Guidance on classification for reproductive toxicity under the globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS).

The Globally Harmonised System of Classification (GHS) is a framework within which the intrinsic hazards of substances may be determined and communicated. It is not a legislative instrument per se, but is enacted into national legislation with the appropriate legislative instruments. GHS covers many aspects of effects upon health and the environment, including adverse effects upon sexual function and fertility or on development. Classification for these effects is based upon observations in humans or from properly designed experiments in animals, although only the latter is covered herein. The decision to classify a substance based upon experimental data, and the category of classification ascribed, is determined by the level of evidence that is available for an adverse effect on sexual function and fertility or on development that does not arise as a secondary non-specific consequence of other toxic effect. This document offers guidance on the determination of level of concern as a measure of adversity, and the level of evidence to ascribe classification based on data from tests in laboratory animals.

Substance prioritisation for the development of EU Acute Exposure Toxicity Thresholds (AETLs).

The aim of the EU Acute Exposure project, ACUTEX, is to develop a methodology for establishing European Acute Exposure Threshold Levels, EU AETLs, for toxic substances in relation to harm to people by inhalation. The development of AETLs is initially in the context of the risks of major accidents from chemical sites and in particular their regulation through the EU 'Seveso II' Directive. It is intended that AETLs can be used within Member States, where appropriate, to inform decisions on land-use planning and emergency planning. AETLs will not have a regulatory status. This paper describes: the selection of 21 preliminary substances to use as case studies in the development and testing of the AETL's methodology; and the development of a prioritisation methodology to inform initial substance selection for a possible further AETLs program. The work was based on consultation with experts drawn from EU major stakeholder groups. It included a Validation Exercise working with three Member States, which account for between approximately 40% and 50% of all EU Seveso II sites. From this Validation Exercise we infer that, if these three Member States are representative in terms of numbers of priority substances, then the number of EU higher priority substances for further AETLs development is unlikely to be much in excess of 50.

Does occupational exposure to organic solvents affect colour discrimination?

This review assesses the evidence regarding the effects of occupational exposure to organic solvents on colour discrimination and investigates exposure-response relationships and reversibility. This review also considers the current state of knowledge of the possible mechanisms underlying changes in colour vision, and the human health significance of any reported changes. Among the commonly used organic solvents, styrene has been investigated the most thoroughly. Studies of styrene-exposed workers in Germany, Italy and Japan provide a sufficiently consistent body of evidence to support a robust conclusion that styrene does cause an impairment of colour discrimination relative to age-matched controls. Generally, the impairment of colour discrimination observed in styrene-exposed workers tends to be of the tritan (blue-yellow) type, although some cases of red-green impairment have also been found. The limited information available on exposure-response relationships indicates that the effects on colour discrimination would not be expected at 8-hour time weighted average (8 h TWA) exposures <20 ppm, although a precise threshold cannot be determined. The data on reversibility are limited and inconclusive. The results from the most rigorous study in which this aspect was investigated point to a reversibility of effects after a 4-week exposure-free period, whereas results from a study with limitations suggest a persistence of effect. The effects of toluene, tetrachloroethylene or mixed solvent exposure have also been investigated, although the information available is generally less reliable than for styrene. For toluene, it can be confidently concluded that this solvent does not have an acute effect on colour discrimination, even when exposures are relatively high (50-150 ppm 8 h TWA, and 290-360 ppm 30 minutes TWA). However, studies are inconclusive on whether long-term or repeated exposure to toluene can cause a persistent impairment of colour discrimination. There are few studies that have specifically investigated the effects of tetrachloroethylene on colour discrimination. Among these studies, none has examined the potential for any acute effects of this solvent vapour. A large-scale study in Japanese workers showed no effects of long-term exposure to tetrachloroethylene concentrations in the region of 12-13 ppm. However, the test methodology used was relatively insensitive to changes in colour discrimination, hence the results do not provide reassurance for an absence of subtle effects. A study in Italian dry-cleaners suggested a slight impairment of colour discrimination relative to controls, associated with relatively low exposures to tetrachloroethylene (mean 8 h TWA exposure approximately 6 ppm). The studies concerning the effects of mixed solvent exposure on colour discrimination are based on workers exposed to solvents in paints and lacquers, workers from the printing and petrochemical industries, people working in or living near to microelectronics factories and children exposed to solvents prenatally. However, these studies are subject to design limitations or methodological irregularities, such that no conclusions regarding the effects of mixed solvent exposure on colour discrimination can be drawn. Overall, the only credible evidence for an effect of solvents on colour discrimination derives from the studies on styrene. Because of limitations in the data for other solvents it is not possible to determine whether the evidence for styrene reflects a generic property of solvents. The mechanisms of styrene-induced effects on colour discrimination have not been properly investigated and can only be the subject of speculation. One conclusion that can be drawn is that pathological changes to the ocular system, such as changes to the lens, are unlikely to be involved. This is because there is an absence of convincing evidence for such changes from medical examinations conducted in epidemiological studies of solvent-exposed workers. Also, it seems unlikely that effects on colour discrimination are a nonspecific consequence of more generalised CNS depression, given that styrene-induced effects on colour discrimination appear to occur below the threshold for narcotic effects. The effects of styrene on colour discrimination are subtle and involve an impairment of the ability to discriminate accurately between closely related shades of the same colour rather than 'colour blindness'. There is no valid basis for using colour discrimination as a marker for other forms of solvent-induced neurotoxicity.