Interprofessional interventions that impact collaboration and quality of care across inpatient trauma care continuum: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the recognized importance of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in trauma care, healthcare professionals often work in silos. Interprofessional (IP) interventions are crucial for optimizing IPC and delivering high-quality care across clinical contexts, yet their effectiveness throughout the inpatient trauma care continuum is not well understood. Thus, this review aimed to examine the literature on the effectiveness of IP interventions on collaboration processes and related outcomes in inpatient trauma care. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. We searched six databases for studies from the last decade on IP interventions in inpatient trauma care. Two independent reviewers categorized IP interventions (education, practice, organization) and extracted their impact on IPC processes and related outcomes (team performance, patient, organization). RESULTS: Of the 17,397 studies screened, 148 met the inclusion criteria. Most were cohort designs (72%), conducted in level I trauma centers (57%) and emergency departments (51%), and involved surgeons (56%) and nurses (53%). Studies focused on IP organization interventions (51%), such as clinical pathways; IP practice interventions (35%), such as trauma team activation protocols; and IP education interventions (14%) including multi-method education. IP practice interventions most effectively improved team performance results, while IP education interventions primarily improved IPC processes. Positive patient outcomes were limited, with few studies examining organizational effects. CONCLUSIONS: Significant advancements are still required in IP interventions and trauma care research. Future studies should rigorously explore the effectiveness of interventions throughout the inpatient trauma care continuum and focus on developing robust measures for patient and organizational outcomes.

Predicting Complete versus Incomplete Long-Term Functional Independence after Acute AIS Grade D Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: The proportion of patients with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade D traumatic spinal cord injuries (tSCI) is increasing. Although initial motor deficits can be relatively mild, some individuals fail to recover functional independence. Objectives: This study aims to identify factors associated with failure to reach complete functional independence after AIS grade D tSCI. Methods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center specialized in SCI care. A prospective cohort of 121 individuals with an AIS-D tSCI was considered. The baseline characteristics, length of acute stay, need for inpatient rehabilitation, and 12-month functional status were assessed. Univariate and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to identify factors associated with reaching complete versus incomplete functional independence (defined as perfect total SCIM III score at 12-month follow-up). Results: There were 69.3%, 83.3%, and 61.4% individuals reaching complete independence in self-care, respiration/sphincter management, and mobility, respectively. A total of 64 individuals (52%) reached complete functional independence in all three domains. In the CART analysis, we found that patients are more likely to achieve complete functional independence when they have a baseline motor score ≥83 (65% individuals) and if they present fewer medical comorbidities (70% individuals if Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] ≤4). Conclusion: About half of individuals with AIS grade D tSCI can expect complete long-term functional independence. It is important to recognize early during acute care individuals with baseline motor score <83 or a high burden of comorbidities (CCI ≥5) to optimize their rehabilitation plan.

Bedside electromyography for clinical assessment of sacral motor and reflex activity adapted for patients hospitalized with acute neurological conditions: a pilot study.

STUDY DESIGN: Pilot cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a sacral electromyographic (sEMG) technique at bedside to ascertain sparing of sacral motor activity and reflexes in patients hospitalized for acute neurological conditions. SETTING: Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal a Canadian Level-1 university trauma center specialized in SCI care. METHODS: Nine patients underwent digital rectal examination (DRE) and sEMG, assessing voluntary anal contraction and sacral spinal reflexes (bulbocavernosus reflex and the anal wink). Our sEMG technique utilized surface recording electrodes and tactile elicitation of reflexes. EMG signal was acquired at bedside through the Noraxon MR3 system. RESULTS: It was quick, well accepted and did no harm. We found that contrary to the DRE, sEMG detected subclinical sacral motor activity and reflexes in 20% of cases for voluntary anal contraction and 40% of cases for the anal wink. CONCLUSION: We believe our sEMG technique is a powerful tool able to enhance management of patients suffering from acute neurological impairments and requiring sacral function assessment.

Educational needs and preferences of adult patients with acute pain: a mixed-methods systematic review.

ABSTRACT: Many patients experience acute pain, which has been associated with numerous negative consequences. Pain education has been proposed as a strategy to improve acute pain management. However, studies report limited effects with educational interventions for acute pain in adults, which can be explained by the underuse of the person-centered approach. Thus, we aimed to systematically review and synthetize current evidence from quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies describing patients' needs and preferences for acute pain education in adults. We searched original studies and gray literature in 7 databases, from January 1990 to October 2023. Methodological quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A total of 32 studies were included (n = 1847 patients), two-thirds of which were qualitative studies of high methodological quality. Most of the studies were conducted over the last 15 years in patients with postsurgical and posttraumatic pain, identified as White, with a low level of education. Patients expressed the greatest need for education when it came to what to expect in pain intensity and duration, as well how to take the medication and its associated adverse effects. The most frequently reported educational preferences were for in-person education while involving caregivers and to obtain information first from physicians, then by other professionals. This review has highlighted the needs and preferences to be considered in pain education interventions, which should be embedded in an approach cultivating communication and partnership with patients and their caregivers. The results still need to be confirmed with different patient populations.

Is the level of consent to a national research registry associated with patient outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury? A population-based study from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR).

OBJECTIVE: We examined the impact of consenting to the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) on outcomes: acute length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, medical complications (pressure injuries and pneumonia), and the final discharge destination following a spinal cord injury (SCI) using the national RHSCIR dataset. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using RHSCIR participant data from 2014 to 2019. Participants approached for enrollment were grouped into 1) PC: provided full consent including community follow-up (CFU) interviews, 2) DWC: declined CFU interviews but accepted minimal data collection that may include initial/final interviews and/or those who later withdrew consent, and 3) DC: declined consent to any participation. As no data was collected for the DC group, descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable regression analysis was limited to the PC and DWC groups. RESULTS: Of 2811 participants, 2101 (74.7%) were PC, 553 (19.7%) were DWC, and 157 (5.6%) were DC. DWC participants had significantly longer acute LOS, more acute pneumonias/pressure injuries, and were less likely to be discharged home than PC participants. All these associations - except pneumonia - remained significant in the multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: Not participating fully in RHSCIR was associated with more complications and longer hospital stays.

Classifying clinical phenotypes of functional recovery for acute traumatic spinal cord injury. An observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: Identify patient subgroups with different functional outcomes after SCI and study the association between functional status and initial ISNCSCI components. METHODS: Using CART, we performed an observational cohort study on data from 675 patients enrolled in the Rick-Hansen Registry(RHSCIR) between 2014 and 2019. The outcome was the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and predictors included AIS, NLI, UEMS, LEMS, pinprick(PPSS), and light touch(LTSS) scores. A temporal validation was performed on data from 62 patients treated between 2020 and 2021 in one of the RHSCIR participating centers. RESULTS: The final CART resulted in four subgroups with increasing totSCIM according to PPSS, LEMS, and UEMS: 1)PPSS < 27(totSCIM = 28.4 ± 16.3); 2)PPSS ≥ 27, LEMS < 1.5, UEMS < 45(totSCIM = 39.5 ± 19.0); 3)PPSS ≥ 27, LEMS < 1.5, UEMS ≥ 45(totSCIM = 57.4 ± 13.8); 4)PPSS ≥ 27, LEMS ≥ 1.5(totSCIM = 66.3 ± 21.7). The validation model performed similarly to the original model. The adjusted R-squared and F-test were respectively 0.556 and 62.2(P-value <0.001) in the development cohort and, 0.520 and 31.9(P-value <0.001) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Acknowledging the presence of four characteristic subgroups of patients with distinct phenotypes of functional recovery based on PPSS, LEMS, and UEMS could be used by clinicians early after tSCI to plan rehabilitation and establish realistic goals. An improved sensory function could be key for potentiating motor gains, as a PPSS ≥ 27 was a predictor of a good function.

After a traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), early neurological examination using the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is recommended to determine initial injury severity and prognosis.This study identified three initial ISNCSCI components defining four subgroups of SCI patients with different expectations in functional outcomes, namely the initial pinprick sensory score, the Lower Extremity Motor Score, and the Upper Extremity Motor Score.Clinicians could use these subgroups early after tSCI to plan rehabilitation and set realistic therapeutic goals regarding functional outcomes.In clinical practice, careful and accurate assessment of pinprick sensation early after the SCI is crucial when predicting function or stratifying patients based on the expected function.

Does Improvement in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grade Correlate With Functional Recovery in All Patients With a Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine what improvement on the American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale correlates with functional status after a traumatic spinal cord injury. DESIGN: We performed an observational cohort study, analyzing prospective data from 168 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury admitted to a single level 1 trauma center. A multivariable analysis was performed to assess the relationship between functional status (from the Spinal Cord Independence Measure) at 1-year follow-up and American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade (baseline and 1-yr follow-up), while taking into account covariables describing the sociodemographic status, trauma severity, and level of neurological injury. RESULTS: Individuals improving to at least American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade D had significantly higher Spinal Cord Independence Measure score compared with those not reaching American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale D (89.3 ± 15.2 vs. 52.1 ± 20.4) and were more likely to reach functional independence (68.5% vs. 3.6%), regardless of the baseline American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade. Higher final Spinal Cord Independence Measure was more likely with an initial American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade D (ß = 1.504; 95% confidence interval = 0.46-2.55), and a final American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade D (ß = 3.716; 95% CI = 2.77-4.66) or E (ß = 4.422; 95% CI = 2.91-5.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that reaching American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade D or better 1 yr after traumatic spinal cord injury is highly predictive of significant functional recovery, more so than the actual improvement in American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade from the injury to the 1-yr follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine what improvement on the American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale correlates with functional status after a traumatic spinal cord injury. DESIGN: We performed an observational cohort study, analyzing prospective data from 168 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury admitted to a single level 1 trauma center. A multivariable analysis was performed to assess the relationship between functional status (from the Spinal Cord Independence Measure) at 1-year follow-up and American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade (baseline and 1-yr follow-up), while taking into account covariables describing the sociodemographic status, trauma severity, and level of neurological injury. RESULTS: Individuals improving to at least American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade D had significantly higher Spinal Cord Independence Measure score compared with those not reaching American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale D (89.3 ± 15.2 vs. 52.1 ± 20.4) and were more likely to reach functional independence (68.5% vs. 3.6%), regardless of the baseline American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade. Higher final Spinal Cord Independence Measure was more likely with an initial American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade D (ß = 1.504; 95% confidence interval = 0.46­2.55), and a final American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade D (ß = 3.716; 95% CI = 2.77­4.66) or E (ß = 4.422; 95% CI = 2.91­5.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that reaching American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade D or better 1 yr after traumatic spinal cord injury is highly predictive of significant functional recovery, more so than the actual improvement in American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale grade from the injury to the 1-yr follow-up.

