Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
1.
Urol Oncol ; 42(4): 115.e9-115.e16, 2024 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depending on the risk of LN metastasis ePLND at RP is recommended. As ePLND has potential side effects, and diagnostics have improved substantially, our objective was to evaluate the performance of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a contemporary cohort with preoperative negative PSMA-PET. METHODS: Patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (CaP), undergoing RP and ePND at our center with preoperative negative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET were included. The Accuracy of the nomogram was assessed using ROC analysis. The association of clinical parameters with the presence of LN metastasis was assessed using logistic regression. Specimen of prostate and LNs in patients with false negative PSMA-PET were additionally stained for AR and PSMA expression and assessed by IHC. RESULTS: The study included 108 patients, 28% intermediate- and 72% high-risk. Twelve patients harbored occult LN metastasis. Accuracy of the nomogram was 0.62. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed a NPV of 89%. IHC showed expression of PSMA and AR in the primary and LN metastasis in all patients. On logistic regression analysis only DRE (OR 2.72; 95%CI 1.01-7.35; P = 0.05) and percentage of cores with significant CaP (OR 1.29; 95%CI 1.05-1.60; P = 0.02) showed a significant association with LN metastasis. CONCLUSION: The currently used nomogram is suboptimal in detecting patients with occult LNM. While the cut-off value to perform ePLND can be increased slightly following a negative PSMA-PET scan, more accurate methods of identifying these patients are needed. Whether ePLND can have a therapeutic benefit, as opposed to a diagnostic only, needs to be re-evaluated in the PSMA-PET era.


Asunto(s)
Radioisótopos de Galio , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico por imagen , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología
2.
Eur Urol Focus ; 2023 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38161107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on real-world outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) since immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. Our objective was to analyze outcomes for patients with mUC since ICIs became available. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 131 patients with mUC attending the outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care center who received systemic therapy between June 2017 and July 2021 with follow-up up to December 2022. Summary and descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical and continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate survival, and a Cox proportional-hazards model was used to explore associations between clinical variables and outcomes. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The median patient age was 68 yr (range 35-90). The first systemic therapy administered was platinum-based in 79% of cases and ICI-based in 21%. Some 61% of the cohort received a second systemic treatment, with 75% of these an ICI. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 24 mo (interquartile range 9-35). Patients on ICI therapy for ≥6 mo had median overall survival of 59 mo (95% confidence interval 39 mo-not reached). Metastatic sites on initiation of ICI therapy and C-reactive protein kinetics were prognostic in patients receiving ICIs. Limitations include the retrospective design and inherent selection bias. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: More than 60% of patients with mUC received second-line treatment, and 75% of these received an ICI. Patients staying on immunotherapy for more than 6 mo have substantially better outcomes in comparison to patients with less time on immunotherapy and historical cohorts. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the lines of therapy and outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer of the urinary tract, starting from when immunotherapy drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. We found that 60% of patients have received second-line therapy, which is a double the rate in comparison to historical groups of patients. Patients with long-term ICI therapy (>6 months) had significantly better outcomes, with a median survival of more than 3 years.

3.
World J Urol ; 41(8): 2091-2097, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37528288

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Determining the frequency and distribution of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in Austrian prostate cancer (PCa) patients and to assess the accuracy of different clinical risk scores to correctly predict PGVs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 313 men with advanced PCa. A comprehensive personal and family history was obtained based on predefined questionnaires. Germline DNA sequencing was performed between 2019 and 2021 irrespective of family history, metastatic or castration status or age at diagnosis. Clinical risk scores for hereditary cancer syndromes were evaluated and a PCa-specific score was developed to assess the presence of PGVs. RESULTS: PGV presence was associated with metastasis (p = 0.047) and castration resistance (p = 0.011), but not with personal cancer history or with relatives with any type of cancer. Clinical risk scores (Manchester score, PREMM5 score, Amsterdam II criteria or Johns Hopkins criteria) showed low sensitivities (3.3-20%) for assessing the probability of PGV presence. A score specifically designed for PCa patients stratifying patients into low- or high-risk regarding PGV probability, correctly classified all PGV carriers as high-risk, whereas a third of PCa patients without PGVs was classified as low risk of the presence of PGVs. CONCLUSION: Application of common clinical risk scores based on family history are not suitable to identify PCa patients with high PGV probabilities. A PCa-specific score stratified PCa patients into low- or high-risk of PGV presence with sufficient accuracy, and germline DNA sequencing may be omitted in patients with a low score. Further studies are needed to evaluate the score.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Células Germinativas/patología , Austria , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad
4.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 12911, 2022 07 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35902635

