate was 42.6% and 32.5% in EFP versus Onco-FP (P < 0.05). Ongoing pregnancy (57.7% vs. 35.7%) and live birth rates (68.8% vs. 41.1%) were higher in EFP patients aged ≤35 than the Onco-FP matching age patients (P < 0.05). The reason for FP per se had no effect on oocyte survival (OR = 1.484 [95%CI = 0.876-2.252]; P = 0.202) or the CLBR (OR = 1.275 [95%CI = 0.711-2.284]; P = 0.414). Conversely, age (<36 vs. ≥36 y) impacted oocyte survival (adj.OR = 1.922 [95%CI = 1.274-2.900]; P = 0.025) and the CLBR (adj.OR= 3.106 [95%CI = 2.039-4.733]; P < 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher cumulative probability of live birth in patients <36 versus >36 in EFP (P < 0.0001), with improved outcomes when more oocytes were available for IVF. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Statistical power to compare IVF outcomes is limited by the few women who came to use their oocytes in the Onco-FP group. The patients' ages and the COS protocols used were significantly different between the EFP and ONCO-PP groups. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although the implantation rate was significantly lower in the Onco-FP patients the impact of cancer disease per se was not proven'. EFP patients should be counseled according to their age and number of available oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Asynchronous and pathological windows of implantation: two causes of recurrent implantation failure.

STUDY QUESTION: Is endometrial recurrent implantation failure (RIF) only a matter of an asynchronous (displaced) window of implantation (WOI), or could it also be a pathological (disrupted) WOI? SUMMARY ANSWER: Our predictive results demonstrate that both displaced and disrupted WOIs exist and can present independently or together in the same RIF patient. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since 2002, many gene expression signatures associated with endometrial receptivity and RIF have been described. Endometrial transcriptomics prediction has been applied to the human WOI in two previous studies. One study describes endometrial RIF to be the result of a temporal displacement of the WOI. The other indicates that endometrial RIF can also result from a molecularly disrupted WOI without temporal displacement. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective analysis was undertaken to compare WOI endometrial transcriptomics predictions in controls (n = 72) and RIF patients (n = 43). RIF was clinically designated by the absence of implantation after four or more transfers of high quality embryos or after the placement of 10 or more embryos in multiple transfers. Endometrial tissue samples were collected from LH + 5 to LH + 8. We compared the two molecular causes of RIF to signatures currently described in the literature. We propose a new transcriptomic RIF taxonomy to fill the gap between the two hypotheses and to guide the development of clinical detection and determination of both types of RIF. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Utilizing 115 gene expression profiles, two different predictive designs were developed: one considering RIF versus controls removing menstrual cycle timing, called the disrupted or pathological model, and another stratifying the WOI in transcriptomic profiles related to timing for predicting displacements. The predictive value of each model was compared between all signatures selected. We propose a new genomic approach that distinguishes between both types of RIF in the same sample cohort. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: From the 16 signatures analysed, we clearly predicted two causes of RIF-both a displaced WOI and an on-time but pathologically disrupted WOI. A high predictive value related to WOI profiles associated with menstrual cycle timing was found in most of the signatures. Specifically, 69% of the signatures analysed presented an accuracy higher than expected by chance in a range from 0.87 to 0.97. Displacements and disruptions were not molecularly independent, as some signatures were moderately associated with both causes. The gene and functional comparison between signatures revealed that they were not similar, although we did find functions in common and a cluster of moderate functional concordance between some of the signatures that predicted displacements (the highest Cohen's Kappa index were between 0.55 and 0.62 depending on the functional database). We propose a new transcriptomic RIF taxonomy to fill the gap between these prior studies and to establish methodology for detecting and distinguishing both types of RIF in clinical practice. Our findings indicate these two phenotypes could present independently or together in the same RIF patient. RIF patients designated by clinical criteria have been stratified transcriptomically as 18.6% with only a displaced WOI, 53.5% with a displaced and pathological WOI, 23.3% with only a disrupted WOI, and 4.7% could be a clinical RIF with non-endometrial origin. The new RIF transcriptomic taxonomy avoids menstrual cycle timing as a confounding variable that should be controlled for, distinguishing clearly between a disrupted and a displaced WOI for precision medicine in RIF. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main objective of this study was to use transcriptomics to detect both RIF causes and to understand the role of transcriptomic signatures in these phenotypes. The predictive value in absolute terms for each signature was not indicative in these prediction designs; instead, the comparison between signatures was most important for prediction capability in the same sample cohort for both RIF causes. Clinical follow up of the RIF taxonomies proposed has not been analysed in this study, so further prospective clinical studies are necessary to determine the prevalence and penetrance of these phenotypes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The main insight from this study is a new understanding of RIF taxonomy. Understanding how to classify RIF patients to distinguish clinically between a patient who could benefit from a personalized embryo transfer day and a patient with a disrupted WOI will enable identification and stratification for the research and development of new treatments. In addition, we demonstrate that basic research designs in endometrial transcriptomics cause masking of the study variable by the menstrual cycle timing. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research has been funded by IVI-RMA; the authors do not have any competing interests.

Reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic metroplasty for women with dysmorphic uterus and recurrent implantation failure.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the reproductive outcomes of women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) after hysteroscopic metroplasty for dysmorphic uteri. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 190 women with a diagnosis of RIF. These patients were eligible for hysteroscopic metroplasty for dysmorphic uteri, including T-shaped uteri, between January 2008 and September 2015 at the Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI) in Valencia, Spain. RESULTS: The total clinical pregnancy rate, the live birth rate, and the abortion rate were 80.0% (152/190), 77.9% (147/190) and 8.9%, respectively. At 12 months, the clinical pregnancy rate was 76.3% (145/190) and at 6 months 50.5% (96/190). After the metroplasty, approximately 76% of all gravidities, were achieved during the first 12 months of follow-up. Within the first IVF cycle, pregnancy and live birth rates were 77.8% and 86.1%, respectively. The mean time to pregnancy was 6.5 months. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that hysteroscopic metroplasty improves pregnancy and live birth rates for women with a history of recurrent implantation failure and dysmorphic uterus. However, conclusions must be taken carefully as this is an observational study. A prospective, randomized and controlled study is necessary to support these results.

Low serum progesterone on the day of embryo transfer is associated with a diminished ongoing pregnancy rate in oocyte donation cycles after artificial endometrial preparation: a prospective study.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a relationship between serum progesterone (P) and endometrial volume on the day of embryo transfer (ET) with ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) in artificial endometrium preparation cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: Patients with serum P < 9.2 ng/ml on the day of ET had a significantly lower OPR but endometrial volume was not related with OPR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A window of optimal serum P levels during the embryo implantation period has been described in artificial endometrium preparation cycles. A very low endometrial volume is related to poor reproductive outcome. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Prospective cohort study with 244 patients who underwent ET in an oocyte donation cycle after an artificial endometrial preparation cycle with estradiol valerate and vaginal micronized progesterone (400 mg/12 h). The study period went from 22 February 2016 to 25 October 2016 (8 months). Sample size was calculated to detect a 20% difference in OPR (35-55%) between two groups according to serum P levels in a two-sided test (80% statistical power, 95% confidence interval (CI)). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients undergoing their first/second oocyte donation cycle, aged <50, BMI < 30 kg/m2, triple layer endometrium >6.5 mm and 1-2 good quality transferred blastocysts. A private infertility centre. Serum P determination and 3D ultrasound of uterine cavity were performed on the day of ET. Endometrial volume measurements were taken using a virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL™) system. The primary endpoint was OPR beyond pregnancy week 12. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: About 211 of the 244 recruited patients fulfilled all the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Mean serum P on the day of embryo transfer was 12.7 ± 5.4 ng/ml (Centiles 25, 9.2; 50, 11.8; 75,15.8). OPRs according to serum P quartiles were: Q1: 32.7%; Q2: 49.1%; Q3: 58.5%; Q4: 50.9%. The OPR of Q1 was significantly lower than Q2-Q4: 32.7% versus 52.8%; P = 0.016; RR (95% CI): 0.62 (0.41-0.94). The mean endometrial volume was 3.4 ± 1.9 ml. Serum P on the day of ET did not correlate with endometrial volume. A logistic regression analysis, adjusted for all the potential confounders, showed that OPR significantly lowered between women with serum P < 9.2 ng/ml versus ≥9.2 ng/ml (OR: 0.297; 95%CI: 0.113-0.779); P = 0.013. The ROC curve showed a significant predictive value of serum P levels on the day of ET for OPR, with an AUC (95%CI) = 0.59 (0.51-0.67). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Only the women with normal uterine cavity, appropriate endometrial thickness and good quality blastocysts transfer were included. Extrapolation to an unselected population or to other routes and/or doses of administering P needs to be validated. The role of endometrial volume could not be fully defined as very few patients presented a very low volume. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The present study suggests a minimum threshold of serum P values on the day of ET that needs to be reached in artificial endometrial preparation cycles to optimize outcome. No upper threshold could be defined. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02696694.

