RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with parent quality of life during and after neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge among parents of infants with congenital anomalies admitted to the NICU. STUDY DESIGN: This secondary analysis of 2 prospective cohort studies between 2016 and 2020 at a level IV NICU included parents of infants with major congenital anomalies receiving NICU care. The primary outcomes were parent health-related quality of life (HRQL) during the NICU stay and at 3 months post-NICU discharge. RESULTS: A total of 166 parent-infant dyads were enrolled in the study, 124 of which completed the 3-month follow-up interview. During the NICU stay, parent history of a mental health disorder (-13 points), earlier gestational age (-17 points), consultation by multiple specialists (-11 points), and longer hospital stay (-5 points) were associated with lower HRQL. Parents of infants with a neonatal surgical anomaly had higher HRQL (+4 points). At 3 months after NICU discharge, parent receipt of a psychology consult in the NICU, the total number of consultants involved in the child's care, and an infant with a nonsurgical anomaly were associated with lower parent HRQL. Parents of infants with a gastrostomy tube (-6 points) and those with hospital readmission (-5 points) had lower HRQL. Comparing same-parent differences in HRQL over time, parents of infants with anomalies did not show significant improvement in HRQL on discharge home. CONCLUSION: Parents of infants with congenital anomalies reported low HRQL at baseline and at discharge. Parents of infants with nonsurgical, medically complex anomalies requiring multispecialty care represent a vulnerable group who could be better supported during and after their NICU stay.
Asunto(s)
Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Calidad de Vida , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Padres/psicología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare use and parent health-related quality of life (HRQL) in 3 groups of infants whose neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge was delayed by oral feedings. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, single-center cohort of infants in the NICU from September 2018 to March 2020. After enrollment, weekly chart review determined eligibility for home nasogastric (NG) feeds based on predetermined criteria. Actual discharge feeding decisions were at clinical discretion. At 3 months' postdischarge, we compared acute healthcare use and parental HRQL, measured by the PedsQL Family Impact Module, among infants who were NG eligible but discharged with all oral feeds, discharged with NG feeds, and discharged with gastrostomy (G) tubes. We calculated NICU days saved by home NG discharges. RESULTS: Among 180 infants, 80 were orally fed, 35 used NG, and 65 used G tubes. Compared with infants who had NG-tube feedings, infants who had G-tube feedings had more gastrointestinal or tube-related readmissions and emergency encounters (unadjusted OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.3-12.7, P = .02), and orally-fed infants showed no difference in use (unadjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.1-1.7, P = .225). Multivariable adjustment did not change these comparisons. Parent HRQL at 3 months did not differ between groups. Infants discharged home with NG tubes saved 1574 NICU days. CONCLUSIONS: NICU discharge with NG feeds is associated with reduced NICU stay without increased postdischarge healthcare use or decreased parent HRQL, whereas G-tube feeding was associated with increased postdischarge healthcare use.