RESUMEN

Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (PSC) is a rare disease with limited information on the molecular events leading to malignant transformation. In a third of PSC cases, presence of human papilloma virus (HPV) is found. The APOBEC3 family of proteins is known to play a significant role in defense against HPV infection, but their role in PSC is largely unknown. In this study, we aim to assess mRNA expression levels of APOBEC3 family members in HPV+ and HPV- PSC to get insight into their association with clinicopathological features and to evaluate their prognostic impact. Expression levels of six APOBEC3 family members in tissue from 50 patients with PSC were determined by RT-PCR and correlated with clinical and histopathological features. Lower expression of APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, and APOBEC3C was observed in advanced PSC stages. Except for APOBEC3D, HPV+ samples showed higher expression of APOBEC3s compared to HPV- samples. In univariate analyses, APOBEC3A and APOBEC3C expression tended to be associated with disease-free survival and APOBEC3A expression with overall survival; however, multivariable analyses failed to confirm these associations with outcome. More extensive external validation and functional laboratory studies are needed to evaluate further their role in PSC development and progression.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Desaminasas APOBEC , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Citidina Desaminasa/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Menor/genética , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/genética , Pene/patología , Pronóstico
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(8): 5307-5316, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35347517

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis-related marker vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) has been shown to be elevated in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), but its predictive/prognostic role has not been determined. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the predictive/prognostic role of VCAM-1 for patients who have UCB treated with radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS: The study enrolled 1036 patients with clinically non-metastatic advanced UCB who underwent RC, and plasma VCAM-1 was evaluated preoperatively. The correlation of plasma VCAM-1 with pathologic and survival outcomes was assessed using binominal logistic regression and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the curve and concordance indices. The clinical net benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Preoperative VCAM-1 was significantly elevated in patients with adverse pathologic features. Higher VCAM-1 levels were independently associated with increased risk of lymph-node-metastasis (LNM), ≥pT3 disease, and non-organ-confined disease (NOCD (p < 0.001 for each). Preoperative plasma VCAM-1 was independently associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in pre- and postoperative multivariable models. Adding VCAM-1 to these predictive models improved their discriminatory ability to predict all outcomes by a significant margin. In the DCA, VCAM-1 addition to the reference models for prediction of LNM, NOCD, RFS, and CSS resulted in relevant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma VCAM-1 was associated with biologically and clinically aggressive UCB disease features. After validation, preoperative VCAM-1 may serve as a biomarker to help identify patients likely to benefit from intensified/multimodal therapy. In addition, VCAM-1 improved the discriminatory power of predictive/prognostic models and can be used to refine personalized clinical decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Cistectomía , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Molécula 1 de Adhesión Celular Vascular
6.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 169: 103570, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902554

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the oncologic and toxicity outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients treated with radical surgery for urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in the network meta-analysis of different therapy regimens compared to observation or placebo. RESULTS: Nine studies comprised of 2,444 patients met the eligibility criteria. In bladder UC, chemotherapy, atezolizumab, and nivolumab did not improve disease progression compared to observation/placebo. In upper tract UC (UTUC), chemotherapy was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of disease progression compared to observation/placebo, while atezolizumab and nivolumab were not. Based on the analysis of the treatment ranking, adjuvant chemotherapy appeared as the best treatment approach in both bladder UC and UTUC. The risk of adverse events with ICIs was comparable to that of observation/placebo. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests a superior oncologic benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy over ICIs in patients treated with radical surgery for both bladder UC and UTUC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Teorema de Bayes , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía
7.
Transl Androl Urol ; 10(10): 4051-4061, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34804847

