Premature discontinuation among individuals with epilepsy participating in epilepsy self-management research interventions.

OBJECTIVE: The Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network conducts epilepsy self-management (ESM) intervention development, testing, and archival clinical trials data analyses in the MEW Network Integrated Database (MEW-DB). However, not all trial participants fully benefit from ESM due to prematurely discontinuing program participation. This analysis sought to identify demographic and clinical predictors of premature discontinuation (PD) of ESM interventions available in the MEW-DB. METHODS: Data from prior studies were included if: 1) they were prospective trials testing an ESM intervention, 2) included baseline assessment and at least one post-intervention assessment, and 3) included data on PD. Dependent variables were all-cause PD, categorized as a binary variable (yes/no) and time to PD for the intervals between baseline and follow-up visit 1 (V1; approximately week 12) and visit two (V2; approximately week 24). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors affecting PD time-point. Explanatory variables included age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, employment, income, marital status, psychiatric comorbidities, depressive severity, anxiety symptoms, self-efficacy, number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), health status, seizure frequency, and study design. RESULTS: Six prior MEW-DB studies were included, consisting of 627 people, where 624 were assigned to ESM or to control. PD among randomized individuals was 14.3 % by V1 and 15.7 % by V2. Predictors for V1 PD were treatment (ESM) vs. control arm, more severe depressive symptoms and having schizophrenia. Predictors for V2 PD were younger age, white race, more severe depressive symptoms and having schizophrenia. SIGNIFICANCE: While ESM approaches can improve multiple health outcomes among people with epilepsy, nearly one in six individuals prematurely discontinues their program. These findings suggest that ESM interventionists need to be particularly attentive to program retention over the first 3 months after ESM initiation. Younger people with epilepsy, those who self-identify as white, those with schizophrenia, and/or more severe depressive symptoms may need additional support for engagement.

A randomized controlled trial of customized adherence enhancement (CAE-E): study protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation project.

BACKGROUND: Mood-stabilizing medications are a cornerstone of treatment for people with bipolar disorder, though approximately half of these individuals are poorly adherent with their medication, leading to negative and even severe health consequences. While a variety of approaches can lead to some improvement in medication adherence, there is no single approach that has superior adherence enhancement and limited data on how these approaches can be implemented in clinical settings. Existing data have shown an increasing need for virtual delivery of care and interactive telemedicine interventions may be effective in improving adherence to long-term medication. METHODS: Customized adherence enhancement (CAE) is a brief, practical bipolar-specific approach that identifies and targets individual patient adherence barriers for intervention using a flexibly administered modular format that can be delivered via telehealth communications. CAE is comprised of up to four standard treatment modules including Psychoeducation, Communication with Providers, Medication Routines, and Modified Motivational Interviewing. Participants will attend assigned module sessions with an interventionist based on their reasons for non-adherence and will be assessed for adherence, functioning, bipolar symptoms, and health resource use across a 12-month period. Qualitative and quantitative data will also be collected to assess barriers and facilitators to CAE implementation and reach and adoption of CAE among clinicians in the community. DISCUSSION: The proposed study addresses the need for practical adherence interventions that are effective, flexible, and designed to adapt to different settings and patients. By focusing on a high-risk, vulnerable group of people with bipolar disorder, and refining an evidence-based approach that will integrate into workflow of public-sector care and community mental health clinics, there is substantial potential for improving bipolar medication adherence and overall health outcomes on a broad level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04622150 on November 9, 2020.

A community-targeted implementation of self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART): A research and community partnership to reduce epilepsy burden.

AIMS: Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART) is a behavioral intervention that has been demonstrated to reduce epilepsy-related complications and improve physical and mental health functioning among people with epilepsy (PWE) [1]. The Community-SMART (C-SMART) initiative was a 4-month prospective implementation of feasibility and pre/post outcomes of SMART in a community setting and in collaboration with key epilepsy service stakeholders. METHODS: Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events is a group-format, entirely virtual intervention delivered in eight 60-90 sessions over the course of 8-10 weeks. The C-SMART initiative used research staff to guide intervention performance evaluation and staff of a regional epilepsy advocacy agency to assist with community engagement. Process evaluations included outreach and engagement efforts needed to reach PWE, the barriers and facilitators to roll-out, and participant retention and satisfaction. Outcomes included depressive symptoms and epilepsy self-management competency. RESULTS: Thirty individuals were enrolled in 3 "cohorts" of approximately 10 PWE per cohort. Mean age of participants was 48.50 (standard deviation 16.15) years, 60% were female and 53.3% were African-American. Individuals had epilepsy, on average, for over 2 decades, were on approximately 2 prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and had an average of just over 6 seizures in the last 30 days. Over 63% had a comorbid mental health condition. There were 23 individuals (76.7%) who were retained at the 4-month follow-up. Baseline to 4-month outcomes for depression and epilepsy self-management were significantly improved. Most (90%) of participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSIONS: The SMART epilepsy self-management program can be successfully implemented in partnership with epilepsy-focused community partners, is acceptable to participants and associated with improved outcomes. Future work might consider how to make virtual epilepsy self-management available to the full spectrum of PWE.

Findings From a Real-World Translation Study of the Evidence-Based "Partners in Dementia Care".

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Numerous non-pharmacological programs for family caregivers and persons with dementia (PWDs) have been found efficacious in randomized controlled trials. Few programs have been tested in translation studies that assess feasibility and outcomes in less-controlled, real-world implementations. This translation study tested the impact of the partnership version of BRI Care Consultation, "Partners in Dementia Care (PDC)," on outcomes for PWDs and their family/friend caregivers. PDC was delivered via partnerships between the Louis Stokes Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Greater East Ohio Alzheimer's Association Chapter and the Western Reserve Area Agency on Aging. PDC is a personalized coaching program done by telephone, e-mail, and regular mail. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: For this translation study, the program was implemented in a manner that mirrored a non-research implementation. The study sample included 148 caregivers and 84 PWDs who used PDC for 12 months. Research data came from 2 structured telephone interviews, one before program implementation and a follow-up after program completion. PWDs and caregivers averaged 14 telephone contacts with Care Consultants over the 12-month study period, and 12 behavioral action steps to address problems or concerns. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVAs showed the use of PDC was related to significant improvements across several outcomes for PWDs and caregivers, with greater benefits in more difficult caregiving situations. Caregivers had decreased levels of isolation, physical health strain, unmet needs; and increased confidence in caregiving capacity, informal helpers, and support service use. PWDs had decreased embarrassment about memory problems and unmet needs; and increased informal support and community service use. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Overall, improved outcomes for PWDs and caregivers in this translation study were similar to findings from previous randomized trials, and affirmed the value of the program when delivered as a regular service offering by health care and community service organizations.