Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Distal Junctional Kyphosis After Posterior Cervical Fusion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Posterior cervical fusion is the surgery of choice when fusing long segments of the cervical spine. However, because of the limited presence of this pathology, there is a paucity of data in the literature about the postoperative complications of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). We aimed to identify and report potential associations between the preoperative cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score and the occurrence of DJK after posterior cervical fusion. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent posterior cervical fusion at a single hospital between June 1, 2010, and May 31, 2020. Patient data were screened to include patients who were >18 years old, had baseline MRI, had baseline standing cervical X-ray, had immediate postoperative standing cervical X-ray, and had clinical and radiographic follow-ups of >1 year, including a standing cervical X-ray at least 1 year postoperatively. Univariate analysis was completed between DJK and non-DJK groups, with multivariate regression completed for relevant clinical variables. Simple linear regression was completed to analyze correlation between the C-VBQ score and total degrees of kyphosis angle change. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were identified, of whom 19 (20.4%) had DJK and 74 (79.6%) did not. The DJK group had a significantly higher C-VBQ score than the non-DJK group (2.97 ± 0.40 vs 2.26 ± 0.46; P < .001). A significant, positive correlation was found between the C-VBQ score and the total degrees of kyphosis angle change (r 2 = 0.26; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, the C-VBQ score independently predicted DJK (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.67; P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found that the C-VBQ score was an independent predictive factor of DJK after posterior cervical fusion.

A Novel Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Cage Subsidence After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons can preoperatively assess bone quality using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or computed tomography; however, this is not feasible for all patients. Recently, a MRI-based scoring system was used to evaluate the lumbar spine's vertebral bone quality. OBJECTIVE: To create a similar MRI-based scoring system for the cervical spine (C-VBQ), correlate C-VBQ scores with computed tomography-Hounsfield units (HU), and evaluate the utility of this scoring system to independently predict cage subsidence after single-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: Demographic, procedure-related, and radiographic data were collected for patients. Pearson correlation test was used to determine the correlation between C-VBQ and HU. Cage subsidence was defined as ≥3 mm loss of fusion segmental height. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to determine the correlation between potential risk factors for subsidence. RESULTS: Of 59 patients who underwent single-level ACDF, subsidence was found in 17 (28.8%). Mean C-VBQ scores were 2.22 ± 0.36 for no subsidence levels and 2.83 ± 0.38 ( P < .001) for subsidence levels. On multivariate analysis, a higher C-VBQ score was significantly associated with subsidence (odds ratio = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.39-2.46, P < .001) and was the only significant independent predictor of subsidence after ACDF. There was a significant negative correlation between HU and C-VBQ (r 2 = -0.49, P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found that a higher C-VBQ score was significantly associated with cage subsidence after ACDF. Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between C-VBQ and HU. The C-VBQ score may be a valuable tool for assessing preoperative bone quality and independently predicting cage subsidence after ACDF.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Use of drug-eluting, balloon-expandable resolute onyx coronary stent as a novel treatment strategy for vertebral artery ostial stenosis: Case series.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral artery (VA) ostial stenosis is notoriously difficult to treat using bare-metal stents owing to high rates of restenosis and stent kinking and breakage. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of treatment with a drug-eluting, balloon-expandable coronary stent (Resolute Onyx, Medtronic). METHODS: Our prospectively maintained database was retrospectively searched for consecutive patients diagnosed with VA ostial stenosis who underwent Resolute Onyx stenting with/without angioplasty between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2022. Patient demographics and clinical and radiographic presentations were recorded. Occlusion location, stenosis severity, contralateral disease, devices used, and intraprocedural and postprocedural complications were noted. Outcomes were assessed based on new or recurrent stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Patients were followed up clinically and with radiographic imaging for in-stent stenosis. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in our study (21 men [80.8%]; mean age 70.3 ± 9.8 years). Symptomatic patients presented with TIA (11/26, 42.3%) and stroke (10/26; 38.5%). Mean stenosis in the study cohort was 74.9 ± 13.0%. One (3.8%) intraprocedural complication was encountered whereby the stent failed to open despite several attempts and was exchanged with a new one without issues. No in-hospital postprocedure stroke, TIA, or mortality was reported. During a mean 16.2 ± 13.6 months' follow up, two patients developed symptomatic in-stent restenosis that was treated with balloon angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first case series of Resolute Onyx drug-eluting stenting including 30-day postprocedure stroke/TIA rates and clinical/radiographic follow up and demonstrate safe and effective treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic VA ostial stenosis.

