Childhood Polyvictimization and Associated Health Outcomes: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Background: Polyvictimization, the experience of multiple types of victimization, is associated with detrimental health outcomes. Despite extensive research on the health consequences of polyvictimization, one challenge in understanding this literature lies in the varied operationalized definitions of polyvictimization and health outcomes. This scoping review provides the volume of the current literature on this topic, documents the varied constructs of polyvictimization and associated health outcomes, identifies knowledge gaps, and guides future research directions. Method: A systematic search of English-language original articles that presented quantitative associations of childhood polyvictimization and health outcomes was performed through six-database searches, a gray literature search, and citation mining from June 2020 to January 2021. The varied constructs of polyvictimization, health outcomes, and other study characteristics were extracted. Results: A total of 96 studies were included. Two ways of creating continuous variables (30.21%) and four ways of constructing categorical variables (72.92%) were identified for operationalizing polyvictimization. The majority of health outcomes were mental, behavioral, or social (96.88%), while slightly more than 10% of studies examined physical health (11.46%) or general health conditions (10.42%), respectively. More than half of studies used U.S. samples (56.25%). Conclusions: The varied constructs of polyvictimization suggests that there is a need to establish a valid polyvictimization construct that is consistently agreed upon in the research community. Findings summarize the specific health outcomes that can be targeted for further investigation and prevention efforts. Findings also suggest that the study of resilience and coping education for childhood polyvictims is sorely needed.

PTSD in autistic adults: Correlates of meeting DSM-5 criteria and predictors of professional diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Although many autistic adults show high posttraumatic stress, PTSD is underdiagnosed in this population. This study aims to examine correlates of autistic adults screening positive for PTSD (PTSD +) and predictors of a professional PTSD diagnosis (Diagnosis +) in the PTSD + subgroup. METHOD: Self-identified autistic adults (N = 677) completed an online survey on their demographic characteristics, mental health symptoms, and trauma history. T tests and chi-squares were used to compare subgroups, and logistic regression was used to predict diagnosis status. RESULTS: PTSD + participants were less likely to be employed or to identify as cisgender men, had more mental health symptoms and worse functional impairment, and had experienced a higher number of traumas and more interpersonal trauma. The same was true for Diagnosis + participants, who were also older and more likely to have a marginalized racial/ethnic identity. Among participants who were PTSD +, older age, being a woman or gender minority, being unemployed or on disability, having increased posttraumatic stress, having more co-occurring conditions, and having lower functional impairment predicted being Diagnosis +. The final model explained 35% of variance in diagnosis. CONCLUSION: PTSD is associated with significant impairment in autistic adults, but it often goes unrecognized. In particular, autistic cisgender men might be underdiagnosed with PTSD because of gendered stereotypes. High functional impairment may also increase barriers to obtaining an appropriate diagnosis. Future research should include participant treatment history as a potential factor. Clinicians should be aware of these potential signs of PTSD and diagnostic barriers when working with autistic clients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Delivery of an Evidence-Based Child Maltreatment Prevention Program: Understanding the Perspectives of SafeCare® Providers.

Child maltreatment (CM) is a global public health problem. Evidence-based home visiting programs, such as SafeCare®, reduce CM risk, and enhance parent-child relationships and other protective factors. As the result of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting restrictions, SafeCare Providers transitioned from home to virtual delivery for the SafeCare curriculum. The purpose of this study is to 1) examine active SafeCare Providers' opinions on the feasibility and effectiveness of SafeCare via remote delivery, and 2) better understand workforce concerns for human service professionals within the context of COVID-19 mitigation efforts. Data are from a cross-sectional survey of SafeCare Providers (N = 303) in the United States, Canada, and Australia. The majority of Providers reported they were actively delivering SafeCare virtually and were comfortable with the delivery format. Providers indicated that the majority of SafeCare families are making progress on target skills, and that engagement is high among many families. Some service delivery challenges were reported, ranging from family data plan limitations to difficulty with delivery of specific components of the SafeCare curriculum related to modeling and assessment. The impact of COVID-19 on Providers' daily routines, stress level, and work-life balance has been significant. Remote, virtual delivery of CM prevention programming offers the opportunity to continue serving vulnerable families in the midst of a pandemic. Barriers related to family technology and data access must be addressed to ensure reach and the effective delivery of prevention programming during the pandemic and beyond.

