Comparison of three tests for latent tuberculosis infection in high-risk people in the USA: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection is an important strategy to prevent tuberculosis disease. In the USA, three tests are used to identify latent tuberculosis infection: the tuberculin skin test (TST) and two IFN-γ release assays (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON). To our knowledge, few large studies have compared all three tests among people at high risk of latent tuberculosis infection or progression to tuberculosis disease. We aimed to assess test agreement between IFN-γ release assays and TST to provide guidance on their use in important risk groups. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, we enrolled participants at high risk of latent tuberculosis infection or progression to tuberculosis disease at ten US sites with 18 affiliated clinics, including close contacts of infectious tuberculosis cases, people born in countries whose populations in the USA have high (≥100 cases per 100 000 people) or moderate (10-99 cases per 100 000 people) tuberculosis incidence, and people with HIV. Participants were interviewed about demographics and medical risk factors, and all three tests were administered to each participant. The primary endpoints for this study were the proportions of positive test results by test type stratified by risk group and test concordance by risk group for participants with valid results for all three test types. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01622140. FINDINGS: Between July 12, 2012, and May 5, 2017, 26 292 people were approached and 22 131 (84·2%) were enrolled in the study. Data from 21 846 (98·7%) participants were available for analysis, including 3790 (17·3%) born in the USA and 18 023 (82·5%) born outside the USA. Among non-US-born participants overall, the RR comparing the proportions of TST-positive results (7476 [43·2%] of 17 306 participants) to QuantiFERON-positive results (4732 [26·5%] of 17 882 participants) was 1·6 (95% CI 1·6-1·7). The risk ratio (RR) for the comparison with the proportion of T-SPOT.TB-positive results (3693 [21·6%] of 17 118 participants) was 2·0 (95% CI 1·9-2·1). US-born participants had less variation in the proportions of positive results across all tests. The RRs for the proportion of TST-positive results (391 [10·9%] of 3575 participants) compared with the proportion of QuantiFERON-positive results (445 [12·0%] of 3693 participants) and T-SPOT.TB-positive results (295 [8·1%] of 3638 participants) were 0·9 (95% CI 0·8-1·0) and 1·3 (1·2-1·6), respectively. 20 149 (91·0%) of 21 846 participants had results for all three tests, including 16 712 (76%) non-US-born participants. Discordance between TST and IFN-γ release assay results varied by age among non-US-born participants and was greatest among the 848 non-US-born children younger than 5 years. 204 (87·2%) of 234 non-US-born children younger than 5 years with at least one positive test were TST-positive and IFN-γ release assay-negative. The proportion of non-US-born participants who were TST-negative but IFN-γ release assay-positive ranged from one (0·5%) of 199 children younger than 2 years to 86 (14·5%) of 594 participants aged 65 years and older (ptrend<0·0001). Test agreement was higher between the two IFN-γ release assays than between TST and either IFN-γ release assay, regardless of birthplace. κ agreement was particularly low between TST and IFN-γ release assays in non-US-born children younger than 5 years. INTERPRETATION: Our findings support the preferential use of IFN-γ release assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in high-risk populations, especially in very young and older people born outside the USA. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Impact of T-Cell Xtend on T-SPOT.TB Assay in High-Risk Individuals after Delayed Blood Sample Processing.

T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) is an interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) used to detect infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on the number of spot-forming T cells; however, delays in sample processing have been shown to reduce the number of these spots that are detected following laboratory processing. Adding T-Cell Xtend (XT) into blood samples before processing reportedly extends the amount of time allowed between blood collection and processing up to 32 h. In this study, paired blood samples from 306 adolescents and adults at high risk for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) or progression to TB disease were divided into three groups: (i) early processing (∼4.5 h after collection) with and without XT, (ii) delayed processing (∼24 h after collection) with and without XT, and (iii) early processing without XT and delayed processing with XT. The participants' paired samples were processed at a local laboratory and agreement of qualitative and quantitative results was assessed. The addition of XT did not consistently increase or decrease the number of spots. In groups 1, 2, and 3, samples processed with XT had 13% (10/77), 28.0% (30/107), and 24.6% (30/122), respectively, more spots, while 33.8% (26/77), 26.2% (28/107), and 38.5% (47/122) had fewer spots than samples processed without XT. The findings suggest that XT does not reliably mitigate the loss of spot-forming T cells in samples with processing delay.

Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: ACOEM and NTCA Joint Task Force on Implementation of the 2019 MMWR Recommendations.

: On May 17, 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Tuberculosis Controllers Association issued new Recommendations for Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of Health Care Personnel, United States, 2019, updating the health care personnel-related sections of the Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005. This companion document offers the collective effort and experience of occupational health, infectious disease, and public health experts from major academic and public health institutions across the United States and expands on each section of the 2019 recommendations to provide clarifications, explanations, and considerations that go beyond the 2019 recommendations to answer questions that may arise and to offer strategies for implementation.

Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020.

Comprehensive guidelines for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among persons living in the United States were last published in 2000 (American Thoracic Society. CDC targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221-47). Since then, several new regimens have been evaluated in clinical trials. To update previous guidelines, the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA) and CDC convened a committee to conduct a systematic literature review and make new recommendations for the most effective and least toxic regimens for treatment of LTBI among persons who live in the United States.The systematic literature review included clinical trials of regimens to treat LTBI. Quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) from clinical trial comparisons was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. In addition, a network meta-analysis evaluated regimens that had not been compared directly in clinical trials. The effectiveness outcome was tuberculosis disease; the toxicity outcome was hepatotoxicity. Strong GRADE recommendations required at least moderate evidence of effectiveness and that the desirable consequences outweighed the undesirable consequences in the majority of patients. Conditional GRADE recommendations were made when determination of whether desirable consequences outweighed undesirable consequences was uncertain (e.g., with low-quality evidence).These updated 2020 LTBI treatment guidelines include the NTCA- and CDC-recommended treatment regimens that comprise three preferred rifamycin-based regimens and two alternative monotherapy regimens with daily isoniazid. All recommended treatment regimens are intended for persons infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is presumed to be susceptible to isoniazid or rifampin. These updated guidelines do not apply when evidence is available that the infecting M. tuberculosis strain is resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin; recommendations for treating contacts exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were published in 2019 (Nahid P, Mase SR Migliori GB, et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. An official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e93-e142). The three rifamycin-based preferred regimens are 3 months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine, 4 months of daily rifampin, or 3 months of daily isoniazid plus rifampin. Prescribing providers or pharmacists who are unfamiliar with rifampin and rifapentine might confuse the two drugs. They are not interchangeable, and caution should be taken to ensure that patients receive the correct medication for the intended regimen. Preference for these rifamycin-based regimens was made on the basis of effectiveness, safety, and high treatment completion rates. The two alternative treatment regimens are daily isoniazid for 6 or 9 months; isoniazid monotherapy is efficacious but has higher toxicity risk and lower treatment completion rates than shorter rifamycin-based regimens.In summary, short-course (3- to 4-month) rifamycin-based treatment regimens are preferred over longer-course (6-9 month) isoniazid monotherapy for treatment of LTBI. These updated guidelines can be used by clinicians, public health officials, policymakers, health care organizations, and other state and local stakeholders who might need to adapt them to fit individual clinical circumstances.

Interferon-γ Release Assays in Children <15 Years of Age.

OBJECTIVES: The tuberculin skin test (TST) has been preferred for screening young children for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) because of concerns that interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) may be less sensitive in this high-risk population. In this study, we compared the predictive value of IGRAs to the TST for progression to tuberculosis disease in children, including those <5 years old. METHODS: Children <15 years old at risk for LTBI or progression to disease were tested with TST, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT), and T-SPOT.TB test (T-SPOT) and followed actively for 2 years, then with registry matches, to identify incident disease. RESULTS: Of 3593 children enrolled September 2012 to April 2016, 92% were born outside the United States; 25% were <5 years old. Four children developed tuberculosis over a median 4.3 years of follow-up. Sensitivities for progression to disease for TST and IGRAs were low (50%-75%), with wide confidence intervals (CIs). Specificities for TST, QFT-GIT, and T-SPOT were 73.4% (95% CI: 71.9-74.8), 90.1% (95% CI: 89.1-91.1), and 92.9% (95% CI: 92.0-93.7), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values for TST, QFT-GIT, and T-SPOT were 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1-0.8), 0.9 (95% CI: 0.3-2.5), and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.2-2.9) and 99.9 (95% CI: 99.7-100), 100 (95% CI: 99.8-100), and 99.9 (95% CI: 99.8-100), respectively. Of 533 children with TST-positive, IGRA-negative results not treated for LTBI, including 54 children <2 years old, none developed disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although both types of tests poorly predict disease progression, IGRAs are no less predictive than the TST and offer high specificity and negative predictive values. Results from this study support the use of IGRAs for children, especially those who are not born in the United States.