Prolonged Opioid Use After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Persistent opioid utilization after spine surgery is a rising complication among both preoperatively opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant patients. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to determine the prevalence and characterize the risk factors that predispose patients to prolonged opioid use (≥3 months) after lumbar fusion. METHODS: Studies were identified through searches in PubMed and EMBASE from each database's earliest records to February 1, 2022. We included observational studies examining the risk factors and rates of prolonged opioid use following lumbar fusion. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using inverse-variance methods. RESULTS: In this meta-analysis of 12 studies encompassing 80,935 patients, 40.2% of patients continued to fill opioid prescriptions ≥3 months after lumbar fusion. Significant sociodemographic predictors included Medicare or Medicaid insurance (OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.36-1.88), African-American ethnicity (OR=1.29, 95% CI 1.18-1.41), being from the Southern United States (OR=1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.25), or women (OR=1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20). Being from the Midwestern United States (OR=0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.85) was found to be a protective factor. Comorbidities associated with increased risk of prolonged opioid use were preoperative opioid use (OR=5.76, 95% CI 3.52-9.41), drug abuse (OR=3.11, 95% CI 2.37-4.08), alcohol abuse (OR=2.37, 95% CI 2.14-2.64), psychiatric disorders (OR=2.29, 95% CI 1.94-2.70), smoking history (OR=1.81, 95% CI 1.23-2.66), arthritis (OR=1.35, 95% CI 1.29-1.40), and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (standardized mean difference=0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of prolonged opioid use after lumbar fusion underscores the importance of screening patients for comorbidities and implementing targeted strategies to minimize opioid misuse.

Extracranial-to-Intracranial Bypass for Distal Internal Carotid Artery and/or Proximal Middle Cerebral Artery Steno-Occlusive Disease: A Case Series of Clinical Outcomes at a Single, High-Volume Cerebrovascular Center.

BACKGROUND: Extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass was first described by Yasargil in the 1960s for treatment of symptomatic distal internal carotid artery (ICA) and/or proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) steno-occlusive disease through direct anastomosis. Subsequent bypass trials failed to demonstrate benefit for overall outcomes and stroke rates compared with best medical therapy. However, the procedure remained in the neurosurgeon's armament, with studies showing benefits in select patient populations. With advancements in technology, patient selection has become more comprehensive. OBJECTIVE: To provide a contemporary evaluation of EC-IC bypass from our high-volume cerebrovascular center, focusing on associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent direct EC-IC bypass surgeries for symptomatic distal ICA and/or proximal MCA steno-occlusive disease between April 2015 and September 2019 were identified retrospectively. Medical records were reviewed to collect demographics, clinical presentation, computed tomography perfusion imaging findings, transcranial Doppler results, procedure indication, donor vessel types, anastomosis site, bypass patency, periprocedural complications, postprocedural complications, symptom recrudescence, repeat or new interventions, subjective improvements, and modified Rankin Scale scores. RESULTS: We identified 27 patients who underwent 32 EC-IC bypass procedures. The rate of ipsilateral stroke was 9.4%, with a median follow-up of 8 months (IQR, 4-13 months). Patients experienced a 22.3% improvement in modified Rankin Scale scores, and 70.3% of patients reported subjective improvement and satisfaction at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Direct EC-IC bypass remains a viable option for revascularization in symptomatic patients with distal ICA and/or proximal MCA steno-occlusive disease.

Minimally Invasive Robot-Guided Dual Cortical Bone Trajectory for Adjacent Segment Disease.

