Progression of Self-Directed Learning in Health Professions Education: Clarifying Terms and Processes.

As the complexity ofmedical knowledge and clinical practice continues to grow, physicians and physicians-intrainingmust learn to identify gaps in their knowledge and understand and engage in self-directed learning (SDL) in pursuit of academic goals and improved clinical performance. There is a lack of consensus, however, on the precise definition of SDL and how it relates to self-regulated learning (SRL) and co-regulated learning (CRL). We propose a conceptual framework for understanding the progression of a self-directed learner in the health professions and describe the interplay of SRL and CRL.

"Should I Say Something?": A Simulation Curriculum on Addressing Lapses in Professionalism to Improve Patient Safety.

Introduction: Medical students may witness lapses in professionalism but lack tools to effectively address such episodes. Current professionalism curricula lack opportunities to practice communication skills in addressing professionalism lapses. Methods: We designed a simulation curriculum to introduce professionalism expectations, provide communication tools using elements of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality TeamSTEPPS program, and address observed professionalism lapses involving patient safety in hierarchical patient care teams. Students were surveyed on knowledge, skills, and attitude regarding professionalism before, immediately after, and 6 months after participation. Results: Of 253 students, 70 (28%) completed baseline and immediate postsurveys, and 39 (15%) completed all surveys. In immediate postsurveys, knowledge of communication tools (82% to 94%, p = .003) and empowerment to address residents (19% to 44%, p = .001) and attendings (15% to 39%, p < .001) increased. At 6 months, 96% of students reported witnessing a professionalism lapse. Discussion: The curriculum was successful in reported gains in knowledge of communication tools and empowerment to address professionalism lapses, but few students reported using the techniques to address witnessed lapses in real life.

Silent Airway Mucus Plugs in COPD and Clinical Implications.

BACKGROUND: Airway mucus plugs are frequently identified on CT scans of patients with COPD with a smoking history without mucus-related symptoms (ie, cough, phlegm [silent mucus plugs]). RESEARCH QUESTION: In patients with COPD, what are the risk and protective factors associated with silent airway mucus plugs? Are silent mucus plugs associated with functional, structural, and clinical measures of disease? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified mucus plugs on chest CT scans of participants with COPD from the COPDGene study. The mucus plug score was defined as the number of pulmonary segments with mucus plugs, ranging from 0 to 18, and categorized into three groups (0, 1-2, and ≥ 3). We determined risk and protective factors for silent mucus plugs and the associations of silent mucus plugs with measures of disease severity using multivariable linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 4,363 participants with COPD, 1,739 had no cough or phlegm. Among the 1,739 participants, 627 (36%) had airway mucus plugs identified on CT scan. Risk factors of silent mucus plugs (compared with symptomatic mucus plugs) were older age (OR, 1.02), female sex (OR, 1.40), and Black race (OR, 1.93) (all P values < .01). Among those without cough or phlegm, silent mucus plugs (vs absence of mucus plugs) were associated with worse 6-min walk distance, worse resting arterial oxygen saturation, worse FEV1 % predicted, greater emphysema, thicker airway walls, and higher odds of severe exacerbation in the past year in adjusted models. INTERPRETATION: Mucus plugs are common in patients with COPD without mucus-related symptoms. Silent mucus plugs are associated with worse functional, structural, and clinical measures of disease. CT scan-identified mucus plugs can complement the evaluation of patients with COPD.

A Primer for Developing Chalk Talks.

Chalk talks are a ubiquitous teaching strategy in both pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine and medicine in general; yet, trainees and early career faculty are rarely taught how to design, prepare, and present a chalk talk. Skills necessary to deliver a chalk talk are transferable to other settings, such as the bedside, wards during rounds, and virtual classrooms. As a teaching strategy, the chalk talk can involve learners at multiple levels, foster practical knowledge, stimulate self-assessment, encourage the generation of broad differential diagnoses, and promote an interactive learning environment. Suited for both formal and informal learning, the chalk talk can be prepared well in advance or, after some practice, can be presented "on the fly." Furthermore, often on the wards or in the intensive care unit, team members are asked to "teach the rest of the team" at some point during rounds. There is little guidance in medical education for students and trainees to prepare for how to do this, and the chalk talk can serve as an excellent format and teaching strategy to "teach the team" when tasked to do so. To highlight our perspectives on best practices in using the chalk talk format effectively, we first briefly review the literature surrounding this very common yet understudied teaching strategy. We then provide a primer on how to design, develop, and deliver a chalk talk as a resource for how we teach residents, fellows, and early career attendings to deliver their own chalk talks.