How much have we learned from time-lapse in clinical IVF?

Can the time-lapse system (TLS) identify the best embryo for transfer? Although there are several studies that support this hypothesis, more research is required to improve the quality of the current evidence and also to assess live birth rate, miscarriage, stillbirth or clinical pregnancy in order to choose between a TLS or conventional incubation. In addition, although some authors report on effectiveness and safety in the use of TLS monitoring of embryo development in vitro, other authors that have not found relevant differences between the two systems for the culture and subsequence embryo selection. On the other hand, TLS has emerged as a novel technology and has been introduced into clinical practice in many laboratories to perform embryo morphology evaluation and study developmental kinetics in ART. However, most studies only assess blastocyst formation or implantation rate as the primary end-point and additional data are required, for example, about live birth, monozygotic twinning rates and health problems. Furthermore, the features of populations studies are varied; for example, female and male age, seminal characteristics and female factor. The embryo culture conditions and culture medium used also vary. For this review, a search of PubMed was conducted to retrieve relevant studies regarding use of TLS in embryo incubation and selection, and compare them with standard embryo culture and evaluation.

The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of  implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.

STUDY QUESTION: Can we use morphokinetic markers to select the embryos most likely to implant and are the results likely to be consistent across different clinics? SUMMARY ANSWER: Yes, morphokinetic markers can be used to select the embryos most likely to implant and the results were similar in different IVF clinics that share methods and organization to some extent. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: With the introduction of time-lapse technology several authors have proposed the use of kinetic markers to improve embryo selection. The majority of these markers can be detected as early as Day 2 of development. Morphology remains the gold standard but kinetic markers have been proven as excellent tools to complement our decisions. Nevertheless, the majority of time-lapse studies are based on small data sets deriving from one single clinic. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective multicentric study of 1664 cycles of which 799 were used to develop an algorithm (Phase 1 of the study) and 865 to test its predictive power (Phase 2 of the study). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: University-affiliated infertility centres patients undergoing first or second ICSI cycle using their own or donated oocytes. Embryo development was analysed with a time-lapse imaging system. Variables studied included the timing to two cells (t2), three cells (t3), four cells (t4) and five cells (t5) as well as the length of the second cell cycle (cc2 = t3 - t2) and the synchrony in the division from two to four cells (s2 = t4 - t3). Implantation (IR) and clinical pregnancy (CPR) rates were also analysed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: During Phase 1 of the study we identified three variables most closely related to implantation: t3 (34-40 h), followed by cc2 (9-12 h) and t5 (45-55 h). Based on these results we elaborated an algorithm that classified embryos from A to D according to implantation potential. During Phase 2 of the study the algorithm was validated in a different group of patients that included 865 cycles and 1620 embryos transferred. In this phase of the study, embryos were categorized based on the algorithm and significant differences in IR were observed between the different categories ('A' 32%, 'B' 28%, 'C' 26%, 'D' 20% and 'E' 17%, P < 0.001). In addition we identified three quality criteria: direct cleavage from one to three cells, uneven blastomere size in second cell cycle and multinucleation in third cell cycle. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective nature of the study limits its potential value, although the use of one database to generate the algorithm (embryos from this database were not selected by any morphokinetic criteria) and one database to validate it reinforces our conclusions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The elaboration of an algorithm based on a larger database derived from different (albeit related) clinics raises the possibility that such algorithms could be applied in different clinical settings.

Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles.