Evaluating child maltreatment and family violence risk during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Using a telehealth home visiting program as a conduit to families.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected many child maltreatment risk factors and may have affected maltreatment among vulnerable families. We surveyed 258 certified providers of an evidence-based home visiting program, SafeCare, about their perception of the impact of the pandemic on the families they serve. We examined if the providers perceived an overall change in child maltreatment and family violence risk among the families with young children they served and factors that may have contributed to changes. Regressions estimated the relationship between providers' assessment of families' ability to social distance, emotional struggles, and access to public resources/services with providers' perception of child maltreatment and family violence risk in the home. Findings indicate that 87% of providers believed maltreatment risk had increased during the pandemic. Providers serving families who were unable to social distance due to employment were more likely to report increased supervisory neglect and material neglect among the families they serve. Providers reporting that families were struggling with elevated frustration levels also reported more family conflict and material neglect among the families they serve. Results from this research can inform strategic decision-making for policies and programs that address the challenges low-income families with young children face in emergency situations.

La pandemia del COVID-19 ha afectado muchos factores de riesgo de maltrato del niño y pudiera haber afectado el maltrato en familias vulnerables. Les preguntamos en una encuesta a 258 proveedores certificados de un programa de visitas a casa con base en la evidencia, SafeCare®, acerca de sus percepciones del impacto de la pandemia en las familias a quienes les ofrecían el servicio. Examinamos si los proveedores percibían un cambio general en el maltrato del niño y el riesgo de violencia familiar en familias con niños pequeños a las que les servían y los factores que pudieran haber contribuido a los cambios. Las regresiones calcularon la relación entre la evaluación de los proveedores acerca de la habilidad de la familia para mantener la distancia social física, los problemas emocionales, así como el acceso a recursos y servicios públicos, con la percepción de los proveedores acerca del maltrato infantil y el riesgo de violencia familiar en la casa. Los resultados indican que el 87 por ciento de los proveedores creía que el riesgo de maltrato había aumentado durante la pandemia. Aquellos proveedores que les servían a familias que no podían mantener la distancia social física debido al empleo, estuvieron más propensas a reportar el aumento en la negligencia de supervisión y la negación de material en las familias a quienes les servían. Los proveedores que reportaron que las familias estaban luchando con elevados niveles de frustración también reportaron más conflicto familiar y negación de material en las familias a las que les servían. Los resultados de esta investigación pueden apoyar la toma de decisiones estratégica para políticas y programas que se enfoquen en los retos que enfrentan las familias de bajos recursos con niños pequeños en situaciones de emergencia.

La pandémie du COVID-19 a affecté bien des facteurs de risque de la maltraitance de l'enfant et peut avoir affecté la maltraitance chez les familles vulnérables. Nous avons questionné 258 prestataires certifiés d'un programme de visite à domicile fondé sur des données probantes, SafeCare®, sur leur perception de l'impact de la pandémie sur les familles qu'ils servent. Nous avons examiné si les prestataires ont perçu un changement général de la maltraitance de l'enfant et dans le risque de violence familiale au sein des familles avec les jeunes enfants qu'ils servaient et les facteurs qui ont pu contribuer à ces changements. Des régressions ont estimé la relation entre l'évaluation qu'ont fait les prestataires de la capacité des familles à assurer la distanciation sociale, des difficutés émotionnelles et de l'accès aux resources/services publiques avec la perception des prestataires de la maltraitance de l'enfant et du risque de violence familiale à la maison. Les résultats indiquent que 87 pourcent des prestataires pensaient que le risque de maltraitance avait augmenté durant la pandémie. Les prestataires servant les familles qui ne pouvaient pas assurer la distanciation sociale à cause de leur emploi étaient plus à même de faire état d'une négligence acrue de la supervision et de négligence matérielle chez les familles qu'ils servent. Les prestataires indiquant que les familles faisaient face à des difficultés avec des niveaux de frustration élevés ont aussi fait état de plus de conflit familial et de néglicence matérielle chez les familles qu'ils servent. Les résultats de ces recherches peuvent aider les prises de décision stratégiques pour les politiques et les programmes qui répondent aux défis des familles défavorisées avec de jeunes enfants dans des situations d'urgence.

Interpersonal Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress in Autistic Adults.

