Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) as an Extension of the Physical Examination in Patients with Bacteremia or Candidemia.

BACKGROUND: In general, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the first diagnostic test used for patients with bacteremia or candidemia and clinical signs of Infective Endocarditis (IE). Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may be used in addition to physical examination for the detection of structural heart disease and valve abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for the detection of signs suggestive of IE, including vegetation, valvular regurgitation, structural heart disease, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly and septic embolisms, in patients with bacteremia or candidemia. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study using convenience sampling. SETTING: Six Spanish academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult patients with bacteremia or candidemia between 1 February 2018 and 31 December 2020. MEASUREMENTS: The reference test, to evaluate vegetation, valvular regurgitation and structural heart disease, was transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). For patients who did not undergo TEE, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was considered the reference test. POCUS was performed by internists, while conventional echocardiography procedures were performed by cardiologists. RESULTS: In 258 patients, for the detection of valvular vegetation, POCUS had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 77%, 94%, 82% and 92%, respectively. For valvular regurgitation (more than mild), sensitivity was ≥76% and specificity ≥85%. Sensitivity values for the detection of hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were 92% and 92%, respectively, while those for specificity were 96% and 98%. CONCLUSION: POCUS could be a valuable tool, as a complement to physical examination, at the hospital bedside for patients with bacteremia or candidemia, helping to identify signs suggestive of IE.

Supervised Exercise Immediately After Bariatric Surgery: the Study Protocol of the EFIBAR Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated weight loss caused by exercise following bariatric surgery. However, in most cases, the training program is poorly reported; the exercise type, volume, and intensity are briefly mentioned; and the sample size, selection criteria, and follow-up time vary greatly across studies. PURPOSE: The EFIBAR study aims to investigate over 1 year the effects of a 16-week supervised exercise program, initiated immediately after bariatric surgery, on weight loss (primary outcome), body composition, cardiometabolic risk, physical fitness, and quality of life in patients with severe/extreme obesity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The EFIBAR study is a parallel-group, superiority, randomized controlled trial (RCT), comprising 80 surgery patients. Half of the participants, randomly selected, perform a 16-week supervised exercise program, including both strength and aerobic training, starting immediately after the surgery (7-14 days). For each participant, all primary and secondary outcomes are measured at three different time points: (i) before the surgery, (ii) after the intervention (≈4 months), and (iii) 1 year after the surgery. CONCLUSION: The EFIBAR study will provide new insights into the multidimensional benefits of exercise in adults with severe/extreme obesity following bariatric surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EFIBAR randomized controlled trial was prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03497546) on April 13, 2018.

Impact of exercise training after bariatric surgery on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.

The purpose of this systematic review was to provide updated evidence synthesis of the effectiveness of exercise training in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery to improve cardio-metabolic risk. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. The studies selected were those in which an exercise-based intervention was performed after bariatric surgery, a control group was present, and at least one of the following outcomes was investigated: VO2max or VO2peak, resting heart rate (RHR), blood pressure, lipid profile, glucose, and insulin. The study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale and the data were meta-analyzed with a random effects model, comparing control groups to intervention groups using standardized measurements. Twenty articles were included in the systematic review and fourteen (70%) in the meta-analysis. Significant differences were observed between the control and intervention groups (always in favor of exercise) for absolute VO2max / VO2peak (ES = 0.317; 95% CI = 0.065, 0.569; p = 0.014), VO2max / peak relative to body weight (ES = 0.673; 95% CI = 0.287, 1.060; p = 0.001), HDL cholesterol (ES = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.009, 0.430; p = 0.041) and RHR (ES = -0.438; 95% CI = -0.753, -0.022; p = 0.007). No effects were observed for either systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Exercise training for patients undergoing bariatric surgery appears to be effective in improving absolute and relative VO2max / VO2peak, HDL cholesterol and reducing the RHR. More intervention studies using (better) exercise interventions are needed before discarding their effects on other cardiometabolic risk factors. This systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in Prospero (CRD42020153398).