BACKGROUND: The influence of elevated serum progesterone levels during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles on pregnancy rates is a matter of continued debate among fertility clinicians. Efforts to resolve this question have been impeded by the various assays used to measure progesterone and the different, arbitrary threshold values for defining 'high' progesterone levels. METHODS: A non-interventional, retrospective, observational, single-centre cohort study evaluated the relationship between serum progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration and the ongoing pregnancy rate in 4032 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for pituitary down-regulation. RESULTS: Ongoing pregnancy rates were inversely associated with serum progesterone levels on the day of hCG (P < 0.001 for overall trend), irrespective of the GnRH analogue used for pituitary down-regulation. Patients with serum progesterone levels < or = 1.5 ng/ml had significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates than those with progesterone levels >1.5 ng/ml (31.0 versus 19.1%; P = 0.00006); odds ratio, 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.72). Multivariate regression analysis showed that daily follicle-stimulating hormone dose, number of oocytes and estradiol values on the day of hCG administration were positively associated with progesterone levels (P < 0.0001 for all). Serum progesterone levels were significantly greater in women treated with GnRH agonists (n = 1177) versus antagonists (n = 2855; 0.84 +/- 0.67 versus 0.75 +/- 0.66 ng/ml; P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum progesterone levels on the day of hCG administration is associated with reduced ongoing pregnancy rates. In particular, serum progesterone levels of >1.5 ng/ml were associated with lower ongoing pregnancy rates following IVF/ICSI cycles irrespective of the GnRH analogue used for pituitary down-regulation.

Improving FISH diagnosis for preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening.

BACKGROUND: In our routine programme of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening (PGS) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), nine chromosomes (13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, X and Y) are analysed in two consecutive hybridization rounds. We also perform additional hybridization rounds for these chromosomes, using probes that bind to different loci, for non-conclusive results and for confirmation of certain aneuploidies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of additional hybridization rounds on FISH accuracy. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of our FISH data from 1000 PGS cycles performed from December 2007 to December 2008 for various indications. In addition to the hybridization rounds described above, 132 of the embryos diagnosed as chromosomally abnormal were re-analysed on Day 5. RESULTS: A total of 2477 embryos were re-hybridized, 1496 due to non-conclusive results and 981 to confirm observed aneuploidies. After re-hybridization, 882 embryos (59%) were then diagnosed as normal, 600 embryos (40.1%) had a clear abnormality and only 14 embryos (0.9%) remained non-informative. From the 981 embryos in the latter group, 890 embryos had monosomies and, after re-hybridization 174 embryos (19.6%) were normal and 716 (80.5%) had confirmed monosomies. In contrast, re-hybridization confirmed 90 (98.9%) of the 91 observed trisomies. In addition, Day-5 re-analysis of abnormal embryos showed a higher rate of concordant diagnosis between Day 3 and Day 5 when re-hybridizations had been included on Day-3 (95 versus 82.7%; P= 0.0443), especially for the confirmation of monosomies (82.8 versus 61.0%; P = 0.0087). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that additional hybridization rounds improve the accuracy of the diagnosis, increasing the number of chromosomally normal embryos available for transfer. Re-hybridization with additional probes as a standard approach to PGS could enhance the potential benefits of the technique.

Y chromosome microdeletions, sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm oxidative stress as causes of recurrent spontaneous abortion of unknown etiology.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the implication of male factor, in terms of sperm DNA oxidation and fragmentation, and Y chromosome microdeletions in recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) of unknown origin in a strictly selected cohort. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out in a private university-affiliated setting. Three groups, each comprised of 30 males, were compared. The first was formed by healthy and fertile sperm donors (SD) with normal sperm parameters (control group), the second by men presenting severe oligozoospermia (SO) without RSA history, and the third by men from couples who had experienced idiopathic RSA. Frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions and mean sperm DNA fragmentation and oxidation were determined. RESULTS: Y chromosome microdeletions were not detected in any of the males enrolled in the study. Moreover, sperm DNA oxidation measurements were not demonstrated to be relevant to RSA. Interestingly, sperm DNA fragmentation was higher in the SO group than in the RSA and the SD groups, and also higher in the RSA group compared with the SD group, but lacked an adequate predictive power to be employed as a discriminative test of RSA condition. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm DNA features and Y chromosome microdeletions do not seem to be related to RSA of unknown origin. Other molecular features of sperm should be studied to determine their possible influence on RSA. Clinicaltrials.gov reference: NCT00447395.

