Real-World Outcomes of Everolimus and Exemestane for the Treatment of Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer in Patients Previously Treated With CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Everolimus with exemestane (EVE+EXE) was FDA-approved to treat metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (mHRBC) based on BOLERO-2. However, none of those patients received prior CDK4/6 inhibitors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of EVE+EXE in mHRBC after CDK4/6 inhibitors. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients ≥18 years old with mHRBC treated with EVE+EXE, for ≥30 days, at our institution from January 1, 2012, to April 1, 2020 was conducted. Primary objective was to compare progression free survival (PFS) for EVE+EXE between patients with and without prior exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: 192 patients were included in the study (n = 79, prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use; n = 113, no prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use). Baseline patient characteristics were similar between groups. Greater number of prior therapies before EVE+EXE use increased risk of disease progression (P = .017). Patients with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use had a lower median PFS of 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.4-4.7) vs. 5.4 months (95% CI: 3.9-6.2) for patients without prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use, with a HR for progression of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.08 to 1.97, P = .013). Overall survival between groups was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Patients who received a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor had a lower median PFS benefit from EVE+EXE compared to those who did not, without differences in overall survival. Although PFS is expected to decrease with subsequent lines of therapy, it is reasonable to use EVE+EXE after CDK4/6 inhibitors in selected patients, recognizing that additional benefit is modest.

Expansion of pharmacist clinical services to optimize the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities.

INTRODUCTION: The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer treatment and is now a part of the treatment paradigm for several malignancies. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors are generally well tolerated, treatment is associated with immune-related adverse events, some serious and potentially life threatening. Early identification and prompt appropriate management of immune-related adverse events are crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality. The complexity and severity of immune-related adverse events require interdisciplinary collaboration to optimize care. Patient and caregiver education and continued communication between patients and members of the oncology care team are vital for timely recognition and successful management of immune-related adverse events. The objective of this program is to provide a proof of concept; a pharmacist-led immune checkpoint inhibitor management program will increase early recognition and management of immune-related adverse events through patient and caregiver education and proactively assessing patients for toxicities. METHODS: At the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, we developed and implemented a pharmacist-driven program, referred to as the immune checkpoint inhibitor program, which aimed to ensure patient and caregiver education and continuous monitoring of immune-related adverse events. This program utilized pharmacist-patient encounters to improve patient and caregiver education and follow-up monitoring. The design and implementation are detailed. Pharmacist interventions and patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: At interim analysis, 47 patients were enrolled in the program and pharmacists completed 34 interventions on 26 patients. Pharmacists are well positioned to educate patients and caregivers on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and provide proactive monitoring to detect immune-related adverse events. We hypothesize that the interventions made by pharmacist may lead to earlier recognition and treatment of immune-related adverse events.