Clinical Characteristics of Active Tuberculosis Diagnosed After Starting Treatment for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

Although rare, subclinical tuberculosis disease can be missed during evaluations for latent tuberculosis infection, and can manifest with symptoms during latent tuberculosis treatment. Among over 8000 patients treated for latent tuberculosis we found no evidence of acquired drug resistance, underscoring the safety of rifampin monotherapy for latent tuberculosis.

Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of U.S. Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019.

The 2005 CDC guidelines for preventing Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission in health care settings include recommendations for baseline tuberculosis (TB) screening of all U.S. health care personnel and annual testing for health care personnel working in medium-risk settings or settings with potential for ongoing transmission (1). Using evidence from a systematic review conducted by a National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA)-CDC work group, and following methods adapted from the Guide to Community Preventive Services (2,3), the 2005 CDC recommendations for testing U.S. health care personnel have been updated and now include 1) TB screening with an individual risk assessment and symptom evaluation at baseline (preplacement); 2) TB testing with an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) or a tuberculin skin test (TST) for persons without documented prior TB disease or latent TB infection (LTBI); 3) no routine serial TB testing at any interval after baseline in the absence of a known exposure or ongoing transmission; 4) encouragement of treatment for all health care personnel with untreated LTBI, unless treatment is contraindicated; 5) annual symptom screening for health care personnel with untreated LTBI; and 6) annual TB education of all health care personnel.

Latent tuberculosis infection: Opportunities and challenges.

Diagnosing and treating latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) is recognized by the World Health Organization as an important strategy to accelerate the decline in global TB and achieve TB elimination. Even among low-TB burden countries that have achieved high rates of detection and successful treatment for active TB, a number of barriers have prevented implementing or expanding LTBI treatment programmes. Of those infected with TB, relatively few will develop active disease and the current diagnostic tests have a low predictive value. LTBI treatment using isoniazid (INH) has low completion rates due to the long duration of therapy and poor tolerability. Both patients and physicians often perceive the risk of toxicity to be greater than the risk of reactivation TB. As a result, LTBI treatment has had a limited or negligible role outside of countries with high resources and low burden of disease. New tools have emerged including the interferon-gamma release assays that more accurately diagnose LTBI, particularly in people vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Shorter, better tolerated treatment using rifamycins are proving safe and effective alternatives to INH. While still imperfect, TB prevention using these new diagnostic and treatment tools appear cost effective in modelling studies in the United States and have the potential to improve TB prevention efforts globally. Continued research to understand the host-organism interactions within the spectrum of LTBI is needed to develop better tools. Until then, overcoming the barriers and optimizing our current tools is essential for progressing toward TB elimination.

