Association of Circumscribed Subcortical Gray and White Matter Lesions With Apraxic Deficits in Patients With Left Hemisphere Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Apraxia is commonly attributed to left hemisphere (LH) lesions of the cortical fronto-temporo-parietal praxis networks or white matter lesions causing disconnections between cortical nodes. By contrast, the contribution of lesions to the subcortical gray matter, that is, basal ganglia or thalamus, to apraxic deficits remains controversial. Here, we investigate whether damage to these subcortical gray matter structures (i.e., caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, and thalamus) or the adjacent white matter tracts was associated with apraxic deficits. METHODS: We identified patients with distinct subcortical lesions with and without apraxia from a large retrospective sample of subacute LH ischemic stroke patients (n = 194). To test which subcortical structures (caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, thalamus, and adjacent white matter tracts), when lesioned, contributed to apraxic deficits, we statistically compared the proportion of lesioned voxels within subcortical gray and white matter structures between the apraxic and nonapraxic patients. RESULTS: Of the 194 stroke patients screened, 39 (median age = 65 years, range 30-82 years; median time poststroke at the apraxia assessment = 7 days, range 1-44 days) had lesions confined to subcortical regions (gray and white matter). Eleven patients showed apraxic deficits when imitating gestures or pantomiming object use. Region-wise statistical lesion comparison (controlled for lesion size) revealed a more significant proportion of damage ('lesion load') in the caudate nucleus in apraxic stroke patients (mean difference = 6.9%, 95% CI 0.4-13.3, p = 0.038, η p 2 = 0.11). By contrast, apraxic patients had lower lesion load in the globus pallidus (mean difference = 9.9%, 95% CI 0.1-19.8, p = 0.048, η p 2 = 0.10), whereas the lesion load in other subcortical structures (putamen, thalamus, and adjacent white matter tracts) did not differ significantly between the apraxic and nonapraxic patients. DISCUSSION: These findings provide new insights into the subcortical anatomy of apraxia after LH stroke, suggesting a specific contribution of caudate nucleus lesions to apraxic deficits.

Gesture meaning modulates the neural correlates of effector-specific imitation deficits in left hemisphere stroke.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on left hemisphere (LH) stroke patients reported effector-specific (hand, fingers, bucco-facial) differences in imitation performance. Furthermore, imitation performance differed between meaningless (ML) and meaningful (MF) gestures. Recent work suggests that a gesture's meaning impacts the body-part specificity of gesture imitation. METHODS: We tested the hypothesis that the gesture's meaning (ML vs MF) affects the lesion correlates of effector-specific imitation deficits (here: bucco-facial vs arm/hand gestures) using behavioural data and support vector regression-based lesion-symptom mapping (SVR-LSM) in a large sample of 194 sub-acute LH stroke patients. RESULTS: Behavioural data revealed a significant interaction between the effector used for imitation and the meaning of the imitated gesture. SVR-LSM analyses revealed shared lesion correlates for impaired imitation independent of effector or gesture meaning in the left supramarginal (SMG) and superior temporal gyri (STG). Besides, within the territory of the left middle cerebral artery, impaired imitation of bucco-facial gestures was associated with more anterior lesions, while arm/hand imitation deficits were associated with more posterior lesions. MF gestures were specifically associated with lesions in the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left insular region. Notably, an interaction of effector-specificity and gesture meaning was also present at the lesion level: A more pronounced difference in imitation performance between the effectors for ML (versus MF) gestures was associated with left-hemispheric lesions in the STG, SMG, putamen, precentral gyrus and white matter tracts. CONCLUSION: The current behavioural data show that ML gestures are particularly sensitive in assessing effector-specific imitation deficits in LH stroke patients. Moreover, a gesture's meaning modulated the effector-specific lesion correlates of bucco-facial and arm/hand gesture imitation. Hence, it is crucial to consider gesture meaning in apraxia assessments.

Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -"Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation".

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is the leading cause of acquired disability in western societies. (Motor) cognitive deficits like apraxia significantly contribute to disability after stroke, harming activities of daily living and rehabilitation outcome. To date, efficient therapeutic options for apraxia remain sparse. Thus, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted. METHODS: Based on promising results of a pilot study, the on-going RAdiCS (Rehabilitating stroke-induced Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation) study is a randomized controlled trial, which follows a double-blinded (investigator and patient), two-arm parallel interventional model. It is designed to include 110 apraxic patients (as diagnosed by the Cologne Apraxia Screening, KAS) in the subacute phase after a left hemisphere (LH) stroke. The University of Cologne initiated the trial, which is conducted in two German Neurorehabilitation Centers.The study aims to evaluate the effect of anodal (versus sham) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) with an intensity of 2 mA for 10 min on five consecutive days on apraxic deficits. In addition to anodal or sham tDCS, all LH stroke patients undergo a motor (cognitive) training that is performed before and after the stimulation (off-line stimulation).The primary outcome measure is the (differential) change in the overall KAS score after five daily sessions of anodal versus sham tDCS when compared to the baseline assessment before tDCS. Secondary study outcomes include further apraxia scores, aphasia severity, and measures of motor performance and disability after stroke. All outcome measures are obtained in the post-stimulation assessment as well as during follow-up (3-4 months after tDCS). PERSPECTIVE: The RCT RAdiCS shall evaluate in a large number of LH stroke patients whether anodal tDCS (compared to sham tDCS) expedites the rehabilitation of apraxia - over and above additional motor (cognitive) training and standard care. A positive study outcome would provide a new strategy for the treatment of apraxia, which hopefully ameliorates the negative impact of apraxia on daily living and long-term outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Gov: NCT03185234, registered 14 June 2017 ; Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien: DRKS00012292, registered 01 June 2017. TRIAL STATUS: Participant enrollment began on 22 June 2017. The trial is expected to be completed on 30 June 2022.