GnRH agonist versus recombinant HCG in an oocyte donation programme: a randomized, prospective, controlled, assessor-blind study.

The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for triggering ovulation remains controversial. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) following GnRH agonist versus recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) as methods for triggering ovulation. A second aim was to compare the clinical outcome and embryo quality according to the two procedures. The cycle characteristics of 100 oocyte donors undergoing ovarian stimulation and IVF outcomes of their 100 oocyte recipients were analysed. Donors were prospectively randomized into two groups on the last day of ovarian stimulation: Group I received a single bolus of 0.2 mg of triptorelin and Group II received 250 microg of recombinant HCG. No differences were observed in the number of oocytes retrieved or in the proportion of metaphase II oocytes between the groups. The OHSS rate was higher in donors that received recombinant HCG ( P = 0.003). Moreover, there was no significant difference between IVF parameters and outcome in the two groups. In conclusion, a GnRH agonist effectively triggers the final oocyte maturation in oocyte donors without negatively affecting implantation, pregnancy or miscarriage rates. Moreover, this regime effectively eliminates the risk of OHSS in this group of women.

Microarray analysis in sperm from fertile and infertile men without basic sperm analysis abnormalities reveals a significantly different transcriptome.

Sperm analysis following World Health Organization guidelines is unable to explain the molecular causes of male infertility when basic sperm parameters are within a normal range and women do not present gynecologic pathology. Consequently, there is a need for accurate diagnostic tools in this area, and microarray technology emerges as promising. We present, for the first time, preliminary results of a comparison of sperm mRNA expression profiles between fertile and infertile men with normal semen parameters, discovering profound discrepancies between groups, with potential diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities.

Effect of different cryopreservation protocols on the metaphase II spindle in human oocytes.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different cryopreservation protocols on the repolymerization of metaphase (M)II spindles in human oocytes. Fresh aspirated donor oocytes were cryopreserved 3-4 h after retrieval using four different protocols: slow freezing using 1.5 mol/l 1,2-propanediol (PROH) + 0.2 mol/l sucrose (n = 36); 1.5 mol/l PROH + 0.3 mol/l sucrose (n = 34); 1.5 mol/l PROH + 0.3 mol/l sucrose with Na(+) depleted-choline replaced media (n = 27), and vitrification by the Cryotip method (n = 23). The control group comprised 34 fresh oocytes. Three hours after thawing, surviving and control oocytes were fixed for meiotic spindle/chromatin assessment. Survival rates were 63.8, 73.5, 74.1 and 86.9% respectively for the four protocols described above. Survival for vitrified oocytes was higher than that observed for slow freezing with 0.2 and 0.3 mol/l sucrose (P < 0.05). The proportion of oocytes showing normal spindle configuration was similar for the four protocols (81, 73.9, 88.9 and 81.3% respectively) and 88.5% for controls, showing that the MII spindle returns to its normal configuration after 3 h of post-thawing incubation under standard conditions, irrespective of the cryopreservation technique used.

Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists--a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Highly purified hMG (hp-hMG) has recently shown better cycle outcome than the recombinant FSH (rFSH) when compared in GnRH agonist long protocol cycles. However, they have not yet been compared in GnRH antagonist cycles. METHODS: A RCT comparing the ongoing pregnancy rate (primary end-point) in 280 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI after stimulation with hp-hMG or rFSH controlled with a GnRH antagonist. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between hp-hMG and rFSH in terms of the ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle (35.0 versus 32.1%, respectively; P = 0.61); relative risk: 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.78-1.51; risk difference: 2.9%). No differences were observed for implantation, clinical pregnancy and pregnancy loss rates. More oocytes were obtained from patients receiving rFSH then hMG (14.4 +/- 8.1 versus 11.3 +/- 6.0, respectively; P = 0.001). Estradiol was higher at the end of stimulation in the hp-hMG group (P = 0.02), whereas progesterone was higher in patients stimulated with rFSH (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A similar outcome was observed for hp-hMG and rFSH when used for stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycles. However, some differences were found in ovarian response in terms of oocyte yield and hormonal profile. Clinical Trials.gov TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00669786.