Breathing, Obstruction, Restriction, and Gas Exchange: A Pulmonary Function Testing Interpretation Framework for Novice Learners.

Pulmonary function testing (PFT) is a common method of assessing patients with respiratory symptoms, yet exposure to PFT is variable throughout medical training. Therefore, incorporating a dedicated approach to teaching PFT into the formal medical education curriculum can ensure that trainees become familiar with both the relevant physiologic principles involved in interpreting PFT results and the indications for performing PFT in clinical practice. In this "How I Teach" article, we present breathing, obstruction, restriction, and gas exchange (BORG), a novel, small-group workshop designed to teach novice learners a sequential framework for PFT interpretation. The BORG workshop comprises two segments: a whiteboard minilecture that illustrates the BORG framework and a case-based worksheet whereby learners apply this approach to sets of PFTs with increasing difficulty. Our workshop is grounded in two cognitive psychology frameworks: the cognitive theory of multimedia learning and the dual-process theory. We provide three figures and four supplementary videos to illustrate our workshop's design and delivery, as well as both learner and instructor versions of our BORG worksheet. Last, we address three PFT concepts that have challenged us as instructors and provide evidence-based teaching scripts. The BORG workshop can be used by medical educators working with medical students and residents as a means of helping learners progress along the continuum from a basic understanding of spirometry to independent analysis and interpretation of PFTs to application of PFT results to medical decision making.

Timing of Transport of Patients with COVID-19.

RATIONALE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of mortality or ECMO cannulation for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 transferred from sending hospitals to receiving tertiary care centers as a function of the duration of time at the sending hospital. OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 who were transferred to tertiary or quarternary care medical centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of critical care transports of patients to one of seven consortium tertiary care centers from March 1, 2020, through September 4, 2020. Age 14 years and older with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 transported from a sending hospital to a receiving tertiary care center by the critical care transport organization. RESULTS: Patients transported with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 to tertiary care centers had a mortality rate of 38.0%. Neither the number of days admitted, nor the number of days intubated at the sending hospital correlated with mortality (correlation coefficient 0.051 and -0.007, respectively). Similarly, neither the number of days admitted, nor number of days intubated at the sending hospital correlated with ECMO cannulation (correlation coefficient 0.008 and -0.036, respectively). CONCLUSION: It may be reasonable to transfer a critically ill COVID-19 patient to a tertiary care center even if they have been admitted at the sending hospital for several days.

Air Versus Ground Transport Times in an Urban Center.

PURPOSE: Given that the benefits of helicopter transport vary with geography and healthcare systems, we assessed transport times for rotor wing versus ground transport over a 10 year period in an urban setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All completed transports from 153 sending hospitals in New England from 2009 through 2018 to 8 local tertiary care centers were extracted from an administrative database. The primary outcome of interest was patient-loaded transport time for rotor wing versus ground transports. Overall, 25,483 patient transports met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. We assessed patient-loaded transport time for all transports, and determined mean time to arrive at the scene, scene to patient time, the bedside time, and distance at which the patient-loaded transport time was faster for rotor wing than for ground transport. We also performed subgroup analyses, evaluating transport times by time of day, day of the week, and destination. RESULTS: The most common indication for transport was adult trauma, (n = 6,008, 23.6%) followed by adult cardiac (n = 4359, 17.1%), adult neuro (3729 14.6%), and adult medical (n = 3691, 14.5%). The median miles traveled for all transports was 26.0, IQR 14-38, ranging from 1 to 264 miles. The median patient-loaded transport time was 27 min (IQR 15-40) for all transports. Nearly all time intervals were shorter for rotor wing versus ground transports, and patient-loaded transport time was significantly shorter at 15 minutes compared to 38 minutes (IQR 12-22 vs 28-33, p < 0.001). There was no distance at which the patient-loaded transport time was faster for ground transport than for rotor wing. CONCLUSIONS: In over 25,000 transports over 10 years, in a compact metropolitan area with relatively short transport distances and times, the use of the helicopter was associated with substantial time savings.

Continuing professional development challenges in a rural setting: A mixed-methods study.

