Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 78(6): 1315-33, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24803302

RESUMEN

AIMS: AMG 181 pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), safety, tolerability and effects after single subcutaneous (s.c.) or intravenous (i.v.) administration were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Healthy male subjects (n= 68) received a single dose of AMG 181 or placebo at 0.7, 2.1, 7, 21, 70 mg s.c. (or i.v.), 210 mg s.c. (or i.v.), 420 mg i.v. or placebo. Four ulcerative colitis (UC) subjects (n= 4, male : female 2:2) received 210 mg AMG 181 or placebo s.c. (3:1). AMG 181 concentration, anti-AMG 181-antibody (ADA), α4 ß7 receptor occupancy (RO), target cell counts, serum C-reactive protein, fecal biomarkers and Mayo score were measured. Subjects were followed 3-9 months after dose. RESULTS: Following s.c. dosing, AMG 181 was absorbed with a median tmax ranging between 2-10 days and a bioavailability between 82% and 99%. Cmax and AUC increased dose-proportionally and approximately dose-proportionally, respectively, within the 70-210 mg s.c. and 70-420 mg i.v. ranges. The linear ß-phase t1/2 was 31 (range 20-48) days. Target-mediated disposition occurred at serum AMG 181 concentrations of less than 1 µg ml(-1) . The PD effect on α4 ß7 RO showed an EC50 of 0.01 µg ml(-1) . Lymphocytes, eosinophils, CD4+ T cells and subset counts were unchanged. AMG 181-treated UC subjects were in remission with mucosal healing at weeks 6, 12 and/or 28. The placebo-treated UC subject experienced colitis flare at week 6. No ADA or AMG 181 treatment-related serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: AMG 181 has PK/PD, safety, and effect profiles suitable for further testing in subjects with inflammatory bowel diseases.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Bioanalysis ; 4(22): 2725-35, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23210655

RESUMEN

The development of an unwanted immune response to a protein therapeutic is a constant concern and necessitates careful monitoring of this class of drugs during clinical development. Neutralizing antibodies can have a significant impact on bioavailability, efficacy and safety of a protein therapeutic. Consequently, immunogenicity testing is required prior to obtaining regulatory approval and in some cases even after a product is marketed. Given the importance of this testing, it is critical that sensitive and robust assays are developed for detection of clinically relevant neutralizing antibodies. This review will describe considerations and current best practices for developing assays to detect neutralizing antibodies to protein therapeutics.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/análisis , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Proteínas/inmunología , Animales , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Humanos , Inmunidad , Proteínas/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...