Vitrification: an effective new approach to oocyte banking and preserving fertility in cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Oocyte cryopreservation is a useful tool for preserving the fertility of cancer patients at risk of losing ovarian function due to undergoing potentially sterilising therapies. Results obtained with different cryopreservation protocols have been disappointing, particularly those obtained with slow cooling procedures. The efficacy of vitrification as an application in clinical practice has recently been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to report results obtained with the Cryotop method of oocyte vitrification in a population of healthy women and to point out its potential usefulness for fertility preservation in oncological patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisting of non-oncological patients included 47 oocyte donors and 57 recipients undergoing an oocyte donation cycle of assisted reproductive technology (ART). A total of 693 mature metaphase II oocytes were collected following ovarian stimulation using long protocol down-regulation plus gonadotropin administration. Vitrification was carried out by means of the Cryotop method. Oocytes were donated to a compatible recipient after endometrial preparation. RESULTS: Of the 693 oocytes, 666 (96.1%) survived. A total of 487 (73.1%) were fertilised successfully. One hundred and seventeen embryos were transferred to 57 recipients. Pregnancy rate per transfer and implantation rates were 63.2% and 38.5% respectively. Twenty-eight healthy babies were later born. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte cryo-banking by means of the Cryotop vitrification method represents a viable option for healthy women, producing excellent survival rates and a clinical outcome similar to that obtained with fresh oocytes. This approach could potentially be used in cancer patients who want to safeguard their fertility. Cancer patients could potentially benefit from this approach by storing their oocytes before the onset of the oncological therapy.

Vitrification: an effective new approach to oocyte banking and preserving fertility in cancer patients

INTRODUCTION: Oocyte cryopreservation is a useful tool for preserving the fertility of cancer patients at risk of losing ovarian function due to undergoing potentially sterilising therapies. Results obtained with different cryopreservation protocols have been disappointing, particularly those obtained with slow cooling procedures. The efficacy of vitrification as an application in clinical practice has recently been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to report results obtained with the Cryotop method of oocyte vitrification in a population of healthy women and to point out its potential usefulness for fertility preservation in oncological patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisting of non-oncological patients included 47 oocyte donors and 57 recipients undergoing an oocyte donation cycle of assisted reproductive technology (ART). A total of 693 mature metaphase II oocytes were collected following ovarian stimulation using long protocol down-regulation plus gonadotropin administration. Vitrification was carried out by means of the Cryotop method. Oocytes were donated to a compatible recipient after endometrial preparation. RESULTS: Of the 693 oocytes, 666 (96.1%) survived. A total of 487 (73.1%) were fertilised successfully. One hundred and seventeen embryos were transferred to 57 recipients. Pregnancy rate per transfer and implantation rates were 63.2% and 38.5% respectively. Twenty-eight healthy babies were later born. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte cryo-banking by means of the Cryotop vitrification method represents a viable option for healthy women, producing excellent survival rates and a clinical outcome similar to that obtained with fresh oocytes. This approach could potentially be used in cancer patients who want to safeguard their fertility. Cancer patients could potentially benefit from this approach by storing their oocytes before the onset of the oncological therapy (AU)

No disponible

[Clinical factors associated with the outcome of oocyte donation]. / Facteurs cliniques et résultats du don d'ovocytes.

This article aims at reviewing the literature in order to provide a summary of the actual knowledge about the clinical factors of the oocyte recipient (other than those affecting the morphology of the uterine cavity) influencing the outcome of oocyte donation cycles. Recipient age, from 45 years onwards, is clearly associated with a poorer outcome in oocyte donation cycles as well as the presence of a hydrosalpinx. The negative impact of smoking has recently been confirmed. The exact influence of a high body mass index is under examination but it is likely that it is associated with a lower ongoing pregnancy rate. Endometriosis does not have a negative impact when standard endometrial priming protocols are used in oocyte donation. During endometrial priming, serum estradiol levels and endometrial thickness, if >5 mm, does not influence negatively the outcome; however duration of estrogen treatment of more than 7 weeks is associated with a diminished pregnancy and implantation rate.