RESUMEN

Urothelial cancer (UC) is most commonly found in the urinary bladder, but can also appear in the upper urinary tract, where it is associated with several disease-specific challenges affecting its diagnosis, clinical staging, surgical management, and systemic therapy. A significant number of patients experience extra-vesical disease recurrence despite radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), leading to inevitable demise. Over the last years, the therapeutic armamentarium of UC has expanded with several systemic treatment options entering clinical care and deliver the potential to support a more individualized treatment in the near future. Currently, novel targeted therapies are emerging, accompanied with extensive biomarker research, which leads to a better understanding of the disease and therefore, reshaping the treatment landscape continuously and decisively. Though, systemic treatment of UTUC comes along with certain challenges that are specific to the disease, e.g., loss of renal function after RNU, which might result in ineligibility for a cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In this narrative review, the current standard of systemic treatment of UC in the perioperative and metastatic treatment setting are reported, with focus on UTUC. In addition, molecular aspects of UTUC, as well as future directions and specific implications for treatment of patients diagnosed with UTUC are discussed.

8.
Urol Oncol ; 39(11): 764-773, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34400065

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been widely used in the management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the use of systemic therapies in the adjuvant setting of localized and locally advanced RCC has shown conflicting results across the literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of TKIs in the adjuvant setting for patients with localized and locally advanced RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in December 2020 to identify phase III randomized controlled trials of patients receiving adjuvant therapies with TKI for RCC. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints. The secondary endpoints included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of high and any grade. RESULTS: Five trials (S-TRAC, ASSURE, PROTECT, ATLAS, and SORCE) were included in our meta-analysis comprising 6,531 patients. The forest plot revealed that TKI therapy was associated with a significantly longer DFS compared to placebo (pooled HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96, P= 0.004). The Cochrane's Q test (P = 0.51) and I2 test (I2 = 0%) revealed no significant heterogeneity. Adjuvant TKI was not associated with improved OS compared to placebo (pooled HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83-1.04, P= 0.23). The Cochrane's Q test (P = 0.74) and I2 test (I2 = 0%) revealed no significant heterogeneity. The forest plot revealed that TKI therapy, compared to placebo, was associated with higher rates of high grade TRAEs (OR: 5.20, 95% CI: 4.10-6.59, P< 0.00001) as well as any grade TRAEs (OR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.22-12.17, P= 0.02). The Cochrane's Q tests (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.00001, respectively) and I2 tests (I2 = 79% and I2 = 90%, respectively) revealed significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our analyses suggest an improved DFS in patients with localized and locally advanced RCC receiving adjuvant TKI as compared to placebo; however, this did not translate into any significant OS benefit. Additionally, TKI therapy led to significant toxicity. Adjuvant TKI does not seem to offer a satisfactory risk and/orbenefit balance for all patients. Select patients with very poor prognosis may be considered in a shared decision-making process with the patient. With the successful arrival of immune-based therapies in RCC, these may allow a more favorable risk/benefit profile.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología
9.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 4(5): 755-765, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757737

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: There have been substantial changes in the management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) over the past decade, with upfront immunotherapy-based combinations replacing targeted therapies. A broad range of combinations have been approved, and comparisons of their efficacy and safety are needed to guide the optimal choice of first-line therapy. OBJECTIVE: To perform indirect comparisons of efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies for mRCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched multiple databases and abstracts of major scientific meetings up to February 2021 to identify phase III randomized controlled trials of patients receiving first-line ICI-based combination therapies for mRCC. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints. The secondary endpoints included complete response rates (CRRs), objective response rates (ORRs), grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Subgroup network meta-analyses were performed based on patients' risk group categories and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Six trials were included in our network meta-analyses comprising 5121 patients. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib had the highest likelihood of providing the maximal OS (P score: 0.7573). Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated the highest likelihood of PFS (P score: 0.9906) and ORR (P score: 0.9564). CRRs were more likely to be associated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (P score: 0.8682). In patients with ≥1% PD-L1 expression, the highest likelihood of better PFS was associated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was also associated with the lowest rates of grade ≥3 TRAEs; while the highest likelihood of AE-related treatment discontinuation was associated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Our network meta-analysis suggests that combinations of ICIs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) provide superior PFS, ORR, and OS to ICI-ICI combinations, regardless of the on International mRCC Database Consortium risk group. However, an ICI-ICI combination could be the optimal treatment for tumors with increased PD-L1 expression. The newly introduced ICI-TKI combinations, nivolumab plus cabozantinib and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, showed promising activity and are likely to have an important role in the mRCC treatment strategy. PATIENT SUMMARY: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations (ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor and ICI-ICI) improved oncological outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status could help guide physicians and patients to select the appropriate treatment strategy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Ipilimumab , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Metaanálisis en Red
10.
Curr Opin Urol ; 31(3): 270-275, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742987

