Etiological Diagnosis of Uveitis: Contribution of the of the Extra-Ophthalmological Clinical Examination.

PURPOSE: Determining uveitis etiology is a challenge. It is based primarily on demographic data and the characteristics of eye examination. It is not clear to what extent extraocular physical signs contribute to elucidating the etiology. This study aimed to establish the contribution of the clinical extra-ophthalmological features for the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1307 patients with uveitis referred to our tertiary center between 2003 and 2021. Uveitis was classified according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature. Clinical features were collected at diagnosis by internists before the etiological diagnosis was made. The main outcome description was the contribution of clinical features. RESULTS: Clinical extra-ophthalmological features contributed to the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis in 363 (27.8%) patients. The joint and the skin examinations were the most useful for etiological investigations, respectively in 12.3% and 11.8% of patients. Five etiologies of uveitis accounted for 80% of the cases: sarcoidosis, HLA-B27-related uveitis, Behçet's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Clinical extra-ophthalmological features were particularly important in the etiological diagnosis of acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that clinical extra-ophthalmological features are essential for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis in more than a quarter of patients. It demonstrates once again the value of collaboration between ophthalmologists and other specialists experienced in performing extra-ophthalmological clinical examinations, particularly in patients with acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis.

Mortality and Associated Causes in Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Multiple-Cause-of-Death Analysis in France.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe hyperinflammatory syndrome with an overall mortality rate of 40%. A multiple-cause-of-death analysis allows for the characterization of mortality and associated causes over an extended period. Death certificates, collected between 2000 and 2016 by the French Epidemiological Centre for the Medical Causes of Death (CepiDC, Inserm), containing the ICD10 codes for HLH (D76.1/2), were used to calculate HLH-related mortality rates and to compare them with the general population (observed/expected ratios, O/E). HLH was mentioned in 2072 death certificates as the underlying cause of death (UCD, n = 232) or as a non-underlying cause of death (NUCD, n = 1840). The mean age at death was 62.4 years. The age-standardized mortality rate was 1.93/million person-years and increased over the study period. When HLH was an NUCD, the most frequently associated UCDs were hematological diseases (42%), infections (39.4%), and solid tumors (10.4%). As compared to the general population, HLH decedents were more likely to have associated CMV infections or hematological diseases. The increase in mean age at death over the study period indicates progress in diagnostic and therapeutic management. This study suggests that the prognosis of HLH may be at least partially related to coexisting infections and hematological malignancies (either as causes of HLH or as complications).

IgA Vasculitis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A French Multicenter Case Series Including 12 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination campaign triggered several autoimmune diseases. We hereby aimed to describe IgA vasculitis (IgAV) following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a national, multicenter, retrospective study in France of new-onset adult IgAV diagnosis following COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: In total, 12 patients with new-onset IgAV were included. Of these, 5 (41.7%) were women, and the median age was 52.5 (IQR 30.75-60.5) years. Of the 12 patients, 10 had received an mRNA vaccine and 2 had received a viral vector vaccine. The median time from vaccination to onset of symptoms was 11.5 (IQR 4.25-21.25) days. Vasculitis occurred after the first vaccine dose in most patients (n = 8). All patients had skin involvement, with skin necrosis in 4 patients. In total, 7 patients had joint involvement and 2 had arthritis. A total of 4 patients had nonsevere gastrointestinal involvement and 2 had nonsevere renal involvement. The median C-reactive protein level was 26 (IQR 10-66.75) mg/L, the median creatininemia level was 72 (IQR 65-81) µmol/L, and 1 patient had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min at management. All patients received treatment, including 9 patients (75%) who received glucocorticoids. In total, 5 patients received a vaccine dose after developing IgAV, 1 of whom experienced a minor cutaneous relapse. CONCLUSION: The baseline presentation of IgAV following COVID-19 vaccination was mild to moderate, and outcomes were favorable. Thus, a complete COVID-19 vaccination regimen should be completed in this population. Of note, a fortuitous link cannot be ruled out, requiring a worldwide pharmacovigilance search to confirm these findings.

Challenging Mimickers in the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis: A Case Study.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause characterized by a wide variety of presentations. Its diagnosis is based on three major criteria: a clinical presentation compatible with sarcoidosis, the presence of non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. Many conditions may mimic a sarcoid-like granulomatous reaction. These conditions include infections, neoplasms, immunodeficiencies, and drug-induced diseases. Moreover, patients with sarcoidosis are at risk of developing opportunistic infections or lymphoma. Reliably confirming the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and better identifying new events are major clinical problems in daily practice. To address such issues, we present seven emblematic cases, seen in our department, over a ten-year period along with a literature review about case reports of conditions misdiagnosed as sarcoidosis.

Uveitis: Autoimmunity and beyond.

OBJECTIVE: Uveitis is the most common ophthalmological finding in the practice of rheumatology and clinical immunology. The condition is frequently idiopathic but about 60 causes of uveitis have been described. Our aim was to analyze the clinical patterns and etiologies of uveitis in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: The records of 912 consecutive patients referred to the department of internal medicine (Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France) for the diagnostic work-up of uveitis were examined. Demographic, clinical, anatomical, and etiological features of uveitis were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age at onset was 48.8 years; 59.8% of the patients were women and 78.2% were Caucasians. Anterior uveitis was the most common type of uveitis (40.6%), followed by panuveitis (31.7%), posterior (18.75%) and intermediate uveitis (9%). 46.9% of the patients had idiopathic uveitis. The most common etiologies were systemic diseases (37.3%), such as sarcoidosis (17.1%), HLA-B27-related uveitis and/or spondyloarthritis (12.5%), and tuberculosis (7.5%). CONCLUSION: We describe one of the largest cohorts of consecutive uveitis patients referred to a department of internal medicine. The high percentage of uveitis associated with underlying (systemic) diseases highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach, in order to reduce the diagnostic delay.

Uveitis of Unknown Etiology: Clinical and Outcome features. A Retrospective Analysis of 355 Patients.

Purpose: Despite the huge advance in diagnostic technics, about one-third of uveitis is still considered of unknown etiology. In this study, we aimed to report their clinical features and to describe how a diagnosis has been finally reached for some patients.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with uveitis referred to our tertiary center between 2002 and 2016. The unknown etiology was admitted after a new ophthalmologic examination and a full work-up in internal medicine in our tertiary center.Results: Among 957 patients with uveitis, 355 had uveitis of unknown etiology. The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of this subgroup were no different from those with a known etiology. Out of 104 patients who were followed-up for more than 1 year, a diagnosis was finally achieved in 20 patients. The diagnosis was determined either because of the occurrence of a new clinical symptom (n = 10), a new/repeated non-ophthalmologic investigation (n = 7), or a new/repeated ophthalmic exam (n = 3).Conclusion: A prolonged follow-up, with repeated exams, may allow the determination of an etiology in about one-fifth of uveitis initially considered as idiopathic.