Here we present a novel application of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) fixation utilizing robotic guidance in a previously instrumented spine with a traditional pedicle screw (PS), obviating the need for a larger posterior incision, reducing the risk of infection, muscular dissection, and likely decreasing hospital length of stay. A 60-year-old woman with prior left L3-L4 extreme lateral interbody fusion and unilateral percutaneous PS placed at L3 to L5 presented with progressive bilateral lower-extremity pain and diminished sensation in the S1 dermatome secondary to adjacent segment disease (ASD). The patient underwent an L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion for indirect decompression and restoration of segmental lordosis. After the first stage was completed, she was turned prone for posterior percutaneous instrumentation. Given prior instrumentation at L3-L5 on the left side, a robot planning software was used to plan a cortical bone screw on the left L5 pedicle. A left S1 PS was then planned with the screw head aligning with the left L5 cortical bone screw. Instrumentation was then placed percutaneously using the robot bilaterally without issue. Intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging demonstrated accurate placement of PS, and postoperative computed tomography demonstrated the excellent positioning of all PSs. This report is the first documented case of a robotically placed CBT screw placed in the same pedicle as a prior traditional PS for ASD. This method expands the surgical options for ASD to include robotic percutaneous placement of posterior instrumentation at the same level as previous instrumentation.

The effect of COVID-19 on trainee operative experience at a multihospital academic neurosurgical practice: A first look at case numbers.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the economy, health care, and society as a whole. To prevent the spread of infection, local governments across the United States issued mandatory lockdowns and stay-at-home orders. In the surgical world, elective cases ceased to help "flatten the curve" and prevent the infection from spreading to hospital staff and patients. We explored the effect of the cancellation of these procedures on trainee operative experience at our high-volume, multihospital neurosurgical practice. METHODS: Our department cancelled all elective cases starting March 16, 2020, and resumed elective surgical and endovascular procedures on May 11, 2020. We retrospectively reviewed case volumes for 54 days prelockdown and 54 days postlockdown to evaluate the extent of the decrease in surgical volume at our institution. Procedure data were collected and then divided into cranial, spine, functional, peripheral nerve, pediatrics, and endovascular categories. RESULTS: Mean total cases per day in the prelockdown group were 12.26 ± 7.7, whereas in the postlockdown group, this dropped to 7.78 ± 5.5 (P = 0.01). In the spine category, mean cases per day in the prelockdown group were 3.13 ± 2.63; in the postlockdown group, this dropped to 0.96 ± 1.36 (P < 0.001). In the functional category, mean cases per day in the prelockdown group were 1.31 ± 1.51, whereas in the postlockdown group, this dropped to 0.11 ± 0.42 (P < 0.001). For cranial (P = 0.245), peripheral nerve (P = 0.16), pediatrics (P = 0.34), and endovascular (P = 0.48) cases, the volumes dropped but were not statistically significant decreases. CONCLUSION: The impact of this outbreak on operative training does appear to be significant based solely on statistics. Although the drop in case volumes during this time can be accounted for by the pandemic, it is important to understand that this is a multifactorial effect. Further studies are needed for these results to be generalizable and to fully understand the effect this pandemic has had on trainee operative experience.

Social Media Use Among Neurosurgery Trainees: A Survey of North American Training Programs.

BACKGROUND: Social media have revolutionized access to educational content. Given the extensive presence of social media, these platforms have the potential to influence neurosurgical training and education of residents and fellows. We explored the attitudes of neurosurgical trainees (postgraduate years 1-9) toward social media and their perceived influence on training and education. METHODS: This study was a survey of trainees at North American neurosurgery residency programs. A 22-item survey, including 2 free-text questions, was distributed through the Congress of Neurological Surgeons listserv. The survey consisted of questions regarding demographics, social media platform use, and trainee views on social media; their perceived impact on education and job performance was gauged using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: The survey was disseminated to 1160 neurosurgery trainees, with a response rate of 15.3%. Of 178 respondents, 132 (74.2%) were men; 142 (79.8%) were 25-34 years old. All respondents used social media. The most commonly used platforms were Facebook (87.1%), followed by YouTube (84.3%), Instagram (81.5%), and Twitter (74.7%). The most common reasons for social media use were personal social (89.8%), networking (65.5%), and academic resources (65.0%); 113 respondents (63.5%) reported spending <25% of their time on social media for academics. The Neurosurgical Atlas (63.3%), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (11.2%), and American Association of Neurological Surgeons (10.1%) social media accounts were the most commonly used academic platforms. CONCLUSIONS: Social media use was ubiquitous among trainees. Although most used social media for personal social communication, most also used it for academic purposes.

Transradial access for flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms: Case series.