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss treatment decisions in the first-line setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). RECENT FINDINGS: Immune check point inhibitor (ICI) combinations have replaced sunitinib as the standard of care in the first-line treatment of mRCC. Dual ICI treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab was shown to significantly improve overall survival and objective response rates. Similarly, the ICI-tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations pembrolizumab and axitinib and nivolumab and cabozantinib have demonstrated superiority in terms of overall survival, objective response rates and progression-free survival versus sunitinib. The lack of both comparative trials and predictive markers impedes individualized treatment decisions. Clinicians are left to make treatment choices based on clinical and biological factors. These factors may include differences in toxicity profiles, the rate of complete remission, a clinical situation that requires urgent tumor shrinkage, the presence of inflammation, histological or immune-histochemical features and others. SUMMARY: In the absence of comparative trials, clinical and biological factors may facilitate the choice between various treatment options in the first-line setting of mRCC. In addition, both the experience of the physician with a specific treatment together with patient's preferences and expectations of systemic therapy may be part of the decision-making process.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Axitinib/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos
11.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 70(9): 2641-2650, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591412

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic role of the preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our multi-institutional database to identify 2492 patients. SII was calculated as platelet count × neutrophil/lymphocyte count and evaluated at a cutoff of 485. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of SII with muscle-invasive and non-organ-confined (NOC) disease. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of SII with recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival (RFS/CSS/OS). RESULTS: Overall, 986 (41.6%) patients had an SII > 485. On univariable logistic regression analyses, SII > 485 was associated with a higher risk of muscle-invasive (P = 0.004) and NOC (P = 0.03) disease at RNU. On multivariable logistic regression, SII remained independently associated with muscle-invasive disease (P = 0.01). On univariable Cox regression analyses, SII > 485 was associated with shorter RFS (P = 0.002), CSS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.004). On multivariable Cox regression analyses SII remained independently associated with survival outcomes (all P < 0.05). Addition of SII to the multivariable models improved their discrimination of the models for predicting muscle-invasive disease (P = 0.02). However, all area under the curve and C-indexes increased by < 0.02 and it did not improve net benefit on decision curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative altered SII is significantly associated with higher pathologic stages and worse survival outcomes in patients treated with RNU for UTUC. However, the SII appears to have relatively limited incremental additive value in clinical use. Further study of SII in prognosticating UTUC is warranted before routine use in clinical algorithms.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Inmunidad , Inflamación/metabolismo , Neoplasias Urológicas/etiología , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidad , Humanos , Inflamación/etiología , Recuento de Leucocitos , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Recuento de Plaquetas , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia
12.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(4): 843-849, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32089496