INTRODUCTION: Health professionals in rural settings encounter a wide range of medical conditions requiring broad knowledge for their clinical practice. This creates the need for ongoing continuing professional development (CPD). In this study, we explored the barriers that health professionals in a rural healthcare context faced participating in CPD activities and their preferences regarding educational strategies to overcome these challenges. METHODS: This mixed-methods (exploratory sequential) study in a community hospital in rural Mexico includes 22 interviews, 3 focus groups, 40 observational hours, and a questionnaire of healthcare staff. RESULTS: Despite low engagement with CPD activities (67% not motivated), all participants expressed interest and acknowledged the importance of learning for their practice. Barriers to participating include a disparity between strategies used (lecture-based) and their desire for practical learning, institutional barriers (poor leadership engagement, procedural flaws, and lack of resources), and collaboration barriers (adverse interprofessional education environment, ineffective teamwork, and poor communication). Additional barriers identified were inconvenient scheduling of sessions (75%), inadequate classrooms (65%), high workload (60%), ineffective speakers (60%), and boring sessions (55%). Participants' preferred learning strategies highlighted activities relevant to their daily clinical activities (practical workshops, simulations, and case analysis). The questionnaire had an 18% response rate. DISCUSSION: The barriers to CPD in this rural setting are multifactorial and diverse. A strong interest to engage in context-specific active learning strategies highlighted the need for leadership to prioritize interprofessional education, teamwork, and communication to enhance CPD and patient care. These results could inform efforts to strengthen CPD in other rural contexts.

Methanol Poisoning Leading To Brain Death: a Case Report.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has put increased stress on medical systems, infrastructure, and the public in expected and unexpected ways. This case report summarises an unexpected case of methanol poisoning from hand sanitiser ingestion due to changes in industry regulations, increased demand for cleaning products and severe psychosocial stressors brought on by the pandemic. Severe methanol toxicity results in profound metabolic disturbances, damage to the retina and optic nerves, and potentially death. Case Presentation: The patient was a 26-year-old male with alcohol use disorder who presented with one day of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain after consuming hand sanitiser. Within a few hours, the patient had suffered multiple seizures, cardiac arrests and required admission to the ICU for emergent management of methanol poisoning. EEG and brain perfusion imaging were performed to confirm brain death, given concerns about the cranial nerve exam after methanol poisoning. Conclusions: While rare, methanol toxicity remains a potentially fatal poisoning in the United States and worldwide. When healthcare and public resources are strained, healthcare professionals must consider particularly abnormal presentations. In patients suspected of brain death from methanol toxicity, cranial nerve examination may be unreliable. Therefore, additional testing is necessary to confirm brain death.

Defining Student-as-Teacher Curricula in the Absence of National Guidelines: An Innovative Model.

Teaching is a critical skill in the medical profession, yet has only recently gained recognition as a core skill for medical students and trainees. Student-as-teacher (SAT) programs provide medical students formal teaching instruction with opportunities for practice. While efforts to determine how SAT courses should be taught are ongoing, the authors' review of SAT programs in medical schools' curricula shows they are diverse and often developed by faculty and trainees who advocate for formal teacher training at their institutions, rather than by medical school leadership. Consequently, there is significant heterogeneity among known SAT programs with regard to content, format, and evaluation methods. As efforts are underway to create guidelines and competency frameworks for SAT programs, medical educators must engage in open and critical discussion about the optimal content and organization for SAT educational experiences, emphasizing outcomes-based value and curricular and experiential consistency across programs. The authors describe an innovative SAT elective at Harvard Medical School (HMS), discuss research supporting curricular content and decisions, and emphasize potential implications for the conception and implementation of SAT programs at other institutions. The HMS SAT course is a year-long, elective, longitudinal curriculum built on a community of practice model and comprising 5 key components: Fundamentals of Medical Education seminar series, teaching field experiences, teaching observations, final educational product, and self-reflection. This 5-component theoretically justified model covers essential topics of SAT programming, providing students a comprehensive educational skills training curriculum. Medical educators developing SAT courses must identify common core competencies and curricular activities to implement SAT programs informed by the perspective of local stakeholders and institutional needs. Further growth of SAT programs in medical education offers opportunities for collaboration and coordination among medical educators, institutions, and licensing and accreditation bodies, to further develop consistent guidelines for teaching medical education skills to future medical educators.

'Educator with a capital E': Comparing medical education experiences of student-as-teacher elective participants and peers.

