RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is a parenting program in which caregivers must achieve "skill criteria" in using Do Skills and avoiding Don't Skills to complete treatment. Despite PCIT's emphasis on these skills, little is known about how Latinx caregivers acquire these Western-based parenting practices and whether cultural mismatches lead to inequities in outcomes. This study compared the trajectories of change in PCIT skills and treatment outcomes of Latinx and non-Latinx White families. METHOD: We analyzed weekly treatment data from 64 families (20.3% Spanish-speaking Latinx, 51.6% English-speaking Latinx, 28.1% non-Latinx White) served in community clinics. Caregivers were mostly females (95.3%), on average 35.13 years old, and lived in poverty (77.6%). PCIT skills were coded using the Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System, and child behavior problems were reported using the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory. RESULTS: Latinx and non-Latinx White caregivers acquired Do Skills similarly during treatment. In contrast, some Latinx caregivers began treatment using significantly more Don't Skills and needed more sessions to achieve some aspects of PCIT skill criteria compared with non-Latinx White caregivers. Latinx families also experienced similar or even more pronounced reductions in child behavior problems than non-Latinx White families. There were no significant differences in the percentage of caregivers who achieved PCIT skill criteria or left treatment prematurely. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that strictly defined PCIT skill criteria may lead to inequities in treatment length for some Latinx families. Informed by these findings, we propose data-driven adaptations to improve the cultural fit of PCIT for Latinx groups.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Latinxs experience a longer duration of untreated depression and anxiety. LEP Latinxs have difficulty accessing mental healthcare due to insufficient Spanish-speaking behavioral/mental health clinicians to meet demand. These under-resourced healthcare systems are less likely to be the site for the implementation of innovations. Digital interventions can provide an effective option for overcoming these barriers; yet, when digital evidence-based treatments are available, uptake and engagement is often low. This manuscript presents the protocol for the SUPERA (SUpport from PEeRs to expand Access) study which will evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based, Spanish language, digital cognitive-behavioral therapy (dCBT) intervention (i.e., SilverCloud) in safety-net primary care clinics for LEP Latinx patients with depression or anxiety. METHODS: We will conduct an effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial (Type 2) design comparing engagement and clinical outcomes in two modalities of dCBT delivery (peer-supported vs. unsupported). We will also compare provider-level outreach (using a clinic patient registry) versus inreach (traditional provider referral) to compare rates of initiation, completion, and cost. Participants will be 426 LEP Latinx adults ≥18 years of age, PHQ-9 ≥ 10 or GAD-7 ≥ 8, with access to the internet via smartphone, and not currently receiving individual psychotherapy. We will collect baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks), and follow up (3 months) data. CONCLUSION: The long-term goal of this research is to aid in the implementation of digital mental health interventions that can be sustainably implemented in low-resourced settings, while reducing the reliance on professionals, overcoming workforce deficits, and increasing relevance for diverse populations.