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urologists' adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations to perform inguinal (ILND) and pelvic (PLND) lymph node dissection in penile cancer (PC) patients is not known. OBJECTIVE: To assess a German-speaking European cohort of urologists based on their criteria to perform ILND and PLND in PC patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 14-item survey addressing general issues of PC treatment was developed and sent to 45 clinical centers in Germany (n = 34), Austria (n = 8), Switzerland (n = 2), and Italy (n = 1). INTERVENTION: Two of the 14 questions assessed the criteria to perform ILND and ipsilateral PLND. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Correct responses for ILND and PLND criteria were assessed. Based on a multivariate logistic-regression-model, criteria independently predicting guideline adherence were identified. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 557 urologists participated in the survey, of whom 43.5%, 19.3%, and 37.2% were residents in training, certified, and in leading positions, respectively. ILND and PLND criteria were correctly identified by 35.2% and 23.9%, respectively. Of the participants, 23.3% used external sources for survey completion. The use of auxiliary tools (odds ratio [OR] 1.57; p[bootstrapped] = 0.028) and participants outside of Germany (OR 0.56; p[bootstrapped] = 0.006) were predictors of ILND guideline adherence. The number of PC patients treated yearly (p = 0.012; OR 1.06) and the use of auxiliary tools (p < 0.001; OR 5.88) were predictors of PLND adherence. Department size, healthcare status, professional status, and responsibility for PC surgery did not predict endpoints. Limitations include sample size and results in comparison with retrospective studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate overall suboptimal knowledge of the correct indications to perform ILND and PLND in PC patients among the surveyed urologists. We propose that governments and healthcare providers should be encouraged to centralize PC management. PATIENT SUMMARY: The management of inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes is crucial for the survival of penile cancer patients. Disease rarity mandates referral to clinical practice guidelines for appropriate treatment selection.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Pene , Urología , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Masculino , Neoplasias del Pene/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Eur Radiol ; 31(6): 3754-3764, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33263793

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the visibility of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCA) lesions on the sequences multiparametric MRI of the prostate (mpMRI) and to evaluate whether the addition of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) improves the overall visibility. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated multiparametric MRI images of 119 lesions in 111 patients with biopsy-proven clinically significant PCA. Three readers assigned visual grading scores for visibility on each sequence, and a visual grading characteristic analysis was performed. Linear regression was used to explore which factors contributed to visibility in individual sequences. RESULTS: The visibility of lesions was significantly better with mpMRI when compared to biparametric MRI in visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis, with an AUCVGC of 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.69; p < 0.001). This benefit was seen across all readers. Multivariable linear regression revealed that a location in the peripheral zone was associated with better visibility on T2-weighted imaging (T2w). A higher Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score was associated with better visibility on both diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and DCE. Increased lesion size was associated with better visibility on all sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Visibility of clinically significant PCA is improved by using mpMRI. DCE and DWI images independently improve lesion visibility compared to T2w images alone. Further research into the potential of DCE to impact on clinical decision-making is suggested. KEY POINTS: • DCE and DWI images independently improve clinically significant prostate cancer lesion visibility compared to T2w images alone. • Multiparametric MRI (DCE, DWI, T2w) achieved significantly higher visibility scores than biparametric MRI (DWI, T2w). • Location in the transition zone is associated with poor visibility on T2w, while it did not affect visibility on DWI or DCE.


Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Medios de Contraste , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Curr Opin Urol ; 30(4): 547-556, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32453001

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been implemented in the treatment algorithm of metastatic urothelial cancer as they have shown higher and more sustained responses compared with conventional second-line chemotherapy. Recently, several clinical trials have reported on CPIs in earlier disease stages such as muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This review summarizes ongoing clinical trials and results from early phase clinical trials in muscle invasive and locally advanced bladder cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: In phase II clinical trials, neoadjuvant use of CPIs as mono and combination therapy, in patients with MIBC planned for radical cystectomy, has shown promising pathological complete response rates. Whether this will translate in survival benefit remains to be assessed. Combination of CPIs and conventional chemotherapy or other targeted agents promises to increase the efficacy of perioperative systemic therapy with potentially additive toxicities. Recently, preclinical models of combined trimodal therapy with CPIs delivered the proof of principle leading to several ongoing trials in this setting. SUMMARY: First results of clinical trials evaluating CPIs in MIBC demonstrate very promising results that warrant further investigation as they could revolutionize management of MIBC in the near future. The trend and hope are toward higher rates of safe and sustained bladder preservation.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Cistectomía , Humanos , Neoplasias de los Músculos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Músculos/patología , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
15.
Curr Opin Urol ; 30(4): 527-533, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32453003

