Hindfoot alignment assessment by the foot-ankle offset: a diagnostic study.

INTRODUCTION: Foot-ankle offset (FAO) is a three-dimensional (3D) biometric measurement of hindfoot alignment (HA) measured on images from weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). Our aim was to investigate its distribution in a large cohort of patients, hypothesizing that threshold FAO values in valgus or varus could be identified as markers for increased risk of associated pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, monocentric, level II study including 125 subjects (250 feet) undergoing bilateral WBCT [58.4% female; mean age, 54 years (18-84)]. Patients were clinically assessed and pathologies were classified according to anatomic location (valgus- or varus associated). HA was measured using FAO on 3D datasets and tibio-calcaneal angles (TCA) on two-dimensional Saltzman-El-Khoury views. Threshold FAO values and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were calculated for predicting increased risk of medial or lateral pathologies. RESULTS: Mean FAO was 1.65% ± 4.72 and mean TCA was 4.15° ± 7.67. Clinically, 167 feet were normal, 33 varus and 50 valgus with FAO values of 1.71% ± 3.16, - 4.96% ± 5.30 and 5.79% ± 3.77, respectively. Mean FAO was 0.99% ± 3.26 for non-pathological feet, - 2.53% ± 5.05 for lateral and 6.81% ± 2.70 for medial pathologies. Threshold FAO values of - 1.64% (51.4% sensitivity, 85.1% specificity, AUC = 0.72) and 2.71% (95% sensitivity, 82.8% specificity, AUC = 0.93) best predicted the risk of lateral and medial pathology, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with FAO between - 1.64% and 2.71% had the least risk of degenerative foot and ankle pathology. This interval could be considered a target for patients undergoing realignment procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A "safe zone" for Foot Ankle Offset was described between - 1.64% and 2.71%, for which the risk of foot and ankle pathologies is lower. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-Diagnostic study.

Bifascicular nature of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus tendons: forgotten anatomical characteristics rediscovered with US imaging.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the bifid configuration of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor pollicis longus (FPL). METHODS: In the first part of this study, 20 digits from 4 cadaver hands were dissected and analyzed using anatomical and histological slices. The second part of the study was carried out over a 12-month period starting in August 2018. It was a prospective US imaging study of 300 digits from 30 healthy participants performed by two radiologists in a double-blinded manner. This study focused on two items: tendon shape and whether a central septum separated the two hemitendons. Descriptive statistics were calculated along with the inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: In 100% (300/300) of fingers and thumbs, the FDP and FPL tendons were made up of two parallel bundles arranged side by side, with a central vertical septum between these two hemitendons, starting at the head of the proximal phalanx (PP) and continuing distally. This central septum was always present starting at the proximal third of PP for the FDP of the index, middle, and ring fingers. The septum was more difficult to identify in the thumb and little finger. Cohen's kappa indicated near perfect agreement when all digits were considered together (≥ 0.9), and substantial agreement for the thumb (0.71) and for the little finger (0.82). CONCLUSIONS: With US imaging, the bifascicular nature of the FDP and FPL tendons is easy to see, as these tendons have a double-barreled configuration starting at the head of the proximal phalanx. KEY POINTS: •Analysis of anatomical slices of the hand tendons found a bifascicular appearance of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus tendons starting at the head of the proximal phalanx. •This distinct feature of two hemitendons arranged side by side was seen in 100% of tendons we examined with US. It is associated with a vertical central septum that causes anisotropy. •Awareness of this "forgotten" anatomical detail has practical implications when interpreting images generated by latest-generation US systems and during surgery on hand flexor tendons.