Maintaining Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Treatment with Patiromer in Hyperkalaemic Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Comparison of a Propensity-Matched Real-World Population with AMETHYST-DN.

INTRODUCTION: Guideline-directed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy is rarely achieved in clinical settings, often due to hyperkalaemia. We assessed the potassium binder, patiromer, on continuation of RAASi therapy in hyperkalaemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the AMETHYST-DN trial, propensity score-matched to a real-world cohort not receiving patiromer (Salford Kidney Study). METHODS: The phase 2, open-label AMETHYST-DN trial (NCT01371747) randomized 304 adults with CKD on RAASi, T2DM, hyperkalaemia (serum potassium [sK+] >5.0 mEq/L), and hypertension to receive patiromer, 8.4-33.6 g/day for 12 months. Patients underwent propensity score matching for systolic blood pressure (BP), heart failure status, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with 321 patients with CKD, T2DM, hyperkalaemia, and on RAASi from a prospective CKD cohort (Salford Kidney Study). Changes in RAASi utilization, sK+, BP, proteinuria, and eGFR during 12-month follow-up were assessed by Mann-Whitney U or χ2 tests. RESULTS: Matching produced 135:135 patients with no significant differences in age, sex, systolic BP, sK+, eGFR, or heart failure status, although differences in diastolic BP remained (p < 0.001). After 12 months, 100% of AMETHYST-DN patients receiving patiromer remained on RAASi therapy, whereas 38.5% of the Salford Kidney Cohort discontinued RAASi (p < 0.001); hyperkalaemia contributed in 16% of patients (42% of RAASi discontinuations). Significantly greater reductions in sK+ and BP, but not proteinuria or eGFR, were observed in AMETHYST-DN, compared with Salford Kidney Study patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the benefit of patiromer for sK+ management to enable RAASi use while revealing beneficial effects on BP.

Antihypertensive prescribing patterns in non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease: Findings from the Salford Kidney Study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is commonly observed in patients living with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Finding an optimal treatment regime remains challenging due to the complex bidirectional cause-and-effect relationship between hypertension and CKD. There remains variability in antihypertensive treatment practices. AIM: To analyze data from the Salford Kidney Study database in relation to antihypertensive prescribing patterns amongst CKD patients. METHODS: The Salford Kidney Study is an ongoing prospective study that has been recruiting CKD patients since 2002. All patients are followed up annually, and their medical records including the list of medications are updated until they reach study endpoints [starting on renal replacement therapy or reaching estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) expressed as mL/min/1.73 m2 ≤ 10 mL/min/1.73 m2, or the last follow-up date, or data lock on December 31, 2021, or death]. Data on antihypertensive prescription practices in correspondence to baseline eGFR, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, primary CKD aetiology, and cardiovascular disease were evaluated. Associations between patients who were prescribed three or more antihypertensive agents and their clinical outcomes were studied by Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated differences in survival probabilities. RESULTS: Three thousand two hundred and thirty non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients with data collected between October 2002 and December 2019 were included. The median age was 65 years. A greater proportion of patients were taking three or more antihypertensive agents with advancing CKD stages (53% of eGFR ≤ 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 26% of eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.001). An increased number of patients receiving more classes of antihypertensive agents was observed as the urine albumin-creatinine ratio category increased (category A3: 62% vs category A1: 40%, P < 0.001), with the upward trends particularly noticeable in the number of individuals prescribed renin angiotensin system blockers. The prescription of three or more antihypertensive agents was associated with all-cause mortality, independent of blood pressure control (hazard ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.27, P = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier analysis illustrated significant differences in survival outcomes between patients with three or more and those with less than three antihypertensive agents prescribed (log-rank, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Antihypertensive prescribing patterns in the Salford Kidney Study based on CKD stage were consistent with expectations from the current United Kingdom National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline algorithm. Outcomes were poorer in patients with poor blood pressure control despite being on multiple antihypertensive agents. Continued research is required to bridge remaining variations in hypertension treatment practices worldwide.

Kidney Transplant-Associated Viral Infection Rates and Outcomes in a Single-Centre Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of post-transplant DNA virus infections (CMV, EBV, BKV and JCV infections) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) at a single tertiary centre and evaluate their impact on graft outcomes. METHODS: KTR transplanted between 2000 and 2021 were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to identify factors associated with DNA virus infections and their impact on allograft outcomes respectively. A sub-analysis of individual viral infections was also conducted to describe the pattern, timing, interventions, and outcomes of individual infections. RESULTS: Data from 962 recipients were evaluated (Mean age 47.3 ± 15 years, 62% male, 81% white). 30% of recipients (288/962) had infection(s) by one or more of the DNA viruses. Individually, CMV, EBV, BKV and JCV viruses were diagnosed in 13.8%. 11.3%, 8.9% and 4.4% of recipients respectively. Factors associated with increased risk of post-transplant DNA virus infection included recipient female gender, higher number of HLA mismatch, lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CMV seropositive donor, maintenance with cyclosporin (rather than tacrolimus) and higher number of maintenance immunosuppressive medications. The slope of eGFR decline was steeper in recipients with a history of DNA virus infection irrespective of the virus type. Further, GFR declined faster with an increasing number of different viral infections. Death-censored graft loss adjusted for age, gender, total HLA mismatch, baseline eGFR and acute rejection was significantly higher in recipients with a history of DNA virus infection than those without infection (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR, 1.74, 95% CI, 1.08-2.80)). In contrast, dialysis-free survival did not differ between the two groups of recipients (aHR, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.88-1.47). CONCLUSION: Post-transplant DNA viral infection is associated with a higher risk of allograft loss. Careful management of immunosuppression and close surveillance of at-risk recipients may improve graft outcomes.

The Role of Iron in Calciphylaxis-A Current Review.

Calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA), also known as calciphylaxis, is a rare and often fatal condition, frequently diagnosed in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Although exact pathogenesis remains unclear, iron supplementation is suggested as a potential risk factor. Iron and erythropoietin are the main stay of treatment for anaemia in ESRD patients. Few observational studies support the role of iron in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis although data from the pivotal trial was not strongly supportive of this argument, i.e., no difference in incidence of calciphylaxis between the low-dose and high-dose iron treatment arms. Elevated levels of vascular cell adhesion molecules in association with iron excess were postulated to the pathogenesis of CUA by causing inflammation and calcification within the microvasculature. In-addition, oxidative stress generated because of iron deposition in cases of systemic inflammation, such as those seen in ESRD, may play a role in vascular calcification. Despite these arguments, a direct correlation between cumulative iron exposure with CUA incidence is not clearly demonstrated in the literature. Consequently, we do not have evidence to recommend iron reduction or cessation in ESRD patients that develop CUA.