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Indications for chemotherapy have increased in prostate cancer (PCA), many of which are shared with new hormonal agents (NHA). With no head to head comparison available, defining the optimal sequence and identifying biomarkers to predict response, has been a focus of intense research in PCA. We aim to summarize the best currently available evidence in all stages of disease to help guide therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, Cabazitaxel has shown improved radiographic progression-free survival over another NHA after Docetaxel and one NHA. For hormone sensitive PCA (mHSPC) multiple meta-analyses have shown combination therapy with Docetaxel or an NHA to be superior to androgen deprivation therapy alone, yet no clear benefit over each other. For peri-interventional chemotherapy with local therapy, there is currently only one positive prospective trial, for very high-risk disease. SUMMARY: Cabazitaxel is underutilized and should be used earlier. NHAs should not be used in succession as there is significant cross resistance. Combination therapy should be used in mHSPC, yet there is no clear benefit for any combination. Peri-interventional chemotherapy might have a benefit for a small group of patients with very high-risk disease, yet this must be carefully evaluated, and side effects must be taken into account.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Curr Opin Urol ; 30(2): 229-233, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31972637

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Whereas substantial advances have been made in systemic tumour therapy in the past decade, the prognosis of advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis remains disproportionally poor. In this review, we aimed to present an update on systemic therapy of penile SCC highlighting the most recent data and future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS: Lymph node metastases play a key role in treating and assessing the prognosis of patients with penile SCC. Data show longer overall survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pelvic lymph node metastases and recent analyses lead to the development of a nomogramm predicting overall survival in connection with the use of perioperative chemotherapy. There are two pathways in the pathogenesis of penile cancer, including human papilloma virus related and unrelated, leading to many possible novel therapeutic targets. Other targeted therapies have been evaluated, which show promising results with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. SUMMARY: Chemotherapy has shown moderate activity in advanced stages of the disease, however, the ideal timing of chemotherapy in patients with lymph node metastases is not entirely clear. Potential targets for future therapies exist, and are already being tested in other malignancies. Owing to the rarity of this condition, a robust evidence is lacking and it is of great importance to pursue further research to unveil several aspects of this disease, particularly in patients with recurrence, lymph node metastases or metastatic disease.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Pene/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Receptores ErbB/biosíntesis , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias del Pene/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Pene/mortalidad , Pronóstico
17.
World J Urol ; 38(8): 1989-1996, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31691085

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in patients undergoing diagnostic cystoscopy. Overall changes in the entire study population were assessed, as well as broken down by various subgroups. METHODS: A prospective multi-center study among consecutive 450 adults undergoing diagnostic cystoscopy was conducted. OAB-symptoms were evaluated with the validated eight-item OAB Screening Awareness Tool (OAB-V8) immediately before and on days 1, 4, and 7 after cystoscopy. Patients were distinguished between being OAB-negative and OAB-positive (< 8 and ≥ 8 sum-score, respectively). Average sum-scores and subdomains were evaluated. RESULTS: Before cystoscopy, 44.7% of patients were screened OAB-positive and 55.3% OAB-negative. Out of those being screened negative, development of de-novo OAB was noticed in 16.8%, declining to 8.1% on day 7 (p < 0.001). In patients being OAB-positive before cystoscopy, a decline of OAB-positivity was noted during follow-up (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were noted when broken down by gender (p = 0.92), age (p = 0.82) and type cystoscope (rigid vs. flexible, p = 0.38). Average sum-scores declined from 8.68 before cystoscopy to 6.9 during follow-up. Flexible cystoscopy was superior over rigid in four subdomains: uncomfortable urge to urinate (p = 0.04), sudden urge to urinate with little or no warning (p = 0.02), uncontrollable urge to urinate (p = 0.03), and urine loss associated with a strong desire to void (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: OAB-symptoms are common in patients undergoing cystoscopy. Cystoscopy itself can cause de-novo OAB-symptoms. Controversially, a decline of OAB-symptoms was noted after cystoscopy when patients were screened OAB-positive before cystoscopy. Flexible scopes were superior in some subdomains.