Validation of a New Tool to Detect and Characterize Spinal Cord Injury in the Acute Trauma Patient: The Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective validation protocol. OBJECTIVE: The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive tool for classifying spinal cord injuries (SCI), but it is not adapted for the evaluation of trauma patients. The objective is to develop and validate a streamlined tool, the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (MAC-SCI) that can be integrated in the evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize traumatic SCI (tSCI). METHODS: The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during initial evaluation after tSCI was estimated at a Level-1 trauma center specialized in SCI care. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the MAC-SCI, a new tool to detect and characterize the severity grade and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. A cohort consisting of 35 consecutive tSCI patients with complete ISNCSCI documentation was used to validate the MAC-SCI. The severity grade and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. RESULTS: Only 33% of 148 patients admitted after a tSCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI retains 53 of the 134 elements from the ISNCSCI. There was a 100% concordance in severity grade between the MAC-SCI and ISNCSCI. The NLI were within 2 levels between the MAC-SCI and ISNCSI for 100% of patients. CONCLUSION: The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool that accurately detects and characterizes tSCI in the acute trauma setting. It could be implemented in trauma protocols to guide the management of SCI patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Diagnostic criteria.

Is it safe to initiate activity-based therapy within days following traumatic spinal cord injury? Preliminary results from the PROMPT-SCI trial.

CONTEXT: Activity-based therapy initiated within days of the accident could prevent complications and improve neurofunctional outcomes in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). However, it has never been attempted in humans with TSCI because of practical obstacles and potential safety concerns. The PROMPT-SCI trial is the first attempt at implementing ABT within the first days following a TSCI (i.e. very early ABT; VE-ABT). The objective is to determine if VE-ABT can be initiated safely in the intensive care unit (ICU) within 48 h of early decompressive surgery. DESIGN: As part of the PROMPT-SCI trial, 15 adult patients with severe TSCI were enrolled between April and November of 2021. The intervention consisted of 30-minute sessions of motor-assisted in-bed leg cycling starting within 48 h of early spinal surgery. Safety was assessed through continuous monitoring of vital signs and recording of adverse events during and after sessions. The main outcome measure was the achievement (yes or no) of a full and safe session within 48 h of early surgery. FINDINGS: Out of the 15 participants, 10 (66.6%) achieved this outcome. Out of the remaining 5, 2 were not cleared to engage in cycling within 48 h of surgery and 3 initiated cycling within 48 h but stopped prematurely. All 5 eventually completed a full and safe session within the next 1-2 days. In all 15 participants, there were no neurological deteriorations after the first completed session. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that it is safe and feasible to perform a first session of VE-ABT within days of a severe TSCI with no serious adverse events and excellent completion rates.

Histaminergic regulation of food intake.

Histamine is a biogenic amine that acts as a neuromodulator within the brain. In the hypothalamus, histaminergic signaling contributes to the regulation of numerous physiological and homeostatic processes, including the regulation of energy balance. Histaminergic neurons project extensively throughout the hypothalamus and two histamine receptors (H1R, H3R) are strongly expressed in key hypothalamic nuclei known to regulate energy homeostasis, including the paraventricular (PVH), ventromedial (VMH), dorsomedial (DMH), and arcuate (ARC) nuclei. The activation of different histamine receptors is associated with differential effects on neuronal activity, mediated by their different G protein-coupling. Consequently, activation of H1R has opposing effects on food intake to that of H3R: H1R activation suppresses food intake, while H3R activation mediates an orexigenic response. The central histaminergic system has been implicated in atypical antipsychotic-induced weight gain and has been proposed as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of obesity. It has also been demonstrated to interact with other major regulators of energy homeostasis, including the central melanocortin system and the adipose-derived hormone leptin. However, the exact mechanisms by which the histaminergic system contributes to the modification of these satiety signals remain underexplored. The present review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the central histaminergic system's role in regulating feeding and highlights unanswered questions remaining in our knowledge of the functionality of this system.