RESUMEN
This work aims to model and characterize the radiation beam of one Accuray tomotherapy equipment using the Monte Carlo Code MCNP5 (Monte Carlo N-Particle). This tomotherapy equipment is used for delivering high doses of radiation in tumor regions to kill cancer cells and shrink the tumor during radiation therapy of cancer patients, however, the radiation can damage surrounding areas and nearby organs at risk (OAR) if the radiation field is not well delimited. In particular, intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments (IMRT) with tomotherapy equipment offer great benefits to patients allowing treatment of tumor regions without affecting surrounding areas and OAR. Nowadays, it is well known that a correct simulation of transport of radiation in tomotherapy equipment facilitates considerably the estimation of ideal doses in the tumor, surrounding regions, and OAR. For that reason, in this work, we simulated the geometry of the 6 MV ACCURAY Tomotherapy equipment of the CECAN using the MCNP5. The model includes a TomoLINAC consisting of an electron source that emits Gaussian distribution particles with an average energy of 5.7 MeV and width of 0.3 MeV. The emitted particles impact the tungsten target and pass through primary collimators and jaws that define the irradiation field in the isocenter. To validate the geometry and radiation transport in the TomoLINAC the curves of depth dose percentage (PDD) estimated by simulation and the curves measured experimentally were tuned. In the same way, the simulated transverse and longitudinal profiles were compared with the experimental results. In addition, a comparison between the qualities of the radiation beam characterized with MCNP and measured experimentally in CECAN showed a deviation of 1%. For the simulations, cylindrical detectors located inside a water phantom were considered and it was employed the tally *F8. A good agreement was observed between the PDD's curves obtained from the simulation and those measured experimentally for a field of 5 × 10 cm2 in the isocenter and SSD (distance from the source to the surface) of 85 cm. Also, the comparison between the simulated and experimental transverse profiles obtained at 1.5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm depth with a radiation field of 5 × 40 cm2 showed very good agreement. The longitudinal profiles were estimated with the same depths as the transverse ones, but for each of them, the openings of the jaws were 5.0 cm, 2.5 cm and 1.0 cm in the longitudinal direction, which corresponds to the direction in which the patient's table moves. The comparison between the simulated and experimental longitudinal profiles showed good concordance too. Once the radiation beam of the ACCURAY tomotherapy equipment had been characterized, experimental dose measurements were made using a Cheese phantom and two A1SL ionization chambers. These results obtained experimentally were compared with those estimated with MCNP for a field of 5 × 40 cm2 at the isocenter and SAD of 85 cm and, it was concluded that both results were similar considering the regions of uncertainty. Finally, we must highlight that the modeling and characterization of the radiation beam of CECAN's ACCURAY tomotherapy equipment can be a key tool for dose estimations in different cancer treatment plans and future research.