BACKGROUND: Transradial access for neurointerventions offers advantages of fewer access-site complications, reduced procedure time, and greater patient comfort over transfemoral access. Data about transradial access for flow diversion are limited. We share our early experience with transradial access for flow diversion in a relatively large case series. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent Pipeline embolization device (Medtronic) deployment via transradial access were included in the study, irrespective of location and laterality of the intracranial aneurysm. The cases were performed between July 2016 and October 2019. Demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and procedure-related details (including catheter systems used) were recorded and statistically evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-five transradial flow diversion procedures were attempted in 32 patients, of which 33 procedures were successful. In two cases involving left common carotid artery and internal carotid artery access, guide catheter herniation into the aortic arch led to abandonment of transradial access in favor of transfemoral access. The most common aneurysm locations in the transradial access procedures were the posterior communicating artery (n = 7), ophthalmic artery (n = 7), and superior hypophyseal artery (n = 7). Most transradial access procedures (66.7%) were performed using a biaxial catheter system. 6-French Benchmark (Penumbra) and Phenom 27 (Medtronic) were the most commonly utilized guide- and microcatheters, respectively. One patient had intraprocedural subarachnoid hemorrhage. No access-site complications occurred. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates safety and feasibility of transradial access for Pipeline embolization device deployment and shows the versatility of this approach for different catheter systems. Tortuosity and acute angulation of the left common carotid artery and internal carotid artery were associated with approach failure.

Transradial middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma using Onyx: case series.

BACKGROUND: Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is an emerging therapy for the resolution of subacute or chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). CSDH patients are often elderly and have several comorbidities. We evaluated our experience with transradial access (TRA) for MMA embolization using predominantly Onyx under conscious sedation. METHODS: Data for consecutive patients who underwent transradial MMA embolization for CSDH during a 2-year period (2018-2019) were analyzed from a single-center, prospectively-maintained database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, ambulatory times, subdural hematoma resorption status, and guide catheter type were recorded. Conversion to femoral access and complication rates were also recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (mean age, 71.7±14.4 years) were included in this study. Mean CSDH size was 14±5.5 mm. Most (91.3%) TRA embolizations were performed with 6-French 0.071-inch Benchmark guide catheters (Penumbra). MMA embolization was successful in 44 patients (95.7%) (including two cases of TRA conversion). Twenty-one (48%) patients had a severe Charlson Comorbidity Index (>5). Symptomatic improvement was noted in 39 of 44 patients (88.6%). Mean length of stay was 4±3 days. Patients were ambulated immediately postprocedure. At mean follow-up (8±4 weeks), 86.4% of patients had complete or partial CSDH resolution. Persistent use of antiplatelet agents after the procedure was associated with failed or minimal CSDH resorption (5 of 6, 83.3% vs 9 of 38 23.7% with complete or near-complete resolution; P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Transradial Onyx MMA embolization under conscious sedation is safe and effective for CSDH treatment. TRA may be especially useful in elderly patients with numerous comorbidities.

Comparing Cortical Bone Trajectories for Pedicle Screw Insertion using Robotic Guidance and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Navigation.

BACKGROUND: Cortical bone trajectories (CBTs) for pedicle screw insertion can be used to stabilize the spine. Surgeons often rely on fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT)-navigation technologies to guide screw placement. Robotic technology has potential to increase accuracy. We report our initial experience with robotic guidance for pedicle screw insertion utilizing CBTs in patients with degenerative disc disease. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted using data for consecutive patients who underwent spinal stabilization using a posterior approach for CBTs. The newest robotic platform (Mazor X) was used in these cases. Accuracy was determined by applying the Ravi Scale: grade I (no breach or deviation), II (breach <2 mm), III (breach 2-4 mm), or IV (breach >4 mm). The results were compared with those for a historical cohort of patients who underwent CT navigation-guided pedicle screw insertion using CBTs. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent robot-assisted pedicle screw placement using CBTs. A total of 92 screws were inserted across 24 spinal levels with grade I accuracy and without complications in the robotic group. Eighteen patients underwent CT-navigation for CBT pedicle screw insertion. A total of 74 screws were inserted across 19 levels, 69 of which were grade I accuracy and 5 were grade II accuracy. When comparing operative time (P = 0.97), fluoroscopy time (P = 0.8), and radiation dose (P = 0.4), no significant differences were observed between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic technology and CT-navigation technology for CBT pedicle screw insertion were safe and accurate.