Long-term cognition and speech recognition outcomes after cochlear implantation in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate how cognition, as measured using the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination Test (SAGE), and age affect speech recognition scores in older adults (age > 65) at one year and two years after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single institution. METHODS: Unilateral cochlear implantation was performed by two surgeons on adult patients (>65 years) with postlingual bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. There were 230 patients who underwent cochlear implantation from January 2016 to June 2023. Fifty-five of these patients completed the SAGE questionnaire before implantation, one year after implantation, and 2 years after implantation. Paired t-test analysis was used to evaluate pre- and post-operative speech recognition scores (CNC, AzBio in Quiet). RESULTS: Patients who had normal preoperative cognition on SAGE showed greater improvement in postoperative speech recognition tests at 1 year and 2 years after implantation compared with patients who showed preoperative cognitive impairment. There were no significant differences in postoperative speech outcome between age group 1 (between 65 and 80 years old) and age group 2 (over 80 years old) cochlear implant recipients. There were no changes in cognitive SAGE scores after 2 years implantation. CONCLUSION: Cognitive function, as measured by SAGE, is a more reliable predictor than age in determining speech recognition improvement after cochlear implantation. Cochlear implantation did not improve postoperative cognition.

Clinical performance, audiological outcomes, and quality of life of the Cochlear Osia ® system.

OBJECTIVE: The Cochlear Osseointegrated Steady-State Implant Bone Anchored Hearing Device (Osia) is a surgically implanted titanium apparatus that utilizes a piezoelectric actuator under the skin to address conductive and mixed hearing loss as well as single-sided deafness. The purpose of this study is to examine the clinical, audiologic, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients who underwent Osia implantation. METHODS: This is a retrospective study analyzing 30 adult patients (age 27-86) with conductive healing loss (CHL), mixed hearing loss (MHL), or single-sided deafness (SSD) who were implanted with the Osia device from January 2020 to April 2023 at a single institution by the senior author. Preoperative speech score testing (CNC, AzBio in quiet, AzBio in noise) were performed in all subjects while unaided, wearing conventional air conduction hearing aids, and wearing a softband BAHA. These preoperative speech scores were then compared to post-implantation speech scores using paired t-test analysis to assess for degree of speech improvement. In order to analyze quality of life after Osia implantation, each patient filled out the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) survey. The GBI is a series of 18 questions answered using a five-point Likert scale that addresses the changes in general health status, physical health status, psychosocial health status, and social support after a medical intervention. RESULTS: CHL, MHL, and SSD patients had significant improvement in hearing and speech recognition scores after Osia implantation compared to preoperative unaided hearing: CNC (14 % vs 80 %, p < 0.0001), AzBio in Quiet (26 % vs 94 %, p < 0.0001), and AzBio in Noise (36 % vs 87 %, p = 0.0001). Preoperative speech scores using the softband BAHA were accurate predictors of post-implantation speech scores and can serve to determine surgical candidacy for the Osia. Post-implantation Glasgow Benefit Inventory patient surveys demonstrated significant improvement in quality of life with patients scoring an average increase of +54.1 points in heath satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Adult patients with CHL, MHL, and SSD can receive significant improvement in speech recognition scores after implantation with the Osia device. This translates to improved quality of life, which was confirmed on the post-implantation Glasgow Benefit Inventory patient surveys.

Predicting Speech Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults Using the Self-administered Gerocognitive Examination Test.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if a cognitive test, Self-administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE), correlates with speech recognition outcomes 1 year after cochlear implantation in adults over 65 years of age. METHODS: Retrospective study was conducted at a single institution. Surgery was performed by two surgeons on adult patients (>65 yrs) with postlingual bilateral sensorineural hearing loss meeting clinical and audiological candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation. Patients who performed SAGE preimplantation, and speech testing (CNC, AzBio in quiet, AzBio in noise) before and 1 year after implantation were included. RESULTS: Forty patients with a mean age of 78 were included. The overall mean preoperative SAGE score was 17.4 (95% CI 16.2-18.7). Greater than 17 is considered normal. Data demonstrated a statistically significant linear correlation between preoperative SAGE scores with change in speech testing 1 year postoperatively: CNC-Adjusted R-squared: 0.1955, p value: 0.002508; AzBio in quiet-Adjusted R-squared: 0.1564, p value: 0.006686; AzBio in noise-Adjusted R-squared: 0.1543, p value: 0.007053. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that age and SAGE scores both statistically correlated with speech testing 1 year after implantation (p = 0.01 for both). Patients who passed the SAGE (≥17) had statistically significant higher CNC, AzBio in quiet, and AzBio in noise scores 1 year postoperatively compared with patients with low SAGE scores (<17) despite statistically similar age means in each group. CONCLUSION: SAGE can predict speech recognition testing 1 year after cochlear implantation in older adults over 65 years of age.