PURPOSE: Student-as-teacher electives are increasingly offered at medical schools, but little is known about how medical education experiences among enrolled students compare with those of their peers. The study's aim was to characterize medical students' education-related experiences, attitudes, knowledge, and skills based on their enrollment status in a student-as-teacher course. MATERIALS/METHODS: We conducted four focus groups at a medical school in the United States: two with graduating students in a student-as-teacher elective (n = 11) and two with unenrolled peers (n = 11). Transcripts were analyzed using the Framework Method to identify themes. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: interest in and attitudes towards medical education; medical education skills, knowledge, and frameworks; strategies for giving/receiving feedback; medical education training as part of medical school. Course participants demonstrated higher-level education-related knowledge and skills. Both groups endorsed teaching skills as important and identified opportunities to incorporate medical education training into medical school curricula. CONCLUSIONS: Medical education knowledge and teaching skills are self-reported as important learning outcomes for medical students, independent of enrollment status in a student-as-teacher course. The structure of such courses, best understood through a deliberate practice-based model, supports students' achievement of key learning outcomes. Certain course elements may warrant inclusion in standard medical school curricula.

Self-Directed Learning in Medical Education: Training for a Lifetime of Discovery.

Issue: Life-long learning is a skill that is central to competent health professionals, and medical educators have sought to understand how adult professionals learn, adapt to new information, and independently seek to learn more. Accrediting bodies now mandate that training programs teach in ways that promote self-directed learning (SDL) but do not provide adequate guidance on how to address this requirement. Evidence: The model for the SDL mandate in physician training is based mostly on early childhood and secondary education evidence and literature, and may not capture the unique environment of medical training and clinical education. Furthermore, there is uncertainty about how medical schools and postgraduate training programs should implement and evaluate SDL educational interventions. The Shapiro Institute for Education and Research, in conjunction with the Association of American Medical Colleges, convened teams from eight medical schools from North America to address the challenge of defining, implementing, and evaluating SDL and the structures needed to nurture and support its development in health professional training. Implications: In this commentary, the authors describe SDL in Medical Education, (SDL-ME), which is a construct of learning and pedagogy specific to medical students and physicians in training. SDL-ME builds on the foundations of SDL and self-regulated learning theory, but is specifically contextualized for the unique responsibilities of physicians to patients, inter-professional teams, and society. Through consensus, the authors offer suggestions for training programs to teach and evaluate SDL-ME. To teach self-directed learning requires placing the construct in the context of patient care and of an obligation to society at large. The SDL-ME construct builds upon SDL and SRL frameworks and suggests SDL as foundational to health professional identity formation.KEYWORDSself-directed learning; graduate medical education; undergraduate medical education; theoretical frameworksSupplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.1938074 .

Promoting Critical Thinking in Your Intensive Care Unit Team.

Effective and efficient critical thinking skills are necessary to engage in accurate clinical reasoning and to make appropriate clinical decisions. Teaching and promoting critical thinking skills in the intensive care unit is challenging because of the volume of data and the constant distractions of competing obligations. Understanding and acknowledging cognitive biases and their impact on clinical reasoning are necessary to promote and support critical thinking in the ICU. Active educational strategies such as concept or mechanism mapping can help to diagnose disorganized thinking and reinforce key connections and important clinical and pathophysiologic concepts, which are critical for inductive reasoning.

Training medical educators to teach: bridging the gap between perception and reality.

Teaching is a core expectation of physicians in academic hospitals and academic medical centers, but best practices for training physicians to teach have not been established. There is significant variability in how physicians are trained to teach medical students and residents across the world, and between Israeli hospitals. In an article published earlier this year in the Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, Nothman and colleagues describe a survey of 245 Israeli physicians in departments of internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology, at four different faculties of medicine across Israel. The majority of Israeli physicians responding to this survey reported receiving minimal training to teach, with only 35% receiving any training focused on medical education skills, most (55%) receiving training of only 1-2 days duration. In addition, the physicians surveyed perceived their training as inadequate and not aligned with their self-perceived educational needs. Furthermore, the respondents felt strongly that "compensation and appreciation" for medical education was less than for those involved in research. Despite the general lack of training in teaching skills and the perception that teaching physicians are less valued than researchers, survey respondents rated themselves as highly confident in most domains of medical education. In this context, this commentary reviews the disconnect between the general perception that all physicians can and should engage in teaching in the clinical setting with the well-described observation that competence in medical education requires dedicated and longitudinal training. Leveraging best practices in curriculum design by aligning educational interventions for teaching physicians with their self-perceived needs is discussed, and models for dedicated faculty development strategies for teaching medical education skills to physicians are reviewed. Finally, the importance of and potential strategies for assessing teaching physicians' effectiveness in Israel and elsewhere are considered as a means to address these physicians' perception that they are not as valued as researchers. Understanding teaching physicians' perspectives on and motivations for training medical students and residents is critical for supporting the frontline teaching faculty who educate future healthcare providers at the bedside in medical schools, hospitals, and academic medical centers in Israel and beyond.