Background: Many autistic adults report interpersonal traumas (IPTs) such as physical or sexual assault, which are often associated with posttraumatic stress and dissociation. Factors such as gender might make autistic individuals particularly vulnerable to experiencing IPT and negative posttraumatic symptoms. Methods: In this study, 687 self-identified autistic adults completed an online survey on their traumatic experiences and mental health symptoms. Results: Seventy-two percent of participants reported experiencing sexual assault, other unwanted or uncomfortable sexual experiences, or physical assault. Forty-four percent of participants met the criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including 50% of those who had experienced IPT and 28% of those who had not (odds ratio = 2.50; 95% confidence interval 1.74-3.60). IPT was also significantly associated with higher levels of psychoform (p < 0.001) and somatoform (p < 0.001) dissociation. Autistic cisgender women and gender minorities experienced a significantly higher number of traumas (p = 0.004) and were significantly more likely than cisgender men to experience sexual IPT (p < 0.001) and meet the criteria for PTSD (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between autistic individuals with and without a professional autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis. Conclusions: IPT is associated with potentially severe mental health outcomes for autistic adults. Autistic women and gender minorities may be particularly vulnerable to sexual IPT and adverse outcomes. Increased screening for a history of IPT and posttraumatic symptoms is recommended for all autistic adults regardless of ASD diagnosis status. Lay summary: Why was this study done?: Many autistic people experience interpersonal traumas (IPTs) such as sexual or physical assault. These can lead to mental health challenges such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or dissociation (a disconnection between individuals and aspects of their perceptions or sense of self). We wanted to better understand what might make autistic adults more likely to experience trauma and how it affects them.What was the purpose of this study?: The purpose was to understand what might make autistic people more at risk of experiencing IPT and PTSD. We also wanted to know if IPT is associated with a higher risk of PTSD or dissociation.What did the researchers do?: Six hundred eighty-seven autistic adults filled out an online survey about their traumatic experiences, PTSD symptoms, and dissociation symptoms. We analyzed their responses to see how often participants reported experiencing different types of trauma and whether they met the criteria for PTSD and clinical dissociation. We then compared trauma experiences and PTSD rates across genders and those with and without a professional autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis and compared PTSD rates and dissociation rates across participants who had versus had not experienced IPT.What were the results of the study?: Seventy-two percent of autistic adults in this study reported having experienced sexual assault, another unwanted sexual experience, or physical assault. Almost half (44%) met the criteria for PTSD. Most participants (93%) also reported high levels of mind-based dissociation, and 32% reported high levels of body-based dissociation (dissociation that causes negative emotions to be experienced as physical problems such as headaches or trouble moving). Participants who had experienced IPT were almost twice as likely to meet the criteria for PTSD and scored higher on both measures of dissociation. Cisgender women and gender minorities were more likely to experience IPT and meet the criteria for PTSD than cisgender men. Participants with and without a professional ASD diagnosis did not differ.What do these findings add to what was already known?: Most previous research on trauma and PTSD for autistic people was done on children and did not look at IPT specifically or compare people based on their gender or ASD diagnosis. As far as we know, this is the first study on posttraumatic dissociation in autistic adults.What are potential weaknesses in the study?: The findings of this study may not apply to autistic adults as a whole. People who could have participated may not have been interested in the topic, may not have seen study advertisements and so been unaware of the study, or may not have had the time or energy to participate. Findings might have been different if different groups of autistic people participated more.How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?: If professionals who help autistic people do not talk to them about trauma, traumatized autistic adults may not get the right support. This study could encourage professionals to screen more autistic people, especially women and gender minorities, for trauma.

Dual-Task Processing With Identical Stimulus and Response Sets: Assessing the Importance of Task Representation in Dual-Task Interference.

Limitations in our ability to produce two responses at the same time - that is, dual-task interference - are typically measured by comparing performance when two stimuli are presented and two responses are made in close temporal proximity to when a single stimulus is presented and a single response is made. While straightforward, this approach leaves open multiple possible sources for observed differences. For example, on dual-task trials, it is typically necessary to identify two stimuli nearly simultaneously, whereas on typical single-task trials, only one stimulus is presented at a time. These processes are different from selecting and producing two distinct responses and complicate the interpretation of dual- and single-task performance differences. Ideally, performance when two tasks are executed should be compared to conditions in which only a single task is executed, while holding constant all other stimuli, response, and control processing. We introduce an alternative dual-task procedure designed to approach this ideal. It holds stimulus processing constant while manipulating the number of "tasks." Participants produced unimanual or bimanual responses to pairs of stimuli. For one set of stimuli (two-task set), the mappings were organized so an image of a face and a building were mapped to particular responses (including no response) on the left or right hands. For the other set of stimuli (one-task set), the stimuli indicated the same set of responses, but there was not a one-to-one mapping between the individual stimuli and responses. Instead, each stimulus pair had to be considered together to determine the appropriate unimanual or bimanual response. While the stimulus pairs were highly similar and the responses identical across the two conditions, performance was strikingly different. For the two-task set condition, bimanual responses were made more slowly than unimanual responses, reflecting typical dual-task interference, whereas for the one-task set, unimanual responses were made more slowly than bimanual. These findings indicate that dual-task costs occur, at least in part, because of the interfering effects of task representation rather than simply the additional stimulus, response, or other processing typically required on dual-task trials.