Asunto(s)
Cistoscopios , Cistoscopía/instrumentación , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/diagnóstico , Anciano , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
18.
Urol Int ; 101(2): 197-200, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30089304

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We hypothesized sarcopenia as predictive factor as a response to upfront chemotherapy of muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 30 patients who received upfront cisplatin-based chemotherapy for MIBC (pT2-4 N0/+ M0) before planned radical cystectomy. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated by CT at study baseline and following completion of chemotherapy. Patients were stratified according to the presence of sarcopenia. Endpoints included clinical and pathological response. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 30 patients (53.3%) had sarcopenia at baseline. The median SMI was 51.2 cm2/m2 (IQR 45.6-57.9). Throughout the course of chemotherapy, 22 patients (73.3%) experienced a decline in SMI, which ranged from 1 to 20% (median decline 3%, p < 0.01). All 16 patients with baseline sarcopenia persisted, while 5 of 14 patients (35.7%) without baseline sarcopenia became sarcopenic (p = 0.06). None of the clinical variables were predictive of clinical or pathological response, including SMI (p = 0.78 and p = 0.59), sarcopenia (p = 0.65 and p = 0.16) and SMI kinetics (p = 0.54 and p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia is present in a considerable proportion of patients with MIBC undergoing upfront cisplatin-based chemotherapy before planned RC. SMI decreases during treatment, but neither baseline SMI nor its kinetics is associated with response to chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Urotelio/efectos de los fármacos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Cistectomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Sarcopenia/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Urotelio/patología
19.
Memo ; 11(1): 43-46, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29606979

RESUMEN

Until recently, there were no true innovations in the management of locally advanced (aUC) and metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) in the last three decades. Vinflunine has been approved by the EMA (European Medicines Agency) with only limited improvement compared to best supportive care in second line treatment. In addition, gemcitabine/cisplatin has been established as an alternative to methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC). The advent of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) revolutionized the care of these patients, transforming a unanimously deadly disease into one with hope through sustained disease control. Five immune CPI have recently been approved for aUC/mUC by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) including atezolizumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab. All five CPI are FDA-approved as second-line therapy with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab also being approved for first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients. The rapid acceptance in the treatment algorithm of UC is based on the impressive clinical efficacy of these agents in some patients, combined with their excellent safety profile. These new agents are indeed the most important advancement in UC care. However, the challenge in the age of precision medicine is to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from CPIs, as the majority of patients do not respond to CPI. Toward this goal, validation of clinical, molecular and imaging biomarkers that serve for prediction and monitoring of treatment response are of central necessity.

20.
World J Urol ; 36(11): 1703-1709, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29549485

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A small subset of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors manifest atypical patterns of response, the so-called pseudoprogression (PP) and hyperprogression (HP). Their prevalence in urothelial (UC) and renal cancer (RCC) remains, to date, mostly uninvestigated. Therefore, we aimed to provide a summary of the current knowledge about PP and HP during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in UC and RCC patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic medline/pubmed© literature search was performed. The atypical patterns of response to systemic immunotherapy were reviewed. Endpoints were PP and HP in UC and RCC. RESULTS: Tumors respond differently to immunotherapy compared to systemic chemotherapy. To evaluate response to immunotherapy, new guidelines (iRECIST) have been developed. To date, no studies focused on PP in UC and RCC, and the only way to evaluate its role is to take patients who respond to treatment beyond progression as surrogate for pseudoprogressors. PP seems to occur in a non-negligible rate of UC and RCC (from 1.5 to 17% and from 5 to 15%, respectively). The concept of HP, defined as a rapid progression after treatment, just took the first steps, and therefore, data from ongoing trials are awaited to elucidate its impact in genitourinary cancers. CONCLUSIONS: PP and HP are not uncommon entities in UC and RCC patients, treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Further investigation is warranted to define which patients are likely to experience PP and could benefit from treatment beyond progression and which ones will instead rapidly experience progression despite treatment and should, therefore, avoid systemic immunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...