Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 27(5): 903-7, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23725688

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Volatile anesthetics have cardioprotective properties that improve clinically relevant outcomes in cardiac surgery, and can be used during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) through adapted calibrated vaporizers together with air and oxygen (O2). The effect of volatile agents on the membrane oxygenator is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate, for the first time, the performance of semiporous polypropylene membrane oxygenators after the use of sevoflurane vaporized during CPB in cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two consecutive patients scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass graft with CPB. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated randomly to receive either a volatile anesthetic (sevoflurane 1%-3%, 16 patients) or an intravenous hypnotic (midazolam, 16 patients) during CPB. After surgery, the membrane oxygenators used during CPB were tested with regard to O2 transfer, carbon dioxide transfer, and pressure drop. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors observed no protocol deviation or crossover. The performance of the membrane oxygenator was similar between the 2 groups, as documented by O2 transfer (55±6.4 mL/min/L in the sevoflurane group versus 57±4.7 mL/min/L in the midazolam group, p = 0.4), carbon dioxide transfer, and pressure drop. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sevoflurane during CPB in cardiac surgery does not affect membrane oxygenator performance.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Éteres Metílicos/administración & dosificación , Oxigenadores de Membrana/normas , Polipropilenos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polipropilenos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Sevoflurano , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia ; 27(5): 903-907, 2013. tab, ilus
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1064214

RESUMEN

Objectives: Volatile anesthetics have cardioprotectiveproperties that improve clinically relevant outcomes in car-diac surgery, and can be used during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)through adapted calibrated vaporizers together with air and oxygen(O2). The effect of volatile agents on themembrane oxygenator is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate, for the first time, the performance of semiporous polypropylene membrane oxygenators after the use of sevoflurane vaporized during CPB in cardiacsurgery.Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.Setting: Teaching hospital.Participants: Thirty-two consecutive patients scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass graft with CPB.Interventions: Patients were allocated randomly toreceive either a volatile anesthetic (sevoflurane1%-3%, 16 patients) or an intravenous hypnotic (midazolam, 16patients)during CPB. After surgery, the membrane oxygen-ators used during CPB were tested with regard to O2 transfer, carbon dioxide transfer, and pressure decrease.Measurements and Main Results: The authors observed no protocol deviation or crossover. The performance ofthemembrane oxygenator was similar between the 2 groups, as documented by O2 transfer (55+- 6.4mL/min/L in the sev o-flurane group versus 57+- 4.7mL/min/L in the midazolam group, p= 0.4), carbon dioxide transfer, and pressure drop.Conclusions: The use of sevoflurane during CPB in cardiacsurgery does not affect membrane oxygenator performance.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Puente Cardiopulmonar
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA