A systematic review of contrast-enhanced computed tomography calcium scoring methodologies and impact of aortic valve calcium burden on TAVI clinical outcomes.

Different methodologies have been used to assess the role of AV calcification (AVC) on TAVI outcomes. This systematic review aims to describe the burden of AVC, synthesize the different methods of calcium score quantification, and evaluate the impact of AVC on outcomes after TAVI. We included studies of TAVI patients who had reported AV calcium scoring by contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and the Agatston method. The impact of calcification on TAVI outcomes without restrictions on follow-up time or outcome type was evaluated. Results were reported descriptively, and a meta-analysis was conducted when feasible. Sixty-eight articles were included, with sample sizes ranging from 23 to 1425 patients. Contrast-enhanced calcium scoring was reported in 30 studies, calcium volume score in 28 studies, and unique scoring methods in two. All studies with calcium volume scores had variable protocols, but most utilized a modified Agatston method with variable attenuation threshold values of 300-850 HU. Eight studies used the Agatston method, with the overall mean AV calcium score in studies published from 2010 to 2012 of 3342.9 AU [95%CI: 3150.4; 3535.4, I2 â€‹= â€‹0%]. The overall mean score was lower and heterogenous in studies published from 2014 to 2020 (2658.9 AU [95% CI: 2517.3; 2800.5, I2 â€‹= â€‹79%]. Most studies reported a positive association between calcium burden and increased risk of adverse outcomes, including implantation of permanent pacemaker (7/8 studies), paravalvular leak (13/13 studies), and risk of aortic rupture (2/2 studies). AVC quantification methodology with contrast-enhanced CT is still variable. AVC negatively impacts TAVI outcomes independently of the quantification method.

Comparative effectiveness of devices for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Atrial septal defect is a common congenital heart disease, producing a left-to-right shunt in the atrial septum; the current preferred treatment is transcatheter device closure. The aim is to conduct a systematic review to synthesize information on the comparative effectiveness and safety of atrial septal defect closure devices. The methods used: a comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases was conducted. Studies comparing procedural and follow-up outcomes of atrial septal defect devices were included. Network meta-analyses were conducted to generate direct and indirect evidence for comparative effectiveness and safety outcomes between devices. The results are as follows: Twelve studies met our inclusion criteria and were compared in network meta-analyses. The meta-analyses evaluated contemporary devices: the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder; the GORE CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder; the Figulla Flexible II Occluder; the CeraFlex Septal Occluder; and the HELEX Septal Occluder. These studies represented 3998 patients. The primary safety and efficacy outcomes were device embolization and follow-up residual shunt, respectively. Secondary clinical outcomes included procedural success and major and minor complications. No differences were found between devices in terms of device embolization and secondary clinical outcomes. Follow-up residual shunt was higher with the HELEX Septal Occluder compared with the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder (odds ratio 2.92, 95% confidence interval 1.12-7.61). To conclude: although most outcomes were similar between devices, evidence was largely based on observational low-quality studies. There were inconsistencies in outcome reporting and definitions; this merits future studies, with head-to-head device comparisons and standardization of outcomes.

A survey of cardiac surgeons to evaluate the use of sutureless aortic valve replacement in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SuAVR) is gaining popularity for the treatment of aortic stenosis. We aimed to describe Canadian cardiac surgeons' practice patterns and perceptions regarding SuAVR. METHODS: Content experts (clinicians and methodologists) developed the survey. Domains in the questionnaire include: respondent characteristics, factors influencing the decision to implant a SuAVR, barriers to SuAVR use, and interest in participating in a trial. RESULTS: A total of 66 cardiac surgeons (median duration of practice: 15 years; range 8-20 years) from 18 hospitals across Canada responded to the survey for a response rate of 84%. Surgeons reported that the following patient characteristics increased the likelihood they would choose SuAVR: hostile root (73%), small annular size (55%), high Society of Thoracic Surgery risk score (42%), older age (40%), to support minimally invasive surgery (25%) and redo-operation (23%). The following patient characteristics made surgeons less likely to pursue SuAVR: young age (73%), low STS score (40%), and large annular size (30%). Reported barriers to SuAVR use included: cost (33%), permanent pacemaker risk (27%) and uncertain durability (12%). Of respondents, 73% were interested in participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing SuAVR with transcatheter aortic valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: The primary reasons for surgeons selecting SuAVR were high surgical risk and anatomical challenges. Cost is a primary factor limiting SuAVR use.

Outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement versus conventional aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement, updated systematic review, and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SuAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study compares the effectiveness of SuAVR to SAVR and TAVR. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to July 2021 for studies evaluating SuAVR, SAVR, and TAVR in adults with aortic stenosis. We performed screening, full-text assessment, data collection, and risk of bias evaluation independently and in duplicate. We evaluated risk of bias using by Cochrane and CLARITY's tools, and certainty in evidence using the GRADE framework. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified one randomized and 78 observational studies (n = 60,689; SuAVR vs. SAVR = 39,171, vs. TAVR = 21,518). All studies were at high or unclear risk of bias, with very-low certainty in effect estimates. Compared to TAVR, SuAVR demonstrates no significant difference in mortality at 30-days (odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI: 0.85, 1.16], I2 = 0%), but decreased odds at 2-years (OR: 0.39, 95% CI [0.17, 0.88], I2 = 0%). SuAVR also reduced odds of mild paravalvular regurgitation (OR: 0.11, 95% CI [0.06, 0.21], I2 = 50%). Compared to SAVR, SuAVR was associated with a similar mortality at 30-days (OR: 0.99, 95% CI [0.85, 1.16], I2 = 0%) and 2-years (OR: 0.99, 95% CI [0.43-2.30], I2 = 7%). SuAVR significantly increased odds of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR: 2.5, 95% CI [2.25, 2.77], I2 = 0%). Pooled effect estimates were consistent with results from the randomized trial comparing SuAVR and SAVR. CONCLUSION: Based on very-low quality evidence, SuAVR is associated with similar short- and midterm outcomes compared to TAVR and SAVR. Comparative randomized data with long-term follow-up are required to clarify the role of SuAVR.

Association Between Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-term Risks of Stroke and Death in Noncardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently reported as a complication of noncardiac surgery. It is unknown whether new-onset perioperative AF is associated with an increased risk of stroke and death beyond the perioperative period. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the long-term risks of stroke and mortality associated with new-onset perioperative AF after noncardiac surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2020 for studies reporting on the association between perioperative AF and the risk of stroke and death occurring beyond 30 days after noncardiac surgery. Reference screening, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. Data were pooled using inverse variance-weighted random-effects models and presented as risk ratios (RRs). RESULTS: From 7344 citations, we included 31 studies (3,529,493 patients). The weighted mean incidence of perioperative AF was 0.7%. During a mean follow-up of 28.1 ± 9.4 months, perioperative AF was associated with an increased risk of stroke (1.5 vs 0.9 strokes per 100 patient-years; RR: 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-3.9, I2 = 78%). Perioperative AF was also associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (21.0 vs 7.6 deaths per 100 patient-years; RR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5-2.2, I2 = 94%). The pooled adjusted hazard ratios for stroke and all-cause mortality were 1.9 (95% CI: 1.6-2.2, I2 = 31%) and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.3-1.7, I2 = 20%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had perioperative AF after noncardiac surgery had a higher long-term risk of stroke and mortality compared with patients who did not. Whether this risk is modifiable with oral anticoagulation therapy should be investigated.

CONTEXTE: La fibrillation atriale (FA) est une arythmie fréquemment attribuée à une complication d'une chirurgie non cardiaque. On ne sait toutefois pas si l'apparition d'une FA périopératoire est associée à un risque accru d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès au-delà de la période périopératoire. Nous avons donc procédé à un examen et à une méta-analyse systématiques dans le but d'évaluer les risques à long terme d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès associés à l'apparition d'une FA périopératoire à la suite d'une chirurgie non cardiaque. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans MEDLINE et EMBASE depuis leur création jusqu'à mars 2020 pour y relever les études signalant l'association entre la FA périopératoire et le risque d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès survenant au-delà de 30 jours à la suite d'une chirurgie non cardiaque. Le tri des références, la sélection des études, l'extraction des données et l'évaluation de la qualité ont été effectués en double. Les données ont été regroupées à l'aide de modèles à effets aléatoires pondérés par l'inverse de la variance et présentées sous forme de rapports de risques relatifs (RR). RÉSULTATS: Parmi 7 344 références, nous avons inclus 31 études (3 529 493 patients). L'incidence moyenne pondérée de FA périopératoire était de 0,7 %. Dans le cadre d'un suivi moyen de 28,1 ± 9,4 mois, la FA périopératoire était associée à un risque accru d'accident vasculaire cérébral (1,5 vs 0,9 accident vasculaire cérébral par 100 années-patients; RR de 2,9; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %; de 2,1 à 3,9; I2 = 78 %). La FA périopératoire était également associée à un risque considérablement plus élevé de décès toutes causes confondues (21,0 vs 7,6 décès par 100 années-patients; RR de 1,8; IC à 95 %; de 1,5 à 2,2; I2 = 94 %). Les rapports de risques instantanés ajustés regroupés d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès toutes causes confondues étaient de 1,9 (IC à 95 %; de 1,6 à 2,2; I2 = 31 %) et de 1,5 (IC à 95 %; de 1,3 à 1,7; I2 = 20 %), respectivement. CONCLUSIONS: Les patients qui souffraient de FA périopératoire à la suite d'une chirurgie non cardiaque présentaient un risque accru à long terme d'accident vasculaire cérébral et de décès par rapport aux patients qui n'en souffraient pas. Il serait approprié d'examiner la possibilité de modifier ce risque par une anticoagulothérapie orale.

