A qualitative assessment of blunt smokers' perceptions and receptivity to non-tobacco blunt wraps.

OBJECTIVE: The recent debut of the non-tobacco blunt wrap (N-TBW) for smoking cannabis has received little attention from the tobacco control community. The present study is intended to assess blunt smokers' perceptions and receptivity to N-TBWs, which are being marketed as an alternative to cigarillos and other tobacco products used for making blunts. METHODS: Current blunt smokers (n=41) were recruited from social media platforms to participate in one of nine two-hour focus groups held between October 2022 and May 2023. Six topics ranging from social aspects of blunt smoking to impediments to switching to N-TBWs were discussed. A domain analysis was utilized in uncovering semantic relationships between a given variable (e.g., uneven burn rate) and outcome (e.g., not using N-TBWs). RESULTS: Blunt smokers conveyed interest in the N-TBWs because of health concerns about tobacco. Yet, the following three main barriers impede blunt smokers use of N-TBWs: lack of awareness and accessibility of the N-TBW, familiarity with preparing and smoking a traditional blunt, and incomparability of the tobacco blunt wrap (e.g., cigarillo). The latter was the most formidable challenge as participants expressed several negative product features of N-TBWs (e.g., flimsy material) relative to cigarillos. CONCLUSIONS: The N-TBW is unlikely to displace the cigarillo in the near-term future. A more likely scenario is that blunt smokers will continue to use cigarillos with intermittent use of N-TBWs in situational settings. If this occurs, then blunt smokers will continue to be exposed to harmful tobacco products.

The Marketing and Perceptions of Non-Tobacco Blunt Wraps on Twitter.

OBJECTIVE: Non-tobacco blunt wraps (N-TBWs), which entered the marketplace in 2017, are being promoted as an alternative to traditional TBWs (e.g., cigarillos) for blunt smoking. The lack of studies on these novel products warrants an investigation. This study was the first to explore blunt smokers' perceptions about N-TBWs and the extent of product marketing on Twitter. METHODS: A corpus of tweets from Twitter, posted between January 2017 and November 2021, were identified by a Boolean search string (N = 149,343), where 48,695 tweets were classified as relevant by a machine learning algorithm. These relevant tweets were further screened and labeled as promotional or organic based on product URLs, usernames, keywords, or hashtags. Topic modeling using Dirichlet Allocation was then employed for identifying latent patterns of words among relevant tweets. The Social Networking Potential (SNP) score was employed for identifying influential accounts. RESULTS: Most relevant tweets (89%) were organic, non-promotional expressions about N-TBWs. Account users who only posted non-promotional tweets had a significantly higher SNP than those who only posted promotional tweets. Yet, neither of the two groups of account users consisted of known celebrities. Topic modeling revealed three broad groups of topics (7 in total) denoting the attributes of hemp N-TBWs, interest in non-hemp N-TBWs, and product marketing. CONCLUSIONS: The large proportion of organic tweets is indicative of the nascency of N-TBWs, which will need to be marketed more extensively if they are to replace cigar products used by blunt smokers.

Use of internal documents to investigate a tobacco company's strategies to market snus in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies indicate that cigarette manufacturers have been interested for decades in developing a smokeless tobacco (SLT) product for smokers and non-users of SLT. The current study aims to assess a tobacco company's use of novel marketing strategies and intent to promote snus in the US as either a replacement or situational substitute for the cigarette. METHODS: A Boolean search string was used to search R. J. Reynolds' (RJR) Records in UCSF's Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library. A total of 358 documents, from 2005-2009, met our initial search criteria and were selected for their relevance to the marketing of Camel Snus. A content analysis was subsequently conducted using the Framework Method to identify themes and strategies for promoting Camel Snus. RESULTS: Four major themes about Camel Snus emerged from the documents: 1) promotion by third parties including retailers, snus ambassadors and secret shoppers, 2) expansion of the target population of SLT users to include female smokers and dual users of cigarettes and SLT, 3) emphasis on the difference between Camel Snus and other SLT, and 4) a shift from promoting the practical uses of Camel Snus to using emotional messages conveying freedom. CONCLUSIONS: The findings align with other studies suggesting that RJR intended to market snus to non-users of SLT. The findings also reveal that RJR employed creative marketing strategies (e.g. snus ambassadors) and may have intended to promote snus as a situational substitute for the cigarette, as evidenced by the company's recruitment of dual tobacco users.