Comparison of different treatments for isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Isoniazid-resistant, rifampicin-susceptible (INH-R) tuberculosis is the most common form of drug resistance, and is associated with failure, relapse, and acquired rifampicin resistance if treated with first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. The aim of the study was to compare success, mortality, and acquired rifampicin resistance in patients with INH-R pulmonary tuberculosis given different durations of rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (REZ); a fluoroquinolone plus 6 months or more of REZ; and streptomycin plus a core regimen of REZ. METHODS: Studies with regimens and outcomes known for individual patients with INH-R tuberculosis were eligible, irrespective of the number of patients if randomised trials, or with at least 20 participants if a cohort study. Studies were identified from two relevant systematic reviews, an updated search of one of the systematic reviews (for papers published between April 1, 2015, and Feb 10, 2016), and personal communications. Individual patient data were obtained from authors of eligible studies. The individual patient data meta-analysis was performed with propensity score matched logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and risk differences of treatment success (cure or treatment completion), death during treatment, and acquired rifampicin resistance. Outcomes were measured across different treatment regimens to assess the effects of: different durations of REZ (≤6 months vs >6 months); addition of a fluoroquinolone to REZ (fluoroquinolone plus 6 months or more of REZ vs 6 months or more of REZ); and addition of streptomycin to REZ (streptomycin plus 6 months of rifampicin and ethambutol and 1-3 months of pyrazinamide vs 6 months or more of REZ). The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methodology. FINDINGS: Individual patient data were requested for 57 cohort studies and 17 randomised trials including 8089 patients with INH-R tuberculosis. We received 33 datasets with 6424 patients, of which 3923 patients in 23 studies received regimens related to the study objectives. Compared with a daily regimen of 6 months of (H)REZ (REZ with or without isoniazid), extending the duration to 8-9 months had similar outcomes; as such, 6 months or more of (H)REZ was used for subsequent comparisons. Addition of a fluoroquinolone to 6 months or more of (H)REZ was associated with significantly greater treatment success (aOR 2·8, 95% CI 1·1-7·3), but no significant effect on mortality (aOR 0·7, 0·4-1·1) or acquired rifampicin resistance (aOR 0·1, 0·0-1·2). Compared with 6 months or more of (H)REZ, the standardised retreatment regimen (2 months of streptomycin, 3 months of pyrazinamide, and 8 months of isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol) was associated with significantly worse treatment success (aOR 0·4, 0·2-0·7). The quality of the evidence was very low for all outcomes and treatment regimens assessed, owing to the observational nature of most of the data, the diverse settings, and the imprecision of estimates. INTERPRETATION: In patients with INH-R tuberculosis, compared with treatment with at least 6 months of daily REZ, addition of a fluoroquinolone was associated with better treatment success, whereas addition of streptomycin was associated with less treatment success; however, the quality of the evidence was very low. These results support the conduct of randomised trials to identify the optimum regimen for this important and common form of drug-resistant tuberculosis. FUNDING: World Health Organization and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Better Completion of Pediatric Latent Tuberculosis Treatment Using 4 Months of Rifampin in a US-based Tuberculosis Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Children less than 5 years of age have the highest age-specific rate of progression from latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active disease. Therefore, regimens for treatment of pediatric LTBI must be not only efficacious but practical enough to overcome the unique childhood barriers to regimen adherence. Since 2012, a 4-month regimen of daily rifampin (4R) has been the standard recommendation for pediatric LTBI at the Denver Metro Tuberculosis Clinic. METHODS: Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we compared treatment completion rates between 4R and 9-month isoniazid (9H) regimens for all pediatric patients treated for LTBI at the Denver Metro Tuberculosis Clinic between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015, and assessed the influence of clinical and demographic characteristics on successful completion of the 2 regimens. RESULTS: There were 395 children in the 4R cohort and 779 in the 9H cohort. Completion rates overall were significantly higher for 4R than 9H (83.5% vs. 68.8%, P < 0.001). Drug toxicity leading to treatment noncompletion was low in both groups (1.5% in 4R and 0.7% in 9H, P = 0.23), and no patient progressed to active tuberculosis in either cohort. The 9H cohort was more likely to fail treatment completion because of barriers potentially related to the longer duration of treatment such as relocation or loss to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients were significantly more likely to complete LTBI treatment using a 4R than with a 9-month isoniazid regimen. Better completion rates of 4R may increase efficacy of tuberculosis prevention and decrease demand on public health resources.

Highly Multiplexed Proteomic Analysis of Quantiferon Supernatants To Identify Biomarkers of Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

The tests for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) are limited by a poor predictive value for identifying people at the highest risk for progressing to active tuberculosis (TB) and have various sensitivities and specificities in different populations. Identifying a more robust signature for LTBI is important for TB prevention and elimination. A pilot study was conducted with samples from immigrants to the United States that were screened for LTBI by the three commercially approved tests, namely, the tuberculin skin test (TST), the Quantiferon-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-GIT), and the T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT). QFT-GIT supernatants from 13 people with concordant positive results and 26 people with concordant negative results were analyzed via the highly multiplexed SOMAscan proteomic assay. The proteins in the stimulated supernatants that distinguished LTBI from controls included interleukin-2 (IL-2), monocyte chemotactic protein 2 (MCP-2), interferon gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 14 (TNFSF14, also known as LIGHT), monokine induced by gamma interferon (MIG), and granzyme B (P <0.00001). In addition, antigen stimulation increased the expression of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) and activin AB in LTBI samples. In nil tubes, LIGHT was the most significant marker (P <0.0001) and was elevated in LTBI subjects. Other prominent markers in nonstimulated QFT-GIT supernatants were the complement-3 components C3b, iC3b, and C3d, which were upregulated in LTBI and markedly decreased upon stimulation. We found known and novel proteins that warrant further studies for developing improved tests for LTBI, for predicting progression to active disease, and for discriminating LTBI from active TB.