Remote Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Remote ambulatory cardiac monitoring (rACM) could identify high-grade atrioventricular block (AVB) before and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TAVR, with 14-day rACM before and after TAVR, was performed. Of 62 patients undergoing TAVR, 41 patients had rACM before TAVR. Three patients had asymptomatic AVB leading to planned pacemaker (PM) implant. After TAVR, 23 patients had rACM, with 1 patient requiring a PM implant for asymptomatic AVB. Five patients underwent unplanned PM after TAVR. Using rACM, almost half of PM implants in TAVR recipients were identified electively. High-grade AVB requiring PM was identified in nearly 10% of patients before TAVR.

La surveillance ambulatoire par télémétrie cardiaque pourrait permettre de détecter un bloc auriculoventriculaire (BAV) de haut grade avant et après le remplacement valvulaire aortique par cathéter (RVAC). Les données concernant des patients ayant subi un RVAC précédé ou suivi d'une période de surveillance ambulatoire de 14 jours ont été l'objet d'une analyse rétrospective. La surveillance ambulatoire a précédé le RVAC chez 41 patients sur 62 ayant subi l'intervention. Chez trois patients, un BAV asymptomatique a donné lieu à l'implantation planifiée d'un stimulateur cardiaque (SC). Le RVAC a été suivi d'une surveillance ambulatoire par télémétrie cardiaque chez 23 patients. La présence d'un BAV asymptomatique a nécessité l'implantation d'un SC chez un patient. L'implantation non planifiée d'un SC a été effectuée chez cinq patients après le RVAC. Grâce à la surveillance ambulatoire par télémétrie cardiaque, près de la moitié des cas nécessitant l'implantation d'un SC ont été dépistés accessoirement parmi les patients ayant subi un RVAC. Un BAV de haut grade nécessitant l'implantation d'un SC a été détecté chez près de 10 % des patients avant le RVAC.

Antithrombotic Management After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Survey of Canadian Physicians.

Optimal postprocedural antithrombotic regimen is uncertain after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We developed an online questionnaire on post-TAVR antithrombotic management. After research ethics board approval, we distributed the survey to TAVR implanters across Canada. A total of 24 TAVR implanters from 17 centres responded to the survey for a response rate of 75%. Dual antiplatelet therapy for variable durations was the preferred initial treatment for patients in sinus rhythm after isolated TAVR, TAVR with a recent stent (≤ 1 month), and valve-in-valve procedures (71%, 96%, and 65%, respectively). Most respondents continued patients on acetylsalicylic acid indefinitely after these procedures (100%, 92%, 90%, respectively). In patients with atrial fibrillation, the CHA2DS2-VASC score was the preferred stroke risk score for 57% of respondents, the CHADS2 score was the preferred stroke risk score for 22% of respondents, and the CHADS65 score was the preferred stroke risk score for 17% of respondents. To determine the risk of bleeding, the HASBLED score was most often used (52%), but 48% of respondents indicated that they did not use a bleeding risk score. In the presence of atrial fibrillation, antithrombotic therapy choice varied widely. Our survey shows that dual antiplatelet therapy is the most common discharge regimen after TAVR in current practice. However, the choice and duration of antithrombotic regimen vary in patients requiring anticoagulation.

Outcomes after Ross procedure in adult patients: A meta-analysis and microsimulation.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the risk of adverse events, life expectancy, and event-free life expectancy after the Ross procedure in adults. METHODS: We searched databases for reports evaluating the Ross procedure in patients aged more than or equal to 16 years of age. A microsimulation model was used to evaluate age- and gender-specific life expectancy for patients undergoing the Ross procedure. RESULTS: Data were pooled from 63 articles totaling 19 155 patients from 20 countries. Perioperative mortality was 2.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-3.1; N = 9978). We found a mortality risk of 5.9% (95% CI: 4.8-7.2) at a mean follow-up of 7.2 years (N = 7573). The rate of perioperative clinically significant bleeding was 1.0% (95% CI: 0.1-3.0); re-exploration for bleeding 4.6% (95% CI: 3.1-6.3); postoperative clinically significant bleeding from 30 days until a mean of 7.1 years was 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2-1.0). At a mean of 6.9 years of follow-up, reintervention rate of any operated valve was 7.9% (95% CI: 5.7-10.3). The risk of valve thrombosis was 0.3% (95% CI: 0.2-0.5) at 7.6 years; peripheral embolism 0.3% (95% CI: 0.2-0.4) at 6.4 years; stroke 0.9% (95% CI: 0.7-1.2) at 6.5 years; and endocarditis 2.1% (95% CI: 1.6-2.6) at 8.0 years. Microsimulation reported a 40-year-old undergoing the Ross procedure to have a life expectancy of 35.4 years and event-free life expectancy of 26.6 years. CONCLUSIONS: Ross procedure in nonelderly adults is associated with low mortality and low risk of adverse events both at short- and long-term follow-up. The surgical community must prioritize a large, expertize-based randomized controlled trial to definitively address the risks and benefits of the Ross procedure compared to conventional aortic valve replacement.