Spontaneous duodenal hematoma: a rare complication of triple antithrombotic therapy case report.

Triple therapy is defined as concurrent use of an anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to review the clinical course of a patient who developed a spontaneous duodenal hematoma on triple therapy and appraise current guidelines regarding triple antithrombotic therapy use. A 59-year-old man presented with acute heart failure and an apical mural thrombus. After medical stabilization, the patient underwent elective coronary stent placement. He was placed on triple antithrombotic therapy and subsequently developed a spontaneous duodenal hematoma. This case describes a rare but potentially fatal complication of triple therapy and underscores the importance of underutilizing this therapy. In conclusion, we report the clinical presentation and management of a rare bleeding complication in a patient on triple therapy.

The use of multiple types of blood-thinning medications is common in patients with blood clots, atrial fibrillation and heart disease, which can increase their risk of bleeding. We present the case of a rare type of gastrointestinal bleeding (a spontaneous duodenal hematoma) that occurred shortly after a patient with new heart failure and a blood clot in the left ventricle was placed on three different types of blood-thinning medications following a cardiac stent procedure. This case highlights the importance of careful management of comorbid cardiac conditions as well as the avoidance of using three blood-thinning medications simultaneously.

Femoral Artery Closure Devices vs Manual Compression During Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background: Femoral arterial access remains widely used despite recent increase in radial access for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various femoral artery closure devices have been developed and are commonly used to shorten vascular closure times, with variable rates of vascular complications observed in clinical trials. We sought to examine the rates of contemporary outcomes during diagnostic catheterization and PCI with the most common femoral artery closure devices. Methods: We identified patients who had undergone either diagnostic catheterization alone (n = 14,401) or PCI (n = 11,712) through femoral artery access in the Indiana University Health Multicenter Cardiac Cath registry. We compared outcomes according to closure type: manual compression, Angio-Seal, Perclose, or Mynx. Access complications and bleeding outcomes were measured according to National Cardiovascular Data â€‹Registry standard definitions. Results: The use of any vascular closure device as compared to manual femoral arterial access hold was associated with a significant reduction in vascular access complications and bleeding events in patients who underwent PCI. No significant difference in access-site complications was observed for diagnostic catheterization alone. Among closure devices, Perclose and Angio-Seal had a lower rate of hematoma than Mynx. Conclusions: The use of femoral artery access closure devices is associated with a reduction in vascular access complication rates as compared to manual femoral artery compression in patients who undergo PCI.

Orbital Atherectomy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: A Multicenter Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of orbital atherectomy (OA) for the treatment of severely calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of severely calcified coronary artery lesions is associated with lower procedural success and higher rates of target lesion failure compared to non-calcified lesions. OA is an effective treatment for calcified coronary artery lesions prior to stent implantation. However, there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of OA in patients with coronary artery bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Data were obtained from analysis of patients with severe coronary artery calcification who underwent OA and coronary stent implantation at ten high-volume institutions. Data were pooled and analyzed to assess peri-procedural outcomes and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 1156 patients were treated with OA and PCI. 363 lesions were at a coronary artery bifurcation. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the bifurcation and non-bifurcation groups. In the bifurcation group, treatment involved the left anterior descending artery and its branches more frequently and right coronary artery less frequently. After propensity score matching, the 30-day freedom from MACE was not statistically significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter cohort analysis, patients with severely calcified coronary bifurcation lesions had low rates of MACE and target vessel revascularization at 30 days at rates comparable to non-bifurcation lesions. This analysis demonstrates that OA is safe and effective for complex coronary lesions at both bifurcation and non-bifurcation locations.