Low Plasma Appearance of (+)-Catechin and (-)-Catechin Compared with Epicatechin after Consumption of Beverages Prepared from Nonalkalized or Alkalized Cocoa-A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

Flavan-3-ols are claimed to be responsible for the cardioprotective effects of cocoa. Alkalized cocoa powder (ALC), commonly used for many non-confectionary products, including beverages, provides less (+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin, and procyanidins and more (-)-catechin than nonalkalized cocoa powder (NALC). This may affect the plasma appearance of monomeric flavan-3-ol stereoisomers after consumption of NALC vs. ALC. Within a randomized, crossover trial, 12 healthy nonsmokers ingested a milk-based cocoa beverage providing either NALC or ALC. Blood was collected before and within 6 h postconsumption. (+)-Catechin, (-)-catechin, and epicatechin were analyzed in plasma by HPLC as sum of free and glucuronidated metabolites. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by a one-compartment model with nonlinear regression methods. For epicatechin in plasma, total area under the curve within 6 h postconsumption (AUC0-6h) and incremental AUC0-6h were additionally calculated by using the linear trapezoidal method. After consumption of NALC and ALC, (+)-catechin and (-)-catechin were mostly not detectable in plasma, in contrast to epicatechin. For epicatechin, total AUC0-6h was different between both treatments, but not incremental AUC0-6h. Most kinetic parameters were similar for both treatments, but they varied strongly between individuals. Thus, epicatechin is the main monomeric flavan-3-ol in plasma after cocoa consumption. Whether NALC should be preferred against ALC due to its higher (-)-epicatechin content remains unclear with regard to the results on incremental AUC0-6h. Future studies should investigate epicatechin metabolites in plasma for a period up to 24 h in a larger sample size, taking into account genetic polymorphisms in epicatechin metabolism and should consider all metabolites to understand inter-individual differences after cocoa intake.

Epicatechin ingested via cocoa products reduces blood pressure in humans: a nonlinear regression model with a Bayesian approach.

BACKGROUND: Four meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the classical random-effects model showed that cocoa consumption can reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Because epicatechin is suggested to be responsible for the treatment effect, changes in blood pressure should depend on the dose of ingested epicatechin, which may explain the between-study differences. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to quantify the effect of epicatechin ingested via cocoa products on changes in SBP and DBP. DESIGN: A nonlinear meta-regression model was chosen to investigate the impact of the epicatechin dose on changes in SBP and DBP. A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods was applied for an appropriate treatment of the nonlinearity. RESULTS: Data from 16 RCTs on SBP and 15 RCTs on DBP were included. The dose of epicatechin ingested via cocoa products influenced the changes in SBP and DBP. The asymptotic limit for the reduction was estimated at -4.6 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.4, -3.9 mm Hg) for SBP and at -2.1 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.7, -1.6 mm Hg) for DBP. An intake of 25 mg epicatechin/d led to a mean reduction of -4.1 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.6, -3.6 mm Hg) in SBP and of -2.0 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.4, -1.5 mm Hg) in DBP. CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure reduction by consumption of cocoa products depends on the dose of ingested epicatechin, which explains most of the between-study differences in classical meta-analyses. Similar effects may be achieved by consumption of other foods that are also rich in epicatechin.

Antioxidant effects of cocoa and cocoa products ex vivo and in vivo: is there evidence from controlled intervention studies?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is strong epidemiological evidence that the consumption of flavanol-rich cocoa products contributes to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases mediated partly by their strong antioxidant effects. We reviewed the recent literature to answer the question whether this antioxidant action can be confirmed by intervention studies in healthy study participants and specific patient groups. RECENT FINDINGS: In 19 controlled intervention studies (two in patients with cardiovascular diseases), markers of plasma antioxidant capacity and oxidative stress were analyzed after bolus and/or regular cocoa consumption. In both, healthy study participants and patients, total plasma antioxidant capacity as well as most markers of oxidative stress were not influenced by the intervention. Low-density lipoprotein oxidation ex vivo and in vivo decreased probably due to a direct beneficial effect of cocoa flavanols on lipid and protein oxidation. SUMMARY: Recent clinical trials do not provide sufficient evidence for an essential contribution of cocoa products to the overall antioxidant defense. Any recommendations for cocoa intake within preventive and therapeutic measures are presently not reasonable.