Impact of Risk and Volume on Procedural Traning of Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellows.

Background: Invasive procedures are a core aspect of pulmonary and critical care practice. Procedures performed in the intensive care unit can be divided into high-risk, low-volume (HRLV) procedures and low-risk, high-volume (LRHV) procedures. HRLV procedures include cricothyroidotomy, pericardiocentesis, Blakemore tube placement, and bronchial blocker placement. LRHV procedures include arterial line placement, central venous catheter placement, thoracentesis, and flexible bronchoscopy. Despite the frequency and importance of procedures in critical care medicine, little is known about the similarities and differences in procedural training between different Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) and Critical Care Medicine (CCM) training programs. Furthermore, differences in procedural training practices for HRLV and LRHV procedures have not previously been described.Objective: To assess procedural training practices in PCCM and CCM fellowship programs in the United States, and compare differences in training between HRLV and LRHV procedures.Methods: A novel survey instrument was developed and disseminated to PCCM and CCM program directors and associate program directors at PCCM and CCM fellowship programs in the United States to assess procedural teaching practices for HRLV and LRHV procedures.Results: The survey was sent to 221 fellowship programs, 168 PCCM and 34 CCM, with 70 unique respondents (31.7% response rate). Of the procedural educational strategies assessed, each strategy was used significantly more frequently for LRHV versus HRLV procedures. The majority of respondents (51.1%) report having no dedicated training for HRLV procedures versus 6.9% reporting no dedicated training for any LRHV procedure (P < 0.001). For HRLV procedures, 76.9% of respondents indicated that there was no set number of procedures required to determine competency, versus 25.3% for LRHV procedures (P < 0.001). For LRHV procedures, fellows were allowed to perform procedures independently without supervision 21.7% of the time versus 3.9% for HRLV procedures (P = 0.004). Program directors' confidence in their ability to determine fellows' competence in performing procedures was significantly lower for HRLV versus LRHV versus HRLV procedures (P < 0.001).Conclusion: Significant differences exist in procedural training education for PCCM and CCM fellows for LRHV versus HRLV procedures, and awareness of this discrepancy presents an opportunity to address this educational gap in PCCM and CCM fellowship training.

Medical student perceptions of assessment systems, subjectivity, and variability on introductory dermatology clerkships.

BACKGROUND: Elective introductory clerkships in dermatology serve a critical function in providing formative experiences to medical students interested in the field. Although dermatology clerkships play a pivotal role in students' career choices and residency preparation, the assessment systems used to evaluate students on these clerkships are widely different and likely affect student experiences. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the relationship between dermatology clerkship assessment systems and student experiences through interviews with students about their clerkship reflections and perceptions of assessment. METHODS: The authors contacted clerkship directors via the Association of Professors of Dermatology mailing list and invited them to provide a description of the assessment system at their institution. The authors, via contacted clerkship directors, then invited students who had completed an introductory dermatology clerkship in between 2018 and 2019 to provide a description of the assessment system at their institution and to participate in a qualitative interview about their experiences with assessment systems. The authors then iteratively synthesized interview transcripts using phenomenological analysis, in which a templated approach was used to achieve comprehensive thematic categorization. RESULTS: Prior to clerkship onset, students expressed a limited understanding of their clinical role and the assessment system. During the clerkship, students endorsed variable expectations across preceptors, limited feedback experiences, and pressures to perform for evaluators. After their clerkship, students continued to perceive assessment systems as nontransparent, subjective, and preordained. CONCLUSION: Medical students perceived assessment systems on introductory dermatology clerkships to be unclear and arbitrary. Encouragingly, students also viewed these challenges in assessment as malleable, identifying several opportunities for educational reform in dermatology clerkships.

Optimizing Remote Learning: Leveraging Zoom to Develop and Implement Successful Education Sessions.

Virtual meeting platforms, such as Zoom, have become essential to medical education during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, many medical educators do not have experience planning or leading these sessions. Despite the prevalence of Zoom learning, there has been little published on best practices. In this article we describe best practices for using Zoom for remote learning, acknowledging technical considerations, and recommending workflows for designing and implementing virtual sessions. Furthermore, we discuss the important role of cognitive learning theory and how to incorporate these key pedagogical insights into a successful virtual session. While eventually in-person classrooms will open, virtual teaching will remain a component of medical education. If we utilize these inventive tools creatively and functionally, then virtual learning can augment and elevate the practice of medical education.