Intraoperative Sensory Signals Predict Prognosis for Patients with Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (tCSCI), the potential role of intraoperative neuromonitoring as a prognostic tool has been insufficiently studied. This study aimed to determine if detectable signals during intraoperative neuromonitoring portend a greater likelihood of recovery for patients with tCSCI. METHODS: Patients who underwent decompression and surgical fixation following tCSCI were retrospectively reviewed through previously prospectively collected data from the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. Improvement in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and ASIA Impairment Scale grade conversion rates at final follow-up were compared between patients with detectable intraoperative neuromonitoring somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) signals and those without detectable signals. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients had intraoperative neuromonitoring. Patients with incomplete tCSCI had detectable lower extremity SSEPs more often than patients with complete tCSCI (56.3% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.028). There was no difference in detectable upper extremity SSEPs between complete and incomplete tCSCI (65.6% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.638). Of the 17 patients with complete tCSCI, patients with detectable lower extremity SSEPs had ASIA motor scores similar to the nondetectable cohort on admission (21.5 vs. 16.2, P = 0.609) but higher ASIA motor scores at final follow-up (57.5 vs. 27.1, P = 0.041). Of the 32 patients with incomplete spinal cord injury, there was no difference in grade conversion or motor scores between detectable and nondetectable SSEP cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of upper extremity SSEP signals in patients who present with complete tCSCI portends greater improvement in ASIA motor scores and likelihood of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade conversion at final follow-up.

Rate of Delayed Union With Early Weightbearing Following Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Jones Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Jones fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are predisposed to delayed union and nonunion due to a tenuous blood supply. Solid intramedullary (IM) screw fixation is recommended to improve healing, traditionally followed by delayed weightbearing (DWB). However, early weightbearing (EWB) postoperatively may facilitate functional recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare union rates and time to union after solid IM screw fixation of Jones fractures in patients treated with an EWB protocol to those treated with a DWB protocol, as well as to identify any factors that may be predictive of delayed or nonunion. METHODS: True Jones (zone 2 fifth metatarsal base) fractures treated from April 2012 through January 2018 with IM screw fixation and 6 months follow-up were identified (41 fractures in 40 patients; mean ± SD age, 45.3 ± 17.9 years). Patients were divided into EWB and DWB cohorts (within or beyond 2 weeks, respectively). Delayed union (12.5 weeks) was statistically derived from established literature. Union times were compared between cohorts. Regression analyses were conducted to investigate possible confounders contributing to delayed union. There were 20 fractures in the EWB cohort and 21 fractures in the DWB cohort. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in healing times (EWB: 25% by 6th week, 55% by the 12th week, 20% delayed; DWB: 33% by 6th week, 43% by 12th week, 24% delayed; P = .819) or delayed unions (EWB, 20% vs DWB, 24%; P > .999). There were no nonunions. No significant confounding risk factors were identified. CONCLUSION: Postoperative protocols using early weightbearing following solid IM screw fixation of Jones fractures appear to be safe and do not delay fracture healing or increase the risk of delayed union. Older age may be a risk for delayed union, but larger studies are needed to evaluate this with appropriate power in light of possible confounders. EWB protocols may allow better functional recovery without compromising outcomes by increasing the risk of delayed union. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III, retrospective comparative study.